Netflix's ‘NASA Live' will show spacewalks, rocket launches
With NASA+, Netflix users can see views of Earth from the International Space Station (ISS), astronaut spacewalks and rocket launches.
Rebecca Sirmons, the general manager of NASA+, said, 'Our Space Act of 1958 calls on us to share our story of space exploration with the broadest possible audience.'
'Together, we're committed to a Golden Age of Innovation and Exploration — inspiring new generations — right from the comfort of their couch or in the palm of their hand from their phone,' she added.
Starting this summer, there will be NASA+ live feeds that are available on Netflix's homepage.
If you don't have Netflix, you can still watch the stream on the NASA app and NASA.gov. The point of this partnership is to give viewers another way to watch these live feeds.
NASA+ also has a partnership with Amazon Prime Video, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
It was originally launched in 2023 and streams rocket launches, mission coverage, spacewalks and live footage of the Earth, among other programming.
More detailed schedules for NASA+ on Netflix will be released closer to launch day.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How synthetic lichens can launch Martian construction
This story was originally published on Construction Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Construction Dive newsletter. As NASA continues its preparations to land a human on the moon via its Artemis program, new research points to the possibility of building on the surface of not just the moon, but also Mars. A research team has developed a synthetic lichen system that can form building materials with no outside intervention, according to a news release from College Station, Texas-based Texas A&M University. The team was led by Congrui Grace Jin, an assistant professor in the school's Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution. Jin's team developed a synthetic community, or group of lichen species, that makes use of the advantages of those multiple species, according to the release. This system, which could enable autonomous construction on the planet, eliminates the need for external nutrient supplies and could eventually convert biomaterials into ink for 3D printing. For years, NASA has leaned on the private sector to help field solutions that can lead to permanent structures in space. Building in space presents challenges that range from the prohibitive cost of transporting building materials along with the harsh lunar and Martian climates. In this case, the surface of Mars is covered in regolith, which can consist of dust, sand and rocks. But Jin's team believes they've found a way around that. Their system grows with only Martian regolith simulant, air, light and an inorganic liquid medium, according to the release. In other words, no manpower needed. 'We can build a synthetic community by mimicking natural lichens,' Jin said in the news release. 'We've developed a way to build synthetic lichens to create biomaterials that glue Martian regolith particles into structures. Then, through 3D printing, a wide range of structures can be fabricated, such as buildings, houses and furniture.' That next step — using this regolith ink to print bio-structures using the 3D printing technique of direct ink writing — is already underway, according to the release. 'The potential of this self-growing technology in enabling long-term extraterrestrial exploration and colonization is significant,' Jin said. The study was funded by the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts program and recently published in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Recommended Reading GSA program to test 20 emerging technologies Sign in to access your portfolio
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Earth is as far away from the sun as it ever gets. So why is it so hot?
The peak of summer is approaching for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, but as we prepare for more sunshine and sweltering temperatures, our planet is spinning at its farthest point from the sun. On Thursday at 3:55 p.m. ET, our planet reached what's called the aphelion — the most distant point in its orbit around the sun, roughly 3 million miles farther away than when it's closest. This happens every year in early July, which might sound backward. If we're farthest from the sun, shouldn't it be cooler? People tend to associate proximity with warmth, so it seems natural to assume the seasons are caused by changes in how far Earth is from the sun. But the planet's distance has little to do with it. The real reason for seasonal temperature changes lies in the fact that Earth is tilted. Our planet spins at an angle — about 23.5 degrees — which means different parts of the globe receive more (or less) sunlight depending on the time of year. In July, the Northern Hemisphere is tilted toward the sun, bringing longer days and higher sun angles that lead to more direct sunlight — all of which produce summer-like heat. In contrast, the shape of Earth's orbit plays only a minor role. Although it's slightly oval-shaped rather than perfectly circular, the difference between our closest and farthest points from the sun is relatively small. Right now, Earth is about 3.1 million miles farther from the sun than it is in early January when it reaches perihelion, its closest point. Compared to its average distance of 93 million miles, that's only about a 3.3% difference. Because sunlight spreads out as it travels, even a relatively small change in distance results in about a 7% drop in the amount of solar energy reaching the planet. That's tiny compared to the effect of Earth's tilt. Just how big is the difference? Let's look at a few examples. In cities like Houston, New Orleans and Phoenix — near 30 degrees north in latitude — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth's atmosphere in summer is more than double what those cities receive in winter. Farther north, around 40 degrees, the seasonal swing is even more dramatic. Cities like New York, Denver and Columbus see solar energy climb from about 145 watts per square meter in winter to 430 in summer — nearly a 300% difference. So, while it's true that Earth is receiving less energy from the sun right now, that detail barely registers compared to the power of the planet's tilt. A slight angle in Earth's spin does far more to shape our seasonal patterns than a few million miles of extra distance ever could. In the end, it's not how close we are to the sun that makes summer feel like summer — it's how we're angled toward it.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Earth is as far away from the sun as it ever gets. So why is it so hot?
FacebookTweetLink The peak of summer is approaching for those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, but as we prepare for more sunshine and sweltering temperatures, our planet is spinning at its farthest point from the sun. On Thursday at 3:55 p.m. ET, our planet reached what's called the aphelion — the most distant point in its orbit around the sun, roughly 3 million miles farther away than when it's closest. This happens every year in early July, which might sound backward. If we're farthest from the sun, shouldn't it be cooler? People tend to associate proximity with warmth, so it seems natural to assume the seasons are caused by changes in how far Earth is from the sun. But the planet's distance has little to do with it. The real reason for seasonal temperature changes lies in the fact that Earth is tilted. Our planet spins at an angle — about 23.5 degrees — which means different parts of the globe receive more (or less) sunlight depending on the time of year. In July, the Northern Hemisphere is tilted toward the sun, bringing longer days and higher sun angles that lead to more direct sunlight — all of which produce summer-like heat. In contrast, the shape of Earth's orbit plays only a minor role. Although it's slightly oval-shaped rather than perfectly circular, the difference between our closest and farthest points from the sun is relatively small. Right now, Earth is about 3.1 million miles farther from the sun than it is in early January when it reaches perihelion, its closest point. Compared to its average distance of 93 million miles, that's only about a 3.3% difference. Because sunlight spreads out as it travels, even a relatively small change in distance results in about a 7% drop in the amount of solar energy reaching the planet. That's tiny compared to the effect of Earth's tilt. Just how big is the difference? Let's look at a few examples. In cities like Houston, New Orleans and Phoenix — near 30 degrees north in latitude — the amount of solar energy reaching Earth's atmosphere in summer is more than double what those cities receive in winter. Farther north, around 40 degrees, the seasonal swing is even more dramatic. Cities like New York, Denver and Columbus see solar energy climb from about 145 watts per square meter in winter to 430 in summer — nearly a 300% difference. So, while it's true that Earth is receiving less energy from the sun right now, that detail barely registers compared to the power of the planet's tilt. A slight angle in Earth's spin does far more to shape our seasonal patterns than a few million miles of extra distance ever could. In the end, it's not how close we are to the sun that makes summer feel like summer — it's how we're angled toward it.
