The Dutch farmers reaching for their guns after EU backed down on wolf crisis
Wolves were driven out of the Netherlands in the late 19th century, but after the feared predators were deemed untouchable under a 'strict protection' order issued by the EU in 2015, they have returned.
Now, wolves are ravaging livestock across the country's farms every day, leaving meadows peppered with mutilated carcasses.
A sharp rise in attacks on livestock and pets – including on Ursula von der Leyen's own beloved pony – convinced the EU to downgrade the protection order in December, placing the onus on member states to devise their own responses to wolves from March onwards.
The decision has left rival groups jostling for the ear of Dutch politicians: farmers, who are in favour of culling, and animal rights groups, who fear an open season on the animals.
Officials have as of yet provided no clear direction on how to handle the nine packs of wolves roaming the Netherlands.
Eduard van Adrichem, a wizened hunter sporting a cowboy hat and an unkempt grey beard, sees culling the increasingly emboldened wolf as a solemn duty to his neighbours.
'It's not the wolf's fault, he is an opportunist. It's nature, I don't blame him for that, but I will shoot him for that,' the 67-year-old said, his gnarled hands gripping a rifle with familiarity.
'I would kill them all. It's my obligation to save Holland from a disaster.'
On the farms of Gelderland, Utrecht and Drenthe, WhatsApp groups deliver news of sightings and savage attacks.
Boudewijn Kooijman, from Limburg, orchestrates the Green Wolf warning system, sending on a flurry of reports from farmers complete with gory photographic evidence.
'You never get used to it. I take it home. I can't sleep,' the 65-year-old says after arriving at the scene of a grisly overnight attack on a fellow farmer's flock in Emst.
Once the proud owner of 1,500 Maasduinenschaap (a breed of sheep), which his family has farmed since the 1800s, Mr Kooijman has seen his numbers dwindle to around 500.
'It is my life, but I can't do it anymore. For me it is clear that I will quit breeding sheep,' he said in front of a tractor loader bearing five caracasses, a lamb visible amidst the entrails hanging from a mother's torn belly.
The marauding wolf, Mr Kooijman explained, ravages sheep – ripping the throat and bowels – but rarely eating its prey, leaving behind a gruesome and often half-dead surplus.
Tanja Witman, with anguish sketched into her face, said there have been four attacks on her farm in two years, resulting in the deaths of more than 50 sheep.
'The fences don't work, the wolves jump over. We need to start shooting,' her husband Erik said. 'If it continues like this, it will not be possible to keep sheep in this area.'
Further north in Drenthe, Jos Ubels, a 38-year-old cattle farmer, dismissed the anti-wolf fences subsidised by the government as a waste of time and money.
'You do it because otherwise they say you are not trying but we know it does not work,' he said.
Such fences threaten to eradicate an age-old symbiotic relationship whereby farmers lend sheep to their fellow dairy farmers, rotating through fields for three days at a time to improve the quality of next season's grass.
'They are destroying the system, they don't understand,' Mr Ubels added.
He explained that the choice between leaving sheep vulnerable and taking on back-breaking labour to install and maintain fences, for which the government does not offer compensation, renders the tradition untenable.
Farmers have also warned the more fencing is laid down, the harder it is for wildlife such as deer and boar to migrate across the Netherlands.
Mr Ubels, no stranger to activism as vice president of the Farmers Defence Force, said he was amongst the first to sound the alarm over wolf attacks after 14 of his calves went missing.
'We found a carcass. It was shocking. There was only the spine and a severed head,' he said, adding that the authorities initially refused to send a team to collect DNA samples, claiming that a wolf would never attack cattle.
An organisation known as Bij12 must obtain DNA matching a wolf on the government's database for the farmer to be paid compensation – an amount which farmers feel does not go far enough.
Mr Ubels responded by vowing to deliver the mutilated remains of a heifer through the local authorities' window. After alerting local media, who then phoned the province to ask what was happening, investigators confirmed wolves were responsible.
The cattle farmer fears similarities in the response that wolves will never attack humans.
On Friday, two ponies were found dead, dismembered and uneaten in Hierden, Gelderland, posing further concern over wolves' broadening appetite.
'My children are scared,' Mr Ubels said, adding that, given the opportunity, as a licensed hunter he would not think twice before reaching for his gun.
Last summer, the province of Utrecht was rocked by two cases of children being bitten and knocked over by wolves, which prompted the local authorities to issue urgent advice for children to stay out of the forests.
'It is a question of time before a wolf attacks a child. Little Red Riding Hood will no longer be just a fairy tale,' warned Caroline van der Plas, leader of the farmers' party BoerBurgerBeweging (BBB).
It is a fear shared by Mr van Adrichem, who said wolves prey on easy targets.
'He will learn [that] after sheep that there are children and men, he will learn that,' the hunter warned.
Mr van Adrichem, his shoulders resting on the fur pelt of a black bear he shot with a Winchester lever-action rifle in Canada, does not see himself as above nature, but rather as part of it.
'I adore the wolf, I cannot hate him. I would not even hate him if he took one of my dogs. But I would kill him,' the hunter said. 'I worship the wolf, but Holland is too small for him.'
Fed-up farmers have held demonstrations in Emmen, Ede and Arnhem this month, the latter featuring mock wolf hangings.
Vets have also vented their frustrations at being tasked with euthanising swathes of maimed animals.
'This is not why I became a vet. It is a tragedy. [The wolves] simply have to be shot,' Hans Veenstra, a vet from Wolvega, Friesland, told Dutch outlet AD.
The disparity in attitudes towards wolves has fuelled a widening rift between rural and urban areas.
Eric Kemperman, who represents the BBB in both the national parliament as a senator and the Gelderland local government, has long advocated for shooting wolves that attack livestock.
'People in the cities don't know how serious it is, it is dividing the population,' he told The Telegraph. 'It's getting out of hand, every day there are attacks'.
A hunter himself, Mr Kemperman said his party was 'waiting' for the right case in Gelderland to call on the mayor to enact local legislation which would permit the wolf to be shot.
'We will end up in court immediately, that is how it works here, but we want to challenge it,' he said.
In July 2023, the mayor for Westerwald authorised the killing of a wolf which had bitten a farmer near Wapse in Drenthe – an action which could otherwise result in a prison sentence or a fine.
Faunabescherming, an animal protection group, brought a lawsuit soon after the wolf was shot.
Earlier this month, a court sided with Faunabescherming over the provincial authorities of Gelderland, which had issued a permit allowing rangers to deter wolves with paintball guns.
Wolves neared extinction in the mid-20th century in Europe but recovered after being granted strict protection status by the Berne Convention in 1982 and the EU Habitats Directive in 1992.
Dr Joanna Swabe, senior director of public affairs at Humane Society International/Europe (HSI) fears the decision could mark a watershed moment for animals without natural predators.
'The EU decision-making on lowering legal protections for wolves sets a dangerous precedent for other European species, such as bears and lynx,' she said.
Léa Badoz, a wildlife programme officer at Eurogroup for Animals, believes the wolf has been unfairly tainted as a bogeyman.
'The wolf is unfortunately the latest political pawn, a victim of misinformation,' she said.
'[The downgrading] is based on misconceptions and threatens wolves, while failing to provide real support for farmers and local communities, many of whom are in favour of coexistence with the wolf.'
There have been no verified fatal attacks on humans in the last 40 years.
Jakob Leidekker, head of operations at De Hoge Veluwe National Park, believes the anger of animal rights groups is misguided, citing the loss of wildlife at the hands of the wolf.
'For the profit of one species, do we need to lose other species? Our main concern is maintaining biodiversity,' Mr Leidekker said, explaining that the introduction of wolves into the national park in 2021 decimated the grazing mouflon population.
The mouflon are an integral rung of the food chain, keeping the spread of Scots Pine at bay and propping up the poor-quality soil, without which Mr Leidekker predicts all his heathlands would disappear within 20 years.
Mr Leidekker added that wolves were becoming braver with every human interaction. Of the two children attacked last year, he noted: 'This is just the beginning.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
EU push to protect digital rules holds up trade statement with US: report
The European Union is trying to prevent the US from targeting the bloc's digital rules as both sides work through the final details of a delayed statement to formalize a trade deal reached last month, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. EU officials said disagreements over language relating to 'non-tariff barriers,' which the US said include the digital rules, are among the reasons for the hold-up of the statement, the newspaper said. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The European Union, the White House and the State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Advertisement The statement had originally been expected days after the July announcement by EU President Ursula von der Leyen and President Trump, according to FT. The July deal imposed a 15% import tariff on most EU goods — half the initially threatened rate — and helped avert a broader trade war between the two allies, who together account for nearly a third of global trade. Advertisement The Trump administration says the EU's Digital Services Act stifles free speech and imposes costs on US tech firms. Getty Images The US wanted to keep the door open for possible concessions on the EU's Digital Services Act, which Washington says stifles free speech and imposes costs on US tech companies, according to FT, which added that the commission has said that relaxing these rules is a red line. The EU's DSA is a landmark law meant to make the online environment safer and fairer by compelling tech giants to do more to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material. The commission had anticipated that Trump would sign an executive order by this past Friday to cut tariffs on EU car exports to the US from 27.5% to 15%. However, a US official signaled that this would be delayed until the joint statement was finalized, according to FT.


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European leaders and the NATO Secretary General will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Monday's White House meeting, offering up a coordinated show of support for Kyiv after President Donald Trump failed to reach a ceasefire deal with Russia last week. Why It Matters European officials have looked on with concern as the Trump administration placed itself as the chief negotiator between Russia and Ukraine, jockeying to stay in the loop—and influential—as the Republican appears unwilling to strongarm Russia into concessions. European countries, many of which feel their own security is at stake with an agreement for Ukraine, have repeatedly echoed Kyiv's demands for a ceasefire deal that does not gift Russia territory recognized internationally as Ukrainian, and for Kyiv to have firm security guarantees to deter future Russian attacks. Ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, European leaders made it clear they did not support any change in borders by force. Trump had said in advance of the summit that both sides would need to cede territory. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. AP Photo What To Know British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron will be among the leaders making the trip to Washington. Also expected to attend are Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who has sought a tight relationship with Trump. Finnish President Alexander Stubb may attend, Politico reported on Sunday. The Finnish leader has broken the ice with Trump, bonding over a shared love of golfing while leading a country with a significant land border, and apprehension toward, Russia. Stubb is a "very good player," Trump previously said. Zelensky's previous visit to the White House in February ended in disaster, descending into a public show of fractured relations between Kyiv and Washington. "Most likely, there will be little mutual understanding between Trump and Zelensky," Oleg Dunda, a Ukrainian MP who is part of Zelensky's Servant of the People party, told Newsweek. "Zelensky has already firmly rejected any proposals regarding territories." Trump told European leaders after meeting Putin that he backed a plan in which Ukraine would cede territory it still controlled to Russia, The New York Times reported, citing two senior European officials. Reuters reported that Russia had said it would offer slivers of land it currently controls in Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv giving up chunks of land in the east that Russia does not currently control, citing sources briefed on the Kremlin's thinking. Under the proposal, Ukraine would fully withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, with the current front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions to the south frozen in place, according to the report. Kyiv has said it will not reward Russia's invasion with territory, and to cede these areas would go against the country's constitution. Russia has tried to frame European nations as stumbling blocks to the peace agreement the Trump administration has pledged to broker. Following the Anchorage summit, Putin urged European politicians to "not make attempts to disrupt the planned progress through provocations and behind-the-scenes intrigues," or to become "obstacles." Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Sunday that despite the Alaska summit yielding no deal, Ukraine would have "Article 5-like" protections to ward off any future attempt by Russia to attack its neighbor. Article 5 is the provision in NATO's founding treaty that means that an attack on any member country in the alliance is treated as an attack on all. Moscow has insisted Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO, while Kyiv sees joining the alliance as a way to make sure Russia cannot attack the country again. "Now it is really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump told Fox News following the Alaska summit. "I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit." What People Are Saying Dominique Trinquand, a retired general who previously headed up France's military mission to the United Nations, told The Associated Press: "The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt." What Happens Next It's not clear how much concrete progress will be made in Monday's meeting, the Russian and Ukrainian demands remaining apparently irreconciliable.

Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump refugee plan prioritises white South Africans while others face stricter US entry rules
The Trump administration is weighing a refugee admissions cap of 40,000 for the coming fiscal year, with 30,000 spaces reserved for Afrikaners, a Dutch-descended minority in South Africa, according to U.S. officials and internal government communications reviewed by Reuters. The Trump administration is considering setting a refugee admissions cap of 40,000 for the upcoming fiscal year This proposal which focuses on resettling Afrikaners from South Africa signifies a shift in U.S. refugee policy Analysts express concern that this policy adjustment may imply racial bias and overlook the pressing needs of other refugees globally. The plan marks a sharp departure from decades of U.S. refugee policy, which traditionally had bipartisan support and prioritised vulnerable groups fleeing war, persecution, and famine. By contrast, the Trump initiative focuses heavily on resettling white South Africans, a group the president has argued faces 'racial discrimination and violence' - claims the South African government has repeatedly rejected. Angie Salazar, a top refugee program official in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), told state-level refugee workers that she expected the cap to be 40,000, according to a summary of an August 1 meeting reviewed by Reuters. Two officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that of this number, about 30,000 slots would be devoted to Afrikaners. A separate source familiar with the discussions said a cap as low as 12,000 had also been floated. In addition to Afrikaners, the administration is weighing limited resettlement for Afghans who aided U.S. forces in the Middle-East conflicts and possibly Ukrainians, leaving only a small number of slots unallocated for other nationalities. A break with precedent The 40,000-person cap represents a sharp drop from the 100,000 refugees admitted under President Joe Biden in 2024, with the highest number of entrants coming from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (18,145). During the Obama era, the U.S. admitted roughly 2,500–3,500 refugees annually from the DRC and 3,000–4,500 from Sudan/South Sudan, according to the U.S. Refugee Council. However, the proposed cap is still higher than the record-low 15,000 ceiling set by Trump in fiscal year 2021 before leaving office. The current plan prioritizes 30,000 of these spaces for Afrikaners, a white minority group from South Africa, marking a significant shift in U.S. refugee policy. White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly defended the process, insisting that 'no decisions were final' until Trump decides in October. 'President Trump has a humanitarian heart, which is why he has welcomed these courageous individuals to the United States,' Kelly said. 'Refugee admission caps will be determined next month, and any numbers discussed at this point are pure speculation.' She added. So far, refugee resettlement in the US has been limited. The first group of 59 South Africans arrived in May, with only 34 more admitted as of early August, according to a White House official. Concerns of racial bias Analysts warn that the heavy allocation for Afrikaners could reinforce perceptions of racial bias in U.S. refugee policy, especially given that 37 million people worldwide are currently displaced and that African nations host some of the largest refugee populations globally. Gaza freeze and visa costs deepen access gap The refugee plan comes alongside a U.S. decision to suspend all visitor visas for Gazans, a measure that aid agencies say will block patients in urgent need of medical evacuation. At the same time, Washington has introduced a controversial $250 visa integrity fee that applies to most African nations but not to European or Asian countries included in the Visa Waiver Program. Tourism and business leaders across Africa have warned that the new fee risks shutting out thousands of students, entrepreneurs, and travellers, while deepening perceptions of unfair treatment. Africa sidelined Taken together, the refugee allocation, the Gaza visa freeze, and the new visa surcharge point to a widening gap in U.S.–Africa engagement. While white South Africans may benefit from new resettlement pathways, millions of Black Africans remain effectively excluded, either by financial hurdles or by limited refugee quotas.