
Heritage officials asked if CBC and Radio-Canada should be split, internal document shows
Article content
The controversial question was raised when officials prepared a set of worksheets for members of an advisory committee appointed by the former minister to provide input on the future of the public broadcaster.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The document, released to National Post under federal access-to-information legislation, contains around 40 preliminary 'discussion questions' that were drafted by officials to 'serve as a point of departure for developing these worksheets,' which centred around the themes of CBC/ Radio-Canada's funding, mandate, and governance.
Article content
Article content
'Is there a case for considering a structural separation between CBC and Radio-Canada (e.g., with distinct funding, boards and leaders, etc.)? Why or why not? What would be the benefit and drawbacks of such a model,' officials wrote in the undated document, prepared between December 2023 and May 2024 for Pascale St-Onge, the former minister of Canadian Heritage, who did not seek re-election.
Article content
Article content
In a statement, a department spokeswoman did not directly say whether that issue was ultimately proposed or why officials raised it, but said the former minister met with the advisory committee to discuss 'a range of questions' dealing with the public broadcaster, from its funding to transparency and programming.
Article content
Those meetings informed a set of reforms the former minister proposed back in February, where she did raise the need to better emphasize the separation between CBC and Radio-Canada, at least editorially.
Article content
Other 'potential questions' included how often the corporation's mandate should be reviewed, whether 'public-value tests' were necessary to assess the impact of new initiatives over concerns about competing for audiences, and how timely it was to still have a 'single national public broadcaster,' versus a more decentralized model.
Article content
The current CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, Marie-Philippe Bouchard sat on the advisory panel before she was appointed to her role, but spokesman Leon Mar said in an email they understood that advisory committee members 'committed to keeping their discussions confidential — it was a condition of their participation.'
Article content
He deferred questions to Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault's office.
Article content
A spokeswoman for Guilbeault said the 'close collaboration' between CBC and Radio-Canada was important to deliver programming and pointed to how they share resources.
Article content
'For these reasons, separating the two is not on the table,' Hermine Landry said in a statement.
Article content
'We are currently working on our plan to strengthen CBC/Radio-Canada, and will have more to say in the near future.'
Article content
Jeffrey Dvorkin, a former CBC Radio managing editor and longtime public broadcasting executive, who is now retired, said the idea of splitting the corporation was 'radical' and that many would likely see it as 'an admission of defeat.'
Article content
Article content
'On the other hand,' he said in an interview, 'Radio-Canada is a much more acceptable and popular, and successful organization compared to CBC television.'
Article content
He added that he would not outright dismiss the idea and thinks 'it needs to be explored.'
Article content
'I think that what's necessary now is for a mandate to be more adventuresome and more creative than they have been. My sense is that the CBC is running scared.'
Article content
Discussions around the feasibility of splitting the corporation have emerged in light of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's pitch to 'defund' CBC while promising to maintain Radio-Canada, which Liberals, including the former minister, said would lead to job losses.
Article content
The corporation has said that changes would be needed to the Broadcasting Act, which specifies that its mandate is to provide services in both official languages.
Article content
Article content
While Poilievre himself has never outright called for separation, one of his Quebec MPs, Joel Godin, told La Presse Canadienne at the time that it would be easier to cut CBC if Radio-Canada were its own Crown corporation.
Article content
In May 2024, the Bloc Québécois also sought assurances following a report by La Presse that a 'modernization' plan the Crown corporation was advancing internally would not lead to a merger between the French and English programming wings.
Article content
Back in February, when St-Onge proposed her series of reforms, which were never advanced before Carney triggered an election in March, she called for 'emphasis on the separation of French and English programming.'
Article content
A final report into her proposals elaborated that changes to the Broadcasting Act, 'could emphasize the importance of the separation of editorial and programming decisions between CBC and Radio-Canada.'
Article content
It also argued that the English and French programming wings be 'distinct' and meet the needs of the different communities, but underscored the need to keep the corporation as one.
Article content
'It is clear that a single organization provides a nationwide vision and a national approach while ensuring
administrative and operational efficiencies.'
Article content
Carney's government has yet to advance the campaign promises he made to bolster the public broadcaster, which he emphasized was even more important for the Canadian institution in light of the ongoing trade war with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly stated that he wants Canada to become its '51st state.'
Article content
While Carney adopted some of St-Onge's ideas, he has dropped others. The spokeswoman for Canadian Heritage said efforts to modernize the broadcaster would be based on the Liberals' platform. Nowhere in the document does it mention the issue of better emphasizing the separation between the French and English programming wings.
Article content
Article content
Carney during the platform panned Poilievre's position on the broadcaster, saying 'you can't split this baby.'
Article content
While the former minister proposed bringing CBC/Radio-Canada's per capita funding closer to the level that other countries fund public broadcasters — around $66 per year, up from the current $33 it costs Canadians each year — Carney has vowed to work towards that goal in the long term and pledged an 'initial $150 million' upfront.
Article content
And while St-Onge proposed banning the corporation from running advertisements during newscasts, Carney's plan would allow it to keep running ads — generating another revenue source — while also making it more difficult to unilaterally pull funding by enshrining in law that such changes would have to be approved by Parliament, not a government cabinet.
Article content
More stable funding has been a longstanding call of the corporation, which has said it is an outlier among its counterparts. It has seen declining revenues that led to a growing structural deficit of $36 million last year.
Article content
Article content
CBC/ Radio-Canada receives roughly $1.4 billion in annual funding, and in the 2024-25 budget, it received an extra $42 million, after warning it would have to cut jobs.
Article content
Trouble could still be brewing for the broadcaster under Carney's request that all federal departments and Crown corporations come back with 15 per cent in 'annual savings' over the next three years, which includes CBC/Radio-Canada.
Article content
'Such reductions will necessarily have an impact on programs and services, but we don't have any information to share before the government's decisions on potential reductions are announced,' said Mar.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
16 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tear gas, smashed windows, and a burning trash can at Montreal Rad Pride march
Members of the P!nk Bloc participate in the annual Rad Pride event held the night before the annual parade in Montreal. (P!nk Bloc) Montreal police (SPVM) used tear gas on Rad Pride marchers as windows were smashed, and a garbage can was set on fire on Saturday night. The third annual event, billed as an 'alternative pride event,' began at 9:30 p.m. at Place Émilie-Gamelin on the western edge of The Village in Montreal's Ville-Marie borough. SPVM report that at around 9:50 p.m., participants started to walk towards Sainte-Catherine Street and were blocked by police. They then pushed against police and began throwing objects at officers, spokesperson Manuel Couture said. Police then used tear gas to disperse the crowd. A trash can was set on fire, and several windows of the National Bank on the corner of Saint-Hubert and Saint-Catherine streets were smashed. Couture said the event ended around 10:30 p.m. and the investigation is ongoing. No arrests were made on Saturday night. Six organizations (the P!nk Bloc, TRAPS, FLIP, OPEN Maisonneuve, FAGS, and Brûlances) launched Rad Pride three years ago. This year, organizers say 30 organizations co-signed a call for the alternative Pride event, which took place the day before Sunday's Fierté Montréal Pride parade. 'Unlike the official marches supported by sponsors and monitored by the police, Rad Pride advocates a direct, community-based, and unregulated approach," Rad Pride said in a news release. 'It follows in the tradition of the Stonewall riots and all radical queer resistance movements.' The Rad Pride call to march rejects 'the corporate and state co-opting of queer struggles, wishing to celebrate a festive and radical pride rooted in revolt, memory, and solidarity.' Rad Pride says the official Pride organization only serves 'the whitest, cis and most affluent' portion of the communities. 'More and more people are taking a stand against co-optation and for a return to the militant roots of our history,' said trans activist Camille in the news release. 'Plus, Rad Pride is really unique. It's a real carnival with music, beach balls, costumes of all kinds, papier-mâché effigies, and more.'

National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Air Canada flight attendants organize national action to protest working conditions
Article content On Monday, August 11 th, Air Canada flight attendants, represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), will hold a simultaneous action at airports in Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, and Calgary, to raise awareness among Canadians about ongoing issues related to their working conditions. Flight attendants are asking Air Canada to recognize the key elements of the negotiation, including non-working hours and poverty wages that are no longer consistent with the economic reality of 2025. Article content This mobilization aims to remind the public that flight attendants play a crucial role in aircraft safety, in addition to providing quality service and ensuring the smooth operation of flights across the country. Article content 'We're heading into an intense weekend of bargaining, with strong support from our members. The standard simply can't be maintained, because it's no longer acceptable,' says Wesley Lesosky, president of the Air Canada component of CUPE. Article content Event details Article content When: Article content Monday, August 11, 2025 Article content : Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Media relations Article content Article content Hugh Pouliot Article content Article content Article content hpouliot@ Article content Article content 613-818-0067 Article content Article content Article content


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario
Manitoba Métis Federation president David Chartrand speaks during a press conference ahead of a meeting on the federal government's major projects legislation in Ottawa on Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Spencer Colby OTTAWA — First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Métis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Métis identity. The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Métis Nation of Ontario. It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO — an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights. 'This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?' The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada. The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities. The conflict between First Nations, some Métis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six 'new, historic' Métis communities in the province — and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO's right to self-government. First Nations and other Métis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Métis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council's territory in northeastern Ontario. The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts 'to discredit' it, 'nothing has changed.' 'The facts of history will not change because a new 'expert' has been paid to peddle the same Métis denialism,' the group said in a media statement. The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Métis right. Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Métis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario. 'The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,' says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto. While the report says there were 'certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry' in the region, that can't form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory. Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Métis and First Nations 'should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.' 'We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Métis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,' she said. 'When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters. It's time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.' The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research 'merely reaffirms reality.' 'It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO. Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. Open disputes over claims to Métis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Métis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Métis but now has just two provincial members. The Métis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Métis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry. The Métis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council's ability to serve as a national advocacy organization. Their departure came years after the Manitoba Métis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns. Will Goodon, the Manitoba Métis Federation's minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Métis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Métis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba. One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and 'support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,' says a federal document. Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Métis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories. The Manitoba Métis Federation said it's also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation. The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO's invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government's major projects agenda at risk. 'Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with 'Indigenous communities' but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,' the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement. 'Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 10, 2025. Alessia Passafiume, The Canadian Press