
Karnataka Congress Bets Big On Fresh Caste Survey, Toes Party High Command's Line
With the contentious Kantharaj report now in cold storage, the government hopes to complete the new caste survey within 60 to 90 days, as demanded by the Congress high command
With dominant communities pushing back and AHINDA groups demanding delivery, the Congress government in Karnataka is betting on a fresh survey to help Siddaramaiah regain control over the caste arithmetic and consolidate support across competing blocs ahead of key political battles.
With the contentious Kantharaj report now in cold storage, the government hopes to complete the new caste survey within 60 to 90 days, as demanded by the Congress high command.
Sources told News18 that the Congress high command cited the example of Telangana, which completed its caste survey in just 70 days. 'So the Karnataka government can also complete it quickly. Much of the base data already exists with the Karnataka State Backward Classes Commission, and only an update with a decade's gap and inclusion of those left out needs to be added, which should make the process faster," a senior official said.
Chief minister Siddaramaiah clarified that this will be a fresh, legally mandated enumeration, as the law requires a new survey every ten years. The earlier caste survey was carried out in 2015 through a house-to-house exercise covering 54 parameters. It began on April 11 and concluded on May 30 that year. At the time, Karnataka's population was 6.11 crore as per the 2011 Census and was projected to touch 6.35 crore by 2015. The survey managed to cover 5.98 crore people, with 1.6 lakh personnel involved, of whom 1.33 lakh were teachers, Siddaramaiah said.
At recent cabinet meetings, Siddaramaiah told his ministers to submit their views on the caste survey in writing, encouraging open but non-confrontational discussion. Those opposing the report flagged issues related to population figures, criteria for backwardness, and the methodology used in assessing economic and educational indicators. Siddaramaiah assured them that any discrepancies would be addressed collectively. 'This report is meant to help all communities—even those now opposing it," he said.
But now, that very report stands effectively shelved.
CM Siddaramaiah said that the Congress high command had summoned him and his deputy, DK Shivakumar, to Delhi, where they were advised that the existing Kantharaj report, being ten years old, no longer reflected the current social realities. The views of the commission's current chairman, Madhusudhan Nayak, will also be factored into the process.
'Over ten years, a lot has changed. The law allows for a fresh exercise after this period. The high command was clear: the report must reflect today's reality," the CM said.
In the Delhi meeting—attended by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and MP Rahul Gandhi—the leadership instructed that a new enumeration be conducted within 60–90 days. AICC general secretary KC Venugopal told the media that the survey would be expedited and that inclusivity of all communities was a priority for the party.
Opposition to the Kantharaj report has not only come from the BJP but also from within the Congress. Some party leaders have strongly objected to the findings of the decade-old caste survey.
Siddaramaiah said the decision for a fresh survey was directed by the Congress high command, and a special cabinet meeting convened to take a final call on the contentious backward classes commission report approved it.
Earlier, multiple cabinet meetings on the caste survey discussion were held, many of which saw sharp divisions within the Congress itself. Ministers from the Vokkaliga and Lingayat communities insisted that the previous report was flawed and demanded it be discarded in favour of a fresh one. These dominant groups had already opposed the Kantharaj report publicly, calling it biased, and some cited improper methodology.
Congress ministers from AHINDA communities—representing minorities, backward classes, and Dalits—pushed for the immediate implementation of the original report prepared by Kantharaj and later revised by Jayaprakash Hegde, who at first headed the backward class commission during the BJP rule and submitted the final report to the Congress government in 2024.
Siddaramaiah did not hold back in blaming former CM and now union minister HD Kumaraswamy for blocking the original caste survey report when it was ready to be submitted after his first tenure as chief minister, when he commissioned the study.
The report could not be tabled before his tenure ended in 2018. When the Congress-JD(S) coalition came to power and Kumaraswamy became CM, the report was ready. The then backward classes minister, Puttaranga Shetty, was approached by chairman H Kantharaj and other commission members to formally receive it.
'But Kumaraswamy pressured Puttaranga Shetty not to accept it. He stalled it. That's the truth," Siddaramaiah said, holding the JD(S) leader responsible for derailing the process.
Once Kantharaj's term ended, the BJP government appointed Jayaprakash Hegde as the new chairman. Siddaramaiah pointed out that all commission members were BJP appointees. Hegde submitted his revised version of the report with fresh recommendations on February 29, 2024. 'Kantharaj was also present at the time of submission," he added.
The CM said the report couldn't be discussed due to the Lok Sabha elections. After his government returned to power, it was placed before the cabinet in 2025.
About the Author
Rohini Swamy
Rohini Swamy, Associate Editor at News18, has been a journalist for nearly two decades in the television and digital space. She covers south India for News18's digital platform. She has previously worked with t...Read More
First Published:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
HP again passes Bill to have govt say in appointment of VCs
Shimla: Amidst the ongoing tussle between the Congress govt and governor Shiv Pratap in Himachal Pradesh over the appointment of vice-chancellors of two universities in Solan and Palampur, the legislative assembly on Tuesday again passed The Himachal Pradesh Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry (Amendment) Bill, 2023 without any amendment, insisting that the democratically elected govt must have a role in the appointment of the VCs. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Himachal Vidhan Sabha members did not show any interest in Shukla's recommendation to amend the 2023 Bill in line with the central govt's Model Act for Higher Agricultural Educational Institutions in India, wherein the governor as chancellor appoints the VCs on the search committee's recommendations. When Himachal Vidhan Sabha again passed this Bill on Tuesday, without carrying out any changes in the document passed earlier on Sept 21, 2023, the opposition BJP legislators had already left the House in protest over the issue of defying legislative assembly traditions and democratic norms. The Bill, presented by agriculture minister Chander Kumar, provides that the governor, functioning as chancellor of universities, shall appoint the VCs "on the aid and advice of the govt" since the state govt issues grant-in-aid to these institutions. Until now, the VCs were appointed by the chancellor on the recommendations of a selection committee comprising a nominee of the chancellor, director general of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, and the chairperson of the Universities Grants Commission or his nominee. Earlier, the Amendment Bill was sent to the governor for assent in 2023. As it was pending for a long time, Himachal assembly passed The Himachal Pradesh Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry (Amendment) Bill, 2024 on Sept 4, 2024, with almost the same contents as the Amendment Bill, 2023. This Bill was sent to the governor for assent on Oct 19, 2024, but the governor observed that the Amendment Bill, 2023, was reserved for consideration of the President on July 24, 2024, and it was not appropriate to take action on the Amendment Bill, 2024, until any decision was received by the central govt on the Amendment Bill, 2023. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Why was the Bill returned? Later, the governor referred back the Amendment Bill, 2023 to the state govt with the observation that the state govt should carry out an amendment in the Bill as per Section 4.3(1) of the Model Act for Higher Agricultural Educational Institutions in India (Revised 2023). The section says that the VC "shall be appointed by the chancellor from the panel of eminent educationists in agricultural and allied sciences drawn by the search committee". But the council of ministers in its meeting on July 29 decided to withdraw the Amendment Bill, 2024, and to move a resolution for consideration of Vidhan Sabha "to again pass the Amendment Bill, 2023". Now, this Bill passed on Tuesday will again be sent to the governor for his assent. Article 200 of the Constitution 'Assent to Bills' reads: "…when a Bill is so returned, the House or Houses shall reconsider the Bill accordingly, and if the Bill is passed again by the House or Houses with or without amendment and presented to the governor for assent, the governor shall not withhold assent therefrom." Ruckus in House Himachal Vidhan Sabha proceedings on the second day of the 12-day monsoon session witnessed commotion as the opposition and treasury benches accused each other of defying all traditions of the House as well as the democratic norms. The accusations reached such a point that speaker Kuldeep Singh Pathania was forced to adjourn the House for five minutes as the opposition legislators raised slogans to object to revenue minister Jagat Singh Negi's claims that leader of opposition Jai Ram Thakur broke all democratic traditions when he was the chief minister. As the House re-assembled, speaker Pathania ruled that anything which was against the prestige of any member of the House would not be part of Vidhan Sabha record. Later, the BJP MLAs said they would boycott the revenue minister in assembly, alleging that he made baseless allegations against the leader of the opposition as well as the Prime Minister. Earlier, the opposition MLAs strongly condemned the delay in payments to hospitals under the Himcare Scheme and stepped out of the House. 125 units of power free Chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, while replying to a question, clarified that the state govt had not stopped the 125 units free power subsidy, started by the previous BJP govt, to anyone in the state even if a person had 10 or 50 electricity meters in his name. He said on the state govt's appeal, 12,000-15,000 people in Himachal had given up electricity subsidy to date. Power subsidy to only those people using commercial power meters or income tax payers has been stopped, he added. Responding to BJP MLA Sudhir Sharma, the CM said in future the state govt would also focus on giving 300 units of free electricity depending upon the challenges and capabilities of the govt. Rs 364 crore pending under Himcare Health and family welfare minister Colonel Dhani Ram Shandil (retd) agreed to BJP MLA Randhir Sharma's statement that the Himachal govt was yet to clear Rs 364.20 crore to various health institutions under the Himcare health scheme, which provides cashless medical treatment up to Rs 5 lakh per year to a family. He said the state govt had not stopped the Himcare scheme in the state and also there were 25 private health institutes where this scheme was in operation. BJP MLA Vinod Kumar claimed that patients were not being treated in many govt hospitals under the Himcare scheme and they were forced to mortgage their valuables for treatment. The CM intervened to say that the Congress govt spent Rs 550 crore under the scheme but claimed that they detected large-scale irregularities in the Himcare scheme during the previous BJP govt.


The Hindu
41 minutes ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, August 20, 1975: Ford asks USSR not to interfere in Portugal
Minneapolis (Minnesota), Aug. 19: President Ford said to-day he will ask Congress for an additional $ two to three billions for nuclear weapons unless the Soviet Union helps shape a strategic arms agreement. Mr. Ford also warned that the Soviets could endanger detente by interfering in Portugal to support the communist-backed military Government there. He defended American warmth toward the Soviet Government but he also declared the U.S. must be Number 1 in military might in an address prepared for the American Legion National Convention here. 'I hope we are on a two-way street with the Soviet Union,' Mr. Ford said. But he said that potential adversaries are not reducing the levels of their military power and 'the United States must be alert and strong.' He said that the $92.8 billions including $9.8 billions for nuclear arms, in the Defence budget was the 'bare minimum required for our safety'. He pledged to his military-oriented audience he will 'vigorously resist' defence spending cuts. Maybe in the 1977 fiscal year spending on nuclear forces can be held down but the projection depends on 'real progress in SALT II (strategic arms limitations talks),' Mr. Ford said. If there can be no agreement, 'I will have no choice but to recommend to the Congress an additional $ two to three billions for strategic weapons programme in the current and coming fiscal years,' he said. Mr. Ford also said the U.S. was watching to see if the Soviet Union would honour individual rights and human freedoms that were implicit in the declaration at the recent European summit conference at Helsinki.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
K'taka cabinet approves internal quotas for SCs; 3 groups to share 17% reservation
BENGALURU: After decades of deliberations, agitations and commissions, Congress govt in Karnataka on Tuesday decided to rework the internal reservation structure for Scheduled Castes (SCs). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now An official announcement on this will be made during the ongoing assembly session on Wednesday. According to some cabinet ministers, the Justice Nagamohan Das Commission, which had studied internal reservation among the 101 castes within the SC community, originally suggested five categories to ensure a well-balanced representation. However, govt chose to simplify the matrix and restrict it to three categories only. According to the new framework, Madigas will receive 6% allocation, while Holeyas and Alemari castes will be eligible for 6% reservation jointly. The third category comprising Bhovi, Lambhani and others will be eligible for 5% reservation. Backward classes welfare minister Shivaraj Tangadagi described the cabinet decision as one that carries consensus and acceptance across communities. Law and parliamentary affairs minister H K Patil, who briefed the media after the cabinet meeting, called it a landmark moment in social justice policymaking. "The cabinet meeting came out with a fruitful decision, which makes all ministers such as K H Muniyappa, H C Mahadevappa, and G Parameshwara happy," he said. Former minister H Anjaneya, a long-time advocate for greater representation of the Madiga community, hailed the decision as historic. "I welcome the state gov's decision to grant a 6% reservation to the Madiga community," he said, adding: "Community members had anticipated a 7% reservation. However, they managed to secure 6%. This is a victory for the community's demand that persisted for the last 30 years." The Madiga community, which has been at the forefront demanding equitable distribution within the SC quota, has historically argued that benefits of reservation were cornered disproportionately by a handful of castes.