Russia's Putin suggested Moscow for Zelensky summit: Sources close to talks
Russia President Vladimir Putin was rebuffed after reportedly suggesting that peace talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky be held in Moscow.
KYIV - Vladimir Putin proposed holding a peace summit with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky in Moscow, according to three sources familiar with a phone call between US President Donald Trump and Russia's leader.
The discussion between Mr Trump and Mr Putin came during
high-stakes talks in Washington between Mr Trump, Mr Zelensky and several European leaders that back Ukraine in its fighting against Russia's invasion.
'Putin mentioned Moscow' during their call on Aug 18, one of the sources told AFP, adding that Mr Zelensky had said 'no' in response.
A diplomatic source close to the discussions said that European leaders had told Mr Trump that Mr Putin's proposal 'did not seem like a good idea'.
After the summit in the White House on Aug 18 that included the German, French, Finnish, Italian and UK leaders, Mr Trump said a next step to stopping the fighting now its fourth year would be a face-to-face meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky.
The Ukrainian leader has said repeatedly in recent weeks that he is prepared to sit down with Mr Putin to end the Russian invasion, which has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions.
Mr Putin told Mr Trump during the call on Aug 18 that he was open to the 'idea' of direct talks with Ukraine, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said, according to state media.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Aug 19 that any meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents would have to be prepared 'very thoroughly'.
Switzerland, meanwhile, had said earlier that it would grant Mr Putin immunity if he came to the country for talks on peace in Ukraine, despite the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant.
Mr Trump met with Mr Putin last week in the northern US state of Alaska, ending a years-long Western policy of isolating Mr Putin.
The US leader walked away from the meeting without any guarantees of peace from the Russian president. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
How Europe learned to speak so Trump would listen
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump's persistent effort to bring a diplomatic end to the war has forged stronger bonds among European leaders. BERLIN – By mid-day Aug 15 in Europe, a question was bouncing among the government offices and vacation villas of the continent's most influential leaders. The Ukrainian president was headed to the White House for a crucial meeting with President Donald Trump. Mr Trump was allowing him to bring backup. But who should go? It was the sort of dilemma that once might have erupted into public disputes among Germany, France and Britain, the continent's largest powers. This time, it didn't. The leaders of those countries decided they would all accompany Mr Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, to Washington, for a summit with Mr Trump about peace talks with Russia. So would the leaders of Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato. They flew in on separate planes. But with Mr Trump, they spoke in one voice. 'We were well prepared and well coordinated,' Mr Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany, told reporters after he and his counterparts met Mr Trump at the White House. 'We also represented the same viewpoints. I think that really pleased the American president.' Mr Trump's persistent and sometimes volatile effort to bring a diplomatic end to the war between Ukraine and Russia has forged stronger bonds among European leaders. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 World Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out sending US troops Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Opinion The era of job dating? It's all about matching employers and talent Opinion Singapore's next phase of growth requires a refreshed blueprint Business SGX wants to woo private companies to list in Singapore, says its head of research It has strengthened the unity that emerged earlier this year amid Mr Trump's tariff threats and his wavering on what have been decades-long security guarantees that America has provided to Europe. Since Mr Trump's election, European leaders have raced to shore up their own defenses, wary of losing American support. Nato members, led by Germany, have pledged to increase their military spending significantly, to meet a target set by Mr Trump. Mr Merz, President Emmanuel Macron of France and Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain have signed new friendship treaties with one another and begun to build a set of shadow diplomatic institutions, including one for Ukraine, that advance European interests but do not include the United States. The last two weeks have forced them to coordinate even more closely, on the fly. After Mr Trump made the shock announcement that he would meet President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Alaska, Mr Merz quickly pulled together European allies for a video call with Mr Trump. The Europeans presented Mr Trump with a five-point strategy for him to take into the Alaska meeting – including the insistence that only Ukraine could negotiate any land swaps with Russia and that for serious peace talks to begin Russia must first agree to a ceasefire. Mr Trump signed on to it. But at the summit, he abandoned it – agreeing with Mr Putin's long-standing push to negotiate a peace deal while fighting continues, a position that advantages Russia, which is making gains on the battlefield. That reversal alarmed the European officials, even as they publicly stressed a few areas in which Mr Trump had seemingly won concessions, like the need for a robust multinational security guarantee for post-war Ukraine. After Mr Trump called to brief Mr Zelensky and then the European leaders on his way back from Alaska early on Aug 15, they scrambled again. They agreed on the large group to accompany Mr Zelensky, which was formalised by a White House invitation on the night of Aug 16, and hammered out a strategy for the meeting. Early on Aug 18, they huddled at the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington. Their script leaned heavily on flattery for Trump, which is by now standard practice among visiting dignitaries, and on declarations of unity with each other and with Mr Trump. 'Everybody around this table is in favor of peace,' Mr Macron said, as television cameras rolled, near the start of a large group meeting with the president. The Europeans avoided big disagreements with Mr Trump; the closest anyone came to a diplomatic row was when Mr Merz, on camera, repeated his belief that talks between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin could only happen if a ceasefire was in place. Privately, Mr Merz pressed Mr Trump on at least forcing a ceasefire for the duration of any actual meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. They also tugged on Mr Trump's heartstrings. Mr Zelensky presented a letter from his wife to Mrs Melania Trump, the first lady, echoing her public concerns over the fate of Ukrainian children abducted by Russian troops. Mr Zelensky and Dr Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Union, raised the topic again shortly before their meeting ended and Mr Trump left to call Mr Putin. European leaders expressed confidence that the approach had helped to break whatever spell Mr Putin appeared to have cast over Mr Trump in Alaska, and that Mr Trump had ended the day back in agreement with them over most points about the peace process. Mr Trump, in an interview with Fox News on Aug 19, sounded pleased with the Europeans who had visited him. 'They want to get back to leading their countries,' he said. 'They're consumed with this far more than we are.' He also took credit, in a way, for their united front. 'A year ago, they wouldn't have come,' he said. 'They wouldn't have even thought about it.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump eyes US government stakes in other chip makers that received Chips Act funds, sources say
Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest US recipient of Chips Act cash. WASHINGTON - US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive Chips Act funding to build factories in the country, two sources said. Expanding on a plan to receive an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants, a White House official and a person familiar with the situation said Mr Lutnick is exploring how the United States can receive equity stakes in exchange for Chips Act funding for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung. Much of the funding has not yet been dispersed. Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest US recipient of Chips Act cash. TSMC declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Aug 19 that Mr Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10 per cent government stake. 'The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before,' she told reporters. While Mr Lutnick said earlier on CNBC that the US does not want to tell Intel how to run its operations, any investment would be unprecedented and ramps up a new era of US influence on the big companies. In the past, the US has taken stakes in companies to provide cash and build confidence in times of economic upheaval and uncertainty. In a similar move earlier this year, Mr Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of US Steel after being promised a 'golden share' that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the US, or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent. The two sources said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the Chips Act discussions, but that Mr Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the US$52.7 billion (S$67.7 billion) Chips Ac, which provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the US. Mr Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Mr Trump likes the idea. The US Commerce Department late in 2024 finalised subsidies of US$4.75 billion for Samsung, US$6.2 billion for Micron and US$6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the US. In June, Mr Lutnick said the department was re-negotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, calling them 'overly generous'. He noted at the time that Micron offered to increase its spending on chip plants in the US. REUTERS
Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Intel's $32 billion share rally sends valuation to dot-com era levels
Chicago - After months of turbulence, Intel bulls are finally being rewarded for their patience. But the stock's sudden rebound comes with a worrying side-effect: a valuation so high its most recent precedent is from the dot-com era more than two decades ago. Shares of the struggling chipmaker have rallied 28 per cent in August, adding about US$25 billion (S$32 billion) in market value, on reports that the US government is in talks for a potential equity stake, as well as plans for a US$2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group. The jump has Intel trading at 53 times profits projected over the next 12 months, the highest since early 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 'The stock looks incredibly expensive here,' said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. 'That kind of multiple is a bet that the government will push Intel so hard on customers that it becomes a winner.' The surge in Intel in Aigust followed a slump in the wake of a disappointing earnings report on July 24 and criticism of its chief executive officer Tan Lip-Bu earlier by US President Donald Trump, who called for him to step down, citing conflicts of interest. After meeting with the CEO on Aug 11, Mr Trump changed his tune, saying Mr Tan's 'success and rise is an amazing story.' Since then, reports have circulated that the Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10 per cent in the company. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview on Aug 19 that the talks are aimed at converting US grants already made to Intel under the Chips and Science Act into non-voting equity. Of course, the US's plans regarding Intel haven't been finalised and could still change. Intel didn't respond to a request for comment. For Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth manager at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, the potential government involvement could benefit Intel in the short-term but may pose a risk in the long term. 'This strikes me as an easy road to get onto, but a hard one to get out of,' Mr Nolte said. 'At the end of the day, this raises so many more questions than it answers.' Meanwhile, Intel's premium valuation is largely a reflection of just how much its profitability has collapsed in recent years. Intel is projected to generate more than US$1 billion in adjusted profit over the next four quarters, after losing about US$1.3 billion in the previous four, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. From 2018 to 2021 the company generated more than US$20 billion in annual profits on average. Still, there is optimism that Mr Tan will be able to turn things around. Much of his focus has been on cost cutting, which has improved Intel's outlook to return to profitability but raised concerns the chipmaker may be bowing out of the race for technological leadership. Part of his effort has also been centered on a costly build out of its foundry operations undertaken by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger. 'Clearly it's going to take a number of years for it to really start operating on a smooth basis,' said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund. 'We've got trust in him, but we think he's got a long slog ahead.' BLOOMBERG
