Generation of children will not be allowed to grow up 'at the mercy of toxic algorithms', says Technology Secretary
Peter Kyle said the foundations were being laid for a safer online world, as he warned tech firms 'will be held to account' if they fail to adhere.
The changes, part of the Online Safety Act and set to be enforced by regulator Ofcom, require online platforms to have age checks if they host pornography or other harmful content such as material about self-harm and suicide.
He has vowed a generation of children will not be allowed to grow up 'at the mercy of toxic algorithms', saying tech firms will be held to account by new online protections (stock image)
Platforms must ensure algorithms do not harm children by pushing such content to them.
Firms that fail to comply could face fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of global revenue and court orders blocking access in the UK.
Mr Kyle said: 'We cannot – and will not – allow a generation of children to grow up at the mercy of toxic algorithms.' He calls on firms to 'act now to protect our children'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage appearances on Sky News spark thousands of complaints
It comes after Reform UK set up its own broadcast studio to pump out slick, TV-style videos online Thousands of people have complained to Sky News about 'excessive' coverage of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK. It comes after the party set up its own broadcast studio to pump out slick, TV-style videos online. Twice last week, Sky News broadcast the live feed from Reform's studio, prompting campaigners to accuse them of 'outsourcing editorial control' to Mr Farage's far right party. It comes after Nigel Farage was confronted by grieving dad whose schoolboy son died. Cal Roscow, director of campaigns at Best for Britain, said: 'To outsource editorial control wholesale like this is unprecedented, misleading for viewers, and probably doesn't meet Ofcom's impartiality rules. It should never happen again, and over 5,000 Best for Britain supporters have written to say just that.' In one case Sky News broadcast a feed of Mr Farage 'interviewing' party chairman Zia Yusuf about the Online Safety act. In the same broadcast, Reform played Sky News' interview of Tech Secretary Peter Kyle on their feed - meaning Sky was broadcasting its own interview, but through Reform's live feed. Now more than 5,000 supporters of campaign group Best for Britain have complained to Sky about the coverage. READ MORE: Join our Mirror politics WhatsApp group to get the latest updates from Westminster Mr Roscow added: 'Reform UK have built a TV studio of their own - which is fine in principle - but resulted in a bizarre situation where Sky News's own footage of a Minister was being broadcast back to the TV channel - independently of the producers - and overlaid with commentary from a political party's Chair interviewing that same party's Leader. '
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
EXCLUSIVE: Nigel Farage confronted by dad of tragic schoolboy for 'ridiculous' decision
A grieving dad whose son died aged 15 after receiving horrific messages from predators has hit back at Nigel Farage over a pledge to axe new online safety laws. George Nicolaou lost Christoforos three years ago and believes he "would have been with us today" if safeguarding had been in place at the time. The teenager was subject to abuse in an online forum after clicking on a pop-up link to a private chat while he was playing video games. George said the people who his son spoke to "traumatised him for 50 days" and threatened to kill his family unless he completed challenges. He was found unconscious at his family home in Cheshunt, Herts, in March 2022. George told The Mirror: "I always say our son didn't harm himself, he didn't actually give up his life on his own accord, he was ordered to complete the challenges, and by which I say, and I will always say Christopher was murdered. He did not kill himself." It came as George confronted Mr Farage during a call-in on LBC over the Online Safety Act. Under the Online Safety Act, which Reform UK has pledged to axe if the party wins power, tech companies have been ordered to bring in age verification tools, tame toxic algorithms and remove harmful content. George told The Mirror: "I'm not sure if Nigel Farage has any of his own kids, but I'm a grieving father along with my wife and along with 19 other parents we are in a group together with who have lost our children through various ways through social media. In a way I'm fortunate enough I was able to find the data that my child was involved in." He added: "They made him do so many various, traumatising and scary things. Had this safeguarding been in place then, then I'm pretty sure that Christopher and all the other children would have been with us today. Unfortunately children's minds are like sponges and they absorb anything that they come across."
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Palestine Action ban coupled with Online Safety Act ‘a threat to public debate'
The Online Safety Act together with the proscription of Palestine Action could result in platforms censoring Palestinian-related content, human rights organisations have warned. Open Rights Group, Index on Censorship and others have written to Ofcom calling on it to provide clear guidance to platforms on distinguishing lawful expression from content deemed to be in support of terrorism. They say failure to act by the regulator act risks misidentification – including through algorithms – of support for Palestine as support for Palestine Action, which on 5 July became the first direct action protest group to be banned under UK anti-terrorism laws. It also runs the risk of misidentifying objections to Palestine Action's proscription as unlawful support for the group, the signatories claim. Sara Chitseko, a pre-crime programme manager at Open Rights Group, said: 'Crucial public debate about Gaza is being threatened by vague, overly broad laws that could lead to content about Palestine being removed or hidden online. There's also a real danger that people will start self-censoring, worried they might be breaking the law just by sharing or liking posts related to Palestine and non-violent direct action. 'This is a serious attack on freedom of expression and the right to protest in the UK. We need to ensure that people can share content about Palestine online with being afraid that they will be characterised as supportive of terrorism.' The organisations' concerns are exacerbated by Ofcom's advice that platforms can avoid worrying about their duties under the Online Safety Act (OSA) if they ensure they are more censorious than the act requires. 'This approach risks encouraging automated moderation that disproportionately affects political speech, particularly from marginalised communities, including Palestinian voices,' the letter says. Unlike in the EU, there is no independent mechanism for people in the UK to challenge content they feel has been wrongly taken down. The signatories want platforms – the letter has also been sent to Meta, Alphabet, X and ByteDance – to commit to an independent dispute mechanism, if evidence emerges of lawful speech being suppressed. The letter, also signed by Electronic Frontier Foundation in the US and organisations from eight European countries, as well as experts and academics, says: 'We are concerned that the proscription of Palestine Action may result in an escalation of platforms removing content, using algorithms to hide Palestine solidarity posts and leave individuals and those reporting on events vulnerable to surveillance or even criminalisation for simply sharing or liking content that references non-violent direct action. 'We are also concerned about what platforms understand by their legal duties regarding expressions of 'support' for Palestine Action.' The letter comes a week after the OSA's age-gating for 'adult' material came into effect, prompting fears about access to Palestine-related content. For example, Reddit users in the UK have to verify their age to access the Reddit sub r/israelexposed. Ella Jakubowska, the head of policy at EDRi in Brussels, said there would inevitably be suppression of 'critical voices, journalism and social movements around the world. The problem is worsened by automated content moderation systems, well known for over-removing content from Palestinian creators, in support of Black Lives Matter, about LGBTQI+ issues and more. 'It is very likely that in trying to comply with these requirements, platforms would unjustly remove content from people in the EU and other regions.' She said that would contravene laws such as the EU Digital Services Act, designed to strike a balance between keeping people safe online and freedom of expression. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'We have provided detailed guidance to platforms about how to identify the particular types of illegal and harmful material prohibited or restricted by the act, including how to determine whether content may have been posted by a proscribed organisation. 'There is no requirement on companies to restrict legal content for adult users. In fact, they must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping people safe.' Meta, Alphabet, X and ByteDance were all approached for comment.
