logo
Taliban warns thousands of Afghans secretly airlifted to UK ‘we will HUNT you down' after MoD leaked ‘kill list'

Taliban warns thousands of Afghans secretly airlifted to UK ‘we will HUNT you down' after MoD leaked ‘kill list'

The Sun5 days ago
THE Taliban has chillingly warned it will hunt down thousands of Afghan refugees on a 'kill list' after the UK's huge data breach.
Details of almost 20,000 refugees fleeing the terrorist organisation were leaked after a Royal Marine mistakenly sent a top secret email to the wrong people.
6
6
6
Thousands of the refugees had to be secretly relocated to the UK after the blunder, which was covered up by the Ministry of Defence and is set to cost Britain up to £7 billion.
The majority of those on the secret list were flown into Stansted airport via unmarked planes.
But now Taliban officials have claimed the details of all the refugees have been known to them since 2022, after they allegedly sourced the information from the internet.
Speaking to The Telegraph, they said: 'A special unit has been launched to find them and make sure they do not work with Britain.
'We've been calling and visiting their family members to track them down.
'They believe these individuals are still working with the British, and say the problem must be dealt with.
'These people are seen as traitors, and the plan has been to find as many of them as possible.
'Whoever leaked that file is actually helping us. There may be a general amnesty in place, but spies cannot escape justice.'
It means that the clumsy click and the subsequent cover-up - which has now proven to be ineffective - has potential to be the most expensive data breach in history.
The list also included names of their individual UK sponsors including SAS and MI6 spies and at least one Royal Marine Major General.
Although Defence Secretary John Healey has said that the cost of relocating the Afghans and their families will total £400 million, the final cost could be even higher.
Defence Secretary Healey's figure includes £100 million in compensation for the data breach and £300 million to relocate them to Britain.
Taliban launches warped Afghan TOURISM campaign with vid of brutes posing beside 'hostage' in ISIS-style mock execution
Mr Healey offered a "sincere apology" in the face of the huge error and added that "no government wishes to withhold information from the British public".
He later said: "The full number of Afghan arrivals under all schemes have been reported in the regular Home Office statistics, meaning that they are already counted in the existing migration figures."
However, government sources have estimated that the lifetime cost of supporting the 20,000 individuals and their families could hit £7 billion - if the rescued Afghans decide to sue the government for leaking their data.
Only around 10 to 15 per cent of the individuals on the list would have qualified for relocation under the emergency Afghan Relocation and Assistance Programme, known as ARAP, opened as Kabul fell to the Taliban.
Many of the Afghans who were flown into the country as part of Operation Rubific were initially housed at MoD homes or hotels until permanent accomodation was found.
The leak put countless of people left in Afghanistan at risk, as the country's ruthless Taliban rulers tried to hunt and kill anyone who had helped UK forces.
A number of named individuals have been killed since the leak. Others were tortured and beaten.
But sources insisted it was impossible to prove conclusively whether it was a direct result of the data breach.
The epic MoD blunder was kept Top Secret for almost three years by a legal super injunction but can finally be made public today.
A source said: 'The MoD kept this secret and denied these people the chance to change their numbers, emails, locations or take any measures to protect themselves.'
And the MoD only wrote to those affected to warn them today.
An MoD source said it was 'human error and not a cyber hack or hostile state actor'.
6
6
6
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Football supporters now have a bigger say in how their clubs are run
Football supporters now have a bigger say in how their clubs are run

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Football supporters now have a bigger say in how their clubs are run

The Football Governance Act has officially become UK law after receiving royal assent, establishing an independent regulator for English football. This landmark legislation introduces a watchdog for the top five tiers of the men's game, aiming to ensure clubs are run sustainably and are accountable to their supporters. The new regulator will possess 'backstop' powers to impose financial settlements between the English Football League (EFL) and the Premier League if they fail to reach an agreement. The Act's journey to law was prompted by the attempted European Super League breakaway and numerous instances of clubs facing financial distress and mismanagement. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy highlighted that the Act delivers on promises to fans, protecting cherished clubs and their vital role in communities.

How realistic is Nigel Farage's promise to cut crime in half?
How realistic is Nigel Farage's promise to cut crime in half?

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

How realistic is Nigel Farage's promise to cut crime in half?

N igel Farage claims that he has a plan to 'cut crime in half, take back control of our streets, [and] take back control of our courts and prisons '. The Reform leader says that 'we are facing nothing short of societal collapse', wants to build emergency 'Nightingale prisons ' on Ministry of Defence land, and has semi-promised to send convicted murderer Ian Huntley to El Salvador (admittedly a bit of a vote winner). It's an ambitious package, but there are questions about its viability... Is Britain facing societal collapse? No. If it was, you wouldn't get back alive from the pub or be able to get petrol or bread. Is crime up? On some measures and in some places, against certain given periods of time, it is up; on other measures, it's down. The variations in the way crime is measured are one issue – it's risky to go by the number of crimes recorded by the police, because people will sometimes not bother to report them, especially the less serious matters, so statisticians treat these figures with caution. The other way of measuring crime rates, which should also be adjusted for changes in population, is by conducting surveys among the public – but not everything is included. Somewhat confusingly, Farage seems to think that the survey data is unreliable because people have given up telling the police about, for example, thefts that might affect their insurance. That doesn't make sense. Types of crime also necessarily change over time; there are very few thefts of car radios or bank blags these days, but there's massively more cybercrime and fraud. Even in London, described by Farage as 'lawless', not all crime is up; there's a long-term trend down in murder and rape, for example, and there are still plenty of tourists. So fact-checking any politician on the subject of crime is virtually impossible. All such claims need to be treated with the utmost care. What about the costings? Farage presented a 'costings sheet' that purports to show that the whole massive package – recruiting 30,000 more police, opening new 'custody suites', restoring magistrates' court operations, building prisons, paying rent for offenders deported to prisons in El Salvador or Estonia, and the rest – would come to £17.4bn over a five-year parliament: a mere £3.48bn per annum. The costings seem to be optimistic, based on some arbitrary assumptions such as always being able to cut costs to a minimum. They are not independently audited by, say, the Institute for Fiscal Studies – and if it were really all so cheap to do, the Tories and Labour would surely have taken the opportunity to transform the crime scene and turn Britain into a paradise long ago. As for funding even the admitted £17.4bn, there are no specific named savings elsewhere, just some recycled claims about the (contested) cost of net zero and the supposed economic miracle wrought in Argentina by President Milei. Probably not enough to calm the bond markets under a Farage government. Is the UK 'close to civil disobedience on a vast scale'? So Farage claims. His critics say that his 'I predict a riot' remarks tend to have a self-fulfilling quality to them, as seen in the 'Farage riots' in Southport and elsewhere a year ago. Essex Police, who are currently dealing with violent unrest in Epping – perpetrated by 'a few bad eggs', as Farage terms it – won't thank him for his comments. And the anecdotes? Uncheckable, just as Enoch Powell's were in the infamous 'rivers of blood' speech in 1968. We may never know whether, for example, a former army sergeant was denied a job as a police officer because the force was 'having trouble with its quotas' or for some other reason. Reform's tactics are also reminiscent of the Trump playbook, demonstrating an obsession with incarceration and policing by fear. If Farage could build a British Alligator Alcatraz on a disused RAF base in Suffolk, he probably would. But using grass snakes, presumably. Can Farage cut crime in half in five years? It feels implausible. If he could, then presumably he could abolish crime altogether if he were given a decade in office. The 'zero tolerance' approach sounds fine, but if the pledge that every shoplifting offence, every whiff of a spliff, and every trackable mobile phone theft has to be investigated is taken literally – as he seems to intend – then even 30,000 more officers wouldn't be sufficient, and the expanded court and prison system would collapse. Much the same goes for 'saturation' levels of policing deployed on stop-and-search exercises in high-knife-crime areas. Sending many more people to jail is also very costly, but, more to the point, the recent Gauke report explains why prison doesn't work and just makes everything worse. To get crime down under Reform UK, we'd need to turn the UK into a police state.

Man arrested in murder probe after 72-year-old woman found dead
Man arrested in murder probe after 72-year-old woman found dead

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Man arrested in murder probe after 72-year-old woman found dead

A man has been arrested after a 72-year-old woman was found dead in a house in Cheshire. Emergency services were called to a property in Pearson Street, Macclesfield, over a concern for welfare at a property on Friday, Cheshire Police said. A woman was found dead at the home at around 6.50pm, the force said. A post-mortem examination found the woman died of injuries to her head and neck. Police arrested a 49-year-old man on suspicion of murder on Monday. He remains in police custody for questioning. Detectives believe the death is an isolated incident and there is no wider risk to the public. The force said investigations will be continuing and an increased police presence was likely in the surrounding area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store