logo
New accounting rules to force firms to show climate impact on bottom line

New accounting rules to force firms to show climate impact on bottom line

Companies will soon be expected to reflect climate risk in their profit and loss (P&L) accounts, revealing to investors how floods, storms and droughts affect bottom lines.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), whose rules are used in some 169 jurisdictions across the globe, is due to have a finalised set of examples by October to show companies how to disclose the impact of a hotter planet on P&L items, including impairments and provisions.
It's technical and may make 'people's eyes glaze over', said Natasha Landell-Mills, head of stewardship at Sarasin & Partners, which manages US$23 billion in assets. But this kind of financial rewiring ultimately 'drives decision making', she said.
The development marks a step up from the standard reporting model to date, whereby companies have released financial earnings and mostly left things like climate risk to separate sustainability reports. Forcing companies to merge the two means 'getting to the heart of how the system operates', Landell-Mills said.
More than half of the companies surveyed by Morgan Stanley in June said their revenue took a hit due to climate-related events last year. Photo: Shutterstock
Investors with a focus on sustainability have complained for years that corporate reporting falls short. The IASB decided back in 2023 to identify what could be done to address such concerns, and in July published a draft list of examples.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IPO allotment rule changes make market healthier as a whole
IPO allotment rule changes make market healthier as a whole

South China Morning Post

time21 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

IPO allotment rule changes make market healthier as a whole

The initial public offering (IPO) game has never much favoured small retail investors. With red-hot IPOs, they usually only receive a small allotment, if at all. With less-popular IPOs, woe to those who manage to get all their subscribed lots as that pretty much signals a price fall at debut. New rules now in place mean allotment chances for retail investors will get even smaller, especially with popular IPOs. Market insiders and experts, however, argue that this is not necessarily a bad development. Bigger chunks for institutional investors will mean more stable prices, less volatility and higher liquidity for new stocks. From August 4, IPO candidates have had to allocate at least 40 per cent of the shares to institutional investors, including family offices. That is up from no guaranteed allocation previously. The rules reduce the IPO shares that retail investors can get from the so-called clawback mechanism to 35 per cent, down from 50 per cent previously in the event of a heavily oversubscribed offer. The IPO company may also not offer a clawback, in which case no more than 10 per cent is required to be allotted to retail investors. The new formula translates to a 50 per cent cap on IPOs for cornerstone investors, who face a six-month lock-up period. Institutional investors will enjoy more certainty in getting shares at a time when the IPO market in Hong Kong is hot again, having catapulted the city back to the global No 1 ranking. IPOs of 42 firms raised US$13.5 billion in the first half of this year. The full year could reach HK$250 billion (US$32 billion), according to KPMG. Many retail investors offload their hot shares at debut to make a quick buck. Institutional investors tend to hold shares longer and help with price discovery, as well as stabilising prices, but it also means fewer retail investors can partake in a debut rally.

Hair-raising times as Singaporeans fume over poor service, pushy sales tactics at salons
Hair-raising times as Singaporeans fume over poor service, pushy sales tactics at salons

South China Morning Post

time2 days ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hair-raising times as Singaporeans fume over poor service, pushy sales tactics at salons

A trade association has called for the regulation of the hair industry after hair salons entered the Consumers Association of Singapore's (CASE) top-10 list of most complained-about sectors for the first half of this year. Advertisement The Hair and Cosmetology Association of Singapore (HACOS), which represents more than 300 members in the beauty, hair, make-up and nails industries, said stronger oversight and minimum competency standards are needed to raise professionalism and protect consumers. Complaints against hair salons rose to ninth-highest among industries between January and June this year, surpassing even airlines, which placed 10th, according to CASE figures released on August 5. The motor car industry received the most complaints. This marks a return for hair salons, which were absent from the top 10 in the same period last year. However, the number of complaints in the first half of this year was 167, lower than the 170 in the first half of 2024, CASE president Melvin Yong said. Advertisement Prepayment losses were also lower – S$5,619 (US$4,386) this year compared with S$21,810 last year. Yong said the complaints were largely about high-pressure sales tactics, misleading or false claims, hidden charges for add-ons and poor service.

Applied Materials shares fall 13% after forecast hit by China pause, export‑licence woes
Applied Materials shares fall 13% after forecast hit by China pause, export‑licence woes

South China Morning Post

time2 days ago

  • South China Morning Post

Applied Materials shares fall 13% after forecast hit by China pause, export‑licence woes

Applied Materials forecast fourth-quarter revenue and profit below estimates on Thursday, citing weak demand in China and erratic orders from customers facing uncertainty because of tariffs, sending its shares down nearly 13 per cent in extended trading. US President Donald Trump's ongoing tariff negotiations and certain export restrictions to China have made it more difficult to forecast where the economy is headed, weighing on new orders for chipmaking tools suppliers such as Applied Materials. Dutch firm ASML , the world's biggest supplier of chipmaking equipment, warned earlier in July that it may not achieve revenue growth in 2026 as chipmakers building factories in the US await clarity on the potential impact of tariffs. 'We are expecting a decline in revenue in the fourth quarter driven by both digestion of capacity in China and non-linear demand from leading-edge customers given market concentration and fab timing,' Applied's chief financial officer Brice Hill said in a statement. Tightened export controls on advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China prevent these companies from selling their most cutting-edge tools to Chinese customers. In China, chipmakers are pausing new equipment orders to absorb recently added capacity for older-generation, mainstream chips used in cars, industry and other everyday electronics, the company has said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store