logo
Train passengers fined 'too harshly' for 'innocent errors' with tickets

Train passengers fined 'too harshly' for 'innocent errors' with tickets

Metro3 days ago

Train passengers are being punished for accidental 'minor transgressions' when buying tickets, the rail watchdog has said.
With millions of people in the UK travelling by train every day, mistakes are bound to happen – whether that's selecting the wrong railcard or catching the wrong train.
And the country's rail ticketing system, with various train operators and websites, can be confusing – and draconian.
Now, the transport watchdog, the Office of Rail and Road, has said that train operators took disproportionately harsh measures against passengers who had made 'genuine errors.'
The rules are so harsh that a passenger was threatened with prosecution for mistakenly selecting a 16-25 railcard discount when they had a 26-30 railcard.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Another person found out they had a criminal record when having a background check for a job, despite successfully appealing the penalty fare four years prior.
One passenger had a printed e-ticket, but it was so water-damaged it could not be scanned by staff.
Although they subsequently showed a proof of valid ticket for the journey, they were threatened with prosecution.
The passenger ended up settling out of court for £81 to avoid the risk of conviction, which is 'a serious and potentially life changing matter,' the watchdog said.
In a scathing new report reviewing train operators' revenue protection practices, the watchdog made recommendations on how buying the right ticket could be simpler and how passengers are treated when ticket issues arise.
It comes after 59,000 alleged fare evasion convictions were overturned after train operators used a secretive legal loophole, the Single Justice Procedure, to fast-track prosecutions behind closed doors.
After the procedural error by train operators was revealed, the Transport Secretary commissioned the watchdog to review revenue practices to make sure that 'fare evasion was being addressed, but in a way that was fair to passengers and in line with the correct procedures.'
Sam Williamson, 22, was threatened with prosecution after he bought the wrong ticket using his 16-25 railcard on a journey in Manchester. In the end, Northern Trains backed down on the case, which could have left the graduate with a criminal record.
The watchdog has made several recommendations after disgruntled passengers shared their experiences and after hearing from the rail industry, whose staff can face challenges 'with aggressive and abusive behaviour' when checking tickets.
It can be difficult for staff to distinguish between innocent mistakes and deliberate fare dodging, the report said.
Also, under railway laws, it is simply an offence not to present a valid ticket for a trip, regardless of the passenger's intent.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Meanwhile, train fare evaders continue to be captured – some of them red-handed like a 'short farer' at Waterloo who avoided paying £20,000 over three years by buying a ticket only for a part of his commute.
Fare evasion and ticket revenue loss are on the rise, and it is 'becoming normalised among certain passenger groups,' the watchdog warned.
The watchdog made five key recommendations on how the fare evasion system could improve, although they are unlikely to have any immediate impact on passengers.
Even seasoned travellers can be caught out by different ticket types, validity, restrictions and peak/off-peak travel times. This is because the ticket retail systems are out of date.
The watchdog called for plain English explanations of ticket details, and a redesign of ticketing systems.
Train operators have used 'inconsistent' approaches and legal powers, which can lead to 'sometimes unfair or disproportionate outcomes.'
Actions to address this include adopting more consistent practices when tickets are checked and escalated based on 'likely passenger intent.'
Passengers can face very different practices depending on the train operator if prosecuted for a mistake, including the choice of law, legal procedure, use of third-party agents and out-of-court settlements.
This is why the watchdog proposed a more consistent legal test for prosecutions based on public interest, and a wider review of revenue protection legislation in the future.
Some people, like Sam, have been caught out by the small print in the ticket T&Cs, with conditions like travel being limited to a specific time only if using a railcard.
This could be addressed by making T&C, penalty, prosecution and passenger rights information easier to find and understand.
The way train operators enforce train ticket rules has 'proliferated over time,' while the legal framework is complex and used inconsistently depending on the company.
The ORR called for a body or forum to identify and promote best practices on revenue protection.
Rail Delivery Group, the body representing UK rail operators, said the industry will work to implement the recommendations.
A spokesperson said: 'Fare evasion remains a significant challenge for the industry, costing the railway hundreds of millions of pounds each year. More Trending
'That's money that can't be used to improve services, which increases the burden on customers and taxpayers.
'So we need to strike the right balance addressing genuine, honest mistakes made by customers and taking firm action against those who deliberately and persistently seek to exploit the system.'
It comes after South Western Railway was nationalised as part of the government's plan to cut delays for passengers.
However, the change does not mean cheaper tickets as the focus is on that 'trains arrive on time, lower levels of cancellation and a better passenger experience,' Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told Metro.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Rachel Reeves reveals £15,000,000,000 transport projects – here's what we know
MORE: Motorcyclist seriously hurt after crash near London's Blackwall Tunnel
MORE: Fare dodger barges his way through barriers – and straight into arms of police

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The police corner Vanessa in huge Emmerdale murder story
The police corner Vanessa in huge Emmerdale murder story

Metro

time5 hours ago

  • Metro

The police corner Vanessa in huge Emmerdale murder story

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Vanessa Woodfield (Michelle Hardwick) finds herself implicated in Nate Robinson's (Jurell Carter) murder when Tracy Shankley (Amy Walsh) drops her in it in Emmerdale. Things are getting nasty in the Dales after the discovery of Nate's body and accusations are levelled at two likely suspects. John Sugden (Oliver Farnworth) – the actual perpetrator – is questioned by police, but not over his own possible guilt, Cain is the one in the frame. After arguing with Nate before he died, he is prime suspect. John does some quick thinking and talking to get Cain Dingle's (Jeff Hordley) name off the suspect list, and after Cain's own grilling by the police, he airs his suspicions that Tracy's dodgy behaviour makes her look guilty. So those are the two suspects, Cain and Tracy. John then does the unthinkable to secure Cain's freedom – he plants Nate's phone in the playhouse at Tracy's. When the police show up with a warrant, Tracy thinks she's done for when they find the mobile tucked away. Worse still, the police discover that the removal man who came to collect Nate's things doesn't exist. Things are looking bad for the single mum. More Trending The police reveal to her that they believe Nate died the day he was meant to leave, and thinking on her toes, Tracy blurts out an alibi – she was with Vanessa all day. Want to be the first to hear shocking EastEnders spoilers? Who's leaving Coronation Street? The latest gossip from Emmerdale? Join 10,000 soaps fans on Metro's WhatsApp Soaps community and get access to spoiler galleries, must-watch videos, and exclusive interviews. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications so you can see when we've just dropped the latest spoilers! Problem is, she wasn't. And now Vanessa is implicated. Worse still, Vanessa doesn't even know it. The first Vanessa hears about this is when the police show up to corroborate what we know to be a an untruth. View More » Things are stacking up against Tracy, but has Vanessa got the stomach to lie for her sister? Will the two sisters go down for killing Nate? MORE: Emmerdale confirms major Nate news in ITVX release – and it changes everything for the 'suspects' MORE: Emmerdale legend 'framed for murder' as the police take her away MORE: Who was Nate Robinson in Emmerdale and what happened to him?

Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained
Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained

Metro

time10 hours ago

  • Metro

Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' This is how US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez summarised the fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. It would be funny if it were not two of the most powerful men in the world. Yes, their bromance has imploded in full public view, complete with snarky swipes, tantrums and accusations that could have huge legal implications. The first major cracks in their relationship showed at the end of last month on what turned out to be Musk's last day in the White House. The Tesla CEO had become bolder in expressing his dissent over Trump's budget and tax cut bill currently making its way through Congress. Asked about Musk's disapproval of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters last night: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Musk responded, lashing out further overnight, branding it a 'disgusting abomination' that will explode federal budget deficits. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote on X. The criticism quickly escalated into an all-out brawl between the pair, each on their own social media sites Truth Social and X, or in press conferences. Trump threatened to pull back billions of dollars in government contracts for Musk's companies, while the billionaire bit back, suggesting that Trump would have lost the election without him. It was Musk's tweet – linking Trump with the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein – that caused the most controversy. He alleged that the Republican leader is featured in the secret government files on rich and powerful former associates of thesex offender, reigniting long-running conspiracy theories. Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He later reposted a video from 1992 of Trump partying with Epstein and memes about their feud – amplifying them to his 220 million followers on X. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, however, not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about, and offered no actual evidence for his claim. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt on Thursday called Musk's behavior 'an unfortunate episode' adding the tycoon is 'unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' But the allegation prompted fresh demands for a release of the material – this time from Democrats keen on turning a MAGA conspiracy theory back on its proponents. The breakup could reshape both men's futures. For Musk, the stakes are potentially even higher. More Trending This was already evident minutes into the online feud as Tesla's stock price plunged 14%. The break risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardize government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might threaten his companies' profits. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences, and younger male voters – all key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also complicate fundraising ahead of next year's midterm elections. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: The Dark MAGA conspiracy about Trump, Musk and a new world order MORE: Zelensky refutes Trump's take on war and calls Putin 'murderer who came to kill the kids' MORE: Urgent recall of 1,700,000 air conditioners over fears they harbour mold

Tommy Robinson kicked out of restaurant because 'staff didn't want to serve him'
Tommy Robinson kicked out of restaurant because 'staff didn't want to serve him'

Metro

time11 hours ago

  • Metro

Tommy Robinson kicked out of restaurant because 'staff didn't want to serve him'

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tommy Robinson is upset after being kicked out of a restaurant for making staff 'feel uncomfortable'. The right wing activist – real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – was out eating at the Hawksmoor restaurant near Regent Street, central London, before staff realised who he was. Footage taken by EDL member Guramit Singh Kalirai, who was dining with Robinson, shows the restaurant manager explaining 'staff felt uncomfortable'. Kalirai replied: 'Is it because of the colour of my skin?' The manager responded: 'No, no, no. We have a duty of care to our members of staff. We like to look after our people, as I'm sure you can understand. 'I'm very sorry. I hope it hasn't inconvenienced you.' The footage was posted to X, with Kalirai saying: 'Just been kicked out of Hawksmoor steak house for no reason. Literally just had our starters.' The manager could be seen handing Robinson a business card with the CEO of Hawksmoor's details on it 'if he has any questions', and told him the restaurant will cover the cost of the drinks. Metro has contacted the Hawksmoor for comment. Robinson was released from prison last month after he was jailed for repeatedly lied about a Syrian refugee. But he had his sentence reduced, and was released from HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: I thought Robbie Williams was overhyped but he can still kick it MORE: What I Own: At 22 and 23, we bought a run down London four-bed for £910,000 MORE: Major US fast food chain to open in London Heathrow airport – a European first

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store