Russia's war in Ukraine must end, here's how it could happen
The critics and admirers of America's 47th president disagree on everything and agree on nothing. Some treat his words as gospel; others dismiss them out of hand. But no one can say he hasn't tried to deliver on campaign promises.
Donald Trump vowed to end Russia's war in Ukraine — and if there's one line he's repeated again and again, it's this: 'Too many people are dying — thousands each week — in a terrible and senseless war.'
6 Scenes of vast destruction in Kyiv, where a warehouse was one of the many targets hit during one of Russia's largest-ever drone strikes.
SERGEY KOZLOV/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
Advertisement
Moscow's war of choice is truly terrible, but to call it 'senseless' is to miss the point. Russia has been killing Ukrainians for the crime of being Ukrainian since 2014 — predictably, methodically, relentlessly. Russia's war is also criminal, under the very rules of warfare America helped enshrine in 1945.
Is it senseless for Ukraine to fight back? A war for survival is immensely costly — but to shield your children from Russian missiles is not a choice; it's a duty. Kyiv has no real options but to resist: Because failure to defend your home is dishonor, followed by annihilation.
6 Russian leader Vladimir Putin has suggested he is serious about ending his nation's war in Ukraine, but has only strengthened his attacks on the nation.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
After months of frantic diplomacy, it's finally clear where everyone stands. The White House wants a cease-fire. Ukraine wants peace. Russia wants neither. How do we know? Back in March, Trump dispatched Secretary of State Marco Rubio to demand that Kyiv prove it was serious about ending the war. Within 24 hours, Ukraine not only agreed to halt hostilities in the air and at sea — it offered an unconditional 30-day cease-fire.
Advertisement
Russia rejected Washington's peacemaking efforts, stonewalled and openly mocked America. Putin mouthed lies about ending the fighting, while unleashing ever more rockets on Ukrainian cities. On Palm Sunday — just 48 hours after Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff met with him — Russia launched its worst attack since 2023: 84 civilians wounded, including 10 children.
6 Pres. Trump dispatched US Sec. of State Marco Rubio to demand serious action from Russia to end its war on Ukraine.
REUTERS
This week, Russia set a new record by launching nine cruise missiles and 355 of the Shahed drones it sources from Iran, in a single night. Over the preceding three nights, it launched around 900 drones — a grim milestone in a war defined by deliberate cruelty and heinous war crimes. While Trump uses words like Putin is 'playing with fire,' the Kremlin uses rockets to set suburban neighborhoods ablaze.
Knowing where we stand inspires little optimism — but it doesn't determine what comes next. Russia chose to invade. Ukraine found the courage to defend itself. But crushing Russia's appetite for war will take more than heroism from Kyiv. It will require resolve from America and every nation that stands for freedom. We can and must give peace through strength a chance!
Advertisement
If we're serious about protecting US interests, let's get real about the three ways this war could end.
6 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky needs a lasting peace for his nation if Russia's war on Ukraine is to fully end rather than merely pause.
AFP via Getty Images
The most likely outcome — and the one Washington is drifting toward — is a frozen conflict, otherwise known as a ticking time bomb. A cease-fire is declared, the front line hardens into a de facto border and Putin keeps what he stole. Ukraine loses what it bled for. The West congratulates itself for 'containing the crisis,' and everyone pretends that's a win.
What follows is predictable: Moscow prepares for the next invasion. America's credibility circles the drain and the world tilts toward un-security, where fear reigns, prosperity falters, Russia-China alliance hardens hardens and the cost of freedom rises.
Advertisement
Then there's the most dreadful scenario: We let Russia have its way. A third-rate power with first-rate imperial arrogance, economy the size of Texas and collapsing demographics is handed a victory — not because it deserves one, but because we failed to help Ukraine. We've seen this movie before. In the 1930s, giving Hitler what he wanted didn't end the war — it made it bigger.
6 Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin in Munich i 1938, where their historic act of appeasement paved the way for World War II and Germany's imperialistic power grab.
Getty Images
The third scenario — called the best case by some — is that we finally step up, arm Ukraine properly to push Russia back. We've got the means. What's missing is backbone. Ukraine regains ground, Crimea stays in legal limbo, and Putin claims victory anyway — because tyrants who control the script never admit defeat.
But even this feel-good outcome would fall far short of justice. If stolen children aren't returned, if mass graves and beheaded POWs are ignored, if war criminals are drinking champagne in Moscow instead of facing judgment in The Hague — then what exactly will we have won?
What's not even on the table is the one path history tells us brings lasting peace: The aggressor is defeated, disarmed and held to account. That means full restoration of Ukraine's borders, reparations and prison for those who ordered and carried out atrocities. Not to punish the Russian people — but to give them a chance at finally breaking free from a system built on oppression, violence and conquest.
This version of peace — just, durable and enforced — is the one worth aiming for. And yet, somehow, it's not even part of the conversation.
6 As far as Pres. Trump is concerned, the killing must end in Ukraine. He recently declared that Putin has gone 'crazy' as his tenor against the Russian leader becomes increasingly critical.
AP
Last weekend, Trump said Putin 'has gone absolutely CRAZY!' But madness isn't the problem — impunity is. Russia's war makes perfect sense to Putin, that's why he is waging it.
Advertisement
The real insanity is pretending that angry words or half-measures will stop him.
Andrew Chakhoyan is an academic director at the University of Amsterdam and previously served in the US government at the Millennium Challenge Corporation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Asian Steel Stocks Retreat After Trump's New Tariff Threat
Asian steel stocks began the week hammered by President Trump's threat to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports starting Wednesday. Trump said Friday that tariffs on imported steel and aluminum would increase to 50% from 25%, effective June 4. Global prices for steel have been falling in recent months, making it easier for steel buyers to pay the existing duty on imports and still acquire steel at a discount to domestic prices.
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings
The Department of Health and Human Services' watchdog identified more than $16 billion in overpayments, fraudulent billings and possible cost savings in health programs over a half year spanning the Biden and Trump administrations, including more than $3.5 billion to be returned to the government. Why it matters: The semiannual summary, first shared publicly to Axios, comes as the Trump administration says it's prioritizing government efficiency and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. It reflects growing concern over federal payments to Medicare Advantage plans, along with enforcement actions like McKinsey agreeing to pay $650 million to settle charges that its advice caused Purdue Pharma to submit fraudulent claims stemming from the opioid crisis. The report was sent to Congress late Friday. By the numbers: The HHS Office of Inspector General identified $16.6 billion in real and potential savings from October 2024 through March of this year. The office's investigations identified $3.5 billion in funds due back to the federal government, and its audits found another $451 million that the government will recoup. More than $12 billion in potential cost savings were identified if HHS makes recommended policy changes. The office issued 165 recommendations over the six months. In one example, OIG found that Medicare could have saved $7.7 billion if it lowered payments for swing beds at critical access hospitals so that they match skilled nursing facilities. The change would require action from Congress, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it didn't agree with the recommendation. Nearly 400 civil actions, including settlements, resulted from OIG's work during the period. OIG says its work returned $11 to the federal government for each $1 invested in its office. "Whether it's us, whether it's [the Government Accountability Office], whether it's DOGE, whether it's state auditors, there's always a need for program integrity and oversight," said John Hagg, assistant inspector general in the IG's office of audit services. Zoom in: OIG over the six months covered in the report continued its investigations that raise concerns over improper payments in Medicare Advantage. OIG found that many patient diagnoses reported by privately run Medicare plans were supported only through health risk assessments. That allowed plans to be paid more to care for sicker, more expensive patients without enough supporting documentation, raising questions about their validity, per OIG. OIG recommended that Medicare further restrict plans' abilities to get higher payments based on diagnoses reported only on in-home health risk assessments in order to save an estimated $4.2 billion for Medicare. The office plans to do more work on Medicare Advantage in the near future, Melicia Seay, assistant inspector general in the office of evaluation and inspection, told Axios. "There's a lot of areas in terms of Medicare Advantage that we're exploring, whether it is the payment policy related to the program, the service delivery, quality of care," she said. Catch up quick: President Trump in January abruptly fired several agency inspectors general, including longtime HHS watchdog Christi Grimm. He claimed that"some were not doing their job."
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
China accuses U.S. of violating trade truce, vows "forceful measures"
China has accused the U.S. violating the trade deal that the world's two largest economies signed last month and vowed to take "resolute and forceful measures," per a briefing on Monday morning local time. Why it matters: It's the latest sign of deteriorating relations between the two nations since their Switzerland meeting led to a May 12 deal to lower tariffs on each other fo 90 days while they negotiated on trade. President Trump accused Beijing on Friday of violating the agreement, one day after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described negotiations as " a bit stalled." Driving the news: A Chinese Commerce Ministry spokesperson said Beijing "firmly rejects these unjustified accusations," per translations of the comments that were carried by state media. The spokesperson alleged the U.S. had "seriously undermined" and "violated" the trade agreement by issuing "export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software (EDA) to China, and announcing the r evocation" of visas for Chinese students. "If the U.S. insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," unnamed official added, without elaborating further. The other side: While Trump didn't go into details on his claims that Beijing had "totally violated" the trade deal, administration officials have pointed to delays in sending critical minerals to the U.S., which are needed for American auto, electronics and defense industries, that formed part of the agreement. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent said during a Sunday interview on CBS News ' "Face the Nation." What we're watching: U.S. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday he expects Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jingping will hold a phone call this week as part of negotiations. Bessent said on CBS he's "confident" that the two sides' issues "will be ironed out" once Trump and Xi have spoken. "But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement — maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional," he told CBS' Margaret Brennan. "We'll see after the president speaks with [Xi]." Beijing had not commented on any plans for a call between the two leaders as of late Sunday.
