BSV and tokenizing IP: A new paradigm for creators
In an era where creators struggle to protect and monetize their intellectual property (IP), BSV emerges as a transformative platform for tokenizing IP assets. By leveraging its scalable blockchain, low-cost transactions, and immutable data storage, BSV enables artists, writers, inventors, and creators to secure, manage, and monetize their work without relying on costly intermediaries.
From fractional ownership of patents to micropayments for digital content, BSV offers a new paradigm for IP management that empowers creators and redefines the creative economy. This article explores how BSV addresses longstanding IP challenges and its potential to reshape the creator landscape.
The IP crisis in the digital age
Creators face significant hurdles in protecting and profiting from their IP. Traditional systems like copyright offices and patent registries are slow, expensive, and often inaccessible to independent artists or small-scale inventors. Digital platforms, while democratizing distribution, frequently exploit creators through unfavorable revenue splits or fail to prevent piracy. For instance, musicians earn fractions of a cent per stream on platforms like Spotify, while authors battle unauthorized e-book distribution. This is why we need a system where creators control their own IP.
Tokenization—the process of representing assets as digital tokens on a blockchain—offers a solution, but most blockchains lack the scalability or affordability to support widespread IP applications. BSV, with its unbounded block size and high transaction throughput, fills this gap, enabling creators to tokenize everything from songs to scientific patents in a secure, cost-effective manner.
BSV's technical advantages for IP tokenization
BSV's blockchain is uniquely suited for IP management. Its ability to process 1,000,000 transactions per second (TPS), as demonstrated by the Teranode upgrade, supports global-scale tokenization without network congestion. Transaction fees, often below $0.00011, make it feasible to issue and trade tokens for small-value assets, such as a single poem or a 3D-printed design. The blockchain's immutable ledger ensures that tokenized IP records—such as proof of authorship or licensing agreements—are tamper-proof and verifiable.
BSV's smart contract capabilities enable complex IP management workflows. For example, a musician could tokenize a song, embedding royalty splits that automatically distribute micropayments to collaborators each time it's streamed. Fractional ownership is another key feature: a patent for a new technology could be tokenized into 1,000 shares, allowing inventors to raise capital by selling stakes to investors. BSV's timestamping functionality provides a definitive record of creation dates, helping creators prove originality in disputes. Think of it as unhackable timestamping. Niche applications: Empowering creators
BSV's IP tokenization shines in niche use cases that traditional systems overlook. Independent authors can tokenize e-books, offering readers exclusive access or limited-edition digital copies as non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Unlike Ethereum-based NFTs, which incur high gas fees, BSV's low costs make this viable for small creators. Visual artists can tokenize digital artworks, embedding resale royalty clauses to earn a percentage of future sales, addressing the 'starving artist' problem.
Inventors, particularly in open-source or collaborative fields, benefit from BSV's fractional ownership model. A team developing a new biotech patent could tokenize it, allowing global investors to fund research in exchange for equity-like tokens. This democratizes innovation, enabling small-scale inventors to compete with corporate giants. Additionally, BSV's data storage capabilities allow creators to embed metadata—such as licensing terms or creative commons agreements—directly into tokens, streamlining IP management.
The future: A creator-centric economy
BSV's potential to transform IP management extends beyond individual creators. Applications are building BSV-based tools that integrate tokenization into creative workflows, from music production to patent filing. These tools could disrupt centralized platforms, giving creators direct access to global markets and simultaneously removing the middleman.
Challenges remain, including regulatory hurdles and the need for user-friendly interfaces. However, BSV's regulation-friendly design, built to comply with legal frameworks, positions it to gain institutional adoption. As creators demand fairer systems, BSV's scalable, transparent approach could become the standard for IP tokenization, fostering a creator-centric economy.
Conclusion
BSV's ability to tokenize IP offers creators unprecedented control over their work. Its scalable blockchain, low fees, and smart contract functionality enable niche applications like fractional patents, royalty micropayments, and timestamped authorship records. By bypassing traditional intermediaries, BSV empowers artists, authors, and inventors to monetize their IP securely and transparently. As the creative economy evolves, BSV stands poised to redefine how intellectual property is managed, proving that blockchain can deliver tangible benefits for creators worldwide.
Watch: Small casual payments transforms content creation business
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump Media to broadcast GB News on US streaming platform Truth+
The Trump family media company has partnered with GB News to broadcast the channel on its US streaming platform, Truth+. Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG), which operates social media app Truth Social, the streaming platform Truth+, and the FinTech brand announced on Friday that it will add GB News to its list of available channels – making the UK broadcaster accessible to most countries globally, including the US. GB News, which has hosted rightwing commentators such as Nigel Farage, will be offered with the free basic package on Truth+, and can be accessed through multiple devices and platforms including iOS, Android, Web, Apple TV, Android TV, and Amazon Fire. This new alliance between TMTG and GB News comes as the US president continues to criticise the mainstream media, filing lawsuits against giants such as Rupert Murdoch, as well as broadcasters and smaller newspapers. Earlier this year, Trump claimed that the US media was full of 'radical-left monsters', who are guilty of 'illegal' reporting. More recently, White House communications director, Steven Cheung, has said that 'liberal media' is spreading 'fake news' in relation to reports claiming that Trump's name appears in US justice department files about Jeffrey Epstein. Trump Media's chief executive and chairperson, Devin Nunes, said in a statement: 'GB News is a terrific source for news, facts, and commentary. 'By expanding its global reach, we aim to connect an enormous new, international audience to the network's unique reporting and opinion, while putting another dent in the global woke news monopoly.' Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News chief executive, said: 'As the fearless champion of freedom of speech in Britain, it is important that we launch across the United States of America and globally on the Truth+ streaming platform.'
The Sun
12 hours ago
- The Sun
The sneaky ways cheats HIDE spicy apps on their gadgets – and all the clues that your other half is betraying you
HOOK-UP apps, little-known chat services, sneaky shortcuts to dating websites, photo storage for raunchy selfies... Flings take place on phones these days, and cheats are savvy when it comes to hiding their infidelities. Apps can be disguised, hidden, locked away, and even "fake deleted". But the signs of betrayal are there – if you know where to look... 9 'FAKE DELETION' One of the easiest ways to hide an app is to "fake delete" it. This is when a cheater keeps the app uninstalled when it's not in use. And because their account is backed up in the cloud, they can just re-install the app whenever they like – and their dating profile will still be there. It only takes a few seconds to delete an app or reinstall it, so it's one of the most effective ways of concealing dodgy phone antics. But there's evidence that this is going on. For a start, any app activity will always show up in Screen Time – even if the app has been deleted. Screen Time is meant to help you track (and limit) your phone usage, but it also shows which apps are being used and when. You can find it in Settings > Screen Time. Another way to tell if an app has been downloaded is to go to the App Store. If an app has never been downloaded before, it'll have a big "Get" button at the top. But if you've claimed it already, you'll get the reinstall option instead – it looks like a cloud with a down arrow. Also, go into the App Store > Account > Apps > Not On This iPhone. How to lock and hide apps in new iPhone update – but there are two downsides that might catch you out This will show you all of the apps that aren't currently installed – but have previously been claimed. Importantly, you can see the exact order they were installed in. It's a similar story on Android. Just go into the Google Play Store and you can easily see app installation history – including deleted downloads. 9 They're a smoking gun that proves an app was previously downloaded. HIDDEN FOLDERS Another way that cheats hide apps is hide them. Yes, both iPhone and Android have special folders designed to conceal apps. On iPhone, it's called the Hidden folder. You can send an app there by holding down on its icon, then choosing Require Face ID > Hide and Require Face ID. 9 It'll turn up in the Hidden folder, which is right at the bottom of your App Library (the far right panel of your Home Screen). You can't see into this folder without unlocking it using Face ID. But there are three ways you can "see" into the folder. The first is (once again) Screen Time, which will record app usage even if it's hidden. Just go to Settings > Screen Time. 9 Similarly, you'll be able to see hidden app usage in your iPhone's Battery settings. Head into Settings > Battery and look for Battery Usage By App. Even if an app has been hidden, its battery drain will appear on this list. Lastly, the app will show up on your App Store purchase / download history. There's no hiding from it. Just head into your App Store > Account > Apps to expose the app. 9 HIDING APPS ON IPHONE – THE RULES Here's what you can and can't do when it comes to hiding iPhone apps... Hiding an app makes it invisible and prevents it from being opened without Face ID, Touch ID or a passcode. But its name will still appear in three places: Screen Time Battery Usage By App App Store Purchase History An app that comes installed with iOS 18 can't be hidden. It's only apps that you've downloaded separately from the App Store that can be hidden. If you set an app as your default web browser, that can't be hidden either. You can unhide an app at any time. But locking and hiding apps works on a per-device basis. So if you hide an app on your iPhone, it won't automatically be hidden on your iPad. You'd have to hide it there too. Once an app is hidden, info inside that app won't appear elsewhere. That means it won't show up in CarPlay, appear with notification previews, pop up on iPhone Search or Siri Suggestions, or appear in your call history (if there's a calling feature, like on WhatsApp). Picture Credit: Apple / The Sun It's a similar story for Android's Private Space, which also functions as a hidden folder. Apps will still appear in your download history. But a cheater could get around this by logging into a different Google Account for their Private Space. If they do that, you wouldn't be able to see the downloaded apps unless you have a way into the Private Space. You can find the Private Space in Settings > Privacy > Private Space. DISGUISED APPS Another clever trick is to disguise an app. On Android, it's a little more complicated, as the cheater would need to download a "launcher" to change the app icons. But if that happens, you'd still be able to see the list of apps in the phone's app library. On iPhone, changing an app icon is very easy. It works using an Apple app called Shortcuts. 9 Shortcuts are meant to let you make quick actions to save you time. It's a bit like programming little commands – but for your iPhone. And Shortcuts let you create an "Open an app" command for any app. You can give that command its own name and icon. And then you can add that Shortcut to the Home Screen. That Shortcut will look like an app – but it can have any icon you choose. This is a cheater's dream. Or it's very easy to expose. Even though the app's true identity is concealed on your Home Screen, it'll still show up like normal in the iPhone's App Library (the far right panel). And it'll also show everywhere else. Like in your iPhone's Search function, in Screen Time, in Battery settings, and anywhere else an app would normally appear. You could also head into the Shortcuts app to see which Shortcuts have been created. That can also expose this trick. Shortcuts don't have to just be apps either. They could link out to websites and conceal their true identity, so keep that in mind. 9 They could give this website link any icon and name they want. So a dating website could be turned into an entirely innocent app link on the Home Screen – and you'd have no idea unless you checked Shortcuts to see if there's one set up. Maybe that 'reminders' app on the Home Screen is something more devious. HIDING THE NAMES OF APPS Your iPhone also lets you hide the names of apps on the Home Screen. If you hold down on the Home Screen and choose Customise, you can set app icons to large. They'll fill more space – removing their names entirely. You can see if someone has done this because none of the apps will have names. But you can go right into the App Library to see the true names of apps. FAKE APPS Lastly, someone could be using purpose-built fake apps designed to hide content. There are absolutely loads of apps on the App Store and Google Play Store that offer ways of hiding photos and videos in secret storage. And some of these apps even have innocent-looking app icons to avoid raising suspicion. These apps might even have separate passcodes to the main iPhone or Android. And you might not even be suspicious if you see them in the App Library. 9 One sign to watch for is suspicious activity in Screen Time or Digital Wellbeing – or in the phone's battery report. If someone is spending four hours a day on the calculator app, they're either an accountant or something fishy is going on. Navigate to that app to see if it really is a calculator – or something else entirely...
Geeky Gadgets
13 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT 5 vs Claude Sonnet : AI Coding Skills Compared
What if the future of coding wasn't just about human ingenuity but also about the battle of AI giants? Imagine two innovative AI models—OpenAI's GPT-5 and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet—competing to build a multiplayer tic-tac-toe game. One delivers deliberate, rule-abiding solutions, while the other dazzles with speed and visual finesse. Yet, neither emerges flawless. This isn't just a tech showdown; it's a glimpse into how AI shapes the tools we use to solve problems, design interfaces, and even manage costs. As developers increasingly rely on AI for coding tasks, the stakes have never been higher: which model truly delivers the edge? In this comparison , Convex breaks down the strengths, weaknesses, and surprising quirks of GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet. From token efficiency and pricing to their ability to handle complex tasks like authentication, you'll discover how these models stack up in real-world scenarios. Whether you're a developer seeking precision or speed, or just curious about how AI models differ in their approach to problem-solving, this comparison will help you navigate the trade-offs. By the end, you might find yourself questioning not just which model is better—but what 'better' really means in the evolving landscape of AI-driven development. GPT 5 vs Claude Sonnet Key Features of ChatGPT 5 and Claude Sonnet GPT-5, OpenAI's latest offering, is engineered for advanced reasoning and adaptability across diverse challenges. It employs a routing mechanism to optimize task performance, making it a versatile tool for developers. Claude Sonnet, a competing model, is recognized for its speed and visually refined outputs, catering to developers who prioritize efficiency and design aesthetics. While both models aim to assist in coding and problem-solving, their approaches and results differ significantly. Performance in Building a Multiplayer Tic-Tac-Toe Game To evaluate their coding capabilities, both models were tasked with creating a multiplayer tic-tac-toe game. The results highlighted distinct strengths and weaknesses: GPT-5: Delivered a functional and robust solution, though its interface was visually basic and required additional design work. Delivered a functional and robust solution, though its interface was visually basic and required additional design work. Claude Sonnet: Produced a polished and visually appealing interface but occasionally included unnecessary schema fields, complicating the codebase. Both models encountered minor coding errors and redundant schema elements, emphasizing the importance of manual refinement regardless of the model used. These findings suggest that while both tools are capable, neither can fully replace human oversight in development tasks. OpenAI ChatGPT 5 vs Claude Sonnet : Coding Showdown Watch this video on YouTube. Master AI coding with the help of our in-depth articles and helpful guides. Impact of Rule Adherence on Model Performance The ability to follow structured requirements, such as cursor guidelines and schema conventions, was tested to assess how rules influence performance. The models exhibited contrasting behaviors: GPT-5: Demonstrated slower but more deliberate processing, often providing thoughtful and detailed solutions that adhered closely to the rules. Demonstrated slower but more deliberate processing, often providing thoughtful and detailed solutions that adhered closely to the rules. Claude Sonnet: Executed tasks more quickly but struggled with schema conventions and index handling, leading to occasional inconsistencies in its outputs. These differences highlight how each model's inherent processing style affects its ability to meet structured requirements. While rules can improve performance, the quality of outputs depends heavily on the model's internal logic and reasoning capabilities. Challenges in Authentication Implementation Authentication tasks, such as implementing username/password and anonymous login systems, posed significant challenges for both models. The results revealed key insights: Both models faced difficulties with environment variable management and TypeScript compatibility, requiring additional manual intervention to resolve issues. GPT-5: Used web searches to compensate for its slower processing speed, often resulting in more complete and reliable solutions. Used web searches to compensate for its slower processing speed, often resulting in more complete and reliable solutions. Claude Sonnet: Executed tasks quickly but occasionally produced incomplete or less dependable functions, requiring further debugging. These findings underscore the complexity of authentication tasks and the need for developers to carefully review and refine outputs, regardless of the model used. Token Efficiency and Cost Implications Token efficiency is a critical factor in determining the cost-effectiveness of AI models. The comparison revealed distinct patterns in token usage: GPT-5 : Consumed more tokens due to its extensive reasoning process, often resulting in higher-quality outputs. Despite using more tokens, its lower per-token rates can make it cost-competitive, especially for complex projects where accuracy is essential. Claude Sonnet: Used fewer tokens but relied heavily on its context window, particularly when rules were not explicitly defined. However, its higher per-token rates can offset the savings from reduced usage. These differences highlight the trade-offs between reasoning depth and token efficiency. GPT-5 offers strong value for detailed, accuracy-driven work, while Claude Sonnet may be better suited for tasks that emphasize speed and brevity. Pricing and Cost Analysis Cost is a significant consideration when selecting an AI model. The pricing structures for GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet are as follows: GPT-5: $1.25 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. $1.25 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. Claude Sonnet: $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. While GPT-5 is more affordable on a per-token basis, Claude Sonnet's lower overall token usage may still make it competitive for shorter, more focused tasks. The choice between the two models should align with your project's specific budget and requirements. Strengths and Weaknesses of Each Model The comparison highlights distinct strengths and weaknesses for GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet, making them suitable for different use cases: GPT-5: Strengths: Advanced reasoning, deliberate problem-solving, and high-quality outputs. Weaknesses: Slower processing, higher token usage, and occasional errors in execution. Claude Sonnet: Strengths: Faster execution, visually appealing outputs, and efficient token usage. Weaknesses: Inconsistent schema handling, less reliable methods, and occasional incomplete solutions. Choosing the Right Model for Your Needs Both GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet offer unique advantages, making them suitable for different types of projects. GPT-5 excels in tasks that require complex problem-solving and reasoning, though its slower processing and higher token usage may be drawbacks for time-sensitive projects. Claude Sonnet, on the other hand, provides faster execution and visually polished results but struggles with consistency and schema handling. Your choice should depend on your project's specific needs. If accuracy, reasoning, and detailed outputs are priorities, GPT-5 may be the better option. For tasks that demand speed and visual appeal, Claude Sonnet could be more suitable. As both models continue to evolve, ongoing testing and updates will provide deeper insights into their capabilities, allowing developers to make even more informed decisions in the future. Media Credit: Convex Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
