How young is too young to have a smartphone? 5 of the biggest parenting questions about smartphones, answered.
Smartphones are an everyday part of our culture, but research on the effects of screen time might give parents pause when it comes to giving their children one of their own. Even so, smartphones allow parents to reach their children in an emergency, students to access educational materials at the stroke of a finger, and kids to find community, especially when peers of certain identity groups may be hard to find locally.
Of course, with each benefit comes a new digital risk. Parents must manage to keep their children safe while they're online. Monitoring their child's content consumption is also important to ensure their phones don't interrupt their sleep, which can induce added stress, or impact their socialization—not to mention potential impacts on their childhood and imagination.
Spokeo reviewed academic research from Stanford University and other institutions and survey data to help answer some of the most pressing questions facing parents considering when to give their children a smartphone.
For Dr. Ryan Sultan, an adult and child psychiatrist and the medical director of Integrative Psych in Manhattan, the most important thing parents can do is show children what a healthy relationship with digital devices looks like.
"Model behavior that you want them to be doing," Sultan told Stacker. "So use your phone at the times that you think it is appropriate—use it for the appropriate things. If you want them to be doing things other than using their phone, then you have to get that going with them. You have to be doing those things with them."
Teaching healthy behaviors, however, can take time.
"For younger children, it's best to delay personal phone ownership until they demonstrate readiness for boundaries that prioritize their sleep and health," said Dr. Lizzie Benge, a sleep medicine physician and faculty member at Harvard Medical School's Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, in an email to Stacker.
A Stanford Medicine study found that when children reach 10 years old, the number of their peers who acquire their first phone increases rapidly until about age 12.5. The average age at which a child receives their first phone is 11.6. By the time American children become teens, nearly all (95%) have access to a phone, according to the Pew Research Center.
There isn't a clear answer to when a child should get a phone, according to Sultan, but the age continues to rise.
"Thirteen is when I would consider giving my kid a phone, for parents who are worried about locating their child all the time," Sultan said.
From a sleep perspective, Benge said children younger than 12 haven't learned how to regulate their phone use responsibly.
"Introducing phones too early, particularly before middle school, can disrupt sleep cycles due to blue light exposure, which suppresses melatonin production and delays sleep onset."
Sultan suggests allowing supervised screen time until a parent officially gives their child a phone or using smartwatches that allow texting and phone calls but not social media.
Even though smart devices can help families communicate and locate each other, Sultan does not recommend giving children access to social media.
"The concern we have with social media is that it was designed to pull you in and keep you in it," he said. "And it's still designed that way, giving you essentially a dopamine hit, which is similar to addiction. We also know that kids' brains are more prone to the circuit of addiction because they're not as developed."
Experts suggest setting clear boundaries based on family values before handing children their first phones. Additionally, it is recommended to set parental controls on the device and make sure children know they must ask permission to download new apps. It can also be helpful to set guidelines for all family members, such as no screens during dinner or turning off notifications while doing homework.
Benge also suggested implementing a no-phone policy one to two hours before bed, a centralized charging station in a common area to keep phones outside of bedrooms at night, and daily screen time limits.
Protecting a child's privacy can start before they're even given a phone. Sheryl Ziegler, a licensed clinical child psychologist, suggests parents adjust the device's privacy and security settings beforehand.
Benge also recommends parents talk to their children about the risks of sharing personal information online, using parental controls to help avoid inappropriate apps or content, and "maintaining open communication about online behavior to foster trust and reduce the mental burden of secrecy or fear."
Although Sultan recommends keeping children off social media for as long as possible, if a parent feels their child is ready, he suggests starting their account with limited functionality intended for younger individuals. Additionally, Instagram, for example, now has teen accounts for people aged 13 to 17 that automatically set their account to private and don't allow private messages from people they're not connected to.
While children don't have any legal rights to privacy online from their parents, there still is a line to toe. Each family can determine the extent of parental monitoring based on each child's needs.
"If you think your child might be the victim of a predator, is having suicidal thoughts, or has a drug addiction, then monitoring the child's communication and devices seems like an obvious step towards protecting them," Elizabeth Burke, a child advocate attorney, said in a 2020 interview with the nonprofit childhood independence organization Let Grow. "The trickier area is things like is your child being bullied or bullying other kids on social media?"
Additionally, if you're giving your child an iPhone, when you set up the phone, you can use features like Screen Time to limit and monitor how much time they spend using the device. You can also set content restrictions by age and prevent app store and in-app purchases.
For Android phones, parents can set up a Google account for their child with Family Link, which allows them to set screen limits. Apps like Qustodio also allow parents to monitor how their child uses their phone, as well as control screen limits. As an extra layer of parental monitoring, Sultan suggests having children under 16 share their passwords with their parents.
Story editing by Shanna Kelly. Copy editing by Paris Close. Photo selection by Lacy Kerrick.
This story originally appeared on Spokeo and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Controversial researchers claim second ‘hidden city' found beneath Egypt's pyramids: report
The researchers who claimed to have found a vast underground city beneath Egypt's Great Pyramids doubled down on the wild theory Tuesday by saying they've found a second 'hidden city.' Italian and Scottish scientists studying the pyramid of Khafre say their radar system has uncovered another subterranean complex linking the structure to the Khufu and Menkaur pyramids, as well as the Great Sphinx, the Daily Mail reported. Filippo Biondi, a radar expert from Scotland's University of Strathclyde, claimed there was a 90% chance that the structures were connected — despite the research being lambasted by experts who slammed the findings as 'fake' and utterly lacking in scientific basis. Advertisement 4 A team of researchers believe they've found two underground cities connecting the Great Pyramids of Giza. 4 The team claims a layout of the land and radar scan reveal massive, vertical shafts beneath the pyramids. Khafre Project 'We firmly believe that the Giza structures are interconnected, reinforcing our view that the pyramids are merely the tip of the iceberg of a colossal underground infrastructural complex,' Biondi told the Mail. The team's research, which has yet to be peer-reviewed or published in any scientific journal, made waves back in March when they claimed to have found 2,000-foot-long vertical shafts underneath the Khafre pyramid. Advertisement The scientists still haven't presented a purpose for what the structures were used for, only speculating that they were built by a lost ancient civilization around 38,000 years ago. Egypt's three Great Pyramids, however, were only built around 4,500 years ago. 4 The research connects with a theory that an ancient civilization existed beneath the wonders of the world. Khafre Project Advertisement The scientists also claim they made the discoveries using satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) technology, which led Dr. Zahi Hawass, a renowned archaeologist and Egypt's former minister of antiquities, to slam the whole research as 'bulls–t.' SAR technology can only penetrate the ground by at most 10 inches, which would make it impossible for researchers to find data on shafts 2,000 feet below ground, Hawass and other experts explained. 'The claim of using radar inside the pyramid is false, and the techniques employed are neither scientifically approved nor validated,' he told the National, slamming the project as 'fake news.' 4 Egypt's pyramids remain a fascination for many around the world. REUTERS Advertisement Despite the scientific consensus, the team's research has reignited interests in ancient Egypt and speculation that there are still many secrets waiting to be uncovered under the sands. Fanatics of ancient Egypt continue to search for the fabled Hall of Records, a hidden library believed to be underneath the pyramid complex or the Great Sphinx containing resources of information about the ancient people. The rumor originated from self-proclaimed clairvoyant Edgar Cayce, an American who claimed in the 1930s that refugees from Atlantis built the library to preserve their history.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
HSPPR receives $100K grant to address lack of veterinary care in excluded communities
(SOUTHERN COLORADO) — The Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region (HSPPR) has received a $100,000 grant to address barriers in accessing veterinary care in Pueblo. Many communities have been left out of the veterinary care services altogether due to rising costs combined with geographical, cultural, and other barriers. While many American households include pets, access to basic veterinary services has not kept pace. 'Pets are universally considered important family members and keeping them together requires resources that are often missing,' HSPPR wrote. 'This is particularly felt in many underserved communities where not only cost, but geography and systemic inequities have left veterinary care beyond reach.' In 2023, PetSmart Charities committed $100 million over the next five years toward improving access to veterinary care. The grant focuses on historically excluded communities, according to HSPPR, many of which lack access to community supports, including veterinary services. HSPPR was chosen to receive a grant to address barriers in accessing veterinary care in East Side Pueblo. 'HSPPR is excited to partner with PetSmart Charities and the East Side Pueblo community on this innovative initiative, which will help identify the community's most pressing pet care needs,' said Lisa Johns, HSPPR Director of Veterinary Services. 'HSPPR will work alongside community members and local partners to fill those gaps, with the ultimate goal of bringing additional resources, including affordable access to veterinary care, to the people of East Side Pueblo.' The grant is designed to give veterinary organizations a one-year runway to build relationships with and deepen their understanding of their partner community. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China is only 3-6 months behind US in AI, Trump official says
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -China is three to six months behind the United States in artificial intelligence, White house AI and crypto czar David Sacks said Tuesday at an event in Washington, warning that excess U.S. AI regulation could damage American innovation in the industry. "China is not years and years behind us in AI. Maybe they're 3-6 months,' said Sacks, speaking at the AWS summit in Washington. "It's a very close race."