FTSE 100 touches above 9,000 for the first time
The FTSE 100 Index briefly rose above the record high, hitting 9,016.98 at one stage in morning trading on Tuesday, having recorded a fresh closing high on Monday just shy of the milestone.
The top tier later eased back to stand 3.34 points lower at 8994.72 by mid-morning.
Markets across Europe lifted tentatively with the Dax in Germany and France's Cac 40 up 0.3% and 0.2% respectively.
Investors were optimistic that a deal can still be reached between the US and EU, despite the latest tariff threats from US President Donald Trump.
Mr Trump said on Saturday that major trading partners Mexico and the EU would face a 30% tariff starting next month, piling on the pressure for deals to be struck.
Some stocks were struggling on the FTSE despite the record being reached, with Barratt Redrow plunging to the bottom of the top tier, shedding 7% after a disappointing update, which also dragged rival housebuilders Persimmon and Berkeley Group lower.
Victoria Scholar, head of investment at Interactive Investor, said a speech by Chancellor Rachel Reeves later will also be in sharp focus.
She said: 'UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to deliver her closely watched Mansion House speech tonight when she is anticipated to outline a series of financial reforms including measures to improve mortgage access.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Triumphant in trade talks, Trump and his tariffs still face a challenge in federal court
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has been getting his way on trade, strong-arming the European Union, Japan and other partners to accept once unthinkably high taxes on their exports to the United States. But his radical overhaul of American trade policy, in which he's bypassed Congress to slam big tariffs on most of the world's economies, has not gone unchallenged. He's facing at least seven lawsuits charging that he's overstepped his authority. The plaintiffs want his biggest, boldest tariffs thrown out. And they won Round One. In May, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized federal court in New York, ruled that Trump exceeded his powers when he declared a national emergency to plaster taxes — tariffs — on imports from almost every country in the world. In reaching its decision, the court combined two challenges — one by five businesses and one by 12 U.S. states — into a single case. Now it goes on to Round Two. On Thursday, the 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, which typically specializes in patent law, are scheduled to hear oral arguments from the Trump administration and from the states and businesses that want his sweeping import taxes struck down. That court earlier allowed the federal government to continue collecting Trump's tariffs as the case works its way through the judicial system. The issues are so weighty — involving the president's power to bypass Congress and impose taxes with huge economic consequences in the United States and abroad — that the case is widely expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, regardless of what the appeals court decides. Trump is an unabashed fan of tariffs. He sees the import taxes as an all-purpose economic tool that can bring manufacturing back to the United States, protect American industries, raise revenue to pay for the massive tax cuts in his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,'' pressure countries into bending to his will, even end wars. The U.S. Constitution gives the power to impose taxes — including tariffs — to Congress. But lawmakers have gradually relinquished power over trade policy to the White House. And Trump has made the most of the power vacuum, raising the average U.S. tariff to more than 18%, highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. At issue in the pending court case is Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs without seeking congressional approval or conducting investigations first. Instead, he asserted the authority to declare a national emergency that justified his import taxes. In February, he cited the illegal flow of drugs and immigrants across the U.S. border to slap tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. Then on April 2 — 'Liberation Day,'' Trump called it — he invoked IEEPA to announce 'reciprocal'' tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and a 10% 'baseline'' tariff on almost everybody else. The emergency he cited was America's long-running trade deficit. Trump later suspended the reciprocal tariffs, but they remain a threat: They could be imposed again Friday on countries that do not pre-empt them by reaching trade agreements with the United States or that receive letters from Trump setting their tariff rates himself. The plaintiffs argue that the emergency power laws does not authorize the use of tariffs. They also note that the trade deficit hardly meets the definition of an 'unusual and extraordinary'' threat that would justify declaring an emergency under the law. The United States, after all, has run trade deficits — in which it buys more from foreign countries than it sells them — for 49 straight years and in good times and bad. The Trump administration argues that courts approved President Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in a 1971 economic crisis. The Nixon administration successfully cited its authority under the 1917 Trading With Enemy Act, which preceded and supplied some of the legal language used in IEEPA. In May, the trade court rejected the argument, ruling that Trump's Liberation Day tariffs 'exceed any authority granted to the President'' under the emergency powers law. 'The president doesn't get to use open-ended grants of authority to do what he wants,'' said Reilly Stephens, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian legal group that is representing businesses suing the Trump administration over the tariffs. In the case of the drug trafficking and immigration tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico, the trade court ruled that the levies did not meet IEEPA's requirement that they 'deal with'' the problem they were supposed to address. The court challenge does not cover other Trump tariffs, including levies on foreign steel, aluminum and autos that the president imposed after Commerce Department investigations concluded that those imports were threats to U.S. national security. Nor does it include tariffs that Trump imposed on China in his first term — and President Joe Biden kept — after a government investigation concluded that the Chinese used unfair practices to give their own technology firms an edge over rivals from the United States and other Western countries. Paul Wiseman, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Entrepreneur
23 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Investing in a Greener Future
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Clean energy is no longer just a government target or a topic for climate reports. It has become a global economic driver and a fast-growing space for innovation. What was once viewed as a specialist sector is now central to how countries plan for growth, security and long-term resilience. For UK founders, this presents a moment of real opportunity. Whether your business is in technology, logistics, finance, construction or professional services, understanding clean energy finance is now part of building a future-ready company. As the world transitions toward low-carbon systems, the ability to navigate this space will separate those who can scale sustainably from those left behind. Over the last 15 years, I've worked across public and private sectors. I've helped shape major infrastructure deals in the UK as the Project Finance Advisor for the UK Cabinet Office and Infrastructure Project Authority, and led the design of energy investment strategies in Mongolia, where we are actively positioning the country as a green energy exporter for Asia. What I've learned is that clean energy is not an isolated sector. It cuts across industries, borders and policy frameworks, which means opportunity is everywhere for those who know how to engage with it. Clean energy is part of the mainstream economy This is a critical mindset shift. Clean energy is not a side project or a corporate social responsibility box to tick. It is a core driver of economic transformation. Global investors are now treating renewable energy, battery storage, grid infrastructure and green hydrogen as long-term, high-quality assets. These are not speculative bets, they are increasingly seen as stable investments that align with both climate targets and commercial returns. Institutional investors, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds are actively building portfolios in this space. The environmental and social impact is important, but so are the financial fundamentals. These projects are producing returns, creating jobs and supporting energy independence. For UK founders, this means that if your product or service plays a role in supporting decarbonisation, energy efficiency or the broader clean economy, you are operating in a growth market. Capital is already flowing in, and demand is growing, so the moment to act is now. Public policy is creating new momentum In the UK, the alignment between policy goals and funding mechanisms is becoming stronger. The government's net zero strategy is backed by institutions like the UK Infrastructure Bank, and public-private partnerships are helping accelerate the delivery of climate-aligned infrastructure. This policy shift is opening new doors for founders. Businesses that help reduce emissions, digitise infrastructure, or create smarter, more sustainable systems can now find clearer routes to support. These may come in the form of grants, co-financing, tax incentives, or simply greater access to decision-makers focused on delivering impact at scale. It is rare to see this level of clarity between long-term policy goals and real-world investment tools. For entrepreneurs, especially those building in tech, sustainability, or infrastructure, this is a window worth paying attention to. You don't need to be in the energy sector to be part of this Some of the most promising innovation in clean energy is coming from outside the traditional power and utilities space. This is because clean energy is more than just generation and transmission, it includes everything from how buildings are heated and cooled, to how transport systems operate, to how supply chains are monitored. Founders in sectors like agriculture, logistics, retail and software are already creating tools that help track energy use, reduce emissions, or integrate renewable sources. It could be a data platform that helps companies report on their carbon footprint. It could be a startup working on smart insulation materials for homes, or it might be a digital service helping consumers manage their household energy use more effectively. The clean energy economy is broad, what matters most is that the solution addresses a real need, delivers measurable results, and can scale sustainably. The barriers to entry are lower than many assume, but the rewards for getting it right are growing every day. There is untapped opportunity in global partnerships One area that is often overlooked is the opportunity to scale internationally by supporting emerging markets. Countries with abundant renewable resources, like Mongolia, are increasingly looking to attract international expertise and capital to help build out their energy systems. This is where blended finance plays a key role, combining funding, concessional loans and commercial investment to reduce risk and get projects moving. UK-based founders with technical knowledge, digital solutions, or infrastructure experience are well placed to contribute to these efforts. These partnerships do take time and they require patience, cultural awareness and long-term commitment, but they also offer access to new markets and the chance to be involved with transformational projects on a global scale. Founders who are open to these kinds of collaborations often find that they can grow faster, diversify revenue streams, and play a leadership role in shaping how the global energy transition unfolds. Flexibility and resilience will carry you further than speed alone Clean energy is moving fast, but it is also complex. Technologies are constantly evolving, regulatory environments shift, and the needs of end users can change quickly. Founders who build their businesses around adaptability, rather than just speed, are far more likely to succeed. That means understanding that what works in one country may not work in another. It means designing solutions that can scale up or down depending on funding, policy or local infrastructure, and it means accepting that long-term value often comes from solving problems steadily and sustainably, not from rushing into markets without a clear plan. Resilience can be built into the core of a business. Whether through flexible financing structures, modular technology, or an agile operating model, founders who prepare for change will be better equipped to respond when challenges arise. This mindset, grounded in practical awareness and long-term thinking, is what sets resilient companies apart in the clean energy space. A final word for UK founders The global shift toward clean energy is one of the defining transformations of our time. It brings together climate action, economic opportunity, and international collaboration. For UK founders, there is a real chance to contribute to this transition in meaningful and commercially viable ways. You do not need to be an energy specialist to get involved. What matters is that your business is built to solve a real challenge, that it can evolve with the market, and that it aligns with the direction the world is already moving in. Clean energy is not just about emissions. It is about creating a fairer, more resilient, and more prosperous economy. Founders who recognise this will be better placed to lead in the years ahead, not just by building successful companies, but by building a better future too.
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Countries Promise Trump to Buy U.S. Gas, and Leave the Details for Later
Trade negotiations have for years focused on the rules of the road for commerce between nations. Under President Trump, the deal making has been more direct, especially when it comes to energy. Countries are now agreeing to purchase American fossil fuels, in specific amounts and often years into the future, whether or not their economies will demand it or whether the United States will have the ability to supply it. That adds a layer of government sway over what are typically open market transactions. And it's not clear how — or whether — political leaders will get private companies to go along. 'This is new, and generally that's because in trade agreements you want things that are clear and enforceable,' said David Goldwyn, a former U.S. diplomat and U.S. Energy Department official. 'These energy commitments are neither clear nor necessarily enforceable. They're more aspirational, political encouragements.' The European Union, for example, committed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy products — including crude oil, nuclear reactor fuel, natural gas and other petroleum derivatives — over three years. On an annual basis, that would amount to more than three times the amount the bloc bought last year from the United States. Trump's deal with Europe The deal would require a huge jump in U.S. energy exports in the future. Note: Estimate based on the E.U.'s commitment to buy $750 billion in U.S. energy exports through 2028. Source: ClearView Energy Partners analysis of Census Bureau data By The New York Times The European Union has been buying more American gas since Russia, previously a big supplier, attacked Ukraine in 2022, and there is appetite to buy more. But purchasing $250 billion a year would require the bloc to use the United States as essentially its only supplier. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
