
The problem with ‘Are you proud to be an American?'
Advertisement
I'll take a pass on jumping into the left-vs.-right ideological scuffle (
Advertisement
The wording of that question has always struck me as awkward and ambiguous. It confuses very different feelings — gratitude, approval, and identity — by jumbling them into a single, emotionally charged term.
The phrase 'proud to be an American' has been a staple of America's civic vocabulary for decades. It was famously enshrined in Lee Greenwood's 1984 anthem, '
Gallup has been asking the question in essentially the same form for over two decades, making it a useful barometer of national sentiment. And yet, looked at closely, the question is clumsy. Respondents aren't being asked about their pride in America, or America's achievements, or America's values. The question Gallup keeps polling is about people's pride in being American. But what does it mean to be proud of something you didn't choose or achieve?
Advertisement
Most Americans were born in this country, which is no more of an accomplishment than being born in February. The case is different for naturalized immigrants, who become Americans by choice, often devoting much time, effort, and commitment to do so. For them, 'being an American' is indeed an achievement for which they're entitled to feel proud. That is because pride, to be meaningful, requires agency: You are entitled to be proud of the things you have done, the learning you have acquired, the contributions you have made — but not of mere accidents of birth you had no say in.
What makes far more sense, in this context, is to ask about gratitude. Americans can and should feel grateful for the freedoms, opportunities, and protections afforded to them by virtue of living in this country. Similarly, Americans can and should express admiration for what their country stands for, or what it has achieved, without reducing that feeling to shallow self-congratulation for being born here.
When Gallup,
The question functions as a proxy for loyalty and belonging, for emotional identification with the nation. Respondents aren't being asked about status but about solidarity. What is being measured is a kind of affective nationalism: Do you feel positively about being an American? Do you embrace that identity in an era when many feel disillusioned or alienated from their government and fellow citizens?
The question is slippery. It allows critics to pounce on a decline in 'pride' as evidence of disloyalty or lack of patriotism. And it invites supporters to wave the flag without reckoning seriously with what pride in being an American should actually entail. To be sure, there are
Advertisement
Uncritical pride is not the mark of a healthy patriotism. The British writer G.K. Chesterton warned against just such confusion when he observed: ''
The German-born
The decline in 'pride to be an American' doesn't necessarily mean Americans are growing less patriotic. More likely it reflects frustration with the nation's faults and with the political leadership that enables them. As the plunge in pride among Democrats indicates, it is clearly bound up with partisan antipathy for the Trump administration.
Advertisement
It is also generational: Young Americans of every partisan stripe — Democratic, Republican, and independent — express pride in being American at lower rates than their older counterparts. Does that mean they don't care about their country? Or does it signal a deeper moral engagement with what they believe America ought to be?
It would be more illuminating — and less inflammatory — if pollsters distinguished between these different sentiments. Instead of asking simply, 'Are you proud to be an American?', why not ask:
Are you grateful to be an American?
Are you proud of what America stands for?
Are you proud of what America has done in the past year?
Do you feel attached to or alienated from American identity?
Each of those questions measures something real and distinct — gratitude for circumstances, embrace of values, approval of conduct, and emotional belonging. Lumping them all into a single catchphrase encourages people to speak in clichés rather than grapple candidly with the complexity of their feelings about their country.
The simple question has persisted over time in part because it's familiar and easy to track and in part because Americans have been conditioned to respond to it in a certain way.
The Greenwood song is still sung, the flag still waved, and the phrase 'proud to be an American' still used as a kind of civic password, even when many who say it harbor deep reservations about the country's direction. And for those who refuse to say it are framed in the headlines as outsiders ungrateful or disloyal, even when their criticism is rooted in love of country and a desire to see it live up to its promise.
Advertisement
Patriotism ought to be more than a reflexive cheer or a performative protest. We can express pride in our ideals without ignoring the ways we have betrayed them. We can love our country without idolizing it, and criticize America without abandoning it. What if we stopped asking people whether they're proud to be Americans, and started asking instead what they're doing to ensure America remains a country worthy of pride.
This is adapted from the current
, Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit
.
Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump, EU leaders to talk ahead of Friday's Putin meeting in Alaska
President Donald Trump spoke with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the 2025 NATO Summit in the Netherlands, on June 25. Merz has organized a meeting between Trump and European leaders to discuss the Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Photo by NATO/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- Ahead of President Donald Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, the European Union will have a call with him Wednesday to remind him that he shouldn't negotiate without Ukraine. The call on Wednesday, organized by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, will include Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders who are friendly with Trump, like Italy Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Zelensky will be in Berlin for the meeting, his office said on Wednesday, and is expected to later brief reporters with Merz. At the Friday meeting in Alaska, Trump will meet with Putin to try to end the war with Ukraine. But Zelensky hasn't been invited. "We cannot accept that territorial issues between Russia and America are discussed or even decided over the heads of Europeans, over the heads of Ukrainians," Merz said in a TV interview Sunday. "I assume that the American government sees it the same way. That is why there is this close coordination." Merz, a center-right politician, has heavily courted Trump since taking office in May. He has tried to impress upon Trump that if the United States were to boldly intervene on behalf of Ukraine, it could drive Putin into a cease-fire and peace talks. Trump's recent frustration with Russia's repeated bombing of Ukraine has made him more receptive to Merz's pleas. But this week, he told reporters he wanted to see what Putin had on his mind, and if he could broker "a deal," which could include swaps of land held by Ukraine and Russia. But peace on bad terms for Putin might encourage him to send troops to another neighbor and threaten Europe. "It's really a concern that Putin might feel emboldened," Anna Sauerbrey, foreign editor for Germany's Die Zeit newspaper, told The New York Times. "Not to go for Berlin, of course, but to cause some unrest in other Baltic countries, other European countries." Europe's leaders seemed optimistic that Trump will hear their pleas and take Europe's needs into consideration. The EU on Tuesday demanded that the Ukrainian people should determine their own future and that no peace deal with Russia could be decided without Ukraine at the table. Hungary disavowed itself from the calls. Leaders of 26 of 27 European Union nations said in a statement that viable negotiations must be within the framework of a cease-fire or easing of hostilities and warned of the threat the war posed to European and international security. There appears to be "more of an understanding from the Americans that you can't just go for land swaps which would somehow give a prize to Russia," said one European Union official, who was granted anonymity by the Washington Post. But, the official said, "it's clear that there are sort of discrepancies, and as we've seen it in the U.S. system by now, you have one man who will decide." Trump told reporters Monday that "It's not up to me to make a deal," echoing what Europe is saying, that Ukraine must be part of the negotiations. "I guess everyone's afraid Putin will play Trump's ego again like he has in the past," said a second European official to the Washington Post. "Who knows, maybe he comes there with another noble-sounding offer or maybe they give [Trump] some state award."


Indianapolis Star
21 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
The EPA wants to rollback climate regulations. Here's how Hoosiers can have a say.
Hoosiers have limited time to voice their opinions as the U.S. EPA prepares to roll back rules meant to curb the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The announcement in Indianapolis last month to rescind a major climate rule was one of the Trump administration's many pushes to deregulate major greenhouse gas polluters — in this case, the transportation industry. And with a rich history of auto manufacturing, Indiana stands to benefit, according to a statement made by U.S. Rep. Jim Baird during the announcement. Meanwhile, Americans will become more vulnerable, said Shannon Anderson, the director of advocacy at Earth Charter Indiana. While greenhouse gas emissions are not directly toxic to human health, they are the driver behind human-caused climate change, which is exacerbating the frequency and intensity of natural disasters across the globe. 'People sometimes feel like climate change is a problem that's coming later, but we're starting to experience it now,' Anderson said. She pointed to extreme heat events and increased flooding across the continent. Sam Carpenter, the executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, warned denial of climate science is bad for individual Hoosiers, communities, and the economy. The EPA has regulated greenhouse gases for over 15 years, but now the agency wants to quash a 2009 ruling that anchors its ability to fight climate change. The agency will no longer regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants or oil and gas operations. And all greenhouse gas standards for new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will be repealed, according to the EPA. Before the ruling is finalized, the public has until Sept. 15, 2025, to submit comments on the proposal. Indiana's greenhouse gas emissions — which come from compounds like carbon and methane — are hefty compared to similar states. Indiana releases the most energy-related greenhouse gases per capita in the Midwest and eighth in the nation, according to the HEC. About 21 percent of Indiana's total emissions come from the state's transportation sector. But as a desire to mitigate climate change impacted consumer choice and federal policy, like the Inflation Reduction Act, Indiana became a leader in electric vehicle manufacturing. Related industries now employ over 240,000 Hoosiers. The repeal of greenhouse gas emission standards could reduce the incentives helping Indiana pursue electric vehicles and battery manufacturing. 'We were starting to get a foothold in the U.S. under the Inflation Reduction Act, and Indiana has benefited mightily from those investments,' said Carpenter of HEC, nodding to the state's push toward clean energy. 'That's all being kind of pushed away through the current stance of denial on climate change. And so, it really has impacts on our health, on our communities, and in our economy.' Despite the agency's new stance on regulating greenhouse gases, 74 percent of Americans think that carbon dioxide should be regulated as a pollutant, according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Anderson thinks the EPA will soon have to face the masses during the required public comment period, where the agency must consider input before the ruling is finalized. 'We know there are so many Americans who stand with us on this issue, and it won't even take all of them to speak out on this, but as many as possible that are willing to just take a minute to write a public comment, to send a message to their legislators, that can be tremendously powerful,' Anderson said. The EPA is "going to have to acknowledge that they are flying in the face of overwhelming public consensus.' The public can submit written comments to the EPA through an online portal, email or by mail. Earth Charter Indiana also created a toolkit to help Hoosiers find out how to comment and contact their elected officials. Comments are due Sept. 15, 2025. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
How Trump's EO on retirement accounts comes with high returns and risks
President Donald Trump signed an executive order allowing Americans to invest their retirement savings in private equity, cryptocurrency and real estate, among other alternatives. NBC News' Emily Lorsch explains how the new options for Americans come with lucrative returns at high risks.