
Train passengers fined 'too harshly' for 'innocent errors' with tickets
With millions of people in the UK travelling by train every day, mistakes are bound to happen – whether that's selecting the wrong railcard or catching the wrong train.
And the country's rail ticketing system, with various train operators and websites, can be confusing – and draconian.
Now, the transport watchdog, the Office of Rail and Road, has said that train operators took disproportionately harsh measures against passengers who had made 'genuine errors.'
The rules are so harsh that a passenger was threatened with prosecution for mistakenly selecting a 16-25 railcard discount when they had a 26-30 railcard.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Another person found out they had a criminal record when having a background check for a job, despite successfully appealing the penalty fare four years prior.
One passenger had a printed e-ticket, but it was so water-damaged it could not be scanned by staff.
Although they subsequently showed a proof of valid ticket for the journey, they were threatened with prosecution.
The passenger ended up settling out of court for £81 to avoid the risk of conviction, which is 'a serious and potentially life changing matter,' the watchdog said.
In a scathing new report reviewing train operators' revenue protection practices, the watchdog made recommendations on how buying the right ticket could be simpler and how passengers are treated when ticket issues arise.
It comes after 59,000 alleged fare evasion convictions were overturned after train operators used a secretive legal loophole, the Single Justice Procedure, to fast-track prosecutions behind closed doors.
After the procedural error by train operators was revealed, the Transport Secretary commissioned the watchdog to review revenue practices to make sure that 'fare evasion was being addressed, but in a way that was fair to passengers and in line with the correct procedures.'
Sam Williamson, 22, was threatened with prosecution after he bought the wrong ticket using his 16-25 railcard on a journey in Manchester. In the end, Northern Trains backed down on the case, which could have left the graduate with a criminal record.
The watchdog has made several recommendations after disgruntled passengers shared their experiences and after hearing from the rail industry, whose staff can face challenges 'with aggressive and abusive behaviour' when checking tickets.
It can be difficult for staff to distinguish between innocent mistakes and deliberate fare dodging, the report said.
Also, under railway laws, it is simply an offence not to present a valid ticket for a trip, regardless of the passenger's intent.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Meanwhile, train fare evaders continue to be captured – some of them red-handed like a 'short farer' at Waterloo who avoided paying £20,000 over three years by buying a ticket only for a part of his commute.
Fare evasion and ticket revenue loss are on the rise, and it is 'becoming normalised among certain passenger groups,' the watchdog warned.
The watchdog made five key recommendations on how the fare evasion system could improve, although they are unlikely to have any immediate impact on passengers.
Even seasoned travellers can be caught out by different ticket types, validity, restrictions and peak/off-peak travel times. This is because the ticket retail systems are out of date.
The watchdog called for plain English explanations of ticket details, and a redesign of ticketing systems.
Train operators have used 'inconsistent' approaches and legal powers, which can lead to 'sometimes unfair or disproportionate outcomes.'
Actions to address this include adopting more consistent practices when tickets are checked and escalated based on 'likely passenger intent.'
Passengers can face very different practices depending on the train operator if prosecuted for a mistake, including the choice of law, legal procedure, use of third-party agents and out-of-court settlements.
This is why the watchdog proposed a more consistent legal test for prosecutions based on public interest, and a wider review of revenue protection legislation in the future.
Some people, like Sam, have been caught out by the small print in the ticket T&Cs, with conditions like travel being limited to a specific time only if using a railcard.
This could be addressed by making T&C, penalty, prosecution and passenger rights information easier to find and understand.
The way train operators enforce train ticket rules has 'proliferated over time,' while the legal framework is complex and used inconsistently depending on the company.
The ORR called for a body or forum to identify and promote best practices on revenue protection.
Rail Delivery Group, the body representing UK rail operators, said the industry will work to implement the recommendations.
A spokesperson said: 'Fare evasion remains a significant challenge for the industry, costing the railway hundreds of millions of pounds each year. More Trending
'That's money that can't be used to improve services, which increases the burden on customers and taxpayers.
'So we need to strike the right balance addressing genuine, honest mistakes made by customers and taking firm action against those who deliberately and persistently seek to exploit the system.'
It comes after South Western Railway was nationalised as part of the government's plan to cut delays for passengers.
However, the change does not mean cheaper tickets as the focus is on that 'trains arrive on time, lower levels of cancellation and a better passenger experience,' Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told Metro.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Rachel Reeves reveals £15,000,000,000 transport projects – here's what we know
MORE: Motorcyclist seriously hurt after crash near London's Blackwall Tunnel
MORE: Fare dodger barges his way through barriers – and straight into arms of police
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Chelsea agree transfer deal to sell forgotten defender after just 12 months
Chelsea have reached an agreement to sell Renato Veiga to Villarreal, according to reports. Veiga joined Chelsea on a seven-year contract from FC Basel just 12 months ago, for a fee thought to be in the region of £12million. But the versatile defender failed to secure regular playing time under Enzo Maresca and was sent on loan to Serie A giants Juventus in January, where he went on to make 15 appearances in all competitions. Though Veiga did his reputation no harm with a string of assured displays at the heart of Juve's defence, he returned to Stamford Bridge from Turin with his immediate future up in the air earlier this summer. The Blues made it clear they would be unable to guarantee the 22-year-old a regular starting role for the 2025/26 campaign, prompting his camp to begin sounding out potential suitors around Europe. Metro's new weekly football newsletter: In The Mixer. Exclusive analysis, FPL tips and transfer talk sent straight to your inbox every Friday – sign up, it's an open goal. Borussia Dortmund, Atletico Madrid, Bayern Munich and Inter Milan have all been credited with an interest, but Villarreal have asserted themselves as the overwhelming favourites to land the Portugal international – who is comfortable operating at both centre-back and in central midfield. According to Fabrizio Romano, Villarreal's discussions have advanced at a pace in recent days and the La Liga outfit have now struck a deal with both Veiga's camp and Chelsea over a €29.5million (£25.5m) package, including add-ons. It's claimed the deal will include a 'heavy' sell-on clause, with Chelsea set to retain a significant percentage of any future transfer fee should the player be sold on again. The move would see Veiga become Villarreal's club-record signing, surpassing Arnaut Danjuma's €23.5m (£20.4m) switch from Bournemouth four years ago. There had still been six years remaining on Veiga's contract at Stamford Bridge, which he signed upon arrival from Basel. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Veiga was left out of Chelsea's first-team squad for their Club World Cup campaign and it was clear the Portuguese was not a part of Maresca's plans for the season. There was no place for Veiga on the substitutes bench as Chelsea were held to a goalless draw in their opening match of the Premier League season with Crystal Palace. It was only last October that Maresca singled Veiga out for special praise after handing the defender a rare start in Chelsea's Europa Conference League defeat of Panathinaikos. More Trending 'I just said to Renato, he has played already as a centre-back, a full-back, holding midfielder, attacking midfielder,' Maresca told reporters at the time. 'He has already played four or five positions. One of my first press conferences, I said that the reason why I really like and love Chelsea is because many players can be versatile. 'Today, in my idea, if they can play different positions, then it is better for the team and especially for the players. Today, if you just play one position, I don't think it's enough. 'You need to learn more positions. Renato, Malo [Gusto], they are playing in different positions and they are doing well.' For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Rasmus Hojlund makes decision over transfer as Manchester United receive new approach MORE: Joe Cole suggests Arsenal should have signed £65m star instead of Viktor Gyokeres MORE: Oliver Glasner speaks out after 'being ignored' by Marc Guehi after Chelsea draw


Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Suranne Jones: ‘My son cringed at one part of my new Netflix thriller'
Let's set the scene: it's a sunny day on Downing Street and the press corps is waiting, cameras poised, for the Prime Minister, when out from Number 10 steps Suranne Jones. Except, it isn't Suranne Jones. This is our latest elected leader Abigail Dalton. (Albeit an unlikely name for a British PM.) With a sharply cropped new hairdo – more on that later – and a plum power suit, Jones stars in Netflix's new political thriller Hostage, across from Julie Delpy's visiting French president. The two world leaders are locked in tense negotiations over Channel boat crossings and NHS medication supplies when disaster, right on cue, strikes. Abigail's do-gooder husband Alex (Bashy) is in French Guiana on a Doctors Without Borders project, when his entire cohort is kidnapped by a masked gang. Their ransom request? Abigail must resign, or they'll start picking off doctors one by one. Given that he's been snatched in French territory and it turns out the kidnappers have dirt on the French pres too, what unfolds is a gripping, if somewhat unlikely, political thriller with two frenemy female leaders going head-to-head. Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Ahead of the five-part show's release on Netflix this Thursday (August 21), Suranne spoke to Metro about working with writer Matt Charman on what type of 'strong female character' she had yet to tackle, when she noticed a politically-themed role was missing from her head count. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Doing double duty as both the show's star and an executive producer meant Suranne was part of the decision-making process on elements like makeup and costume, which real-world female politicians have said is always being carefully managed to ensure it's on brand. Delpy's president Vivienne Toussaint first emerges from a car with all the sleek menace of a knife, wearing a white coat with a slash of red lipstick (the type of thing the Before Sunrise star tells us is the complete opposite of her 'sloppy' norm). 'Abigail matches [Vivienne] in a way,' says Suranne. 'She gets a little bit more put together as her life starts falling apart, which is interesting. You're adding layers, you're adding armour, because you need to be perceived as in control.' With a knowing smile, she adds: 'Also it's a Netflix show. At a very base level, I want to watch and go, 'I want to wear her coat'.' The 46-year-old has become one of British TV's most bankable terrestrial stars – with shows like Vigil and Gentleman Jack on the BBC – but Hostage marks her first foray into the gleaming, glossy-coat world of Netflix. While making TV is by no means an easy feat, Suranne and Julie do point out all the ways their lives are not like their Hostage counterparts. For one thing, Suranne says, she gets more sleep. The stars researched real-life politicians who have walked the corridors of power and remarked upon the 'instant' changes in their hair and pallor when they take office – as if the weight of responsibilities has dawned and taken a psychical toll. Part of that is why Abigail undergoes a drastic hair transformation from the brief scene we see before the election, to the moment she later approaches the despatch box in Parliament. It's a she-means-business cropped 'do. 'Chopping her hair off is something less to worry about,' says Suranne. 'It's taken me a long time to grow it back. My son hated it. He said, 'Mummy, please don't pick me up at the school gates'.' More Trending This makes it sound a much worse trim than it actually is. 'I liked it,' Suranne adds. 'But he was just like 'Oh, cringe'.' It is the case that with the fast-paced twists and turns Hostage takes us on, Abigail's hair is likely the last thing she wants to be thinking about. There are far more important matters at hand. As Julie puts it: 'Usually there's one woman and all men around managing her. Here, it's like women managing everything else.' View More » Hostage is available on Netflix from August 21. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: These are the greatest films of all time you need to stream right now MORE: TV fans defend 'unbelievably stupid' crime thriller that's streaming for free MORE: Netflix viewers race to watch 'mesmerising' drama based on jaw-dropping true story


Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Acid attacker who blinded dad brags about his crimes in rap videos from prison
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A dad who was blinded in one eye by an acid attacker has called it a 'disgrace' that the convict is rapping about his crimes on TikTok. Paul Laskey, 43, was squirted in the face with what was believed to be battery acid after his 16-year-old son was mugged at knifepoint. Robbie Scott, 22, was jailed for the attack but has begun posting music videos from behind bars glorifying violence. The TikTok clips are posted under 'HMP hardest rapper Robdog' and are geographically tagged to 'HMP Manchester (Strangeways)'. In one soundbite, Scott raps: 'I used to roll on the streets with a kitchen knife, would not think twice about dipping guys.' In video he can be seen chanting: 'Robdog jailhouse settings, you know how we do, Geordie boys on coke, oh yes.' Scott violent attack unfolded after he used a zombie knife to steal an £1,000 gold chain from Laskey's son in Newcastle on February 5 2023. The dad went to apprehend Scott when he was squirted in the face with a corrosive acid, causing his left eye to 'melt' away. Reacting to the rap videos, Laskey told Metro: 'It's a disgrace he is able to brag about things he does and has no remorse whatsoever.' The plumber and heating engineer previously recalled how the acid burned his face and destroyed his vision in one eye. He said: 'I couldn't see and couldn't breathe. It took my breathe away with how strong it was. I felt burning on my face. 'It was horrendous. I was off work for the first six months. It was all that was on my mind. It was just awful.' Scott was sent to prison for eight years and six months in May last year after admitting GBH with intent, robbery, having a knife and a corrosive substance in public and resisting arrest. However his sentence was raised to 11 years after it was judged to be unduly lenient. Asked about what Scott's rap videos said about the criminal, Laskey said: 'It just shows the sort of person he is, and when his sentence is over he will probably do it again.' Ministry of Justice has reportedly asked TikTok to take down the videos, according to the Sun. More Trending The Prison Service said: 'Any offender caught using a phone or social media in prison will face punishment, including extra time behind bars.' Metro previously reported how Laskey's eye was saved by a donated placenta. Over the course of a year he received two cornea transplants from donated eyes, as well as 'essential' treatment from a donated placenta. Doctor's used an amnion graft, from the placenta, to help heal surface damage and cover nerve endings. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: These sandals have been dubbed the 'most comfortable' (no breaking-in required) MORE: 'I'm releasing my debut album – but I'm still a lawyer by day' MORE: Streamer says The First Descendant devs 'stole' his likeness in AI ads