The Dutch farmers reaching for their guns after EU backed down on wolf crisis
Rendered dormant for over a century, Dutch farmers are once again calling for the 'wolvenjager' – the wolf hunter – to be unleashed.
Wolves were driven out of the Netherlands in the late 19th century, but after the feared predators were deemed untouchable under a 'strict protection' order issued by the EU in 2015, they have returned.
Now, wolves are ravaging livestock across the country's farms every day, leaving meadows peppered with mutilated carcasses.
A sharp rise in attacks on livestock and pets – including on Ursula von der Leyen's own beloved pony – convinced the EU to downgrade the protection order in December, placing the onus on member states to devise their own responses to wolves from March onwards.
The decision has left rival groups jostling for the ear of Dutch politicians: farmers, who are in favour of culling, and animal rights groups, who fear an open season on the animals.
Officials have as of yet provided no clear direction on how to handle the nine packs of wolves roaming the Netherlands.
Eduard van Adrichem, a wizened hunter sporting a cowboy hat and an unkempt grey beard, sees culling the increasingly emboldened wolf as a solemn duty to his neighbours.
'It's not the wolf's fault, he is an opportunist. It's nature, I don't blame him for that, but I will shoot him for that,' the 67-year-old said, his gnarled hands gripping a rifle with familiarity.
'I would kill them all. It's my obligation to save Holland from a disaster.'
On the farms of Gelderland, Utrecht and Drenthe, WhatsApp groups deliver news of sightings and savage attacks.
Boudewijn Kooijman, from Limburg, orchestrates the Green Wolf warning system, sending on a flurry of reports from farmers complete with gory photographic evidence.
'You never get used to it. I take it home. I can't sleep,' the 65-year-old says after arriving at the scene of a grisly overnight attack on a fellow farmer's flock in Emst.
Once the proud owner of 1,500 Maasduinenschaap (a breed of sheep), which his family has farmed since the 1800s, Mr Kooijman has seen his numbers dwindle to around 500.
'It is my life, but I can't do it anymore. For me it is clear that I will quit breeding sheep,' he said in front of a tractor loader bearing five caracasses, a lamb visible amidst the entrails hanging from a mother's torn belly.
The marauding wolf, Mr Kooijman explained, ravages sheep – ripping the throat and bowels – but rarely eating its prey, leaving behind a gruesome and often half-dead surplus.
Tanja Witman, with anguish sketched into her face, said there have been four attacks on her farm in two years, resulting in the deaths of more than 50 sheep.
'The fences don't work, the wolves jump over. We need to start shooting,' her husband Erik said. 'If it continues like this, it will not be possible to keep sheep in this area.'
Further north in Drenthe, Jos Ubels, a 38-year-old cattle farmer, dismissed the anti-wolf fences subsidised by the government as a waste of time and money.
'You do it because otherwise they say you are not trying but we know it does not work,' he said.
Such fences threaten to eradicate an age-old symbiotic relationship whereby farmers lend sheep to their fellow dairy farmers, rotating through fields for three days at a time to improve the quality of next season's grass.
'They are destroying the system, they don't understand,' Mr Ubels added.
He explained that the choice between leaving sheep vulnerable and taking on back-breaking labour to install and maintain fences, for which the government does not offer compensation, renders the tradition untenable.
Farmers have also warned the more fencing is laid down, the harder it is for wildlife such as deer and boar to migrate across the Netherlands.
Mr Ubels, no stranger to activism as vice president of the Farmers Defence Force, said he was amongst the first to sound the alarm over wolf attacks after 14 of his calves went missing.
'We found a carcass. It was shocking. There was only the spine and a severed head,' he said, adding that the authorities initially refused to send a team to collect DNA samples, claiming that a wolf would never attack cattle.
An organisation known as Bij12 must obtain DNA matching a wolf on the government's database for the farmer to be paid compensation – an amount which farmers feel does not go far enough.
Mr Ubels responded by vowing to deliver the mutilated remains of a heifer through the local authorities' window. After alerting local media, who then phoned the province to ask what was happening, investigators confirmed wolves were responsible.
The cattle farmer fears similarities in the response that wolves will never attack humans.
On Friday, two ponies were found dead, dismembered and uneaten in Hierden, Gelderland, posing further concern over wolves' broadening appetite.
'My children are scared,' Mr Ubels said, adding that, given the opportunity, as a licensed hunter he would not think twice before reaching for his gun.
Last summer, the province of Utrecht was rocked by two cases of children being bitten and knocked over by wolves, which prompted the local authorities to issue urgent advice for children to stay out of the forests.
'It is a question of time before a wolf attacks a child. Little Red Riding Hood will no longer be just a fairy tale,' warned Caroline van der Plas, leader of the farmers' party BoerBurgerBeweging (BBB).
It is a fear shared by Mr van Adrichem, who said wolves prey on easy targets.
'He will learn [that] after sheep that there are children and men, he will learn that,' the hunter warned.
Mr van Adrichem, his shoulders resting on the fur pelt of a black bear he shot with a Winchester lever-action rifle in Canada, does not see himself as above nature, but rather as part of it.
'I adore the wolf, I cannot hate him. I would not even hate him if he took one of my dogs. But I would kill him,' the hunter said. 'I worship the wolf, but Holland is too small for him.'
Fed-up farmers have held demonstrations in Emmen, Ede and Arnhem this month, the latter featuring mock wolf hangings.
Vets have also vented their frustrations at being tasked with euthanising swathes of maimed animals.
'This is not why I became a vet. It is a tragedy. [The wolves] simply have to be shot,' Hans Veenstra, a vet from Wolvega, Friesland, told Dutch outlet AD.
The disparity in attitudes towards wolves has fuelled a widening rift between rural and urban areas.
Eric Kemperman, who represents the BBB in both the national parliament as a senator and the Gelderland local government, has long advocated for shooting wolves that attack livestock.
'People in the cities don't know how serious it is, it is dividing the population,' he told The Telegraph. 'It's getting out of hand, every day there are attacks'.
A hunter himself, Mr Kemperman said his party was 'waiting' for the right case in Gelderland to call on the mayor to enact local legislation which would permit the wolf to be shot.
'We will end up in court immediately, that is how it works here, but we want to challenge it,' he said.
In July 2023, the mayor for Westerwald authorised the killing of a wolf which had bitten a farmer near Wapse in Drenthe – an action which could otherwise result in a prison sentence or a fine.
Faunabescherming, an animal protection group, brought a lawsuit soon after the wolf was shot.
Earlier this month, a court sided with Faunabescherming over the provincial authorities of Gelderland, which had issued a permit allowing rangers to deter wolves with paintball guns.
Wolves neared extinction in the mid-20th century in Europe but recovered after being granted strict protection status by the Berne Convention in 1982 and the EU Habitats Directive in 1992.
Dr Joanna Swabe, senior director of public affairs at Humane Society International/Europe (HSI) fears the decision could mark a watershed moment for animals without natural predators.
'The EU decision-making on lowering legal protections for wolves sets a dangerous precedent for other European species, such as bears and lynx,' she said.
Léa Badoz, a wildlife programme officer at Eurogroup for Animals, believes the wolf has been unfairly tainted as a bogeyman.
'The wolf is unfortunately the latest political pawn, a victim of misinformation,' she said.
'[The downgrading] is based on misconceptions and threatens wolves, while failing to provide real support for farmers and local communities, many of whom are in favour of coexistence with the wolf.'
There have been no verified fatal attacks on humans in the last 40 years.
Jakob Leidekker, head of operations at De Hoge Veluwe National Park, believes the anger of animal rights groups is misguided, citing the loss of wildlife at the hands of the wolf.
'For the profit of one species, do we need to lose other species? Our main concern is maintaining biodiversity,' Mr Leidekker said, explaining that the introduction of wolves into the national park in 2021 decimated the grazing mouflon population.
The mouflon are an integral rung of the food chain, keeping the spread of Scots Pine at bay and propping up the poor-quality soil, without which Mr Leidekker predicts all his heathlands would disappear within 20 years.
Mr Leidekker added that wolves were becoming braver with every human interaction. Of the two children attacked last year, he noted: 'This is just the beginning.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EU proposes fresh sanctions on Russia's oil, banks, Nord Stream and 'shadow fleet'
The European Union has formally proposed a fresh round of sanctions against Russia to pressure the Kremlin into accepting a 30-day unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine, a step that Western allies consider an indispensable prelude to serious peace negotiations. If approved by member states, it would mark the 18th package of sanctions since February 2022, the largest regime ever imposed by the bloc. The latest proposal, unveiled on Tuesday by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and High Representative Kaja Kallas, blacklists an additional 22 Russian banks and extends the ban on transactions to entities based outside the country that contribute to the circumvention of sanctions. The Russian Direct Investment Fund, a sovereign wealth fund with an estimated capital of $10 billion (€8.75 billion), is targeted. "Russia continues to bring death and destruction to Ukraine," von der Leyen said. "Russia's goal is not peace, it is to impose the rule of might." The crackdown on the "shadow fleet" continues with the designation of 77 vessels. So far, Brussels has gone after almost 350 tankers from the old-age, poorly kept fleet, denying them access to EU ports and EU services. The plan also features a ban on the direct or indirect use of the Nord Stream pipelines that connect Russia and Germany. The underwater pipelines are today non-operational, and Berlin has ruled out the prospect of restarting gas transit after the war ends. "There is no return to the past," von der Leyen said. The most notable element of the proposed package is a downward revision of the price cap on Russia's seaborne oil, which was established at the G7 level in December 2022. The cap was set at $60 per barrel of crude and has remained unchanged since then, despite ample fluctuations in Russia's trade and evidence of circumvention. The Nordics and the Baltics have long called for a revision to reflect market dynamics. On Tuesday, von der Leyen pitched a new cap of $45 per barrel, in addition to a prohibition to importing refined products that are made with Russian crude oil and traded under a different label. These mostly come from India and Turkey. In theory, the EU could pass new legislation to bring down the level of the cap on its own in an attempt to further squeeze Moscow's profits. However, doing so without the participation of the United States could create a cacophony and weaken the initiative, which is supposed to have a worldwide effect. Until now, Donald Trump has refused to apply new sanctions against Russia, even if his rhetoric towards Vladimir Putin had hardened over the slow pace of negotiations and the continued barrage of attacks against Ukrainian cities. Trump's position has driven a wedge across the Western front, with the EU, the UK and Canada moving ahead with fresh restrictions while Washington takes a step back. The tensions in the alliance will come to the fore on Sunday during a G7 summit in Canada, where the revision of the price cap will be high on the agenda. Asked if the EU would go it alone, von der Leyen suggested it would not, at least not for the time being. "My assumption is that we do that (the revision of the price cap) together as G7," she said. "We started as G7, it was successful as a measure from the G7, and I want to continue this measure as G7." Meanwhile, EU officials and diplomats insist on piling extra pressure on the Kremlin regardless of the course of action that the White House chooses to take. Trump's direction, though, could influence deliberations in Brussels, as unanimity among the 27 member states is required to approve the 18th package. Hungary and Slovakia have, in recent months, ramped up their criticism against sanctions, arguing they cause more damage to the bloc's economy than to Russia's. Earlier this year, Hungary threatened to veto the renewal of all sectoral sanctions, an against-the-clock experience that prompted officials to start working on legal shortcuts, particularly with a view to protecting the estimated €210 billion in Russia's frozen assets. Last week, Slovakia's parliament narrowly passed a resolution urging the government to oppose further trade restrictions against Russia. "If there is a sanction that would harm us, I will never vote for it," Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said after the vote in parliament. "I am interested in being a constructive player in the European Union, but not at the expense of Slovakia." Still, for all their antagonistic talk, neither Hungary nor Slovakia has gone as far as completely preventing the adoption of a new package of sanctions.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Eurasia is the future — the US needs to get on board
A major discovery of rare earth elements in central Kazakhstan earlier this year sent a jolt through global markets and policymaking circles, with early estimates suggesting it could place the country among the world's top three holders of rare earth reserves. As the Trump administration scrambles to secure alternatives to China's near-monopoly over these critical materials, used in modern technology such as smartphones, electric cars and computers, the spotlight is once again turning to a region long overlooked by Washington: the post-Soviet Turkic world. These Turkic nations — Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan — are unfamiliar to most Americans. Yet U.S. officials have long recognized the region's value, measured in energy, strategic minerals, rare earth elements and alternative supply routes. For many thorny reasons, Washington has failed to establish firm allies there. Diplomatic presence tells the story: while Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin have visited Central Asia 14 and 83 times, respectively, since taking office, no U.S. president has visited any Turkic nation besides Turkey. And now the U.S. has fallen behind. Russia, China and the European Union have all successfully made inroads in the Turkic world in recent years. Moscow, which has traditionally dominated the region, has largely taken control of Uzbekistan's gas industry, while partnering with Kazakhstan on gas and oil exports and nuclear technology for a planned power plant. In 2023, China increased trade with Central Asia by 27 percent from the year prior while signing strategic partnerships with Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan. And the EU recently held a large summit with Central Asian countries in Uzbekistan, announcing it would invest $12 billion in the region. These global powers understand the stakes. Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan together hold 6.5 percent of global gas reserves. Turkmenistan ranks sixth worldwide in gas, and Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan are major oil producers. And over the past several months, Astana has massively exceeded OPEC-plus production targets without signs of slowing. But most important today is the region's supply of minerals and rare earth elements. Besides Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan also has significant reserves and recently invested $2.6 billion to develop mineral extraction. Both Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan also have large reserves of strategic minerals with military, economic and technological uses, like gold, uranium, copper, tungsten, silicon, lithium and titanium. Given Central Asia's large reserves, Washington should invest in refining and mining rare earth elements, to break Beijing's dominance. Refining is particularly important, as these countries lack the ability to refine important strategic minerals like lithium, uranium, nickel and cobalt and often do so in China or Russia. To pave the way for such investment, Congress should consider granting the Turkic world Permanent Normal Trade Relations status. Besides having valuable resources, the region plays an important role in supply routes. During the height of the ancient Silk Road's importance, the Turkic world glued the continent together, serving as a thoroughfare between China, India and Europe. Today, it may be resuming its historic role as a bridge between the East and West, as the Middle Corridor gains in popularity — a transit route from East Asia to Europe bypassing both Russia and Iran. U.S. officials have spoken of the importance of the Middle Corridor in the past, and last year, Washington and Europe signed a Memorandum of Understanding to further develop the route. Such developments give the U.S. a clear opportunity. Should Washington start seriously developing the corridor, it would give Kazakhstani energy a bypass through Azerbaijan while weakening Russia's hold on Kazakhstan. An important step would be brokering a final peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan, widening the corridor and giving an alternative to Georgia, which has become closer to Russia in recent years. Many Turkic leaders, including former Kazakhstani President Nursultan Nazarbayev, former Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev and former Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev, have spoken about decreasing their outward reliance by forming a Turkic bloc. The bloc would represent a total of roughly 175 million inhabitants, with a GDP of some $1.9 trillion — about 95 percent of the Russian GDP, and a growth rate 2 percent higher than the global average. Currently, Turkic countries have deepened cooperation through the Organization of Turkic States. Should Turkic countries increase cooperation further, they will be better able to dictate their own terms. Although Turkey was once expected to lead a unified Turkic bloc, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's Islamist policies and Ankara's focus on the Arab world have alienated key regional powers. The secular Turkic governments are wary of ideological influence, and of becoming subordinate to Ankara. This has led to a leadership vacuum — although possibly not for long. After the conclusion of the 2020 Karabakh war with Armenia, Azerbaijan has begun to position itself along with Kazakhstan as a leader of the Turkic world. Both countries hold the largest reserves of energy and minerals and are most crucial to trade routes. Azerbaijan is located on the very bottleneck between Iran and Russia that crosses the Middle Corridor. Kazakhstan's location makes it the most feasible country for Chinese products to cross over to Europe. The U.S. must take the Turkic world seriously, and soon — not just in words, but with a presidential visit, sustained investment and a new Silk Road strategy. Joseph Epstein is director of the Turan Research Center, a nonpartisan research program at the Yorktown Institute focused on the Turkic and Persian worlds.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
EU's new Russia sanctions to target energy sector and banks
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Commission has proposed an 18th package of sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, aimed at Moscow's energy revenues, its banks and its military industry, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Tuesday. The new package proposes banning transactions with Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines as well as banks that engage in sanctions circumvention. "Russia's goal is not peace, it is to impose the rule of might ... strength is the only language that Russia will understand," von der Leyen told a news conference. The Commission has also proposed lowering the Group of Seven nations (G7) price cap on Russian crude oil to $45 a barrel from $60 barrel in a bid to cut Russia's energy revenues. Von der Leyen said that the oil price cap will be discussed at a G7 meeting this week. "My assumption is that we do that together as the G7. We started that as G7, it was successful as a measure from the G7, and I want to continue this measure as G7," she said. The proposal also lists more vessels that make up Russia's shadow fleet and oil trading companies. "The next round of EU sanctions against Russia will target Russia's energy revenues including the shadow fleet, its military industry and its banking sector," EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas said. EU countries will start debating the proposal this week. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data