logo
Cramps, fatigue and hallucinations: paddling 200km in a Paleolithic canoe from Taiwan to Japan

Cramps, fatigue and hallucinations: paddling 200km in a Paleolithic canoe from Taiwan to Japan

The Guardian04-07-2025
Dr Yousuke Kaifu was working at an archaeological site on the Japanese islands of Okinawa when a question started to bubble in his mind. The pieces unearthed in the excavation, laid out before him, revealed evidence of humans living there 30,000 years ago, arriving from the north and the south. But how did they get there?
'There are stone tools and archaeological remains at the site but they don't answer those questions,' Kaifu, an evolutionary anthropologist at the University of Tokyo, says.
In the Paleolithic era, or the old stone age, technology was rudimentary, he says. 'I thought it was great they reached those islands with such simple technology. I wanted to experience it.'
So Kaifu devised an adventurous plan that would see a team of researchers take to the sea in a 225km canoe trip from Taiwan to Japan's Yonaguni island.
Yonaguni is the closest of the Ryukyu islands – a chain stretching south-west from Kyushu to Taiwan – but it lies across one of the world's strongest currents. The voyage was reminiscent of the famed 1947 Kontiki crossing by Norwegian Thor Heyerdahl, which proved it was possible that peoples from South Americas paddled to Polynesia.
But first, Kaifu's team needed a boat. Any vessel used by the original Paleolithic travellers had long since disintegrated. The team used traditional techniques to build rafts made of bamboo and reed, but ocean tests found they were too slow to battle the Kuroshio current, which was even stronger at the time of the Paleolithic crossing.
'Through those failed experiments we gradually learned the difficulty of the crossing, but at the same time we knew the Palaeolithic people were on the island. They had succeeded, so there must be a resolution which we just hadn't found,' Kaifu says.
Eventually, the team built a heavy, unstable but workable dugout canoe out of Japanese cedar, and identified Wushibi bay on Taiwan's east coast from which to launch the 'Sugime'.
Crucially, Yonaguni is not visible from Taiwan's shore but can be seen on a clear day from its mountains, near Taroko. The researchers believed it likely that the early migrants had seen it, and that they were well aware of the strength and behaviour of the Kuroshio current from fishing ventures.
The team of five included professional paddlers as well as the scientists, but no one who had made such a journey, let alone without modern navigation. The day they set out, the weather was not good, Kaifu recalls, with choppy seas and clouds obscuring the stars they needed to find their way. Instead, they had to rely on another ancient technique, monitoring the direction of the swell to keep their own direction stable. 'Polynesian and Micronesian people did it, and we learned the technique,' says Kaifu, who travelled on the crew's escort vessel, 'the safe place', he laughs.
For 45 hours they paddled, suffering muscle aches, fatigue, cramps and even hallucinations. 'Surrounded only by the sea, clouds, and sky, they were uncertain about their position,' the report's journey log notes.
But their arrival on the second night was anti-climactically untraditional.
Still almost 40km away, 'they found the island by the lighthouse, which was unfortunate', Kaifu said.
'But the beautiful moment for me was the time of [the previous day's] dawn, the sun was coming up and the sky became gradually light, and we saw the clouds on the horizon. But at one point on the horizon the clouds were different, so there must be something under the clouds. That was the moment we were sure the island was there. Just like the ancient people, the ancestors, it was good to capture the island from the natural signature.'
The team made the journey in 2019, with support from Japan's National Museum of Science and Nature, Taiwan's National Museum of Prehistory, and crowdfunding donors. Last week they published two papers and a 90-minute documentary on their findings, on the journey itself and on the ocean modelling of the route's treacherous currents and unpredictable weather.
'Paleolithic people are often regarded as 'inferior' among the general public, primarily due to their 'primitive' culture and technology,' the report said. 'In sharp contrast, our experiment highlighted that they accomplished something extraordinary with the rudimentary technology available to them at the time.'
There is much unknown about the early migration of humans. Homo sapiens are believed to have spread across the world with large-scale maritime expansion occurring at least 50,000 years ago. A 2017 study in northern Australia found it could have been 15,000 to 30,000 years earlier than that.
The team's report noted growing consensus in the scientific community that the maritime migrations were driven by intentional seafaring more than accidental drifting, but without really knowing much about how. Kaifu's team found that while the journey from Taiwan to an unseen island was treacherous and required skill, strength and a lot of luck, it was possible.
Almost six years to the day since his team paddled away from Wushibi, Kaifu is excited recalling the details of their 'imperfect' journey.
'We anthropologist and archeologists who have studied human migration in the past, we draw a line on a map,' Kaifu said. 'But behind each of those lines there must be a great story. Crossing the ocean can't be represented by a simple line. I wanted to know the real story behind those migrations.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A 5,000-year-old tooth may solve the mystery of Stonehenge
A 5,000-year-old tooth may solve the mystery of Stonehenge

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

A 5,000-year-old tooth may solve the mystery of Stonehenge

By One of the biggest mysteries surrounding Stonehenge is how the heavy boulders got there. While some of the rocks came from Wales, one has even been traced to a quarry in Scotland. Recent research confirmed they were moved by humans – not glaciers – but it's not been clear how the bluestones, weighing over three tonnes, were transported hundreds of miles. Now, a new discovery could expose one of the monument's best–kept secrets. A century ago, in 1924, archaeologists discovered a cow's jawbone that had been carefully placed beside Stonehenge's south entrance and dated it to the monument's very beginning, around 5,000 years ago. Experts have now used isotope analysis to finally bring the artefact to life – revealing the cow likely originated in Wales before moving to Stonehenge. The remarkable discovery adds further weight to theories that cows were used in the transportation of the enormous rocks across the country. 'A slice of one cow tooth has told us an extraordinary tale and, as new scientific tools emerge, we hope there is still more to learn about her long journey,' Professor Jane Evans, from the British Geological Survey, said. The team, which also included scientists from Cardiff University and University College London, sliced the cow's third molar tooth, which records chemical signals from the animal's second year of life, into nine horizontal sections. They were than able to measure carbon, oxygen, strontium and lead isotopes, which each offer clues about the cow's diet, environment and movement. Analysis of the composition suggests the cow originated from an area with Palaeozoic rocks, such as the bluestones found in Wales, before moving to Stonehenge. This is the first time that scientists have seen evidence linking cattle remains from the site in Salisbury to Pembrokeshire in Wales, where some of the stones originated. 'This study has revealed unprecedented details of six months in a cow's life, providing the first evidence of cattle movement from Wales as well as documenting dietary changes and life events that happened around 5,000 years ago,' Professor Evans added. The researchers also concluded that unusual lead signals in the tooth could be explained by the stresses of pregnancy, indicating the cow was female. Richard Madgwick, professor of archaeological science at Cardiff University, said: 'This research has provided key new insights into the biography of this enigmatic cow whose remains were deposited in such an important location at a Stonehenge entrance. 'It provides unparalleled new detail on the distant origins of the animal and the arduous journey it was brought on. So often grand narratives dominate research on major archaeological sites, but this detailed biographical approach on a single animal provides a brand–new facet to the story of Stonehenge.' The new findings, which the researchers say 'help fill in just a few more gaps about this legendary landmark', were published in the Journal of Archaeological Science. Michael Parker Pearson, professor of British later prehistory at University College London, said: 'This is yet more fascinating evidence for Stonehenge's link with south–west Wales, where its bluestones come from. It raises the tantalising possibility that cattle helped to haul the stones.' Last month, researchers published a paper that concluded there is 'no evidence' to support the idea that some of Stonehenge's boulders had been deposited there by a glacier. Transporting these bluestones, which can weigh over three tonnes, from Wales to Stonehenge would have been an incredible feat of human logistics. 'Part of the fascination of Stonehenge is that many of its megaliths, in contrast to the large, relatively local sarsens, can be proven to have been sourced from Wales, over 200km to the west,' the researchers wrote. 'Most archaeologists accept that Neolithic people achieved this remarkable feat, transporting blocks weighing up to 3.5 tonnes.' While the large sarsen stones were only transported from West Woods in Wiltshire – roughly 32km (20 miles) away – they weighed over 20 tonnes each and stood up to seven metres tall. The famous 'Altar Stone' was even transported from Scotland around 750km (466 miles) away, a study published last year revealed. 'There is no evidence for how they moved these stones,' the researchers wrote, 'but recent indigenous peoples have been transporting stones weighing many tonnes great distances with ropes, wooden sledges and trackways – technologies which would have been available in the Neolithic.' While builders 5,000 years ago normally used whatever materials were at hand for stone circles, Stonehenge is 'exceptional' for being constructed entirely of stones brought from long distances, the team said. Researchers have previously suggested that the site may have had a political as well as a religious purpose, 'a moment of unification for the peoples of Britain, celebrating their eternal links with their ancestors and the cosmos'. Despite recent findings, the mystery of exactly why Stonehenge is built – and how – is still ongoing.

The mystery of Stonehenge's origins may have been solved
The mystery of Stonehenge's origins may have been solved

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

The mystery of Stonehenge's origins may have been solved

New evidence from an ancient cow 's tooth has further confirmed the link between Stonehenge and two quarries in Wales, believed to be the source of its legendary bluestones. Researchers from the British Geological Survey, Cardiff University, and University College London conducted isotope analysis on a cow's third molar tooth, discovered at Stonehenge in 1924. The analysis of lead isotopes in the cow's third molar suggested the animal originated from an area with Palaeozoic rocks, similar to those found in Wales, before moving to Stonehenge. This marks the first time scientists have found evidence linking cattle remains from Stonehenge to Wales, adding weight to theories that cows were used to transport the enormous stones. The research provides new insights into the animal's origins and its potential role in the arduous journey of the bluestones to the historic Wiltshire landmark.

Scientists are baffled to discover a SLOWDOWN in melting of Arctic sea ice
Scientists are baffled to discover a SLOWDOWN in melting of Arctic sea ice

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scientists are baffled to discover a SLOWDOWN in melting of Arctic sea ice

Scientists have been left baffled after discovering that the melting of sea ice in the Arctic is actually slowing down. Despite rising temperatures, an analysis by experts from the University of Exeter has revealed that the Arctic has been melting at a slower rate for the past 20 years. From 1979 to 2024, ice was lost from the Arctic at a rate of 2.9 million cubic kilometres of ice per decade. But from 2010 to 2024, the rate had reduced to just 0.4 million cubic kilometres per decade – seven times smaller. 'Summer sea ice conditions in the Arctic are at least 33% lower than they were at the beginning of the satellite record nearly 50 years ago,' said Dr Mark England, lead author of the study. However, the scientists caution against celebrating the news. They believe the slowdown is only temporary and will probably only continue for five to 10 years. When it ends, it's likely to be followed by 'faster–than–average' sea ice decline, the experts warned. Despite rising temperatures, an analysis by experts from the University of Exeter has revealed that the Arctic has been melting at a slower rate for the past 20 years In their study, the researchers analysed two datasets containing satellite measurements of the Arctic from 1979 to the present day. The team decided to focus on September – the month at which ice cover is at its annual minimum. Their analysis revealed that sea ice between 2005 and 2024 declined by 0.35 and 0.29 million square km per decade respectively. Meanwhile, the longer–term rate of decline for the period 1979–2024 was 0.78 and 0.79 million square km per decade (depending on which dataset used). That makes the slowdown a 55 per cent and 63 per cent reduction – the slowest rate of loss for any 20–year period since the start of satellite records in 1979. Looking ahead, the researchers predict there's a one in two chance that this slowdown will continue for a further five years, and a one in four chance it will last through until 2035. However, the slowdown won't last forever, they warn. In fact, when the slowdown ends, the pace of Arctic sea ice loss could actually be 0.6 million square km per decade faster than the broader long–term decline. The researchers still don't know why the slowdown has occurred, although they suspect it's down to 'natural climate variations'. 'It may seem surprising to find a temporary slowdown in Arctic sea ice loss,' Dr England said. 'It is, however, entirely consistent with climate model simulations and is likely due to natural climate variability superimposed on the human–driven long–term trend. 'This is only a "temporary reprieve" and before long the rate of sea ice decline will catch up with the longer term rate of sea ice loss.' Dr England uses the analogy of a ball bouncing down a hill – where the hill is climate change. 'The ball continues going down the hill but as it meets obstacles in its path, the ball can temporarily fly upwards or sideways and not seem to be traveling down at all,' he added. 'That trajectory is not always smooth but we know that at some point the ball will careen towards the bottom of the hill.' WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF LOWER SEA ICE LEVELS? The amount of Arctic sea ice peaks around March as winter comes to a close. NASA recently announced that the maximum amount of sea ice this year was low, following three other record-low measurements taken in 2015, 2016 and 2017. This can lead to a number of negative effects that impact climate, weather patterns, plant and animal life and indigenous human communities. Additionally, the disappearing ice can alter shipping routes and affect coastal erosion and ocean circulation. NASA researcher Claire Parkinson said: 'The Arctic sea ice cover continues to be in a decreasing trend and this is connected to the ongoing warming of the Arctic. 'It's a two-way street: the warming means less ice is going to form and more ice is going to melt, but, also, because there's less ice, less of the sun's incident solar radiation is reflected off, and this contributes to the warming.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store