logo
State audit flags deficient oversight of outside contracts, school meals, welfare

State audit flags deficient oversight of outside contracts, school meals, welfare

Yahoo03-04-2025
Apr. 3—A newly released audit of Maine's administration of federal funds found deficiencies in several key areas, including the process for awarding outside contracts and spending on school meals and welfare benefits.
The report from the Office of the State Auditor was published online last week and includes a review of 19 federal programs that represent the bulk of $5.5 billion in federal expenditures made by Maine in the 2024 fiscal year.
Overall, the audit agreed with the state's financial statements that Maine is in a strong financial position.
But, it also detailed over the course of 500 pages several "material weaknesses" indicating a lack of internal controls that could lead to mistakes in the state's financial reporting, as well as less serious "deficiencies" and "serious deficiencies" in various programs.
A spokesperson for Gov. Janet Mills deferred comment on the audit's findings to the Department of Financial and Administrative Services. Sharon Huntley, a spokesperson for the department, said in an email that the administration welcomes the audit's findings and has systems in place to ensure issues are properly addressed and corrected. State officials disputed many of the specific deficiency findings in the report, however.
Huntley said that the number of overall deficiency findings has decreased from the last audit, with the overall count of 76 findings in the latest report representing a 22% drop from last year.
"The Administration works diligently to minimize such occurrences and address those items that are found," Huntley said. "And that has occurred. Both count and severity of findings have declined from the last report."
Maine Senate Republicans blasted the audit's findings regarding state contracts and sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this week asking her to launch a federal investigation into the state's Office of State Procurement Services.
The state spent about $2.1 billion in all contract-related payments in fiscal year 2024, although the audit only examined a sampling of contracts and agreements.
"This report reveals systemic failures in oversight, apparent violations of federal and state procurement laws, and a pervasive disregard for internal controls, jeopardizing billions in taxpayer funds, including significant federal dollars," the senators wrote.
ISSUES RAISED WITH CONTRACT PROCESS
In testing samples of active contracts, agreements and purchase orders, the audit found that five of 23 contracts did not contain required information and 24 of 45 others were signed after the contract start date, even though the audit points out that contracts are not valid until they are signed. The state also could not provide the required documentation about a cost analysis for any of the 45 contracts tested, it said.
The Office of State Procurement Services also awarded multiple low-cost service contracts, for goods or services less than $5,000, to vendors that were already engaged in contracts with the same department in a 12-month period, which is against state policy, the audit said.
Contracts with incomplete or inadequate terms could be declared invalid and that noncompliance with federal regulations could result in money being owed to the federal government, the audit report said. A lack of cost analysis prevents the state from ensuring it is getting the best value in contracting, it said.
The Office of State Procurement Services largely disagreed with the findings regarding contracts, saying in a response included in the report that departments can have more than one low-cost contract with the same vendor under certain conditions and that individual state agencies, not the procurement office, are responsible for federal contract management.
The office also said the audit report overlooked established processes for cost analysis and cited outdated policies. It said an updated policy manual, due for release this year, will clarify current practices.
Huntley stressed in her email that the control system governing state procurements "has extensive supervisory oversight to ensure accountability and transparency."
"(Our response) outlines instances where the auditor overlooked established processes that provide additional documentation, including cost analysis, and did not recognize other controls that are in place as part of the overall procurement process," she said.
SCHOOL MEALS, SNAP PROGRAM CITED
Other problems cited in the audit include overpayments of food assistance benefits and the issuing of benefits after a client's death, as well as discrepancies in eligibility and reimbursement claims for school meals.
In a random sample of 60 households that receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the audit found nine overpayments of monthly benefits due to lack of documentation of eligibility or processing errors. One household received an underpayment of benefits. Another received both an over and an underpayment.
The audit also found 214 cases in 2024 when SNAP benefits were issued more than 75 days after a client's death, a time period that the audit said allows for notification of death and cancellation. The 214 cases represent less than 0.5% of the 129,000 clients the state provided with SNAP benefits in 2024.
DHHS acknowledged "errors in calculations or documentation" in the audit and said it has developed a corrective action plan. It also said it is working to improve data related to deaths and that that issue "should be cleaned up" by the 2026 audit.
The audit also cited a need for better record-keeping around school meal eligibility and reimbursements. In one example, a sampling of 32 applications from schools for participation in the National School Lunch Program found six applications that lacked key information, like the signature of the superintendent or the program year, or were submitted after participation in the program had begun.
Management in the Maine Department of Education said they partially agreed and said they are working on taking corrective actions.
In another deficiency finding, the report says the Maine Department of Health and Human Services erroneously included indirect costs, such as expenses related to a new computer system, when reporting direct child care costs, resulting in the state failing to meet a federal grant requirement that 70% of expenditures be used for direct child care subsidies.
Over the course of two years, the audit says, the state mischaracterized $3.7 million as direct costs when that money should have been reported as indirect costs. DHHS agreed it could enhance its policies and procedures, but disagreed with the $3.7 million in questioned costs.
In her email, Huntley said the Mills administration takes each finding seriously and works with the Office of the State Controller to address deficiencies. In addition to responding to the findings, each agency is also required to submit corrective action plans.
State Auditor Matthew Dunlap said his office will prepare a report for lawmakers on areas where state agencies disagreed with the audit's findings, which could result in lawmakers taking their own action in response. Dunlap said the Legislature should be receiving his office's 2023 report this spring, while the report on the 2024 findings is expected to come out next year.
Copy the Story Link
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding
Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate Democrats launch radio ad attacking GOP over cuts to rural radio funding

The Senate Democrats' campaign arm is launching a new radio ad Wednesday attacking Republicans for slashing funding for rural radio stations as a part of more than $1 billion Republicans made in cuts to public broadcasting in their recissions package. 'Thank you for listening to your local radio station. But stations like these might not be around for long,' a narrator says in the 30-second ad, which was first shared with The Hill. 'Last month in D.C., Republican Senators cut radio funding, voting to end weather alerts, community news and our way to stay connected,' the narrator continued. 'Rural America relies on radio. But Republican politicians left us behind.' They added, 'We can't trust them to fight for us.' The ads are being aired in recognition of National Radio Day, and they're expected to run in rural stations in Alaska, Iowa, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas, all of which Senate Democrats are eyeing as potential pick-up opportunities next year. 'Rural communities rely on local radio to stay connected on everything from local news to lifesaving alerts about severe weather — but Republican Senators left them behind,' Maeve Coyle, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), said in a statement. 'Republican senators will be forced to explain to their constituents why they're robbing the programs that support their communities in order to pay for a giveaway to billionaires,' she added. President Trump signed a recissions package last month, which rescinds around $9 billion Congress had previously approved for funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting (CPB), which helps fund NPR and PBS and its affiliates, and global aid programs. CPB is contending with more than $1 billion in cuts alone. Federal funding makes up a smaller percentage of the money NPR and PBS rely on, but rural stations have already warned it will impact them more severely since it makes up a higher proportion of their overall funding. Republicans have attacked NPR and PBS, arguing they're liberally biased and their programs push 'radical left positions,' which its leaders have pushed back on. Contending with the cuts, the CPB announced it would begin to shut down, with its president Patricia Harrison saying in a statement 'we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations.'

Newsom is the face of California's redistricting push. That could help him — and hurt the plan
Newsom is the face of California's redistricting push. That could help him — and hurt the plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

time17 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom is the face of California's redistricting push. That could help him — and hurt the plan

SACRAMENTO — By launching a campaign to redraw California's congressional districts, Gov. Gavin Newsom has once again placed himself at the center of the national political conversation. That's helpful to Newsom as he positions himself to run for president in 2028 — something he has not explicitly admitted but has long been evident in his efforts to build a national donor base and boost his visibility in other states, including a recent visit to South Carolina. But it could prove detrimental to the redistricting campaign itself if Republicans can convince voters to view the measure as a power grab by Newsom, rather than the Democrats' framing as a fight against President Donald Trump. For loyal Democratic voters, the key constituency Newsom would need to win in a presidential primary, that framing seems to be working. Newsom has surged in popularity on social media with his persistent attacks on Trump and is earning praise from liberals hungry for their leaders to take on the president more aggressively. 'He's staking out a position as the kind of person who fights,' said Hans Noel, a government professor at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. 'A lot of Democrats want to see that.' To successfully campaign for president, Newsom needs to shore up support from Democratic leaders and boost his popularity outside of California, Noel said. With the redistricting measure, Newsom risks criticism from people who disagree with his tactics and don't want to see Democrats abandon independent redistricting. But the campaign is undeniably helping him introduce himself to voters outside the Golden State who may not be familiar with him. Being at the forefront of the campaign might help him with a future presidential run, but it could hamper the campaign's chances within California, said Rob Stutzman, a Republican strategist who previously worked for Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democrats describe the measure as a fight against Trump and a direct response to efforts in Texas to redraw maps in favor of Republicans. Newsom has said he'd abandon the effort if Texas dropped its plans. But it's also something that would hand California Democrats more power, as Republican opponents are already pointing out. 'Every issue that matters to Californians has been put to the side so that (Newsom) and other politicians can seize back power,' Assembly Member Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego, said during a news conference opposing the redistricting measure on Monday. 'The reason why we're here today is Gov. Gavin Newsom's failing presidential campaign needs a little boost.' Democratic lawmakers plan to vote on Thursday to place the measure on the ballot in a Nov. 4 special election. They'll have a remarkably short span of time to convince voters to support the proposition, which would redraw California's congressional maps to give an advantage to Democrats. That would temporarily roll back a reform passed by voters in 2010, when they removed power to draw congressional districts from the Legislature and gave it to an independent commission with equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats. That reform was good in theory, Democrats say, but in practice dilutes Californians' power in Congress because other states continue to draw their districts in a partisan way. The proposed redistricting measure would replace the independent commission's maps with maps favoring Democrats for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections. After the 2030 census, the independent commission would draw new maps free of partisan interference. It's not clear yet whether Newsom will continue to be the face of the campaign. The fight was his idea, and he has led the charge so far — hosting regular press conferences and doing a blitz of interviews to promote the plan. He narrates the campaign's first ad, which features a speech he gave in Sacramento criticizing Texas Republicans' redistricting moves. Voters tend to be skeptical of efforts by politicians to increase their own power. The more Newsom is seen as the face of the measure, the more likely voters are to see it as a self-serving ploy and reject it, Stutzman said. 'Whether this passes is a more difficult question, but the opportunity it provides for Newsom I think is very valuable,' Stutzman said. 'He certainly seems intent on making the most of it.' Julia Azari, a politics professor at Marquette University in Wisconsin, said Newsom's antagonism of Trump somewhat mirrors what Kamala Harris did in 2017. While serving as California's junior senator, Harris staked out a reputation for taking Trump administration officials to task during oversight hearings, an image that helped propel her candidacy for president in 2020. In the end, Harris wasn't able to out-compete the frontrunners in that race — Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders — who both had many more years in the national spotlight. Getting out in front of voters so early has a potential downside, Azari noted, which is that it will give voters more time to learn unflattering things about Newsom's record as governor of California. But Biden faced the same challenge in 2020, which he overcame to win the presidency. The redistricting fight is particularly well-suited for these purposes. It centers Newsom in a major national political story. And it allows him to position himself at the front of the pack of Democrats vying for a nomination in 2028 while uniting, not attacking them, Noel said. Ludovic Blain, who runs the progressive donor group the California Donor Table, said he's not always aligned politically with the governor, but on this issue, they're on the same page. He said progressives are looking for politicians who will stand up to Trump, and Newsom is rising to the occasion. He said he doesn't necessarily see a major downside for Newsom if the ballot measure fails. 'Voters want to see fighters,' he said. 'The question of whether they're successful — that's secondary because you can't be successful if you don't fight.'

Jim Beam column:Texas has awakened Democrats
Jim Beam column:Texas has awakened Democrats

American Press

time17 minutes ago

  • American Press

Jim Beam column:Texas has awakened Democrats

Texas Republican legislators who are trying to create five more GOP congressional seats in their state may not have realized it at the time, but they have given the Democratic Party that appeared to be lost in the wilderness new life. The Associated Press reported that, thanks to Texas, 'Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win.' U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas said, 'For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' — well, here they are. For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' — well, here it is.' Crockett happens to be one of several Democrats who could be ousted if Texas succeeds in creating those five new GOP congressional seats. The AP said progressive and establishment Democrats are working together, 'uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by President Donald Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November…' Leaders on the left say they can challenge Trump's redistricting plan, Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding democracy. The AP said Democrats who left Texas during a special session surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere. They were joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action, The AP said, and added, 'The response was Trumpian.' Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats who left Texas. They pledged to do retaliatory redistricting. California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats that will require voter approval in November. Democratic Party leaders and activists say that by arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats. Despite new Democratic Party enthusiasm, The New York Times reported Monday that Republicans have the advantage in redistricting. States need single-party control and The Times said there are 23 states with Republican control and 15 with Democratic control. Newsom, the California governor, introduced a Louisiana issue in the redistricting fight. He was critical of Trump's police takeover in Washington, D.C., and his activation of the National Guard to quell California protests. When Newsom talked about Shreveport crime in his argument, he got into a personal exchange with Louisiana Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Benton. A headline in The Shreveport Times said Landry and Johnson told Newsom to mind his own business after insulting Shreveport. Newsom said, 'I think (Trump) should start with Shreveport, La., and Speaker Johnson's district that has six times plus the per capita murder rate of Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco. What about the carnage, Mr. President, in Shreveport? Why aren't you protecting the folks there?' David Jacobs in a State Affairs story on LaPolitics Weekly quoted Landry who said, 'Gov. Newsom may hold his own opinions but he is not entitled to distort the facts; homicides in Shreveport are down 40% this year and we are continuing to see a significant decline in crime.' Johnson said Newsom should spend time dealing with 'the disastrous far-left policies that are destroying his state.' Shreveport Mayor Tom Arceneaux told KPEL, 'Gov. Newsom doesn't know what he's talking about and that we are in better shape in Shreveport than he alleges.' Jacobs wrote, 'But regardless of what state and local officials say, Newsom's claim that Shreveport has a much higher homicide rate than San Francisco is correct. In fact, he actually understated the difference between the two cities. 'Based on population estimates and reported homicide numbers for both cities, Shreveport had 29.4 homicides per 100,000 people in 2024, while San Francisco had 4.2 homicides per 100,000. So for last year at least, the per capita homicide rate was more than seven times higher in Shreveport, not six times higher as Newsom stated.' The Texas Legislature is expected to succeed in creating now GOP congressional districts and other Republican states may follow suit. However, the Texas power play has the Democratic Party back in the mix, and Democrats appear to be ready to increase their numbers wherever they can. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store