No terror mention, no deal: S Jaishankar backs Rajnath Singh's Shanghai meet stand
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar backed Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's move to not sign the outcome document of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Defence Ministers' meeting, saying India wouldn't sign the communique if it had no mention of terrorism.In an oblique reference to Pakistan, Jaishankar said India wanted a reference to terrorism in the SCO document, but it was not acceptable to "one country". advertisement"Let me give you some context because I think it's important. The SCO's objective was to fight terrorism. This organisation exists to fight against terrorism. When Rajnath Ji went to the defence ministers' meeting and there was a discussion on the outcome document, one country, you can guess which one. That one country said 'no no, we do not want a reference to that'," he said in a press conference.
"Rajnath Singh's view rightly was, without that reference, that when the main purpose of the organisation is to fight terrorism, and you are not allowing a reference to that, he was not prepared to accept it. SCO runs with unanimity. One country did not agree for making reference to terrorism in the statement. So, Rajnath ji clearly said that if there is no mention of terrorism in the statement, we will not sign it," he said.advertisementSingh on Thursday refused to sign a joint communique of the SCO following the omission of the Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 people, and not explicitly addressing India's concerns over Pakistan-backed cross-border terrorism.According to sources, China, which holds the SCO chair, and its "all-weather friend" Pakistan, tried to divert the attention from terrorism in the SCO document, skipping any mention of the Pahalgam terror attack. However, the document mentioned Balochistan, a veiled attempt to accuse India of creating unrest in the Pakistani province.Over the years, Pakistan has claimed that India supported the Baloch armed groups in the province. However, India has maintained that it was an internal issue of Pakistan.WHAT DID RAJNATH SINGH SAY AT SCO MEET?In his remarks at the SCO Defence Ministers' meeting, Singh said there should be no place for double standards regarding terrorism and the 10-member bloc should not hesistate to blame countries that indulge in such actions.Without naming Pakistan, Singh stressed that peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism. "I believe that the biggest challenges that we are facing in our region are related to peace, security and trust deficit. The root cause of these problems is increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism, he said.advertisement"Those who sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences. Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations," he said.He urged the SCO member states to take united and decisive action against terrorism and non-state actors and terror groups possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that could jeopardise peace in the region.The SCO was established in 2001 by six countries - China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. In 2017, India and Pakistan became full members of the bloc, while Iran and Belarus were inducted into the grouping in 2023 and 2024, respectively.- Ends(with inputs from agencies)Tune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Subrahmanyam Jaishankar#Rajnath Singh#Pakistan#India-China
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Navy Chief Decodes India's New Approach On Terrorism: 'Act Of War Adds...'
Last Updated: Indian Navy chief said that the role of the navy has become "more critical than ever" as India navigates an era with a rapidly changing global security environment. India's decision during Operation Sindoor to treat any terror strike as an act of war has added a new dimension to the Indian Navy's operational outlook, Navy chief Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi said on Friday. He pointed out that the Indian naval ships, submarines, and aircraft were operationally deployed during Operation Sindoor, showcasing strength to deter any 'potential actions from our western adversary" in the maritime domain. 'This rapid and measured response not only showcased our strategic reach and maritime dominance, but sent a clear message of resolve, forcing our adversary to plead for ceasefire, I would say, just in time," Admiral Tripathi said while addressing an investiture ceremony at the Nausena Bhawan in the national capital. 'India's evolved approach to treat any act of terror as an act of war has added a new dimension to our operational outlook," Admiral Tripathi highlighted. He noted that the role of the Indian Navy is 'more critical than ever" as India navigates an era with a rapidly changing global security environment. After Operation Sindoor was put on pause on May 10, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had visited INS Vikrant in Goa on May 30 and interacted with the naval soldiers, lauding their battle preparedness during the four-day (May 7 to 10) military conflict between India and Pakistan. India had launched Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, which killed 26 civilians. Rajnath had said that within 96 hours of the terror attack, 'our western fleet ships deployed at sea carried out multiple successful firings of surface to surface, and surface to air missiles and torpedoes on the western and eastern coast". In India's Operation Sindoor, over 100 terrorists were killed in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in precision airstrikes. Pakistan escalated the situation and carried out drone and missile strikes in India, most of which were thwarted by the Indian air defence systems. On May 10, India struck Pakistan's airbases with BrahMos missiles, making them inoperational. Down on its knees due to India's blows, the Pakistani DGMO contacted his Indian counterpart and urged a ceasefire. India and Pakistan reached an 'agreement" that day to halt military action. India made it clear that Operation Sindoor was only put on hold and was not over yet. First Published:
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Army carrying out trials for solutions to counter drone attacks, says defence expert
The Indian Army is carrying out trials for solutions to counter drone attacks , which were used extensively by Islamabad in its response to Operation Sindoor launched against terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, a top defence expert said on Friday. Pakistan had sent swarms of drones and loitering munitions to counter India's air strikes on terror infrastructure across the border to avenge the terrorist attacks on tourists in Pahalgam. "The armed forces are already doing trials for their counter drone solution ," Lt Gen V G Khandare (retd), former Principal Adviser, Ministry of Defence, said in an interactive session at the India Space Congress organised by SIA-India. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Semua yang Perlu Anda Ketahui Tentang Limfoma Limfoma Pelajari India had repulsed a series of drone attacks launched by Pakistan using its home-built Akashteer air defence system , which has emerged as the key line of defence in warfare. Lt Gen Khandare (retd) said neither the Indian Army nor the Indian Air Force pilots crossed the border during Operation Sindoor, but were still successful in causing devastation on identified targets inside Pakistan. Live Events He, however, said the emerging use of technology in warfare does not diminish the importance of having "boots on the ground". "The Army will continue to do its land operations. You can keep punching somebody, but unless you go and stand on his (enemy) ground, it is not yours. So boots on the ground will determine who owns that particular area," Lt Gen Khandare (retd) said. "That is the leverage that will happen subsequently. If you do not go and capture that land you will have a defeated country promoting somebody as Field Marshal," he added. "As we strive toward the vision of Viksit Bharat, it is equally important to ensure Surakshit Bharat so balancing development with deterrence is essential to maintaining our national momentum and safeguarding our trajectory in the face of evolving global dynamics whether it's the integration of tri-services or broader national-level frameworks, space domain is becoming indispensable across all domains civil, military, and strategic," Lt Gen Khandare (retd) said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Rajnath at SCO meeting, Iran's trade ties with China, and a report that Xi may skip the BRICS summit in Brazil
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh attended the Defence Ministers' meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in China's Qingdao on Thursday (June 26), but refused to sign a draft statement that did not mention the Pahalgam terror attack. As a result, no joint declaration was made. According to a Ministry of Defence press release, he also met his Chinese counterpart, Dong Jun. Singh spoke of 'the necessity of solving the complex issues through a structured roadmap of permanent engagement and de-escalation'. Notably, a permanent resolution has not been mentioned in recent statements. Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh was also in attendance, in his first foreign visit after the recent Iran-Israel conflict. He expressed gratitude over Beijing's stand, even as China has avoided directly engaging with the matter, as mentioned in last week's tracker. The South China Morning Post reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping would not attend the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro in early July. This would mark his absence from the summit for the first time since he became President, the report said. Finally, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te said in a speech that Taiwan was 'of course a country', drawing a sharp response from China, which insists that the island is part of its territory. Here is a closer look at these developments: The SCO was established in 2001 to enhance regional cooperation on terrorism, and has 10 members (including Russia, Iran and Pakistan). The Defence Minister made references to Pakistan as part of India's diplomatic push following the Pahalgam attack. This was also his first visit to China in five years, after the 2020 standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) began. Singh said, 'Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations'. UPSHOT: In general, international cooperation over terrorism has often been hampered by countries taking positions based on their own strategic interests. The position in the SCO is complicated by the presence of both Pakistan, which is among the world's most active exporters of terrorism, and India, the primary target of the Pakistani terror infrastructure for decades. China is Pakistan's strongest backer in international fora, and has long described their relationship as 'iron-clad'. This makes it difficult for India to garner diplomatic consensus against Pakistan-backed terrorist attacks. There are other complexities too. India has a long-term strategic partnership with Russia, which also has deep ties with China, which have grown stronger after the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the targeting of Moscow by Western sanctions. Iran and the central Asian republics have their own relationships with China. It remains to be seen whether the SCO leaders' summit in Tianjin, China, later this year sees a different diplomatic outcome. At the SCO meeting, the Iranian Defence Minister thanked Beijing, saying, 'We hope China will continue to stand for justice, help maintain the current ceasefire and play a greater role in easing regional tensions.' On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned China amid reports of Iran potentially closing the Strait of Hormuz, an important choke point for global oil trade. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said. UPSHOT: Questions have been raised in recent days over the limited Chinese involvement in the Middle East, which was mostly restricted to condemnations and statements calling for de-escalation. Iran has now called for a more proactive Chinese role at a forum that identifies security as a priority area. Iran has a critical economic relationship with China, which buys about 90% of Iranian oil exports, totalling around 14% of China's oil purchases. It has evaded Western sanctions through so-called 'teapot refineries', which are smaller and privately owned, compared to state oil companies. The South China Morning Post reported this week that President Xi would not attend the BRICS summit in Rio, 'marking his first-ever absence from the gathering of leading emerging economies'. The Brazilian government had been informed of a scheduling conflict, and Premier Li Qiang could stand in for the President, the report claimed. According to the report, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's invitation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a state dinner after the summit could have played a part in the decision by Xi, who would have been wary of being 'perceived as a supporting actor' at the gathering. UPSHOT: Brazil, Russia, India, and China formed the grouping in 2009, with South Africa joining the next year. Today, it has six additional members — Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia. The expansion of BRICS has been seen as countries of the Global South moving away from US-led groupings, and towards a multipolar world order. However, both BRICS and the SCO include countries that have important trade relationships with China, and Beijing has often been described as the 'driving force' behind their expansions, in light of its own geopolitical rivalry with the US. 4. Is Taiwan a country? Depends on who you ask Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te recently delivered the first two of his 10 planned speeches, called '10 Talks on the Country'. He drew upon history to argue that 'Taiwan has never belonged to the People's Republic of China' (official name for the mainland China government). China reacted with its usual vehemence, with a Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson describing the speeches as 'Taiwan's independence manifesto'. The people of Taiwan had originally migrated from the Chinese mainland, the spokesperson countered. 'Taiwan has never been a country, and it is an integral part of China,' the spokesperson said, adding, 'Taiwan's future can only be decided by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including our compatriots in Taiwan.' UPSHOT: The Taiwan issue has been referenced by China as a 'red line' in terms of its core security concerns. It has accused the US of backing a 'separatist' movement on the island, and has frequently targeted the Taiwanese government. Increasingly, surveys have recorded that the people of Taiwan identify themselves as Taiwanese rather than Chinese, and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has reiterated this view. It has consecutively won three national elections since 2016, although it returned with a minority government in 2024. In less than a month, several 'recall' polls will be held in Taiwan for a quarter of the total parliamentary seats, all held by the opposition Kuomintang party. The leaders of Kuomintang fought with Mao's communists during the Chinese Civil War (1927-49), and fled to Taiwan after the victory of the communists. However, within Taiwanese politics, the Kuomintang has been perceived as being closer to Beijing. The DPP recently released a video calling on people to 'oppose the communists' in the recall, according to a Reuters report. Winning those seats would give the DPP greater control over Parliament. Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India. ... Read More
