At least 3 dead as flash floods sweep Afghanistan's Khost and Paktia
According to Khaama Press, the floods swept through several districts in both provinces, disrupting lives and leaving widespread economic devastation in their wake.
Local officials told Khaama Press that the Wazi district in Paktia and the Nadershah Kot, Zazi Maidan, and Sabari districts in Khost were among the hardest-hit areas, with homes and agricultural lands destroyed and retaining walls demolished.
"Three individuals lost their lives in Nadershah Kot district while collecting firewood near the floodwaters," eyewitnesses told Khaama Press, highlighting the dangers posed by sudden flooding events in vulnerable rural areas.
In addition to the tragic loss of life, Khaama Press reported that the floods have had a devastating impact on the economy of the affected communities, most of whom rely heavily on farming and natural resources for their livelihoods.
The latest flooding comes just weeks after a similar disaster struck the same region, with Khaama Press noting a troubling trend of recurrent natural disasters in these provinces, where poor infrastructure and limited disaster preparedness exacerbate the consequences.
Experts have called for urgent investment in flood management systems and greater support from national and international organisations to assist affected communities and build resilience against future calamities.
The growing frequency of such disasters, coupled with limited global engagement, highlights Afghanistan's mounting vulnerabilities. Reflecting this broader isolation, Afghanistan's passport has been ranked the least powerful in the world in 2025, offering visa-free access to just 26 countries, as reported by Khaama Press.
According to the Henley Passport Index for 2025, Afghanistan was ranked 106th, at the bottom of the global list, making it the most restricted passport worldwide.
The annual index, based on exclusive data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA), ranks passports according to the number of destinations their holders can enter without a visa.
Khaama Press reported that Afghanistan's travel freedom continues to shrink. In 2024, the country ranked 104th.
The two-rank drop in 2025 highlights a further erosion in the country's global mobility, leaving Afghan citizens increasingly cut off from the rest of the world.
Meanwhile, Singapore topped the Henley Index in 2025, with its citizens enjoying visa-free access to 195 countries. Japan followed with access to 193 destinations.
Finland, France, Germany, Italy, South Korea, and Spain jointly secured third place, with visa-free access to 192 countries.
By contrast, Afghan passport holders can travel without a visa to only 26 countries, including Sri Lanka, Somalia, Kenya, Cambodia, and Bangladesh, Khaama Press noted. The drastic gap underscores the limited options available to Afghan citizens for international movement.
Despite the Taliban's control over the country, Afghan passports continue to be printed with the emblem of the former government, Khaama Press reported.
The report also highlighted how this, combined with severe political instability and economic collapse, has worsened migration trends, even as acquiring a passport has become increasingly difficult for ordinary citizens.
Khaama Press further stated that the consistent decline in the power of Afghanistan's passport mirrors the nation's worsening diplomatic and economic standing.
The limited global access not only restricts individual movement but also reflects broader issues of international exclusion and lack of recognition.
Experts note that unless Afghanistan addresses its core challenges, including governance issues, economic recovery, and efforts to gain international legitimacy, the passport is likely to remain at the bottom of global rankings for the foreseeable future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Taliban stripped Afghan women of rights: US Report
The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) released its 68th and final report, as per Tolo News. According to the report, the US allocated only around USD 342 million in humanitarian aid to Afghanistan in fiscal year 2025, a sharp drop from 2023.(AFP File Photo) The report addresses issues such as US aid to Afghanistan, the situation of women and girls, security, the economy, counter-narcotics efforts, recent developments, SIGAR's monitoring process, the conclusion of its mission, and the role of other US government agencies in overseeing Afghanistan's affairs. SIGAR claims in the report that the Taliban in Afghanistan has broadly stripped Afghan women and girls of their rights over the past four years. Abdul Sadeq Hamidzoy, a political affairs analyst, said: "International institutions have so far highlighted public concerns in their reports, but have taken no concrete action to resolve them." According to the report, the US allocated only around USD 342 million in humanitarian aid to Afghanistan in fiscal year 2025, a sharp drop from over USD 968 million in 2023, Tolo News reported. This steep reduction in aid, at a time when Afghanistan's internal needs are growing, has had significant effects on people's livelihoods. The Ministry of Economy said that US aid to Afghanistan should not be politicised and rejects the claim that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan interferes in US assistance. Abdul Latif Nazari, Deputy Minister of Economy, stated, "The recent SIGAR report has both positive and negative aspects, but I want to emphasise two points: First, the US has politicised humanitarian aid, which contradicts humanitarian principles and international law. Second, it is alleged that the Islamic Emirate interferes in international aid, and we strongly and categorically reject this claim." SIGAR presented its first quarterly report to the US Congress in October 2008. Now that the body has concluded its operations, the question remains: how effective and beneficial was its oversight? Idris Mohammadi Zazai, a political affairs analyst, told Tolo News, "Since 2008, despite SIGAR's reports on administrative corruption, it was neither prevented nor eradicated." It's worth noting that SIGAR previously stated the US has provided over USD 3.83 billion in aid to Afghanistan since 2021.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump vs Russia's Medvedev: Why is US deploying nuclear submarines?
In a dramatic escalation of tensions with Russia, US President Donald Trump on Friday announced he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines, citing "provocative" remarks by Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. US President Donald Trump said on August 1, 2025, that he had ordered deployment of two nuclear submarines in response "highly provocative" comments by then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev..(AFP) The move marked a sharp departure from mere rhetorical differences to military posturing amid growing friction between the two nuclear-armed nations over the Ukraine war. 'Based on the highly provocative statements,' Donald Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' he added. Trump's public reference to submarine deployment is unusual, given the classified nature of such operations, however, it adds a new layer of seriousness to a dispute that began as online taunts but has now veered into potentially dangerous territory. Why is Donald Trump angry? The trigger for Trump's action appears to be a string of social media exchanges with Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, who on Thursday invoked the Soviet-era 'Dead Hand' automated nuclear system in a Telegram post, referencing a Cold War-era doomsday protocol, reported news agency AFP. Trump reacted strongly in an interview, saying: 'When you mention the word 'nuclear'... my eyes light up. And I say, we better be careful, because it's the ultimate threat.' In the same interview, he confirmed the submarines were 'closer to Russia' and said, 'We always want to be ready. And so I have sent to the region two nuclear submarines. I just want to make sure that his words are only words and nothing more than that.' Trump did not clarify whether the submarines were nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed, nor did he reveal their exact deployment locations. The information typically classified by the Pentagon. What Dmitry Medvedev said The war of words began earlier this week when Trump, on his social media platform, called Russia's and India's economies 'dead.' Medvedev fired back, accusing the US president of 'playing the ultimatum game' and warning that Trump 'should remember' that Russia is a formidable force. On Monday, Medvedev wrote on X: 'He [Trump] should remember the formidable potential of our country.' On Thursday, he escalated further by referencing the 'fabled 'Dead Hand'.' Trump returned fire by branding Medvedev 'the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President,' and warned: 'He's entering very dangerous territory!' Medvedev, president of Russia from 2008 to 2012, has transformed in recent years into one of the Kremlin's most provocative online voices, frequently promoting ultra-nationalist narratives. However, analysts note that his influence on actual policy is limited. Russia's nuclear moves and the Ukraine backdrop Tensions were already high before the Trump-Medvedev exchange. Hours earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow had begun mass production of the nuclear-capable Oreshnik hypersonic missile and planned to deploy them in Belarus by the end of the year. 'Work is now underway to prepare these positions,' Putin said, standing alongside Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko. 'So, most likely, we will close this issue by the end of the year,' he added. Putin also reiterated his long-standing demands for ending the war in Ukraine, saying, 'Our demands are unchanged.' He was talking about Moscow' long standing ask that Kyiv abandon its NATO ambitions and cede disputed territory. Despite US pressure, Russia's offensive in Ukraine continues. A missile and drone attack on Kyiv Thursday killed 31 people, including five children, prompting a day of mourning in the Ukrainian capital. President Volodymyr Zelensky renewed his call for direct talks with Putin. 'The United States has proposed this. Ukraine has supported it. What is needed is Russia's readiness,' Zelensky said on X. The United States and Russia collectively control about 90% of the world's nuclear weapons. The US maintains a triad of land, sea, and air-based systems, with nuclear-armed submarines on continuous patrol.
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump stakes reputation as dealmaker with tariff policy
Donald Trump is staking his reputation as a tough negotiator and slick dealmaker -- that has served him well throughout his life -- with his ultra-muscular, protectionist tariffs Friday, the White House released a picture of the US president seen with a smartphone pressed to his ear, with the caption: "Making calls. Making deals. MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"Every trade deal announced by the president, who is convinced that tariffs are both a tool and manifestation of America's economic might, is celebrated by his supporters as a show of his negotiating week's flurry of rate changes was no different. On Thursday, with the stroke of a black marker, the former real estate developer slapped fresh tariffs on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard Republican leader's backtracking, frequently setting trade deadlines only to rescind or extend them -- he most recently granted Mexico a 90-day extension -- has given rise to the mocking acronym "TACO" ("Trump always chickens out"). The jokes implying Trump is all talk and no action on trade have previously struck a nerve for the president. Not chicken But analysts believe there will be no going back this has "not chickened out," according to Josh Lipsky, an international economics expert at the Atlantic Council think told AFP the president is "following through, if not exceeding" what he vowed during his campaign in respect to Aks, a public policy analyst at Evercore ISI, said he did not anticipate a "massive shift" on the latest order, aside from some economies like Taiwan or India striking deals during the seven-day crunch negotiations leading up to the tariffs announcement, Trump struck a series of compromises, notably with the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, setting varying tax rates and touting high investments in the United States. The details of these agreements remain vague and leave the door open to key questions: Are exemptions possible? What will become of key sectors like automobiles, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors? And what of China?The US president and leaders of other countries "have reasons to avoid going into detailed agreements" explained Aks, allowing all sides to present the deals in the most positive, or least negative, way possible to their ability to conclude deals -- often with or without crucial detail -- is, for the 79-year-old Republican, an integral part of his political signature. Art form In his book "The Art of the Deal," the billionaire wrote: "Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That's how I get my kicks."Trump explained in his book that he always "protects" himself "by being flexible." "I never get too attached to one deal or one approach."But despite comments about his trade policy reversals, Trump has hardly budged from his trade strategy, and that could prove politically a survey conducted by Quinnipiac University published in mid-July, only 40 percent of respondents said they supported the president's trade policy, while 56 percent criticized it. The latest employment figures bear the marks of Trump's protectionist offensive, according to experts. Job creation in May and June was revised sharply downward, falling to levels not seen since the Covid-19 pandemic.
