NATO's 'grotesque gesture at glorified baby' Trump covers up alarming threat
There are many indignities a NATO Secretary General might endure in the name of diplomacy - backroom compromises, bruising negotiations, and the occasional awkward photo op with despots in suits.
But calling Donald Trump 'daddy' isn't one of them. At least, it never was until Mark Rutte arrived.
The former Dutch prime minister and now NATO's top official referred to Trump as 'daddy' -
a grotesque, grovelling gesture that might have raised eyebrows in a diplomatic dispatch
but instead exploded into public farce during a high-stakes summit of alliance leaders.
'Sometimes daddy has to use strong words,' Rutte beamed, defending Trump's crude outburst in front of reporters, where the president shouted, 'They don't know what the f--- they're doing,' in reference to the Iran-Israel ceasefire fiasco he claims to have masterminded. It comes as
new dementia fears were raised about Donald Trump after viewers spotted a mysterious clue in his suit
.
Read More
Related Articles
Lip reader reveals world leaders' brutal 6-letter gossip about Trump
Read More
Related Articles
Donald Trump branded 'dumbest President ever' after six-word comment about Congo
Forget diplomacy. Forget leadership. NATO, under Rutte, has started to resemble a glorified babysitting service for a toddler with nuclear launch codes.
It would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous. Rutte's nauseating sycophancy is not just a personal humiliation, it's a strategic collapse.
Trump posing with other world leaders
(Image: AFP via Getty Images)
At a moment when the alliance should be asserting its independence and clarity of mission, it has instead wrapped itself around Trump's ego like a silk cravat on a noose.
Gone is the guarded caution of past NATO heads. In its place, we now have something akin to Joseph Goebbels writing fan mail to Hitler - an image that feels uncomfortably close when you read the actual text message Rutte sent to Trump, which the president gleefully published.
'Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran,' Rutte wrote, referring to Trump's unilateral bombing campaign.
'That was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer.'
It doesn't. And Rutte surely knows that.
The strikes were condemned as reckless and 'unwise and unnecessary' by senior officials, who warned they could provoke the very conflict they were supposedly meant to deter.
Trump's claim to have held the Israel-Iran ceasefire together lasted barely 24 hours. Rutte's message, meanwhile, read less like praise and more like erotic fiction.
'You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening… Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment… You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done.'
Who knew the nuclear deterrence strategy of the West hinged on breathless love notes?
What makes Rutte's behaviour particularly grotesque is the sheer hypocrisy of it.
As Dutch prime minister, he consistently failed to meet NATO's defence spending target of two per cent of gross domestic product.
Now, in his desperate quest to stay in Trump's favour, he's bragging about getting European leaders to commit to a staggering five per cent of GDP on defence - a militaristic fantasy straight from Trump's own wet dreams.
Rutte has gone from pragmatic European liberal to a kind of grinning courtier, performing loyalty rituals for an emperor with no clothes.
President Donald Trump seemed to get red-faced
(Image: Getty Images)
He's not the only one, of course. NATO leaders have spent the latest summit tiptoeing around Trump like terrified interns trying not to spill coffee on a tantrum-prone CEO.
The summit was stripped down to three hours. The official communique was slashed to a single page. Not to streamline diplomacy, but to avoid provoking Trump into one of his trademark rage exits.
It would be comical if the stakes weren't existential.
The alliance was forged to deter tyranny, defend liberal democracy, and confront authoritarianism. Under Rutte, it is flirting with all three.
The Secretary General's job is to unify 31 nations in a common cause, not whisper sweet nothings to a man who once threatened to pull America out of the alliance entirely.
What kind of message does this send to allies? To Russia? To Iran? To China? That NATO no longer leads, it follows - not strategy, not principle, but personality.
And that the only way to hold the West together is to soothe the tantrums of a man who treats global diplomacy like reality TV.
We can't afford this. NATO is not Mar-a-Lago with fighter jets. Its credibility is fragile, its mission vital, and its unity under threat from within.
Mark Rutte was supposed to bring experience and backbone to the role. Instead, he's turned NATO into a stage for Trump's delusions.
While porn star Stormy Daniels may have once called Trump 'daddy', Rutte's humiliation came without even taking off his clothes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 26th: On Israel's relationship with Ireland, Donald Trump and food labels
Sir, – Recent debate within Ireland regarding the Middle East has been reductive and almost exclusively unipolar, led by Tánaiste Simon Harris, whose rhetoric has at times been ugly. Indeed the entire political establishment, along with mainstream social media, backed up by the @X brigade and the unions, have contributed to the toxic, hostile environment in Ireland towards Israel. It is impossible to know exactly to what extent this mirrors public opinion. While there are many critical voices in Europe, some justified for sure, about aspects of Israel's war against Hamas, Hizbullah and now their paymaster, Iran itself, in no other European country has this been as openly and aggressively venomous towards the Jewish state as in Ireland. This antagonism resulted in the withdrawal of the Israeli embassy from Ireland. READ MORE Ireland has taken this path while at the same time fetishising over Palestine and Iran, the latter being the West's largest terror threat. Most countries – some silently – are cheering Israel for having the guts to dismantle the nuclear threat. The war will eventually end. The deep freeze between Ireland and Israel might never do so. Does this matter? Israel has one of the most sophisticated global industrial, technological and scientific reach of any country. The compound fracture with Israel may damage not just the Irish economy but also, for example, the welfare of patients in hospital beds, deprived of the latest medical advances. Maybe Ireland will be judged as the champion of the oppressed, a success story hailed by the more radical pro-Palestinian and pro-Iranian movement; but if so, what are the long-term implications? Will its long-held reputation as a country of a céad mile fáilte for all visitors regardless of race, religion or nationality be forever tarnished? – Yours, etc, Dr ED ABRAHAMSON, Cornwall, England. Sir, – Watching desperate men, women and children in Gaza scrambling with their containers towards food relief trucks daily on our television screens is very distressing. Then you hear many of these desperate people have been shot at by the Israeli army. When asked why, the army's comment is always: 'We are looking into it.' As yet I still have to hear the results of their investigations. – Yours, etc, EILEEN BANNAN, Letterkenny, Co Donegal . Sir, – Referring to Israel's breaches of the obligation to respect human rights enshrined in Article 2 of its free trade agreement with the European Union, Kajia Kallas, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, is apparently prepared to consider 'a proposal' to restrict trade between EU states and 'violent settlers' in occupied Palestine. However, she stresses that the idea is not to 'punish' Israel, but pressure it to 'change course' (' Spain's foreign minister renews call for EU to suspend Israel trade deal ,' June 24th). Two anomalies strike me here. Firstly, under the Fourth Geneva Convention, all settlers in occupied Palestine are illegal, and not just violent ones. When the trade agreement with Israel was signed in 1995, Israel had already built numerous illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and many of the settlers were violent – hence the agreement itself was arguably illegal from the start. Secondly, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism, endorsed by the Irish Government, condemns 'applying double standards [to Israel] by requiring of it a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation'. Would any other state violating the terms of a trade agreement with the EU be told nicely that the idea is not to 'punish' it, but pressure it to 'change course'? If not, is this not a serious example of double standards? – Yours, etc, RAYMOND DEANE, Broadstone, Dublin 7. Trump and the ceasefire Sir, – Your correspondent, Keith Duggan, is to be commended for at least trying to report on US president Donald Trump's leadership style in an objective manner. He has broken with the anti-Trump consensus in the Irish media without becoming a Trump supporter. Referring to the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, he says: 'But the radical switch of fortunes suggested that Trump's uncanny instinct for whom to back, and when, had served him well again. 'The ceasefire declaration was arguably the most statesmanlike delivery of Trump's political life – he didn't feel the need to mention himself even once.' (' Israel-Iran ceasefire announcement shows Trump's uncanny ability to shape the narrative ,' June 24th). I believe Trump was wrong to authorise the US intervention in Israel's war on Iran while his efforts to end the aggression are to be welcomed. But whatever about that, reporting that pulls us back from simplistic group-think deserves support, especially in the context of current politics in the US. – Yours, etc, DAVID ALVEY, Daingean, Co Offaly. Sir, – Does the US president's use of the expletive legitimise it? It looked like a Father Jack moment to me. – Yours, etc, CORMAC MEEHAN, Bundoran, Co Donegal. Sir, –When recently referring to the actions of Israel and Iran, Donald Trump said that 'they don't know what the f**k they are doing'. Coming from him that is quite a statement. –Yours etc BRIAN CULLEN , Rathfarnham, Dublin 16. A beef over food labelling Sir, – Regarding Conor Pope's article on the farmers' campaign to stop plant-based producers from using terms like 'sausage' and 'burger' (' Farmers accuse vegan food makers of hijacking sausages ,' June 25th), the logic, it seems, is to save the public from the shock of discovering a vegan sausage contains – heaven forbid –no pig. If we're to pursue such linguistic purity, surely the dead animal industry should embrace radical honesty too. After all, 'pork' and 'beef' are just euphemisms that soften the reality of what's on our plates. Let's police food language with gusto and transparency for all – so everyone knows exactly what they're eating, whether it once oinked, mooed, or sprouted in a field. Imagine a burger packet simply declaring: 'Contains connective tissue mechanically extracted from the dead body of a slaughtered cow. Producing this burger generated about 9.7 kg of CO2 emissions – over 20 times more than a plant-based patty – and contributed to deforestation and climate change. Regular consumption of red and processed meat is also linked to higher risks of heart disease and cancer. Now that's labelling you can't misunderstand. – Yours, etc, LOUISA MOSS, Annamoe Road, Dublin 7. Sir, – My understanding is that sausages and other such food products were traditionally made with whatever was to hand and often what might otherwise have been unusable – a great diversity. They might include non-meat products such as oatmeal. The shape of the product – sausage, burger or whatever – was what defined the product. It therefore seems the real cynicism is for meat producers to seek to ban vegan and veggie products which use such labels. A pork sausage has pork in it, a veggie sausage has vegetable and presumably grain products, both with flavourings. There is no need to be silly about sausages. – Yours, etc, ROB FAIRMICHAEL, Ballynafeigh, Belfast. An egregious solution Sir, – Thank you to Cathy Dillon for her well-crafted piece in An Irishwoman's Diary (June 23d), and for helping me find the solution to 13 across in Simplex, with her use of the word 'egregious'. – Yours, etc, JOE CARROLL, Bellurgan Point, Dundalk. Putting the cart before the horse Sir, –The Taoiseach has brought a 10- year plan, costing multi millions, to Cabinet to develop the GPO and O'Connell Street. No modern city can properly function without key frontline workers such as gardaí, teachers, nurses, firefighters etc. Dublin rents are now among the highest in the world and are not affordable for these workers. The result is long, stressful and expensive commutes. These vital people are voting with their feet and are choosing to work anywhere but Dublin, with large numbers emigrating or leaving their chosen profession. What a complete waste of talent and money. Surely it is a case of putting the cart before the horse? Start with a viable solution to the accommodation crisis for key workers to live near their place of work. A 24/7 Garda presence on O'Connell Street and neighbouring streets is surely the first step to bringing O'Connell Street back to its former glory. – Yours, etc, PASCHAL TAGGART, Rathgar, Dublin 6. Sir, – The comments from the Dublin City Council project manager are frustrating but, sadly, no longer surprising ('College Green plaza redevelopment budget soars to €80 million,'June 24th). A 700 per cent increase in the budget for the long-promised College Green pedestrianisation, and completion now unlikely before 2030? It is hard to see this as anything other than a failure of basic project management, leadership and accountability. To make matters worse, 40 per cent of the current budget is being classified as 'contingency' – which reads less like prudent planning and more like an admission that those in charge have little to no confidence in their own financial planning. Thirteen-plus years to pedestrianise a city street is not just an embarrassment – it reflects the broader inefficiency and dysfunction that increasingly characterise how we approach public projects in this country. Our city and our citizens deserve much better. – Yours, etc, PETER LYNN, Sandymount, Dublin 4. Sir, – Your editorial (' Creating a new city centre space ,' June 24th) on the escalating cost of the College Green Plaza redevelopment misses the real crisis: stalling projects like this has stifled cycling, robbing citizens of health benefits. Cycling slashes risk of death from heart disease and dementia by 30-40 per cent, yet delays keep our streets unsafe and lacking a joined-up network of protected bike lanes. Plans like this will change hostile environments into ones that are safe, enabling Dubliners to choose healthy mobility. As cycle infrastructure projects wallow in planning purgatory, every year lost costs lives, not just euro. – Yours, etc, Dr SHANE O'HANLON, Terenure, Dublin 6. Electric cars in the slow lane Sir, – Bernard Farrelly (Letters, June 25th) is so right to point out the lack of high-speed chargers available around the national road network. Not only do the drivers of electric vehicles have to wait to fill up while their fellow petrol and diesel road users are done and dusted in two or three minutes, but they must also grapple with very rigid and heavy charging cables which are sometimes too short, a different machine and app for every service station and the inability to just pay by tap and go. When encountering yet another new EV charging provider on your journey you have to register online, verify by email and figure out what code on the charger may or may not need to be scanned. All this in the furthest flung corner of the service station and fully open to the elements. If the Government wishes to ramp up the number of electric cars on the road at pace, they might want to make sure filling up with electricity is at least as easy as filling up with liquid fuel. – Yours, etc, JOE FAHY, Dangan, Galway. Alcohol and labelling Sir, – Regarding the labelling of alcohol products in Ireland, I suggest using a similar strategy to that employed by Norway with regards to its oil industry. Norway exports oil products all over the world, while at the same time protecting its citizens from local pollution from those oil products by subsidising one of the most widespread electric vehicle systems in the world. Ireland could do similar with alcohol labelling. Produce a special label specifically for the Irish market, while exporting without our specific labelling to the rest of the world. The cost of Irish-specific labelling can be paid for by the enormous volume of export product currently going all over the world. Would it cost 1/2 cent extra on an export bottle to pay for the Irish labelling? An Irish solution to an Irish problem. – Yours, etc, DAVID DORAN, Co Carlow. Supporting the Civil Service Sir, – Eddie Molloy, (Letters, June 21st) emerged from his redoubt to fire off a virtual scattergun criticism of the entire Civil Service administration. He says with admirable confidence that the service suffers 'administrative incompetence and inertia', segueing effortlessly into the 'fact' that the Civil Service is not up to the job. As a former civil servant, there was a recognition that there tended to be a cyclical attack on the public service, akin to the life cycle of cicadas, ie about every 15 years. Does Mr Molloy not recall any or all of the incredible private sector fails by banks, building societies and other financial institutions in the relatively recent past, that almost brought the country to its knees, beholden to the International Monetary Fund? On another front, the Department of Health and the Health Service Executive, during the Covid pandemic, steadied the nation's nerve and brought us through an unprecedented crisis. Later on, certain individuals and groups, who should have known better, began a campaign to denigrate those who had worked tirelessly until the serious threat had receded, suggesting that the essential restrictions had been largely unnecessary. I am all for valid criticism, but generalised 'certainties' are never sustainable. – Yours, etc, PATRICK JUDGE, Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin. Short letters Sir, – Regarding the letter about The Irish Times publishing longer letters as opposed to shorter ones: Short letters rule, OK. – Yours, etc, JOHN ROGERS, Rathowen, Co Westmeath.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Satire dead as Trump makes peace
The ceasefire between Israel and Iran appears to be holding at the time of writing, though the swiftness of unfolding events in the Middle East has often made a mockery of presumption in the past. The two nations' exchange of missiles was a worrying escalation in a region not short of hair-trigger tempers, so we should not belittle anyone who is seeking to calm the situation. The performance of US president Donald Trump in these circumstances, however, bears closer inspection. Many readers will be familiar by now with the clip of Mr Trump using bad language in describing Israel and Iran; it is a soundbite that will probably play well with his base, and he may plausibly justify his choice of words while portraying himself as a peacemaker. That was surely part of the motivation for his outspokenness, particularly as it came before his trip to the annual meeting of Nato this week in Holland. Depicting himself as a peace broker would surely have bolstered Mr Trump's authority with his Nato allies, particularly as he is keen to get those allies contributing more to Nato's running costs. That authority was undermined by American intelligence reports suggesting the recent US missile attack on Iran did not obliterate that country's nuclear capability, as claimed, but merely set it back by a few months (reports Mr Trump immediately contradicted). It may not be coincidental that this week, Nato countries have accepted the need to contribute more revenue — but some at least have avoided being bound to Mr Trump's spending targets. This last development may have real-world implications in the future, but for now we are still processing extraordinary scenes: The US president cursing about other countries on air, and rubbishing his own intelligence services' findings, would have fuelled a month's worth of headlines at any other time. This week those stories were outdone by a US politician nominating Mr Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize because of the Iran-Israel ceasefire. When Henry Kissinger was nominated for that award, comedian Tom Lehrer declared satire dead. This week we learned that it is not dead but decomposing. Concrete supply: Infrastructure woes continue It is widely accepted that one of the great challenges of modern Irish life is the pressure on our national infrastructure. Energy is an obvious concern, not just because of our fragile energy security due to our location, but also due to the vast amounts of electricity consumed by data centres. Water supply is another ongoing headache, not least because of the various travails of Uisce Éireann ever since that body was founded. Now, we have learned that another key element in creating and maintaining large-scale infrastructure is in trouble. Engineering consultancy firm RPS carried out a study for the Irish Concrete Federation, which found replenishment rates of quarries are inadequate — currently they are running at 61% of the annual consumption. The study also found that planning permission was refused for over half of the volume of proposed extraction of sand, stone, and gravel in greater Dublin between 2017 and last year — while there have also been delays in obtaining planning permission to extend quarries or get permission for new sites. One does not need to be a civil engineer to realise that if supplies of sand, stone, and gravel dwindle, then there are obvious implications for our building capacity. It is notable that the lack of planning permissions is a key issue here, thus echoing the comments of the ESRI's Seán O'Driscoll in these pages recently. He pointed out then that the Government needed to accept that there was a 'national crisis in Irish infrastructure' if progress was to be achieved, and this study adds weight to that claim. Unfortunately, the response from the current administration does not seem to acknowledge that crisis. The Government will engage with the concrete industry about their concerns, according to housing minister James Browne, but he added that the independent planning system also has to take its 'natural course'. The various shambles we have witnessed in our planning system over the years do not depict that 'natural course' in a flattering light. The 'business as usual' approach on show here is the last response needed for a national crisis. Glastonbury festival: Kneecap drama The Glastonbury festival opened yesterday, with thousands of fans pouring into the venue to see their favourite musicians. This year there is an edge of controversy in the presence of Belfast band Kneecap; band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh faces a terrorism charge for allegedly displaying a Hezbollah flag at a London show last year. British prime minister Keir Starmer said this week that it is not 'appropriate' for the band to perform at Glastonbury, while Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has said the BBC — which normally broadcasts many of the acts at the festival — should not show Kneecap's performance. Belfast band Kneecap. It was not clear at press time whether the BBC would show the Belfast band or wait until nearer the time to make a decision — Kneecap are due to play on Saturday. It is not for us to wonder that an experienced lawyer such as Mr Starmer should be expressing opinions which might be prejudicial to Mr Ó hAnnaidh's case. But we are hardly the only people who feel that British politicians surely have better things to do than complain about Kneecap. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork crime series reveals a city divided by neglect of the northside
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump meets Zelenskyy and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the Nato summit and suggested that increased spending by the transatlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its neighbours. Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending. That target had been 2% of GDP. 'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after meeting with Zelenskyy. 'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.' The US president also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022. 'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Trump said. 'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia'.' Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis's funeral. Trump also had a major confrontation with Zelenskyy earlier this year at the White House. Zelenskyy, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Trump for the US assistance. 'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Zelenskyy added. Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile systems. Donald Trump gestures during a press conference after the plenary session at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Trump said. Advertisement 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.' Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth towards the Ukrainian reporter. 'That's a very good question,' Trump said about the query about Patriots. 'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.' Ukraine has been front and centre at recent Nato summits. But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Zelenskyy was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato. The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war. During Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly conflict that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Putin and Zelenskyy. Zelenskyy spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.
