
This Muslim nation ends 19-year visa ban on Pakistan, welcomes Pakistanis for..., country name is...
This Muslim nation ends 19-year visa ban on Pakistan, welcomes Pakistanis for…, country name is…
Kuwait: What comes as a big relief to Pakistan, Gulf country Kuwait has lifted the 19-year-old visa ban on Pakistani citizens. Before this development, citizens of Pakistan could not apply for a Kuwait visa. This decision by the Muslim-majority country has opened up ample opportunities for Pakistanis to get jobs there. Citizens of Pakistan will now be able to work in Kuwait in sectors such as healthcare, oil, and skilled labour. At the same time, this decision will also improve Kuwait's bilateral relationship with Pakistan.
According to Gulf News, Kuwait, which is facing a growing demand for skilled workers, has started recruiting professionals from Pakistan. The recruitment includes 1,200 nurses. The resumption of visas will create many opportunities for Pak people in Kuwait. They can now apply for Kuwaiti visas including work, family visit, dependent, tourist and commercial categories. Relations with Pakistan will improve
Visa applications will now be available through Kuwait's online platform, so Pakistani citizens can visit the website and apply for the suitable visa.
According to Pakistan's Ambassador to Kuwait Dr Zafar Iqbal, it is a milestone decision in Pakistan-Kuwait relations. Reopening the visa channel for Pakistanis will help in meeting Kuwait's labour needs but will also benefit several families in Pakistan.
Thousands of skilled Pakistani workers will gain new employment opportunities in Kuwait, fostering increased economic cooperation between the two nations. This renewed access to Kuwaiti markets also benefits Pakistani businesses, entrepreneurs, and investors. Beyond economic benefits, this development is expected to strengthen people-to-people ties.
As per reports, both countries are also discussing a new labour memorandum of understanding (MoU). This MoU aims to protect the rights of Pakistani workers in Kuwait, providing more structured and secure framework for labour migration. Reopening Visa channels for Pakistanis will also bolster trade and investment between the two countries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
In battle of the delegations, real story lies in what went unsaid
In the aftermath of their recent military clash, rival delegations from Delhi and Islamabad converged on various global capitals, each aiming to shape elite opinion, win sympathy, and control the post-crisis narrative. Having witnessed some of the exchanges in London firsthand, the diplomatic duel across briefing rooms, think tanks, and diaspora events was as revealing for what was unsaid as for what was spoken. Messaging starts with messengers The difference in delegation profiles was notable. India's all-party parliamentary mission carried symbolic weight and cross-party legitimacy, including senior figures like Ravi Shankar Prasad and Pankaj Saran. Pakistan's team leaned more on technocrats and veteran advocates of global engagement, such as Sherry Rehman and Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. India's group projected cohesion and resolve; Pakistan's aimed to influence narratives and broaden appeal. India's cautious case India's delegation framed Operation Sindoor as part of a broader shift: limited cross-border retaliation to terrorist acts as policy, not aberration. They emphasized terrorism as a global threat whose response merits international understanding—not moral equivalence. The delegation linked India's counterterrorism struggle to challenges faced by Western democracies, with Pakistan as a common denominator. In my observation, Indian representatives appeared quietly frustrated that while many countries expressed sympathy after Pahalgam and tacitly accepted India's right to act, few explicitly condemned Pakistan. Though confident in their message, their delivery often felt restrained. In think tanks, the tone was formal, even stiff; diaspora engagements were reportedly more fiery. Though most accepted the delegation's basic premise, some observers noted the irony in Delhi resisting calls to frame Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a shared threat but now seeking solidarity on Pakistani-based terrorism. Crucially, the delegation faltered when pressed on domestic radicalization. Two of the Pahalgam suspects were reportedly Indian nationals. Asked how New Delhi planned to prevent disillusionment turning to violence, the only response was that 'things today are better than in the 1990s.' This was a missed chance to demonstrate nuanced understanding of the challenge. Other inconsistencies emerged. India's representatives rejected 're-hyphenation' with Pakistan, yet much of their messaging focused on Islamabad. While stressing the quarrel was with Pakistan's military, not its people, questions about suspending the Indus Waters Treaty complicated that briefings took place inside the High Commission, with diaspora members complaining to me that they thought too much political outreach was aimed at UK politicians of Indian heritage. Playing it safe has a certain logic, but may have limited engagement with new or skeptical audiences. Pak's polished—but problematic—pitch If India played it safe, Pakistan opted for smooth. Their delegation turned up at major think tanks eager to engage and keen to appear misunderstood. With assistance from lobbying professionals, their narrative was tightly crafted for European audiences: Pakistan sought peace through dialogue, emphasising Kashmir as the 'unfinished legacy of Partition,' terrorism, and water. Pakistan said it wanted talks, a neutral investigation into Pahalgam, and accused India of refusing cooperation or prove culpability. This narrative of peace sat uneasily beside claims of military success and personal attacks on Indian leaders. Critique of Indian media spin might have bolstered believability had it not been accompanied by other factual distortions: legal sleight-of-hand over Kashmir, misreadings of UN resolutions, and claims that India admitted culpability for terrorism in most convincing moment came on the Indus Waters Treaty, where the stark picture painted of the consequences struck a chord, even if significant action has yet to follow. A key question remains: what was the objective? If persuasion abroad was the objective, the reliance on longstanding misrepresentations made it a difficult sell to informed audiences. If the goal was domestic signaling, that focus likely came at the expense of deeper foreign engagement. Simpler sell, harder ask Ultimately, the Indian delegation framed all terrorism as emanating from Pakistan; Pakistan framed it as emerging from Kashmir. The narratives didn't just clash—they barely shared the same terms of reference. As performative exercises providing content for domestic media, both probably succeeded on their own terms. In the battle to move international opinion, outcomes were uneven. India may have achieved more, but it also had the easier task — framing terrorism as a universal threat aligns with European security narratives. Pakistan, by contrast, asked outside actors to invest political capital in corralling New Delhi back to the negotiating table — a much harder sell. Yet neither side escaped contradiction. India's claim to strategic clarity was weakened by deflection on domestic aspects of terrorism in Kashmir. Pakistan's message of peace was blunted by triumphalism and tired tropes. In diplomacy, silence often speaks louder than words. In London last week, the most telling signals were what each side omitted, ignored, or performed for the audience they believed mattered most. Ladwig III is a senior lecturer at the department of War Studies, King's College London


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
UK's child sex abuse scandal: PM Keir Starmer orders national inquiry into 'grooming gangs' after report, Musk criticism
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Saturday announced a national inquiry into the UK's decades-long child sex abuse scandal involving grooming gangs, reversing his earlier stance in light of a new report and mounting public pressure, including from US tech billionaire Elon Musk. The decision follows the findings of an independent audit by Louise Casey, who had initially believed a national-level probe was unnecessary but changed her view after reviewing the scale and nature of the abuse. 'She has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen. I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation,' Starmer told reporters en route to the G7 summit in Canada. The scandal centres on gangs of mostly Pakistani men who targeted and abused thousands of vulnerable white girls, many from disadvantaged backgrounds or in state care. The abuse occurred in towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, and Bristol over nearly four decades. Previous investigations found that police and local authorities often failed to act, allegedly due to fears of being labelled racist. The matter gained international traction earlier this year after Musk, owner of the X platform, accused the UK government of failing to adequately address the issue. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Addition Hills: Scholarships You Can Apply For (Start Now) College Scholarship | Google Search Search Now Undo On Saturday, Musk responded to news of the inquiry saying he was 'glad to hear this is happening.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper had tasked Casey with a 'rapid audit' in January. Sky News reported Saturday that Casey's findings will indicate that vulnerable white British girls were 'institutionally ignored' by authorities. Criticism of the delay came from Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch, who accused Starmer of dragging his feet. 'I've been repeatedly calling for a full national inquiry since January,' she said. 'Many survivors of the grooming gangs will be relieved that this is finally happening. But they need a resolution soon, not in 10 years' time.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NIA cracks down on terror network of Hizb-ut-Tahrir in MP, Rajasthan
Bhopal/Jaipur: NIA on Saturday raided three locations in MP's Bhopal and two in Rajasthan's Jhalawar as part of its probe into a terror conspiracy by the banned radical outfit Hizb-ut-Tahrir (HuT), which is accused of radicalising Muslim youth and attempting to forge links with global terror networks such as ISIS. The extensive searches were triggered by the data recovered from the mobile phone of Mohsin Khan --- a key conspirator, financier, and recruiter for HuT in India --- who was arrested by NIA in Bhopal last week. The information led to the identification of another suspect in Jhalawar's Manohar Thana town. "Mohsin Khan motivated Muslim youth to spread violence in a bid to overthrow India's democratically elected govt and establish an Islamic state governed by Shariah law through the creation of a Caliphate," said an NIA source. NIA seized digital devices and incriminating materials during coordinated search operations at Aishbagh, Ashoka Garden, and the Shahjahanabad area in Bhopal, as well as a house in Kaji Chowk and a shop near Jama Masjid in Jhalawar. The recovered devices are being sent for forensic analysis to gather further evidence related to the conspiracy. "The case, registered by the NIA as part of its efforts to dismantle various terrorist and radical networks attempting to spread mayhem across the country, relates to HuT's conspiracy to radicalise and recruit vulnerable Muslim youth," NIA said in a release. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pinga-Pinga e HBP? Tome isso 1x ao dia se tem mais de 40 anos Portal Saúde do Homem Clique aqui Undo After evading arrest for an extended period, Khan was tracked by NIA operatives to Thailand. In coordination with international agencies, he was deported to India and subsequently taken into custody in Delhi. Bhopal/Jaipur: NIA on Saturday raided three locations in MP's Bhopal and two in Rajasthan's Jhalawar as part of its probe into a terror conspiracy by the banned radical outfit Hizb-ut-Tahrir (HuT), which is accused of radicalising Muslim youth and attempting to forge links with global terror networks such as ISIS. The extensive searches were triggered by the data recovered from the mobile phone of Mohsin Khan --- a key conspirator, financier, and recruiter for HuT in India --- who was arrested by NIA in Bhopal last week. The information led to the identification of another suspect in Jhalawar's Manohar Thana town. "Mohsin Khan motivated Muslim youth to spread violence in a bid to overthrow India's democratically elected govt and establish an Islamic state governed by Shariah law through the creation of a Caliphate," said an NIA source. NIA seized digital devices and incriminating materials during coordinated search operations at Aishbagh, Ashoka Garden, and the Shahjahanabad area in Bhopal, as well as a house in Kaji Chowk and a shop near Jama Masjid in Jhalawar. The recovered devices are being sent for forensic analysis to gather further evidence related to the conspiracy. "The case, registered by the NIA as part of its efforts to dismantle various terrorist and radical networks attempting to spread mayhem across the country, relates to HuT's conspiracy to radicalise and recruit vulnerable Muslim youth," NIA said in a release. After evading arrest for an extended period, Khan was tracked by NIA operatives to Thailand. In coordination with international agencies, he was deported to India and subsequently taken into custody in Delhi. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .