Ukraine to hold talks with US next week as military aid resumes
In an address on Friday, Zelenskyy emphasised the restoration of military aid shipments and the upcoming military-level discussions with the US, noting that the Assistant to the US President and Special Presidential Envoy for Ukraine, General Keith Kellogg, will be here in Kyiv for the discussions.
"Right now, we are working with our partners on new, increased weapons production in Ukraine and equipping our army. We already have good agreements, and we expect to reach more; we will be working on them in the coming weeks," Zelenskyy stated.
"We have received political signals at the highest level, good signals, including from the United States and from our European friends... According to all reports, aid shipments have been restored. We will continue our work next week with the American side at the military level; in particular, our military will be working with General Kellogg," he added.
The Ukrainian President further called for the sanctions against Moscow to pressure the state to end the conflict, which is currently in its third year.
"We are also preparing new European defence packages. We expect strong steps soon, including sanctions against Russia for this war - pressure must take effect," he said.
Earlier on Tuesday, Trump, during his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, reaffirmed Washington's commitment to bolstering Ukraine's defence capabilities, stating that the US would be sending weapons to Ukraine to defend itself from Russia after reports that the Trump administration temporarily halted certain weapons deliveries to Ukraine amid a review of US military spending and foreign aid, CNN reported, citing a senior White House official.
The resumption of the military by the US came days after Russia launched over 500 drones and 11 missiles at Kyiv on July 4, resulting in the death of one person, injuries to at least 23 others, and widespread damage to buildings across the capital, Al Jazeera reported, citing Ukrainian authorities.
Meanwhile, on Thursday, Trump stated that the US would be providing weapons to NATO allies, who can then transfer them to Ukraine. This arrangement was also confirmed by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday, noting that it was quicker to send supplies from Europe than to ship them directly from American factories, as reported by Al Jazeera.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
6 hours ago
- Observer
Britain and Europe are changing together
Many state visits are empty, symbolic acts that have little to no policy content or lasting significance. But every now and then, such a visit changes the shape of international relations. Could French President Emmanuel Macron's recently concluded trip to London be one of them? Macron's three-day trip, the first state visit to the United Kingdom by a European Union head of state since Brexit in 2020, had plenty of pomp and pageantry. But it also focused on policy and politics, which reflects a profound shift in the UK's circumstances since leaving the EU. During the upheaval of the Brexit psychodrama, there was little interest in constructive exchange, and the UK's relationship with Europe remained defined by its lurching departure from the bloc. But nearly a decade on, Donald Trump is back in the White House and has launched a trade war on the world. Russian President Vladimir Putin has shredded the European security order. And Chinese President Xi Jinping has resorted to threats of economic coercion – a striking reversal from the 'golden era' of UK-China relations proclaimed in 2015. Even more dramatic, perhaps, are the changes in the EU. The big policy initiatives launched during Macron's UK visit reflect the forces that are turning the bloc on its head. First, the EU is moving from a peace project to a war union. For most of its existence, the EU sought peace through economic integration. But Putin's war of Ukraine in 2022 reoriented the bloc towards security – a goal that has taken on greater urgency since Trump cast doubt on the United States' commitment to collective security on the continent. There is broad support for this new orientation. According to a recent opinion poll conducted by the European Council on Foreign Relations, many Europeans favour increased defence spending, conscription and the development of a European or national nuclear deterrent. Against this backdrop, Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer took a bold first step towards establishing an independent nuclear deterrent with the Northwood Declaration, in which they agreed that 'there is no extreme threat to Europe that would not prompt a response by our two nations.' A second major change is the development of 'securonomics.' The EU economy is under pressure from Trump's tariffs and China's export restrictions on magnets and critical minerals. EU policymakers now talk of de-risking, diversifying and deepening the single market, rather than pursuing free-trade agreements. While the UK has made it clear that it will not rejoin the single market or the customs union, the question is whether it can persuade the EU that it can be counted on to help the bloc achieve its new trade goals, or whether it will be given unfriendly treatment because it is seen as posing a risk to those objectives. Domestic politics in Europe has also undergone a rapid transformation. It has been fascinating to watch Macron – once a poster boy for liberal universalism – reinvent himself as a champion of secure borders and protectionism, while taking a tougher stance on crime. This volte-face has seen mainstream European politicians shift focus towards defending national sovereignty – from Russia, China, Trump, and migration – while they try to contain populist parties such as Marine Le Pen's National Rally and Alternative für Deutschland. That is the backdrop for the ground-breaking deal that Starmer and Macron signed on migration returns. Starmer's approach to Europe is a marked improvement from that of former Conservative prime ministers Boris Johnson (who compared the EU to Napoleon and Hitler) and Liz Truss (who questioned whether Macron was a friend or a foe). Starmer has proved himself, particularly with his deft diplomacy on Ukraine, to be a reliable partner and stakeholder, regaining the trust of EU institutions and member states. One senior German policymaker told me how impressed he was by the UK filling the leadership vacuum created by Trump's disregard for Ukraine. In other words, the UK is widely seen in Europe as being 'part of the team' again. The EU-UK summit in May provided a clear framework for deepening the relationship, not least through a Security and Defence Partnership that paves the way for British participation in European defence programmes. But the UK government has remained far too cautious in other areas. Most notably, Starmer has been careful not to cross the Labour Party's self-imposed red lines: no freedom of movement, no customs union and no single market. Future historians may well wonder why Starmer did not aim higher. The changing international environment offers Starmer a clear opportunity to redraw Europe's political map, which would establish him as one of Britain's most consequential leaders. But to do so, Starmer must convince British voters that today's Europe is a different creature from the one they imagine: a defence community that is more focused on safeguarding the continent than on transcending the nation-state. And he must explain how the UK can help build this new European security order, so long as it banishes the Brexit mindset. As a post-liberal Europe emerges, Britain must stop clinging to the past and seize the chance to shape the continent's future in a way that advances its interests. That requires acknowledging that both the EU and the UK have entered a new era. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025
Observer
6 hours ago
- Observer
Trump to send weapons to Ukraine
KYIV/WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine on Monday, and threatened to hit buyers of Russian exports with sanctions unless Russia agrees a peace deal in 50 days, a major shift in policy brought on by disappointment with Moscow. Sitting side-by-side with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters that he was disappointed in Russian President Vladimir Putin. Billions of dollars in weapons would be distributed to Ukraine, he said. "We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO," Trump said, adding that Washington's NATO allies would pay for the weapons. The weapons would include Patriot air defence missiles which Ukraine has urgently sought to defend its cities from Russian air strikes. "It's a full complement with the batteries," Trump said when asked whether he would send Patriot missiles specifically. "We're going to have some come very soon, within days... a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have." "We're going to be doing secondary tariffs. If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100 per cent," Trump said. Trump's moves underline his growing disenchantment with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the lack of progress in U.S.-led efforts to secure a ceasefire in Russia's more than three-year-old war in Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelensky Zelenskiy, who has been seeking air defence systems to fend off Russian airstrikes, said he had discussed "the path to peace and what we can practically do together to bring it closer" at talks with Trump's special envoy on Ukraine, Keith Kellogg. "This includes strengthening Ukraine's air defence, joint production and procurement of defence weapons in collaboration with Europe," Zelenskiy wrote on X after their talks in Kyiv. A White House official said Trump was referring to 100 per cent tariffs on Russian exports as well as so-called secondary sanctions, which target third countries that buy a country's exports. Such secondary sanctions are widely seen as likely to have a far more severe impact on Russia's economy than measures that have been imposed previously, which have allowed Russia to continue selling oil to buyers such as China and India, earning hundreds of billions of dollars. Kellogg's visit — more than three years into the Kremlin's attack — comes as Russian forces killed three civilians in eastern Ukraine and launched dozens of long-range drones at targets across the country. The envoy arrived in Kyiv just one day after US President Donald Trump announced new Patriot air defence systems supplies to Ukraine, in a U-turn that has underscored concerns in Kyiv over the consistency of American support. — Agencies
Times of Oman
11 hours ago
- Times of Oman
US trade 'almost impossible' in case of Trump tariffs — EU
Brussels: EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said on Monday that he believed the US was ready to continue ongoing trade negotiations despite an announcement by President Donald Trump that he would impose 30% trade tariffs on imports from the EU and Mexico from August 1 if no deal was reached. His remarks come amid divisions within the bloc on how to confront the threat, with notably France calling for a hardball approach, while others call for caution with a mind to Europe's continued reliance on the US for defense. What did the EU trade chief say about talks with the US? Sefcovic, who as trade commissioner has been representing the EU's 27 member states during more than four weeks of talks between the two sides, said a deal was still the favored outcome, even while he acknowledged calls from countries like France for the bloc to toughen its stance. In remarks made on arrival for talks in Brussels with bloc ministers, he said the 30% tariff threatened by Trump would make it "almost impossible to continue" trade with the US, which is currently worth €4.4 billion ($5.15 billion) a day. Sefcovic said he and his negotiating team had felt a deal was imminent during the trade talks. "The feeling on our side was that we are very close to an agreement," he said. But he said the turmoil created by the tariff threat should be ended, adding that the bloc was prepared for "all outcomes." "The current uncertainty caused by unjustified tariffs cannot persist indefinitely," Sefcovic told reporters, adding that "well-considered, proportionate countermeasures" were still on the table if no deal could be reached. How might the EU react to Trump's tariffs? European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday delayed — as a sign of good will — a package of retaliatory measures over previous US tariffs on steel and aluminium that was due to kick in on Monday. But diplomats said another set of reprisal measures that could be launched if the 30% tariffs go ahead will be presented to trade ministers on Monday. France's trade minister. Laurent Saint-Martin, said there should be "no taboos" in any retaliatory plans, adding that Trump's announcement meant that the bloc had to reconsider its tactis. "If you hold anything back, you are not strengthening your hand in negotiations," he said at the Brussels talks. "Obviously, the situation since Saturday requires us to change our strategy." Denmark's foreign minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, whose country currently holds the EU presidency, also called for a firmer approach. "We want a deal but there's an old saying: 'if you want peace, you have to prepare for war'," he said ahead of the talks. Merz says will work 'intensively' for deal German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said the 2 1/2 weeks remaining till the August 1 deadline had to be used to reach a deal. "I will be working on this really intensively," he told German public broadcaster ARD in an interview on Sunday. He said that he, like French President Emmanuel Macron, was in favor of massive counter-tariffs if Trump's threat became reality, but "not before August 1." Merz gave an urgent warning about the consequences for the German economy if no deal was reached. "If that happened, then we could forget about much of our effort with regard to economic policy, because it would overshadow everything and hit Germany's export economy in its core."
