logo
1 in 3 Australian Homes Now Worth Over $1 Million: Report

1 in 3 Australian Homes Now Worth Over $1 Million: Report

Epoch Times16-05-2025

Australia's housing crisis has hit new highs, with one in three homes now worth over $1 million (US$643,000), and four major cities ranked among the world's most unaffordable.
Two separate reports released on May 16 reveal the depth of the country's housing crisis.
New research from Cotality (formerly CoreLogic) shows that over 34 percent of homes across Australia were now valued above $1 million.
Just a decade ago, in April 2015, that figure was only 10 percent.
Eliza Owen, head of research at Cotality, said the million-dollar mark is becoming 'increasingly standard,' especially after median home values for most capital cities crossed that mark last year.
'But all of this sort of research points to the same thing, which is how unaffordable the Australian housing market is, Sydney in particular … It's pretty grim,' she said.
Related Stories
5/11/2025
5/8/2025
Even with $1 million, Owen noted, the quality and location of available properties are deteriorating.
In fact, just a few days earlier, a viral video showed a dilapidated property in Sydney's far western Mount Druitt selling for
'If you can afford these properties, you've got a very high income, you've sold another property well, or you have wealth from your family. You need that big pool of wealth to participate in the market, and it's locking out those that don't.'
In an aerial view, vacant land sectioned off for housing is seen in the western suburbs of Sydney on Jan. 11, 2024.Four Aussie Cities Among World's Least Affordable
The Demographia International Housing Affordability survey by Chapman University ranks four Australian cities among the 15 most unaffordable in the world.
Sydney was ranked second globally, behind only Hong Kong. Melbourne, Adelaide, and Brisbane also made the top 10.
Perth narrowly missed out, with a median multiple of 8.3—just shy of the 'impossibly unaffordable' threshold of 9.0 used in the study.
The report measures affordability by comparing median house prices to median household incomes. A ratio of 3.0 or lower is considered affordable. None of the 95 cities surveyed met that standard.
'Sydney has had the first-, second- or third-least affordable housing of any major market in 16 of the last 17 years,' the report said. 'It's remarkable that Australian markets, including Melbourne and Brisbane, are now less affordable than cities like New York, London, or Chicago.'
An aerial view of completed houses in a recently developed estate in Clyde North in the federal seat of Holt in Melbourne, Australia, on March 26, 2025.Wages Stagnate as Prices Climb
Owen attributed the crisis to runaway property values and stagnant wages—particularly following the pandemic-era housing boom that spread price inflation beyond capital cities to regional centres.
'You need that big pool of wealth to participate in the market, and it's locking out those that don't,' Owen warned.
The lack of affordable housing options has also strained social services. Public housing stock has steadily declined, while waitlists have ballooned.
Many Australians are now being tipped into overcrowded housing or, in extreme cases, homelessness.
Planning Laws and Urban Containment Under Fire
The Demographia report points to restrictive urban planning policies—particularly 'urban containment' rules—as a root cause of the crisis.
These rules limit land supply for development, forcing prices upward and pricing out average households.
Over the last 50 years, the report said, these policies have made it harder for the middle class to own a home.
'Given the primacy of housing costs in household budgets, this also means that these stronger policies have been associated with greater overall poverty,' it stated.
Experts add there is a basic mismatch between demand and supply. Australia has not been building enough homes to keep up with its fast-growing population. The resulting scarcity pushes prices higher across the board, from rentals to home ownership.
New Zealand Offers Reform Blueprint
The report highlights New Zealand's 'Going for Housing Growth' policy as a potential model.
The reform program opens land for greenfield development and uses 'Special Purpose Vehicles' to fund infrastructure. These vehicles allow developers or future residents to cover costs over time, reducing the upfront financial burden on governments.
Grim Outlook Without Urgent Reform
Without serious reform, the report warns, home prices will remain out of reach for millions. Major cities risk losing residents to more affordable regions or countries, weakening their economic pull and further fracturing the housing landscape.
Some states, including Victoria and New South Wales, have begun encouraging higher-density development near transport hubs. But whether these plans will be implemented swiftly enough to change the trajectory remains to be seen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside key meeting to remove Trump tariffs
Inside key meeting to remove Trump tariffs

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Inside key meeting to remove Trump tariffs

Trade Minister Don Farrell has detailed the discussion he had with his US counterpart Jamieson Greer, revealing he had the 'greatest confidence' in Anthony Albanese during an expected meeting with Donald Trump next weekend. Senator Farrell spoke to the US Trade Representative while in Paris last week and characterised the talk as 'friendly'. Despite this, he maintained the tariffs were 'simply unjustified', highlighting Australia's trade surplus with the US. Figures indicate Australia buys about $70bn worth of goods from the US, compared to the $30bn of exports Australia sells to America. 'It wasn't a difficult discussion in terms of the relationship between us, and I am certainly of the view that we have the opportunity to continue to talk with Jamieson and Commerce Secretary Lutnick to put our case across,' he said. Senator Farrell also said he was still determined to get the trade barriers slashed. 'It's only by open discussion, honest discussion, with our allies in the United States that I think we can do that, but I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed,' he said. 'And every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States.' However, Senator Farrell said the decision will be ultimately made by Donald Trump, putting increased pressure on Mr Albanese's upcoming meeting with the US President. He said that while there were a 'range of ways' in which Australia communicates with the US, the 'most important … relationship between our prime minister and the president of the United States'. 'Look every meeting, I think, between an Australian Prime Minister and the US president will always be a critical meeting and I have the greatest confidence in our prime minister to push the Australian point of view on this.' The trade barriers currently include a 50 per cent levy on steel, a 25 per cent tariffs on aluminium and a blanket 10 per cent on other goods. While Mr Albanese maintained he won't compromise on Australia's biosecurity, he hinted Australia could review current settings which don't allow the US to import beef which originates from Canada and Mexico. Mr Albanese has also ruled out changes to the Pharmaceuticals Benefit Scheme, News Media Bargaining code and incoming ban on social media for under-16s, while highlighting Australia's critical minerals industry as a potential bargaining chip. 'If things can be sorted out in a way that protects our biosecurity – of course, we don't just say no, we don't want imports in here for the sake of it,' he told ABC radio on Friday. 'But our first priority is biosecurity and there'll be no compromise on that.' Mr Albanese said Australia would not have a 'subservient relationship to any nation'. 'We're a sovereign nation that stand on our own two feet,' he said. Senator Farrell also said he was 'confident' Australia can secure a new trade deal with the European Union, with EU President Ursula von der Leyen expected to visit Australia in July or August. 'We've got lots of things that we can sell to the to the Europeans. I believe now that there's an appetite to reach an agreement on both sides,' he said. 'The world has changed, those countries that believe in free and fair trade have to work together.'

'Haven't given up': minister seeks tariff breakthrough
'Haven't given up': minister seeks tariff breakthrough

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Haven't given up': minister seeks tariff breakthrough

Australia's trade minister remains confident tariffs imposed by the US will be removed, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by the US president around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese signalled on Friday negotiations on opening up access to US beef into Australia could be on the table as part of tariff negotiations. However, he said biosecurity would not be compromised in order to reach an agreement.

Landlord's 'unreasonable' request after tenant has a baby: 'It changes things'
Landlord's 'unreasonable' request after tenant has a baby: 'It changes things'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Landlord's 'unreasonable' request after tenant has a baby: 'It changes things'

Welcome to legal column where lawyers Alison and Jillian Barrett from Maurice Blackburn tackle problems everyday Aussies face — whether it be consumer, property, money matters impacting relationships or work. This week, a landlord questions their rights after a tenant has a baby. Question I'm a property investor and I've recently learned that my tenant had a baby and didn't tell me. I feel like it changes things and now there are more people living in the property than when we first made the lease agreement. Did I have a right to be told when she fell pregnant? Answer As a property investor, it's natural to be concerned about changes in your rental property, especially when it involves an increase in the number of occupants. If you've recently discovered that your tenant had a baby without informing you, you might be wondering about your rights and whether you should have been notified. In Australia, tenancy agreements are governed by state-specific Residential Tenancies Acts, which outline the rights and responsibilities of both landlords and tenants. Generally, these agreements specify the number of occupants allowed in the rental property. However, the birth of a child is typically not considered a breach of the lease agreement. Tenants are not legally required to inform landlords about changes in their family composition, such as having a baby. The Residential Tenancies Acts in various states do not mandate tenants disclose personal events like pregnancy or childbirth. This means that while the addition of a new family member may change the dynamics of the household, it does not necessarily violate the terms of the Tradie turned landlord with $4 million portfolio reveals biggest property mistake: 'Lemons' $4,400 ATO car tax deduction that most Aussies miss: 'Easy win' Centrelink $1,011 cash boost for Aussie farmers doing it tough: 'Get back on track' The situation may be different if an additional family moved in. If, for example, your property is a 2 bedroom, 1 bathroom unit and the lease agreement stipulated one couple but another couple also moved in with their three children – so there are now four adults and three children – that would unlikely be reasonable and would be a breach of the lease agreement. As a landlord, you do have the right to ensure that the property is being used in accordance with the lease agreement. If the increase in occupants leads to issues such as overcrowding or excessive wear and tear, you may have grounds to address these concerns. It's important to approach the situation with sensitivity and understanding, as tenants have the right to privacy and to live comfortably in their rented home. Open communication can often resolve potential problems before they escalate. Additionally, you can review the lease agreement to ensure that it clearly outlines the expectations regarding occupancy and property use. You should be aware that your actions may be viewed as unreasonable and potentially a breach of discrimination laws if you evict your tenants for simply having a baby. These laws are designed to protect individuals from unfair treatment based on certain characteristics. Addressing this matter with sensitivity and ensuring that all parties are treated with respect and fairness is crucial. This legal information is general in nature and should not be regarded as specific legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should consult a solicitor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store