Trump eyes US government stakes in other chip makers that received Chips Act funds, sources say
WASHINGTON - US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive Chips Act funding to build factories in the country, two sources said.
Expanding on a plan to receive an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants, a White House official and a person familiar with the situation said Mr Lutnick is exploring how the United States can receive equity stakes in exchange for Chips Act funding for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung. Much of the funding has not yet been dispersed.
Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest US recipient of Chips Act cash. TSMC declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Aug 19 that Mr Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10 per cent government stake. 'The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before,' she told reporters.
While Mr Lutnick said earlier on CNBC that the US does not want to tell Intel how to run its operations, any investment would be unprecedented and ramps up a new era of US influence on the big companies. In the past, the US has taken stakes in companies to provide cash and build confidence in times of economic upheaval and uncertainty.
In a similar move earlier this year, Mr Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of US Steel after being promised a 'golden share' that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the US, or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent.
The two sources said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the Chips Act discussions, but that Mr Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the US$52.7 billion (S$67.7 billion) Chips Ac, which provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the US.
Mr Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Mr Trump likes the idea.
The US Commerce Department late in 2024 finalised subsidies of US$4.75 billion for Samsung, US$6.2 billion for Micron and US$6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the US.
In June, Mr Lutnick said the department was re-negotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, calling them 'overly generous'. He noted at the time that Micron offered to increase its spending on chip plants in the US. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
42 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions, World News
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump gathered European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for a hastily arranged White House meeting on Monday (Aug 18) to discuss a path to ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Here are takeaways from the talks: Warm tone, little substance Seven European leaders, the Ukrainian president, their motorcades, dozens of Trump administration staff and more than 100 journalists swarmed the White House campus on Monday in anticipation of the unusual meeting. Would Trump and Zelenskiy agree on a path to peace? Or would their latest Oval Office session devolve into a bitter squabble as in February? Neither scenario occurred. Zelenskiy, chided for his appearance and manner in February, adjusted both. Wearing more formal clothing and repeatedly expressing his gratitude to Trump, he was greeted by a far more complimentary US president than in the past. But, despite Trump's vow to assist in Ukraine's security after a hypothetical peace deal, there was no immediate sign that any party had substantially changed position on land swaps, security guarantees or sanctions. Instead, Trump ended with promises to host a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to address the many remaining issues. Heaping praise "Have you said 'thank you' once?" US Vice President JD Vance asked Zelenskiy in February, accusing him of failing to show sufficient gratitude for US support. On Monday, Zelenskiy made sure that was not an issue. His opening remarks in the Oval Office included eight thank-yous, mostly for Trump. "Thank you so much, Mr. President ... thank you for your attention. Thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop killings and stop this war. Thank you," Zelenskiy said. He included the US first lady, who sent a letter to Putin about abducted children in Ukraine. "Using this opportunity, my thanks to your wife," the Ukrainian president said. "And thanks to all our partners and that you supported this format. And after our meeting, we're going to have leaders who are around us, the UK and France, Germany... all partners around Ukraine supporting us. Thanks (to) them. Thank you very much for your invitation." Unlike in February, Vance this time sat largely silent. Combat formal The stakes of the meeting could not have been higher. But one of the most-asked questions among diplomats in DC could not have been more frivolous: Would the Ukrainian president wear a suit? The answer: kind of. Zelenskiy showed up to the White House in what one European diplomat described as "almost a suit." His black jacket had tiny lapels and jetted chest pockets. He did not wear a tie. His attire, which split the difference between the battlefield and the boardroom, could be described as combat formal. Those sartorial details matter when it comes to dealing with the US president, who was upset that Zelenskiy did not wear a suit for their February meeting. Zelenskiy passed the fashion test this time, however. When one journalist in the Oval Office said Zelenskiy looked "fabulous," Trump chimed in to agree. "I said the same thing," Trump told reporters. Divide over ceasefire The assembled European leaders, Zelenskiy included, were careful to paper over policy disagreements with Trump, keeping their comments vague and showering the US president with compliments. But one point of disagreement did bubble to the surface. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told the assembled leaders and media that he wanted to see Putin agree to a ceasefire. Trump had long pushed for a ceasefire in Ukraine. But he largely jettisoned that goal after meeting with Putin last week in Alaska, a shift that was widely seen as a diplomatic defeat for Ukraine. The US president now says he is fine trying to move directly to a peace deal. "To be honest, we all would like to see a ceasefire," Merz said. "I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that." Trump pushed back, arguing he has solved many conflicts without first reaching a ceasefire. [[nid:721540]] Whose boots on the ground? One of the great mysteries that hung over the summit was what support the US would give to secure any Russia-Ukraine deal long term. Trump hasn't offered US troops' "boots on the ground" to guarantee Ukraine's security from Russia, reflecting American reticence to commit to military entanglements or a head-to-head confrontation with a nuclear power. Instead, he has offered weapons sales and promised that Americans will do business in Ukraine, assurances that Ukrainians see as far less than a security guarantee. Europeans are preparing for a peacekeeping mission backed by their forces. Yet, asked explicitly whether US security guarantees for Ukraine could include US troops in the country, Trump did not rule it out. Instead, he teased an announcement as soon as Monday on the topic. "We'll let you know that, maybe, later today," Trump said. He said Europe was the "first line of defence" but that "we'll be involved." What's next Trump said he would call Putin and set up a trilateral meeting with Ukraine at a time and place to be determined. Despite some private misgivings, the assembled leaders agreed that such a meeting was a logical next step. Still, the path forward is more complex than Trump and his allies are letting on. For one, Russia has delayed and obstructed high-level meetings with Ukraine in the past, and it was not immediately clear that Putin would actually sit down with Zelenskiy, who he frequently describes as an illegitimate leader. Additionally, it is unclear how much a principal-level meeting would actually advance the cause of peace. The gulf between the Russian and Ukrainian positions is vast. The Kremlin said on Monday the presence of Nato troops in Ukraine is a non-starter, a stance that would be hard for Ukraine to swallow. Russia is also calling for Ukraine to fork over significant chunks of territory that Kyiv controls, another proposal that Ukraine's leaders are not entertaining. [[nid:721555]]
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
US budget deficit forecast US$1 trillion higher over next decade, watchdog says
[WASHINGTON] US federal budget deficits will be nearly US$1 trillion higher over the next decade than projected in January by the Congressional Budget Office as a result of tax and spending legislation and tariffs, a budget watchdog said on Wednesday (Aug 20). The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's (CRFB) latest forecasts show a cumulative deficit of US$22.7 trillion from fiscal 2026 to 2035, compared to the CBO's January forecast of US$21.8 trillion, which was based on laws and policies that were in place before US President Donald Trump took office in January. The CBO, Congress' non-partisan budget referee agency, said on Monday that it will not issue its customary mid-year budget update this year and will issue its next 10-year budget and economic outlook in early 2026, offering no explanation for the move. The CRFB, which advocates for deficit reduction, projected a US$1.7 trillion deficit in fiscal 2025 or 5.6 per cent of GDP, down slightly from US$1.83 trillion in 2024 and the CBO's 2025 projection of US$1.87 trillion in January. But it said that deficits steadily rise over the decade, reaching US$2.6 trillion or 5.9 per cent of GDP by 2035. The new CRFB estimates include the budget effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act tax and spending bill, as well as Trump's tariffs that are currently in place. But like CBO, they do not include the dynamic economic effects on growth from these changes, a forecasting rule that has drawn criticism from the Trump administration. The group projects the tax cut and spending bill to increase deficits, including interest, by US$4.6 trillion to 2035, adding another year to the CBO's US$4.1 trillion cost estimate to 2034. But CRFB estimates that this will be offset by US$3.4 trillion worth of extra import duty revenue over the next decade due to Trump's new tariffs that are currently in place. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up New rules restricting eligibility for health insurance subsidies will reduce deficits by another US$100 billion to 2035, and Congress' rescission of prior funding to foreign aid, public broadcasting and other programmes would save another US$100 billion if sustained over a decade, CRFB said. Net interest payments on the national debt will total US$14 trillion over the decade, CRFB projected, rising from nearly US$1 trillion or 3.2 per cent of GDP in 2025 to US$1.8 trillion or 4.1 per cent of GDP in 2035. Tariff challenge The forecasts are based on legislative and tariff changes since January but keep CBO's economic forecasts unchanged. Under an alternative scenario forecast by CRFB, the budget picture looks far worse, boosting deficits nearly US$7 trillion higher than the CBO baseline. This scenario would see a significant part of Trump's tariffs cancelled if the Court of International Trade's ruling against many of Trump's new tariffs is upheld, cutting US$2.4 trillion from revenues over a decade. The alternative scenario also assumes extension of a number of temporary tax cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, including tax breaks on overtime, tips, Social Security income and car loan interest, higher state and local tax deduction allowances and full expensing of factory investments, adding US$1.7 trillion to deficits over 10 years. CRFB's alternative scenario also ditches the CBO's projection of a decline in 10-year US Treasury yields over the decade to about 3.8 per cent. If that interest rate stays at the current level of about 4.3 per cent, interest costs would grow by about US$1.6 trillion through 2035, CRFB said. The total 2035 debt-to-GDP ratio would grow from 118 per cent in the CBO January baseline to 120 per cent under the CRFB's projected baseline scenario and 134 per cent under the CRFB's alternative scenario. REUTERS
AsiaOne
3 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Russian foreign minister praises Trump, criticises Europeans over approach to Ukraine peace push, World News
MOSCOW — Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday (Aug 19) that it was clear at Friday's US-Russia Alaska summit that US President Donald Trump and his team sincerely wanted to achieve a long-term and sustainable peace in Ukraine. Lavrov said the atmosphere at the Putin-Trump summit was "very good." "It was clear that the head of the United States and his team, firstly, sincerely want to achieve a result that will be long-term, sustainable, reliable," Lavrov told the Rossiya 24 state television channel. Lavrov contrasted what he said was the constructive US position to that of Europe, some of whose leaders took part in an extraordinary summit at the White House on Monday with Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to discuss Ukraine. Lavrov said "the Europeans had... insisted at every turn only on a cease-fire, and that after that they would continue to supply weapons to Ukraine." [[nid:721542]]
