
Tougher transshipment penalties not expected immediately as Trump tariffs kick in, sources say
Southeast Asian countries including Vietnam and Thailand have been explicitly targeted by White House officials for their alleged role in facilitating the so-called transshipment to America of Chinese goods, which would face higher tariffs if shipped directly from China.
The Trump administration imposed tariffs on goods from dozens of countries from Thursday, and in an executive order said products determined to have been illegally rerouted to conceal their country of origin would face additional duties of 40%. But it did not clarify what constitutes transshipment.
U.S. imports from Southeast Asia's biggest economies, which rely heavily on exports, are now subject to tariff rates of about 19%, most of those significantly reduced from earlier threatened rates.
Existing U.S. customs guidance states goods from countries with no free trade agreements with Washington, such as Southeast Asian nations, can be labelled as made in the country where they undergo a "substantial transformation" of components, even if those parts entirely come from another country, such as China.
And with no new U.S. guidance on rules of origin or specification on what transshipment means, some officials in Southeast Asia have told exporters existing rules apply.
That effectively limits cases of transshipment to illegal activities, like the use of forged export certificates or documents obtained illicitly.
"Currently, all exported goods (from Thailand) are subject to a 19% rate because there are no rules on transshipment yet," Arada Fuangtong, head of the Thai Commerce Ministry's foreign trade department, told Reuters on Thursday.
Her message was echoed by U.S. officials in Vietnam who told businessmen the tariff of 20% would apply to Vietnamese goods, even if they are entirely made with Chinese components and only assembled in Vietnam, according to one person familiar with those talks.
Trade consultants have said rules are vague and they have advised clients, even before the new wave of U.S. tariffs, to have at least 40% of local content for their exports to the U.S. That is "to be on the safe side", one of them said.
The U.S. embassy in Vietnam did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside U.S. working hours.
"Goods defined by U.S. customs as transshipped are subject to 40% duties, but pending any new definition, that's limited to old definitions," said a Vietnam-based consultant.
Both people declined to be named in order to speak more freely.
According to the U.S. customs guidance, repackaging does not usually cause a "substantial transformation", but assembly may, depending on the complexity of the operations.
It is unclear if this narrow interpretation of transshipment could be enforced in other countries.
Economic ministries in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Singapore did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the issue.
Manufacturers in Southeast Asia, which rely heavily on Chinese components, have been in the dark for months on what Washington would consider transshipment.
Questions remain over whether that would include goods with a large, but yet undefined, share of components or raw materials from China, even when they are legitimately transformed in Southeast Asian nations.
A strict definition of transshipment may come later, multiple investment consultants warned.
An executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump last week said the U.S. will "publish every six months a list of countries and specific facilities used in circumvention schemes".
That will "inform public procurement, national security reviews, and commercial due diligence", it said.
"The message from Washington is deterrence," said Marco Forster, director for Southeast Asia at investment consultancy Dezan Shira and Associates.
"If your supply chain cuts corners, it won't be treated as a technical error. It'll be treated as fraud."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Malaysia must stop saying one thing and doing another
In his first year in office as Foreign Secretary, David Lammy has made an astonishing 47 trips abroad. One of the most recent stamps on his diplomatic passport is from Malaysia, where he attended the 58th ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting on 12 July. Opened by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, in the official communique, Anwar underlined the principle of 'centrality' as ASEAN's guiding message, emphasising the need to ensure that, as one international scholar put it, the Southeast Asian organisation should be the engine which empowers 'the evolving regional architecture of the Asia Pacific'. While in Malaysia, Mr Lammy paid a separate courtesy call to the prime minister. Pleasantries and gifts were exchanged, while the prime minister tweeted his delight at the meeting, lauding the upgrade in relations between Malaysia and the UK. In the tweet, Anwar also commended the fact that the UK and Malaysia now benefit from a 'strategic partnership', and that the relationship was 'increasingly mature and strategic, grounded in shared values – justice, the rule of law, and universal humanity'. Honourable and self-congratulatory those sentiments may be, but they are some way removed from the reality of Malaysia's current politics. There has been a bundle of oppressive legislation tabled in Malaysia, the main aim of which appears to be to curtail freedom of expression and media freedom. Anwar's government plans to introduce amendments to the Printing Presses and Publications Act, which, if introduced, will enable the Government to widen the scope of so-called 'undesirable publications' to include those which alight on sensitive issues related to religion, race, and royalty, already a tricolon of controversy in Malaysia. Commentators have noted that the new legislation would be just one of many steps taken to restrict freedom of speech and the media by Anwar's coalition. Promises first made in his party's manifesto to repeal draconian legislation, including the Sedition Act and Multimedia Act, remain on Anwar's campaign website, but somehow appear to be missing at the cabinet table. This chipping away at the rule of law and curbing media freedom and freedom of expression can find no greater epitomisation than in UK journalist Clare Rewcastle Brown, who uncovered the 1MDB scandal, exposing corruption in her famed Sarawak Report. While she has been the target of abusive lawsuits in Malaysia since she first exposed corruption there, under Anwar's aegis, Clare has been sentenced, in absentia, to two years imprisonment on a bogus defamation charge without being told she was to be put on trial. Anxious to appeal, she cannot clear her name as she must attend the court in Malaysia in person. While journalists in many countries have been the target of SLAPPS (strategic lawsuits designed to muzzle them), Clare's case takes this to a new level. Anwar's election was an attempt by Malaysia's electorate to shed light on the long shadow cast by former premier Najib Razak. The hope was that Anwar would oversee an executive who abided by the rule of law, shunned corruption, and lived by the values of a democracy. Yet, within the last three years, Anwar has placed a satirical cartoonist under a travel ban, allowed a British journalist to be tried and found guilty in absentia (with a prison sentence tacked on) for exposing the corruption of the previous government, and promoted a raft of censorious legislation which tightens his grip on civil society and weakens the checks and balances that freedom of speech, the rule of law and media freedom all provide for a flourishing western democracy. It has been said that politicians campaign in poetry and govern in prose. Anwar Ibrahim has campaigned on the promise of reform and governed in breach of that promise. Clare is another on the list of British citizens, like Jimmy Lai and Alaa Abd El Fattah, who are being punished by foreign Governments simply because they do not like their journalism. The Foreign Secretary should be using every opportunity to press their case. That need is even greater when it comes to a 'strategic partner' and Commonwealth country like Malaysia. Mere months before he took office, David Lammy spoke of how easy it is to take the rule of law for granted when it remains a foreign concept in many parts of the world. He can now use the influence of his office to translate that foreign concept to the government of Malaysia and help its citizens enjoy the freedom of expression that we here in the UK take for granted.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Israeli military says two projectiles 'likely' launched from Gaza into Israel
JERUSALEM, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The Israeli military said on Sunday that two projectiles were "likely" launched from Gaza and crossed into Israel. Interception attempts were made, but the results of the interception are under review, the military said.


Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Our pharma industry powerhouses need emergency treatment
Most of Donald Trump's tariffs look likely to settle around the 15pc mark, a level that can be absorbed into the global trading system without too much disruption. But the President appears determined to bring pharmaceutical manufacturing back on shore, using punitive tariffs where necessary. It might start with a few percentage points. But very quickly it will ramp up. The UK needs to find a way of making sure we are exempt from that – otherwise one of our most valuable industries may very soon be lost completely. Amid all the noise over his range of import levies, the constant changes of plan, and the boasting about 'great deals', President Trump has at least been consistent on one point. He thinks medicines should be manufactured within the United States. 'In one year, one and a half years maximum, it's going to go to 150pc and then it's going to go to 250pc because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump announced last week. With levies on that scale, in effect the major drug companies won't have any choice. They will have to manufacture within the United States, or else their profits in the world's largest market for medicines will be completely wiped out. There are a handful of countries that will be hit, and arguably more so than the UK. Switzerland is already reeling from the 39pc tariffs that Trump has imposed on the country, a move that may well plunge its fabulously wealthy economy into a rare recession, and drugs are one of its major exports.