Why Sonam Raghuvanshi left her 'mangalsutra' at Meghalaya homestay before Raja Raghuvanshi's murder
A 'mangalsutra' left behind in a suitcase helped police crack the mysterious honeymoon murder case in Meghalaya, director general of police (DGP) I Nongrang said on Wednesday.
Raja Raghuvanshi (29) and his wife Sonam (25), who were married in Indore on May 11, arrived in Meghalaya on May 20 for their honeymoon. On May 22, the couple reached Sohra in East Khasi Hills district and attempted to check into a homestay. However, they had no prior booking and were unable to secure a room.
On June 2, Raja's body was discovered in a gorge near Weisawdong Falls. A search continued for Sonam, who eventually surrendered in Uttar Pradesh's Ghazipur, around 1,200 km away, in the early hours of June 9.
Her alleged lover, Raj Kushwaha, and the three hired killers were arrested the same day.
The case took a turn when police recovered a ring and Sonam's mangalsutra – a sacred necklace worn by married Hindu women.
According to a police officer involved in the investigation cited by news agency PTI, the couple arrived at a homestay in Sohra on May 22 without a prior booking. As no room was available, they left their suitcase at the homestay, considering it would be difficult to carry it on a trek of over 3,000 steps to Nongriat village, where they intended to visit the double-decker root bridge.
Also read | Sonam Raghuvanshi's brother cuts ties with her, '100%' sure she is guilty
'We recovered Sonam's 'mangalsutra' and a ring from the suitcase the couple abandoned at a homestay in Sohra,' DGP Nongrang told PTI.
The DGP added, 'A married woman leaving behind the ornaments gave us a clue to pursue her as a suspect in the case.'
While their suitcase stayed at the Sohra homestay, they spent the night at a homestay in Nongriat and checked out early on May 23.
After trekking back to Sohra, they collected their scooter from the parking area and proceeded to Weisawdong Falls. There, Raja was allegedly murdered by three contract killers in the presence of his wife, the officer said.
Also read | How Sonam Raghuvanshi manipulated Raja with marriage consummation promise
Police had earlier reported that a local tour guide saw the couple with three Hindi-speaking men while trekking back to Sohra from Nongriat.
'The accused persons have admitted to the crime, and with all the evidence, there is no room to deny,' the officer added.
A Shillong court has remanded Sonam, her 20-year-old 'lover' Raj, and the three contract killers to eight-day police custody.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A murder in Meghalaya and a lesson
The 'honeymoon murder' in Meghalaya has shocked everyone. Many young people lead double lives, and under a façade of complying with conventional norms, it is difficult to know what goes on under the veil of anonymity in urban areas. But as a police officer, I have another take. The case shows that citizens fail to appreciate the detective and investigative skills of the local police. In complex cases, there are loud demands to transfer the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). This is despite the fact that the media has frequently revealed that the CBI has numerous constraints, including officers' vacancies and a huge load of pending cases. Having worked in the Bureau, I know its strengths and deficiencies. Its own cadre of officers is well trained, comprising keen investigators. And the agency is very careful in selecting those who come on deputation. The result is a host of competent investigators and world-class investigation. However, no one can beat police station officers when it comes to obtaining information and accessing local resources. It is the paucity of time that drags them down. Running from one 'bandobast' to the other, responding to emergency calls, settling the petty disputes we citizens frequently get into and providing security to VIPs — an officer hardly gets time to interrogate suspects at length. He is equally pressed for time while documenting his investigation to satisfy the demanding courts. Having accepted these limitations, I would fully trust the state police, in this case in Meghalaya, to detect an offence like murder and to investigate it diligently. There is no doubt that police stations get the best information from local residents, with whom they are in contact daily. In the instant case, a tourist guide is said to have provided an important clue about three people having been in the company of the couple. I have witnessed the technical skills of our young police station staff. Tracing the movements of accused persons or victims through mobiles has become a valuable technical capability that they commonly use for detection, as in the current case. They have become skilled in accessing information and sifting out what is relevant. Cybercrimes are regularly detected and investigated by the younger lot working in police stations. They support inspectors, as only officers of that level are authorised to investigate cybercrime. Considering the huge number of such cases, it is time the power to investigate cybercrime was delegated to sub-inspectors. Between the CBI and police stations are state criminal investigation departments (CID). In the past, they were citizens' favourites, with many Hindi films depicting detectives playing important roles. We have lost sight of them of late. But they continue to work quietly in state headquarters and have enough time at their disposal for sustained investigation. CID officers have conducted some wonderful investigations and secured convictions. Old-timers would recollect the notorious mass killer of Mumbai, Raman Raghav, who through his serial rapes and more than 40 murders had cast a spell of fear over the city. He was arrested, investigated and successfully prosecuted by the Crime Branch, Mumbai. Police officers are transferred and move between police stations and the CID. As they are from the state, officers working in the CID have close contact with station officers as well as citizens. They frequently coordinate with police agencies of other states and are deft in handling inter-state issues. While a lack of resources is common to all law enforcement agencies, interference by local and state-level politicians has to some extent dented the performance of both police stations and the CID. Yet they stand tall in their detective and investigating expertise. The Meghalaya case has shown that state police are not only competent to detect a heinous case involving different states but that they are technologically sound, too. Three different states coordinated and cooperated efficiently. It sends a message to criminals not to underestimate law enforcement. And also for citizens to not routinely seek central agencies but to trust their local officers and those working in the special units like the state CID. The need of the hour is to strengthen local police stations. Politicians have realised the value of the information network of police stations and their resourcefulness. Otherwise, why would each political party or leader fight to keep the Home Department? The lesson from the Meghalaya murder is that the state police and local police stations cannot be ignored. That they are competent and efficient and would perform even better with more resources and technically equipped and trained staff. Between the CBI and local police stations lies an equally competent agency, the CID. This knowledgeable and experienced department needs to be activated in cases of inter-state crime. Awareness about how police in India operate and interest in how they work would be beneficial to both citizens and the police themselves. A disinterested citizenry has led to politicians capturing law enforcement. However, Meghalaya has shown that well-intentioned political support can motivate state police not only to perform but to excel in detection and investigation. The writer is a retired Maharashtra-cadre IPS officer who has worked in both the CBI and the CID
News18
an hour ago
- News18
BJP Targets Bengal Govt In Assembly After Maheshtala Temple Clash; 40 Arrested, Gunpowder Seized
Last Updated: In the aftermath, 40 people were arrested in connection with the violence across seven FIRs. The BJP on Wednesday created uproar in the Bengal Assembly after the Speaker rejected its adjournment motion over the recent violence in Maheshtala. The party accused the Mamata Banerjee-led government of failing to maintain law and order and slammed it for alleged appeasement politics following reports of temple vandalism. BJP MLAs staged a protest inside the House, demanding accountability and action. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari also changed his profile picture on Facebook and X to a Tulsi plant in protest against the incident. The unrest in Maheshtala began Tuesday afternoon when a clash broke out between two groups in the Rabindra Nagar and Nadial police station areas, reportedly over the location of a shop. The confrontation escalated into violence, with brickbatting on police and isolated incidents of vandalism. Police used force to disperse the mob and restore order. In the aftermath, 40 people were arrested in connection with the violence across seven FIRs. 'None of those who have indulged in violence will be spared," officials said. Adding to the tension, police reported the discovery of gunpowder in the Budge Budge area late Tuesday night, leading to the arrest of five more individuals. The material has been seized, and investigations are underway. A clash between two groups occurred yesterday afternoon in Rabindra Nagar PS area and adjacent areas of Nadial PS over the location of a shop, resulting in brickbatting at police and isolated vandalism in the vicinity. Police resorted to necessary use of force and dispersed the…— West Bengal Police (@WBPolice) June 12, 2025 Prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS) have been imposed in the Rabindra Nagar area to maintain peace. Authorities have advised political representatives not to visit the locality until the curbs are lifted. Citizens have also been warned against spreading rumours online. 'Those trying to trigger unrest will be sternly dealt with as per law," police added. Adhikari in a post on X said that he has already written to SP of Diamond Harbour Police District and the Director General (DGP) of West Bengal Police over the incident. He wrote: 'I have approached the SP of Diamond Harbour Police District and DGP @WBPolice so that today, I along with one MLA can visit Maheshtala under Rabindranagar Police Station to meet and express solidarity with the victims of the Hindu families and the affected Hindu shopkeepers who came under the attack of the Jihadis yesterday." I have approached the SP of Diamond Harbour Police District and DGP @WBPolice so that today, I along with one MLA can visit Maheshtala under Rabindranagar Police Station to meet and express solidarity with the victims of the Hindu families and the affected Hindu shopkeepers who… — Suvendu Adhikari (@SuvenduWB) June 12, 2025 He added: 'This visit is a step towards understanding their grievances and ensuring their voices are heard. I hope that the administration doesn't obstruct my visit." First Published: June 12, 2025, 13:34 IST
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Court slams accused in 2020 Delhi riots case for trying to delay trial
A Delhi court has criticised attempts to delay the trial in a 2020 Delhi riots case, observing that the matter is at an advanced stage and cannot be needlessly prolonged. The court noted that despite the trial having gone on for more than a year and only two witnesses remaining, a fresh application was moved seeking re-examination of a prosecution witness. The order was passed on June 4 by additional sessions judge (ASJ) Praveen Singh of Karkardooma Court, who took over the case recently following a reshuffle of judicial officers by the Delhi high court. The court was hearing an application filed by advocate Mehmood Pracha, counsel for accused Sonu Saifi, seeking to recall a witness for further cross-examination. Pracha argued that he was unable to adequately question the witness during an earlier hearing due to lack of time and that the witness's testimony was materially significant to the case. Rejecting the plea, the judge noted: 'Around 26 witnesses have been examined and it is only after a passage of one year that this application has been moved — at a stage when the matter is in its final leg with only two witnesses left.' The court underscored that a lawyer's delay in realising the need for further cross-examination could not justify prolonging a near-concluded trial. 'This application has been moved at the time and convenience of the counsel. A witness cannot be recalled merely because the counsel realised it after one year,' the court observed. The prosecution opposed the application, terming it a deliberate attempt to stall proceedings. It argued that the witness had been sufficiently cross-examined in May 2023 and that no new grounds were presented to justify re-examination. The case arose out of an FIR registered at Dayalpur police station involving charges of arson, attempt to murder, and criminal conspiracy during the February 2020 violence in northeast Delhi. Nineteen people are named as accused, including Faisal Farooq, owner of Rajdhani Public School. According to the prosecution, Farooq allegedly instigated a mob that torched DRP Convent School and nearby properties near Shiv Vihar Tiraha on February 24, 2020. It was further alleged that Farooq's Rajdhani Public School served as a launchpad for hurling petrol bombs and stones at Hindu-owned properties. Charges against all accused were framed in March 2023. Judge Singh replaced ASJ Pulastya Pramachala as part of a broader judicial reshuffle and is now presiding over several high-profile Delhi riots trials. His recent order sends a clear message on the judiciary's reluctance to entertain delay tactics, especially in cases nearing conclusion.
