The Dutch farmers reaching for their guns after EU backed down on wolf crisis
Rendered dormant for over a century, Dutch farmers are once again calling for the 'wolvenjager' – the wolf hunter – to be unleashed.
Wolves were driven out of the Netherlands in the late 19th century, but after the feared predators were deemed untouchable under a 'strict protection' order issued by the EU in 2015, they have returned.
Now, wolves are ravaging livestock across the country's farms every day, leaving meadows peppered with mutilated carcasses.
A sharp rise in attacks on livestock and pets – including on Ursula von der Leyen's own beloved pony – convinced the EU to downgrade the protection order in December, placing the onus on member states to devise their own responses to wolves from March onwards.
The decision has left rival groups jostling for the ear of Dutch politicians: farmers, who are in favour of culling, and animal rights groups, who fear an open season on the animals.
Officials have as of yet provided no clear direction on how to handle the nine packs of wolves roaming the Netherlands.
Eduard van Adrichem, a wizened hunter sporting a cowboy hat and an unkempt grey beard, sees culling the increasingly emboldened wolf as a solemn duty to his neighbours.
'It's not the wolf's fault, he is an opportunist. It's nature, I don't blame him for that, but I will shoot him for that,' the 67-year-old said, his gnarled hands gripping a rifle with familiarity.
'I would kill them all. It's my obligation to save Holland from a disaster.'
On the farms of Gelderland, Utrecht and Drenthe, WhatsApp groups deliver news of sightings and savage attacks.
Boudewijn Kooijman, from Limburg, orchestrates the Green Wolf warning system, sending on a flurry of reports from farmers complete with gory photographic evidence.
'You never get used to it. I take it home. I can't sleep,' the 65-year-old says after arriving at the scene of a grisly overnight attack on a fellow farmer's flock in Emst.
Once the proud owner of 1,500 Maasduinenschaap (a breed of sheep), which his family has farmed since the 1800s, Mr Kooijman has seen his numbers dwindle to around 500.
'It is my life, but I can't do it anymore. For me it is clear that I will quit breeding sheep,' he said in front of a tractor loader bearing five caracasses, a lamb visible amidst the entrails hanging from a mother's torn belly.
The marauding wolf, Mr Kooijman explained, ravages sheep – ripping the throat and bowels – but rarely eating its prey, leaving behind a gruesome and often half-dead surplus.
Tanja Witman, with anguish sketched into her face, said there have been four attacks on her farm in two years, resulting in the deaths of more than 50 sheep.
'The fences don't work, the wolves jump over. We need to start shooting,' her husband Erik said. 'If it continues like this, it will not be possible to keep sheep in this area.'
Further north in Drenthe, Jos Ubels, a 38-year-old cattle farmer, dismissed the anti-wolf fences subsidised by the government as a waste of time and money.
'You do it because otherwise they say you are not trying but we know it does not work,' he said.
Such fences threaten to eradicate an age-old symbiotic relationship whereby farmers lend sheep to their fellow dairy farmers, rotating through fields for three days at a time to improve the quality of next season's grass.
'They are destroying the system, they don't understand,' Mr Ubels added.
He explained that the choice between leaving sheep vulnerable and taking on back-breaking labour to install and maintain fences, for which the government does not offer compensation, renders the tradition untenable.
Farmers have also warned the more fencing is laid down, the harder it is for wildlife such as deer and boar to migrate across the Netherlands.
Mr Ubels, no stranger to activism as vice president of the Farmers Defence Force, said he was amongst the first to sound the alarm over wolf attacks after 14 of his calves went missing.
'We found a carcass. It was shocking. There was only the spine and a severed head,' he said, adding that the authorities initially refused to send a team to collect DNA samples, claiming that a wolf would never attack cattle.
An organisation known as Bij12 must obtain DNA matching a wolf on the government's database for the farmer to be paid compensation – an amount which farmers feel does not go far enough.
Mr Ubels responded by vowing to deliver the mutilated remains of a heifer through the local authorities' window. After alerting local media, who then phoned the province to ask what was happening, investigators confirmed wolves were responsible.
The cattle farmer fears similarities in the response that wolves will never attack humans.
On Friday, two ponies were found dead, dismembered and uneaten in Hierden, Gelderland, posing further concern over wolves' broadening appetite.
'My children are scared,' Mr Ubels said, adding that, given the opportunity, as a licensed hunter he would not think twice before reaching for his gun.
Last summer, the province of Utrecht was rocked by two cases of children being bitten and knocked over by wolves, which prompted the local authorities to issue urgent advice for children to stay out of the forests.
'It is a question of time before a wolf attacks a child. Little Red Riding Hood will no longer be just a fairy tale,' warned Caroline van der Plas, leader of the farmers' party BoerBurgerBeweging (BBB).
It is a fear shared by Mr van Adrichem, who said wolves prey on easy targets.
'He will learn [that] after sheep that there are children and men, he will learn that,' the hunter warned.
Mr van Adrichem, his shoulders resting on the fur pelt of a black bear he shot with a Winchester lever-action rifle in Canada, does not see himself as above nature, but rather as part of it.
'I adore the wolf, I cannot hate him. I would not even hate him if he took one of my dogs. But I would kill him,' the hunter said. 'I worship the wolf, but Holland is too small for him.'
Fed-up farmers have held demonstrations in Emmen, Ede and Arnhem this month, the latter featuring mock wolf hangings.
Vets have also vented their frustrations at being tasked with euthanising swathes of maimed animals.
'This is not why I became a vet. It is a tragedy. [The wolves] simply have to be shot,' Hans Veenstra, a vet from Wolvega, Friesland, told Dutch outlet AD.
The disparity in attitudes towards wolves has fuelled a widening rift between rural and urban areas.
Eric Kemperman, who represents the BBB in both the national parliament as a senator and the Gelderland local government, has long advocated for shooting wolves that attack livestock.
'People in the cities don't know how serious it is, it is dividing the population,' he told The Telegraph. 'It's getting out of hand, every day there are attacks'.
A hunter himself, Mr Kemperman said his party was 'waiting' for the right case in Gelderland to call on the mayor to enact local legislation which would permit the wolf to be shot.
'We will end up in court immediately, that is how it works here, but we want to challenge it,' he said.
In July 2023, the mayor for Westerwald authorised the killing of a wolf which had bitten a farmer near Wapse in Drenthe – an action which could otherwise result in a prison sentence or a fine.
Faunabescherming, an animal protection group, brought a lawsuit soon after the wolf was shot.
Earlier this month, a court sided with Faunabescherming over the provincial authorities of Gelderland, which had issued a permit allowing rangers to deter wolves with paintball guns.
Wolves neared extinction in the mid-20th century in Europe but recovered after being granted strict protection status by the Berne Convention in 1982 and the EU Habitats Directive in 1992.
Dr Joanna Swabe, senior director of public affairs at Humane Society International/Europe (HSI) fears the decision could mark a watershed moment for animals without natural predators.
'The EU decision-making on lowering legal protections for wolves sets a dangerous precedent for other European species, such as bears and lynx,' she said.
Léa Badoz, a wildlife programme officer at Eurogroup for Animals, believes the wolf has been unfairly tainted as a bogeyman.
'The wolf is unfortunately the latest political pawn, a victim of misinformation,' she said.
'[The downgrading] is based on misconceptions and threatens wolves, while failing to provide real support for farmers and local communities, many of whom are in favour of coexistence with the wolf.'
There have been no verified fatal attacks on humans in the last 40 years.
Jakob Leidekker, head of operations at De Hoge Veluwe National Park, believes the anger of animal rights groups is misguided, citing the loss of wildlife at the hands of the wolf.
'For the profit of one species, do we need to lose other species? Our main concern is maintaining biodiversity,' Mr Leidekker said, explaining that the introduction of wolves into the national park in 2021 decimated the grazing mouflon population.
The mouflon are an integral rung of the food chain, keeping the spread of Scots Pine at bay and propping up the poor-quality soil, without which Mr Leidekker predicts all his heathlands would disappear within 20 years.
Mr Leidekker added that wolves were becoming braver with every human interaction. Of the two children attacked last year, he noted: 'This is just the beginning.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Donald Trump is again intending to move the goalposts for his global tariff policy. The United States is fast approaching the end of the president's 90-day pause on his sweeping global tariffs on July 9, but while testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Bessent said that 'Liberation Day' Part 2 may not come to pass so soon. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those. And it is highly likely that those countries that are negoti—or trading blocs, in the case of the EU—who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not,' he added. The Trump administration has not even vaguely approached its initial promise to crack 90 deals in 90 days, only announcing two unfinished deals, with the U.K. and China. Crucially, Trump's paltry set of terms with China isn't even a deal. China referred to it as merely a 'framework,' while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was a 'handshake for a framework' that both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping need to approve. Trump seems intent on running the country's economic policy in 90-day increments, prolonging economic uncertainty that has roiled the markets and sent prices rising. But the president's failure should hardly come as a surprise, as the stated purpose of his tariffs—not to ensure economic prosperity but to bring U.S. trading partners to their knees—defies all logic and reason. With only two half-deals made, and a suddenly unclear horizon, it's not clear how TACO Trump will ever reach the goal of 200 trade deals he'd claimed to have made in April. Especially considering that there aren't even that many countries.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine war latest: Ukraine strikes targets in Russia, including gunpowder plant
Key developments on June 11: Ukrainian drones strike targets in Russia, including gunpowder plant, General Staff says Zelensky urges 'stronger' EU sanctions on Russia, lower oil price cap Ukraine repatriates bodies of 1,212 fallen soldiers Ukraine's SBU releases fresh video of Operation Spiderweb, teases 'new surprises' NATO summit statement omits Ukraine's entry bid, $40 billion pledge, Bloomberg reports Ukrainian drones struck multiple military targets in Russia, including the Tambov Gunpowder Plant, overnight on June 11, the General Staff of Ukraine's Armed Forces reported. The plant, one of Russia's main manufacturers of gunpowder and explosives for small arms, artillery, and rocket systems, caught fire following the drone strike, according to the General Staff. Local residents reported hearing explosions and shared videos showing a large blaze near the facility, according to the Russian independent media outlet Astra. The General Staff described the attack as part of a broader operation to degrade Russia's ability to produce explosive materials and ammunition used in the full-scale war against Ukraine. The Tambov facility has been targeted several times since November 2023, and U.S. sanctions were imposed on it that same year. Tambov Oblast, located southeast of Moscow, lies hundreds of kilometers from Ukraine and shares no direct border with it. Russian state news agency TASS confirmed a drone attack but did not mention the strike on the powder plant. Tambov Oblast Governor Maxim Egorov said that emergency services had extinguished the fire and that there were no casualties, though he did not specify the location of the fire. In addition to the strike on Tambov, Ukrainian drones hit the ammunition depot of Russia's 106th Airborne Division in Kursk Oblast and the depot at Buturlinovka airfield in Voronezh Oblast, the General Staff said. The extent of the damage is still being assessed, the General Staff said. "The Defense Forces continue to take all measures to undermine the military and economic potential of the Russian occupiers and force Russia to stop its armed aggression against Ukraine," the statement reads. Ukraine has ramped up long-range drone strikes in recent weeks, targeting Russian air bases and arms production facilities in an effort to disrupt Moscow's war machine ahead of an anticipated Russian summer offensive. Read also: As Russia inches closer to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, new Ukrainian region might soon be at war President Volodymyr Zelensky on June 11 called on the European Union to impose tougher sanctions against Russia, arguing that stronger financial pressure is necessary to curb Moscow's war effort. Speaking at the Ukraine-Southeast Europe Summit in Odesa, Zelensky said the upcoming 18th EU sanctions package "could be stronger," especially in targeting Russian oil tankers and the financial sector. He urged the EU to further reduce the price cap on Russian oil exports. "A ceiling of $45 per barrel of oil is better than $60, that's clear, that's true. But real peace will come with a ceiling of $30," he said. "That's the level that will really change the mindset in Moscow." After the 17th package of sanctions against Russia took effect on May 20, Ukraine's allies announced the following day that another round of restrictions was already in the works. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on June 10 that the EU is considering lowering the oil price cap from $60 to $45 per barrel — a measure that will be discussed at the upcoming G7 summit in Canada on June 15–17. The Kremlin's budget is increasingly strained by soaring military expenditures, with Russia's Finance Ministry relying heavily on energy revenues to fund the war against Ukraine. Join our community Support independent journalism in Ukraine. Join us in this fight. Support Us The push for tighter sanctions comes as Russia continues to reject ceasefire proposals and presses forward with military operations. Zelensky warned that Odesa remains one of Russia's "main targets," with plans to push beyond it toward the borders with Romania and Moldova. "Russia wants to destroy it, as it has done with countless cities and villages in the occupied territories," he said. "Russian military plans point to this region — Odesa — and then to the border with Moldova and Romania." Odesa is a major port city in southern Ukraine, located on the northwestern coast of the Black Sea. The president warned of possible destabilization efforts in the broader region, comparing the Kremlin's strategy to its previous interference in the Balkans. "We saw this before in the Balkans, where Russia intensified interethnic friction, carried out sabotage, and even attempted coups," Zelensky said. The Odesa summit was attended by several southeastern European leaders, including Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and Romania's newly elected President Nicusor Dan. Vucic's trip marked his first official visit to Ukraine since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion. Read also: Ukraine bracing for 'painful' reduction in US military aid after Hegseth announces cuts Ukraine has brought back the bodies of 1,212 fallen service members, the Ukrainian Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War (POW) said on June 11. The announcement follows Russian-Ukrainian Istanbul talks on June 2, which focused on exchanges of POWs and fallen soldiers. The repatriation was carried out through a coordinated effort involving the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), the Armed Forces, the Interior Ministry, the Ombudsman's Office, the State Emergency Service, and other national security and defense institutions. The International Committee of the Red Cross also supported the operation. The remains of soldiers were returned from multiple front-line regions, including Kharkiv, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Sumy oblasts. Officials emphasized that investigative and forensic teams from the Interior Ministry and the Health Ministry are working to identify the bodies in the shortest possible time. Vladimir Medinsky, aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin, claimed Russia transferred the bodies of 1,212 Ukrainian soldiers in accordance with the agreements in Istanbul, while Ukraine released the remains of 27 Russian service members. The Ukrainian side did not disclose how many Russian bodies were handed over in return. At the Istanbul meeting on June 2, Russian and Ukrainian delegations agreed on a new exchange of POWs but failed to reach a ceasefire agreement. The Turkey-hosted talks were the second round since mid-May and resulted in an agreement to exchange severely wounded and young prisoners, with President Volodymyr Zelensky saying up to 1,200 individuals could be returned on each side. Russia also pledged to transfer up to 6,000 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers. Following the Istanbul talks, Ukraine and Russia have already conducted two prisoner exchanges on June 9 and 10. While exact figures were not immediately disclosed, Ukraine confirmed the return of severely wounded and chronically ill prisoners, including those captured during the 2022 siege of Mariupol and held for more than three years. In Istanbul, Ukraine also submitted a peace proposal that called for a full ceasefire, an "all-for-all" POW exchange, the return of abducted children, and the use of frozen Russian assets to rebuild Ukraine. Russia has yet to formally respond. Read also: 'Ukrainians have been stripped of illusion of control' — Filmmaker Kateryna Gornostai on Russia's war, cinema and reclaiming the narrative The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) released on June 11 a new video detailing the sequence of its mass drone strike against Russia's strategic aviation earlier this month. The Operation Spiderweb, carried out on June 1, involved 117 drones that were hidden in trucks across Russia and deployed against four air bases, some thousands of kilometers from the Ukrainian border. The strike deep in the rear damaged 41 aircraft, including Tu-95, Tu-22M3, and Tu-160 bombers, rare A-50 spy planes, and An-12 and Il-78 transport aircraft, causing damage of over $7 billion, the SBU said. Trucks, seen in the footage driving in an undisclosed location, first transported first-person-view (FPV) drones and wooden cabins to Russia, the SBU said. Already on Russian territory, the vehicles were loaded with cabins, which, in turn, carried the drones. 0:00 / 1× The preparations were taking place in the Russian city of Chelyabinsk, not far from a Federal Security Service (FSB) office, according to the SBU. The loaded trucks then drove to multiple locations in the cities of Ivanovo, Ryazan, and in the Murmansk, Irkutsk, and Amur oblasts. The cabins opened remotely at the time of the attack, allowing the drones to strike Russian planes at the Belaya, Olenya, Dyagilevo, and Ivanovo air bases. The operation was also meant to strike at the Russian air base in Ukrainka in Amur Oblast, but this part of the attack failed. In the strike, Ukraine deployed drones specially designed by SBU specialists for attacks deep in the rear. Their unique features allowed them to be remotely controlled in real time thousands of kilometers behind the border, an SBU source told the Kyiv Independent. The drones' design also helped them "bypass Russian defenses and effectively strike the strategic aviation," the source said. SBU chief Vasyl Maliuk, who personally oversaw the operation, stressed that Ukrainian drones targeted "absolutely legitimate targets – military airfields and aircraft that attack our peaceful cities." "The SBU is hitting and will hit (Russia) where it considers itself unreachable!" Maliuk said in a statement. "We are working on new surprises, no less painful than the Operation Spiderweb." The attack was lauded by Ukrainian leaders and Western partners, with NATO Admiral Pierre Vandier calling it a reinvention of "the Trojan Horse" method with "technical and industrial creativity." Various satellite imagery released after the attack showed around a dozen destroyed planes. NATO estimates that between 10 and 13 Russian planes were completely destroyed, and more were damaged. In turn, President Volodymyr Zelensky claimed that roughly half of the 41 targeted planes have been damaged beyond repair. Russia acknowledged damage to its aircraft but claimed all of them will be "restored." Read also: America's weak strongman A one-page draft of a joint declaration for the upcoming NATO summit omits Ukraine's membership aspirations and last year's pledge of over $40 billion in support, Bloomberg reported on June 11 after reviewing the draft. This news signals that, for the first time since 2022, Russia's war against Ukraine will not be the chief focus of the annual NATO meeting, which is taking place on June 24-25 in The Hague. The unusually brief document recognizes Russia as a threat to NATO but not as an aggressor in Ukraine. It also does not mention China, Bloomberg reported. The communique of the 2024 summit in Washington named Beijing as a "decisive enabler" of Russia's war against Ukraine. Last year's gathering also included a declaration that Ukraine's path to NATO is "irreversible" and promised more than $40 billion in additional military aid. This year, the document will solely focus on defense spending, as U.S. President Donald Trump pushes NATO partners to hike the military expenditure benchmark from 2% to 5% of GDP. The final version of the statement can still change, Bloomberg reported. The brevity of the communique and the summit itself, as well as the decreased focus on Ukraine, stems from the effort to avoid conflict between Trump and European allies. In a sharp break from former U.S. President Joe Biden, the Trump administration has not approved any new military aid packages to Ukraine and signaled its intent to reduce assistance for Kyiv in the next year's budget. The U.S. president initially vowed to broker a peace deal between Kyiv and Moscow but became increasingly less engaged in the process as the negotiations stalled and Russia only intensified its attacks against Ukraine. According to Bloomberg, NATO allies will pledge to allocate at least 3.5% of GDP to defense needs and 1.5% to protecting infrastructure and civil preparedness by 2032. Member states will also consider counting their contributions to Ukraine as part of the new defense spending targets, the news outlet reported. The summit was preceded by rumors that President Volodymyr Zelensky would not be invited to participate for the first time due to U.S. opposition. Later, the speculations were dispelled after the Dutch media reported that NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte had invited the Ukrainian leader to attend. Ukraine War Latest is put together by the Kyiv Independent news desk team, who keep you informed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you value our work and want to ensure we have the resources to continue, join the Kyiv Independent community. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU, Germany boost Ukraine's energy efficiency fund with 18 million euros
The EU and Germany have topped up Ukraine's Energy Efficiency Fund (EEF) with an additional 18 million euros ($20.7 million) to expand their support for Ukraine's energy independence and green recovery, the EU Delegation to Ukraine said on June 11. The move was announced at the 10th meeting of the delegation's Coordination Council in Kyiv. The EU provided 13 million euros ($15 million) of the new funding, while Germany's International Climate Initiative (IKI) provided 5 million euros ($5.7 million). The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the investment arm of the World Bank, will continue to manage the EEF's trust fund, established in 2019, is split into two programs: VidnovyDIM, which helps repair war-damaged homes, and EnergoDIM, which co-finances grants to cut energy consumption and costs by installing new insulation, windows, and heating systems. 'Today, when Russia is shelling Ukrainian homes almost every night, the VidnovyDIM Fund program helps families cover the costs of repairing walls, roofs, and windows so that they can return home safely and with dignity,' EU Ambassador to Ukraine Katarina Maternova said. 'In parallel, through the EnergoDIM program, we continue to support the thermal modernization of old buildings, which allows us to reduce energy consumption and monthly costs.' Since 2021, the fund has grown from 90 projects to 1,500 projects, in cooperation with homeowners' associations, and helped Ukraine save 300 kilowatts per hour in energy consumption– as much as the city of Chernivtsi consumes. The EEF has helped over 217,000 families modernize and repair their homes, of which half were covered by the VidnovyDIM program. The new financing will improve the efficiency of grants, raise the grant size to meet demand, and help more people under Ukraine's environmentally sustainable 'Build Back Better' principle. The grant limit should increase to more than 200,000 euros, said Ukraine's Development of Communities and Territories First Deputy Minister Alena EFF will now be able to resume requests, which were paused due to the high number of applications. Around 10% of Ukraine's housing stock has been damaged or destroyed, while much of the country's heating system is from the Soviet era and inefficient, with apartments unable to control the heating in the winter. Ukraine's energy grid has been targeted relentlessly by Russian attacks, causing widespread energy instability across the country. At the same time, bills have increased for electricity and heating, frustrating citizens who have already taken a financial hit due to the war. The fund has modernized homes and schools to become more energy efficient, which not only cuts costs but also retains warmth during blackouts, said the Shkrum. More Ukrainians are beginning to understand the importance of energy efficiency due to Russian attacks, 'which is why the fund should continue functioning, reforming, and developing further,' she added. Read also: DTEK to build one of Europe's largest energy storage facilities, company announces We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.