Hostage families: Releases will play ‘no part' in UK plan to recognise Palestine
Sir Keir Starmer announced earlier this week that the UK would take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of the UN General Assembly unless Israel meets certain conditions.
Members of four British families met with Foreign Office officials on Thursday night seeking clarification on whether conditions would also be placed on Hamas, their lawyers said in a statement.
'However, it was clear from the meeting last night that the British Government's policy will not help the hostages, and could even hurt them,' they said.
'We do not say this lightly, but it was made obvious to us at the meeting that although the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed 'in the round' in late-September, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations.
'In other words, the 'vision for peace' which the UK is pursuing… may well involve our clients' family members continuing to rot in Hamas dungeons.'
Sir Keir had said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months.
While he also called for Hamas to immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', he did not explicitly say these would factor into whether recognition would go ahead.
The families have a range of views on what the future political settlement should look like but their priority is to keep the hostages 'above political games,' their lawyers said.
They are now urging the Prime Minister to 'change course before it is too late'.
'At a minimum, the British hostage families request that the Government confirm that without the hostages being released, there can be no peace, and that this will be an important part of its decision as to whether to proceed with recognition and its current plan.'
Sir Keir said that he 'particularly' listens to hostages after criticism of his plans from Emily Damari, a British-Israeli who was held captive by Hamas.
The families of Ms Damari and freed hostage Eli Sharabi were among those who met with the Foreign Office.
Also present were relatives of Nadav Popplewell, who died while held captive, as well as those of Oded Lifshitz, who died, and Yocheved Lifschitz, who was released.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the UK will not get into a 'to and fro' with Hamas over the recognition plans and that 'we don't negotiate with terrorists, Hamas are terrorists'.
US President Donald Trump disagrees with Sir Keir's plans, as well as those of France and Canada, which have also pledged their countries will recognise Palestine.
'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gaza latest: Emergency meeting set for UN Security Council as Israel plans military takeover
The UN Security Council will hold an emergency meeting on Saturday following the revelation of Israel 's plans to seize control of Gaza City. Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas called for an immediate emergency meeting of the United Nation's most powerful body in order to stop Israel from escalating its military action in Gaza. The Israeli political-security cabinet approved Benjamin Netanyahu 's plan to take full military control of Gaza City on Thursday. Netanyahu's office said that 'the IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones'. Hamas has warned the Israeli government that seizing control of Gaza City would mean 'sacrificing' the hostages inside the besieged enclave, with the group declaring the decision a 'war crime'. Netanyahu said that neither Hamas nor the rival Palestinian Authority in the occupied West Bank would be allowed involvement in the civil administration that will take over. UK prime minister Sir Keir Starmer joined global leaders in condemning the decision to 'further escalate its offensive', adding it 'only brings more bloodshed'. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz has said the countries that condemn Israel and threaten sanctions "will not weaken our resolve'. Qatar joins Arab nations in condemning Israel move to occupy Gaza Qatar's foreign ministry has released a statement condemning Israel's move to occupy Gaza. The country joins the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and other Arab nations in denouncing the decision by Netanyahu's government, after the Israeli prime minister suggested handing governing duties over the enclave over to Arab forces. Bryony Gooch9 August 2025 03:00 Watch: Former Israeli prime minister calls for end to war in Gaza in critique of Netenyahu Bryony Gooch9 August 2025 02:00 Analysis: Netanyahu's brutal plan for Gaza is a gamble on Israel's very future Netanyahu's brutal plan for Gaza is a gamble on Israel's very future As Germany pauses military sales to Israel in anger over Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu now faces global isolation and a sprint to authoritarianism – only America can stop it, writes world affairs editor Sam Kiley Bryony Gooch9 August 2025 01:00 Watch: JD Vances disagrees with Starmer's plans to recognize Palestinian state 9 August 2025 00:00 Mapped: How much of Gaza is under military control? Bryony Gooch8 August 2025 23:00 UAE condemns Israel's occupation plans The United Arab Emirates is the latest country to condemn Israel's move to occupy Gaza, according to its state news agency. The UAE joins the likes of the UK, Iran, Germany, Turkey and Canada in opposing Israel's latest military expansion. Bryony Gooch8 August 2025 22:30 Israel hits back at global condemnation of military takeover Israeli defence minister Israel Katz has said the countries that condemn Israel and threaten sanctions "will not weaken our resolve" ahead of plans to expand its military operation in Gaza. "Our enemies will find us as one strong, united fist that will strike them with great force," he added. Bryony Gooch8 August 2025 21:54 Watch: Families of Israeli hostages protest Netanyahu plan to occupy Gaza Bryony Gooch8 August 2025 21:38 'I don't know what it would mean': JD Vance hits out at Starmer's plans to recognise Palestine JD Vance tells Lammy US won't join UK in recognising Palestinian statehood Mr Vance and Mr Lammy are said to have developed a personal rapport, bonding over their difficult childhoods and Christian faith Bryony Gooch8 August 2025 21:23 Canada: Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City is 'wrong' Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City is "wrong" and will put the lives of the remaining hostages at greater risk, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters on Friday. Bryony Gooch8 August 2025 21:00
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How we could pay for Reeves's race for growth
Labour made no secret of wooing businesses ahead of the general election last year, promising to cut red tape to boost Britain's economic growth. However, the Government's deregulation drive since coming into power has rung alarm bells with consumer groups. James Daley, of consumer group Fairer Finance, said: 'We've been increasingly concerned by the Government's deregulation agenda over the past few months. 'While we all want to see a return to sustainable economic growth, it's a mistake to think that the key to this is removing consumer protections that have been thoughtfully built up over the course of several decades.' This year, Rachel Reeves has been accused multiple times of putting the needs of the financial services industry before consumers. The Chancellor attempted to intervene in the Supreme Court case on the car finance scandal in January, fearing a negative judgment for banks could reflect badly on Britain as a place to do business. She was reportedly considering overruling the Supreme Court if it decided to hit lenders with a £44bn compensation bill. In the end this was not needed because the Supreme Court largely sided with banks. The Treasury said that it intervened over concerns that a judgment in favour of consumers could reduce the availability of car finance for those who need it. But Liberal Democrats MP Bobby Dean told The Guardian the attempt to intervene was 'disgraceful' and sent a 'bad message' to consumers. Prioritising the City Now, Ms Reeves is understood to be pushing for Revolut to become a fully authorised bank as quickly as possible, despite lingering concerns about the app bank's reputation on fraud prevention. It was named in more fraud reports than any other major bank in 2023-24, according to data from Action Fraud, and The Telegraph revealed last year that Refund had pushed back against refunds for some scam victims despite recommendations by the Financial Ombudsman Service (Fos). Revolut said it was continually enhancing its security and prevented over £600m in potential fraud against customers in 2024. Revolut was granted a provisional licence last year after a three-year wait but has yet to become a fully-fledged bank. The Chancellor is desperate for a potential $65bn (£56bn) flotation to happen in London instead of New York. She had tried to secure a meeting with regulators and Revolut but this was blocked by Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey amid concerns about political interference. Retirements at risk The Treasury has also been accused of putting retirements at risk in order to accelerate economic growth. Under the Mansion House Accord, pension providers agree to invest at least 10pc of so-called 'default' funds in private markets by 2030. The Government estimates this will unlock up to £50bn for the UK economy. But Tom Selby, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said there was a risk this could leave savers worse off in retirement. 'The Government has chosen to conflate its understandable, but increasingly desperate, desire to deliver economic growth with other people's pensions by pushing workplace schemes to increase their allocations to higher risk, often higher cost, illiquid assets such as private equity. 'While it has stopped short of mandating investments in these assets, it has created a power to do this if it doesn't get what it wants, essentially putting a gun to the head of pension schemes to do this voluntarily. 'There is, of course, a world where this approach works and delivers better returns for members and more investment for key UK infrastructure for the Government. But it is also entirely possible that shoe-horning money into illiquid UK investments will deliver lower returns for savers, which would ultimately mean millions of people get less from their pension in retirement.' 'Firms over fairness' At her Mansion House speech in July, Ms Reeves said that rules and red tape were a 'boot on the neck' of British businesses. But aspects of her financial services strategy – dubbed the Leeds Reforms – have been lambasted by consumer groups. Mr Daley said: 'It's particularly alarming to hear talk of plans to scrap the protections that were put in place only a few years ago after the financial crisis.' Ms Reeves has proposed weakening so-called 'ring-fencing' which separates retail banking services from investment banking activities. This regime was introduced in 2019 as a result of the 2008 financial crisis to shield customers' deposits from financial risks emerging elsewhere in banking groups. The Leeds Reforms also include a crackdown on the Fos, the body responsible for settling disputes between businesses and consumers. Ms Reeves wants the Ombudsman to refer to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on ambiguous complaints and give the regulator the power to intervene in mass redress events. The Chancellor said this is to ensure the Fos 'no longer acts as a quasi-regulator'. But consumer advocacy group, the Transparency Taskforce, has warned that increased cooperation between the Fos and FCA could lead to unfair decisions for customers in cases where businesses have technically followed FCA rules but still acted unfairly. In a letter to the Treasury Select Committee, the group wrote: 'This represents a fundamental shift from principles-based regulation to a rigid, legalistic approach that prioritises certainty for firms over fairness for consumers.' Diluting the Consumer Credit Act Separately, the consumer association Which? has raised concerns about the Government's plans to reform the Consumer Credit Act. The Act, which sets out customers' protections in credit agreements, played a key role in the car finance scandal. Despite siding with lenders, the Supreme Court found that consumers could still bring claims under the Act where lenders paid 'excessive' commissions to dealers. But the Treasury is reviewing the Act in order to better align it with the FCA's rules. There are some concerns this could lead to the weakening of protections in the CCA. Rocio Concha, of Which?, said the Government should 'tread carefully with its plans to reform this important piece of legislation'. She added: 'Far from being a blocker to growth, consumer protections are essential for a healthy, functioning economy.' A Revolut spokesman said: 'We are progressing through the final stages of mobilisation and continue to work constructively with the Prudential Regulation Authority. Given Revolut's global scale, this is the largest and most complex mobilisation ever undertaken in the UK. A thorough review is an expected part of the process and getting this right is more important than rushing to meet a specific date. We are looking forward to launching a fully regulated UK bank for our millions of UK customers this year.' A Treasury spokesman said: 'We are balancing growing the economy – our number one mission – with strong consumer protections to deliver for working people. The Leeds Reforms will help more people get on the housing ladder, drive better returns for savers and ensure the Fos provides a cost-free route for consumers to resolve disputes without acting as a quasi-regulator.'
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
As Gaza faces starvation, reluctant Germany starts to curb support for Israel
BERLIN, Aug 9 (Reuters) - The worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza and Israel's plans to expand military control over the enclave have pushed Germany to curb arms exports to Israel, a historically fraught step for Berlin driven by a growing public outcry. Conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz, hitherto a staunchly pro-Israel leader, made the announcement on Friday arguing that Israel's actions would not achieve its stated war goals of eliminating Hamas militants or bringing Israeli hostages home. It is a bold move for a leader who after winning elections in February said he would invite Benjamin Netanyahu to Germany in defiance of an arrest warrant against the Israeli prime minister issued by the International Criminal Court. The shift reflects how Germany's come-what-may support for Israel, rooted in its historical guilt over the Nazi Holocaust, is being tested like never before as the high Palestinian civilian death toll in Gaza, massive war destruction and images of starving children are chipping away at decades of policy. "It is remarkable as it is the first concrete measure of this German government. But I would not see it as a U-turn, rather a 'warning shot'," said Muriel Asseburg, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. It caps months of the German government sharpening its tone over Israel's escalating military campaign in the small, densely populated Palestinian enclave, though still shying away from tougher steps that other European countries and some voices in Merz's ruling coalition were calling for. The suspension of arms deliveries to Israel would affect just those that could be used in Gaza. The move reflects a hardening mood in Germany, where public opinion has grown critical of Israel and more demanding that its government help ease a humanitarian disaster - most of the 2.2 million population is homeless and Gaza is a sea of rubble. According to an ARD-DeutschlandTREND survey released on Thursday, a day before Merz's announcement, 66% of Germans want their government to put more pressure on Israel to change its behaviour. That is higher than April 2024, when some 57% of Germans believed their government should criticise Israel more strongly than before for its actions in Gaza, a Forsa poll showed. Despite Germany helping air drop aid to Gaza, 47% of Germans think their government is doing too little for Palestinians there, against 39% who disagree with this, the ARD-DeutschlandTREND this week showed. Most strikingly perhaps, only 31% of Germans feel they have a bigger responsibility for Israel due to their history - a core tenet of German foreign policy - while 62% do not. Germany's political establishment has cited its approach, known as the "Staatsraison", as a special responsibility for Israel after the Nazi Holocaust, which was laid out in 2008 by then-Chancellor Angela Merkel to the Israeli parliament. Reflecting that stance days before his most recent trip to Israel in July, Merz's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told Die Zeit newspaper that Berlin could not be a "neutral mediator". "Because we are partisan. We stand with Israel," he said, echoing similar statements by other conservative figures in Merz's party. But Merz's junior coalition partner, the Social Democrats (SPD), had already been more explicit in wanting to put sanctions against Israel on the table. Adis Ahmetovic, an SPD foreign policy spokesperson, said suspending weapons shipments was only the first step. "More must follow, such as a full or partial suspension of the (European Union) Association Agreement or the medical evacuation of seriously injured children, in particular," Ahmetovic told Stern magazine. "Furthermore, sanctions against Israeli ministers must no longer be taboo." The deepening divide within Germany has also played out in its media landscape. In two major editorials published in late July, Der Spiegel magazine accused Israel of violating international humanitarian law and condemned what it said was the German government's complicity. The front cover displayed a picture of Gaza women holding out empty bowls with the headline: "A Crime". Meanwhile Bild, the mass-market daily owned by Axel Springer, Germany's largest media group, decried the lack of outrage toward Islamist Hamas whose cross-border assault on Israeli communities triggered the war, pointing to what it saw as growing anti-Israel sentiment and one-sided protests. Filipp Piatov, a Bild reporter whose X account is followed by Merz, accused the chancellor on Friday of doing exactly what he had criticised others for, "that Germany is cutting off support to its ally in the middle of a war." Israel denies having a policy of starvation in Gaza, and says Hamas, which killed some 1,200 people in its October 7, 2023 attack and took 251 hostages back to Gaza, could end the crisis by surrendering. Israel's ground and air war in Gaza has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry. Critics had argued that Germany's approach has been overly hesitant, weakening the West's collective ability to apply meaningful pressure for an end to the fighting and restrictions on humanitarian aid to the Israeli-besieged enclave. Germany had hitherto even been cautious about a modest sanction such as supporting the partial suspension of Israel's access to the EU's flagship research funding programme. There are other reasons for Germany's reluctance to criticise Israel beyond its Nazi past, analysts say, including its strong trading relationship with Israel and the United States. Germany is Israel's second biggest weapons supplier after the U.S., but also buys arms from Israel as part of a massive revamp of its armed forces since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That includes the Arrow-3 missile interception system. Last week, Israeli defence company Elbit Systems announced a $260 million deal with Airbus to equip the German Air Force's A400M planes with directed infrared defence systems. "German arrogance should be avoided," Volker Beck, a former member of parliament and the head of the German-Israeli Society, told Reuters. "If Israel were to retaliate by restricting arms deliveries to Germany, the future of German air security would look grim." ($1 = 0.8590 euros)
