Tariff overhang to delay Fed action; markets await clear catalyst: Santosh Rao
ADVERTISEMENT With respect to interest rate environment, especially after US President Donald Trump yesterday again criticized Federal Reserve Chief Jerome Powell, how do you read this development and what does this mean for Fed's next move and back home for India and RBI governor's move as well?
Santosh Rao: President Trump making comments about the Fed chair is not unusual. He does that all the time. He does not worry about that. What is really driving the thinking or the market is thinking that the case for cutting rates is getting stronger and stronger. The job market is weakening. We will get the jobs report this Thursday. It is expected to be about 110,000 which is lower than the prior month. Unemployment rate is going to stick up slightly. Inflation is coming down at this point. I mean, there was some little bit here and there, but it is generally soft, so the case for cuts. Now, the only issue is, is it going to be immediately or is it going to be in the later half when the tariffs land and we get certainty as to where the tariffs are landing, I think that is the only thing holding the Fed chair back. So, at this point, the market believes that the case is getting stronger and stronger for rate cuts.
I am in the camp that believes that two cuts this year is likely. He does not want to get too ahead of the whole inflation scenario. So, he is going to keep it there. Two cuts maybe unless the things get really bad. And that is another argument, if the things get really bad and if he cuts more than two, that means things are really bad and you do not want to give that message. So, two is the right point, later half in the year, that is where we are at this point.
Now talking about the markets, now S&P 500 and Nasdaq, they are both at record levels at this point. Now going forward as we enter the second half of the year, what is your expectation? Do you think the rally could continue especially given that July 9 tariff deadline looms? And also, I mean, is the rally expected to continue or do you think volatility is expected to be back?
Santosh Rao: Yes, volatility is the name of the game and it is going to stay that way for a while only because there is so many cross currents. At this point, the market is bumping against all-time highs and in fact, it has crossed all-time highs in some indexes. So, at this point and earnings reports coming out next week and on, are going to show that the earnings growth has slowed down, so that is a concern. I do not see any reason for multiple expansions. So, my bet is that the market is pretty much going to be flat to down going forward. Until much later in the year when the tariff thing is done and then we get a sense of how much tax cuts and what is the new budget and at what shape it takes in the end.
ADVERTISEMENT So, at this point, there are more ifs, ands, buts. We do not have any definitive thing, but safe money is betting that it is better to be cautious at this point. Things can get really bad because the economy is slowing down and we need a catalyst to really bump it up and right now I do not see one right there other than lowering interest rates and really spiking up the market in terms of sentiment going forward.
If you can tell us, what is your view on emerging markets including countries like India especially in the backdrop of tariff overhang which could probably play out in the first week of July. How do you view emerging markets especially India?
Santosh Rao: I mean, the way tariff negotiations are going on, I think President Trump is in no rush. Of course, he has these deadlines and they are very loose-loose deadlines. So, he is going to work around and try to get to a reasonable point. At this point, there are some sticky points here and there from last I read. So, it is going to be an ongoing negotiation. It is going to go way past July 9th, that deadline, I think it is pretty much a given that he is not bound to that number.
ADVERTISEMENT But overall, the emerging markets should benefit from the falling dollar, that is a big thing. And falling energy prices, that is great. So, those are big pluses for the emerging markets, so is also for US actually. So, net-net, the tailwind is pretty good for emerging markets. India specifically, they need to sort out the trade deals whatever sticking points there are, but in the end, it will be an amicable settlement because Trump needs to show some development on the tariff side.
ADVERTISEMENT He has made so many promises, threatened so many countries. He needs to come up with a good solution. He needs to settle this dispute. If not, he is going to look bad and he has elections coming up next year.
So, he wants to pretty much get some wins in his column at this point and he does not have much other than a framework with UK and China and maybe Canada. But other than that, he has not had any specific ones. So, he needs to show that and India if he can come to a good settlement, that will be a big win for him to show that he is doing well, that he is coming true on his word.
ADVERTISEMENT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
The crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
The crude oil market 's rather sanguine reaction to the U.S. threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25per cent tariff on imports from India on August 6, which is due to take effect on August 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50per cent, a level high enough to effectively end U.S. imports from India, which totalled nearly $87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as $65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling toward $150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply re-routed the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. Different this time? But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given U.S. and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries , which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, or about 37per cent of its total, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler . About 90per cent of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports and was mainly Urals grade. This is a medium sour crude and it would raise challenges for Indian refiners if they sought to replace all their Urals imports with similar grades from other suppliers. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a re-shuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the United States and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to 2 million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. It's simplistic to say that higher U.S. output can supply India's refiners, as this would mean those refiners would have to be willing to accept a different mix of refined products, including producing less diesel, as U.S. light crudes tend to make more products such as gasoline. For now the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. But the reality is likely to be slightly more messy, as some Indian refiners pull back from importing from Russia, some Chinese refiners may buy more and once again the oil market goes on a geopolitical merry-go-round.
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Gold prices retrace from record high ahead of Trump-Putin meeting. Is it the right time to buy gold?
Gold prices on the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) fell over 1% on Monday after touching an all-time high above ₹ 1,02,000 per 10 grams, tracking weakness in international bullion markets. Silver prices also traded sharply lower. MCX gold rate declined ₹ 1,295, or 1.27%, to an intraday low of ₹ 1,00,503 per 10 grams, while MCX silver futures dropped 1.59% to ₹ 1,13,047 per kg. Last week, MCX gold price had surged to a record ₹ 1,02,250 per 10 grams, supported by a depreciating rupee and heightened global macroeconomic risks, which boosted its appeal as a safe-haven asset. The latest pullback comes amid optimism over a potential resolution to the Russia–Ukraine conflict, following the announcement of a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 15 in Alaska to discuss ending the war. 'Elevated geopolitical tensions, looming US tariffs, and expectations of US Federal Reserve rate cuts have been driving gold demand. Safe-haven buying has remained resilient, even as domestic jewelry demand weakens,' said Jigar Trivedi, Senior Research Analyst, Reliance Securities. However, analysts now believe several of the factors underpinning this year's gold rally may have peaked, increasing the likelihood of a correction. Ajay Kedia, Director, Kedia Advisory, noted that the triggers for gold price rally are starting to fade. 'The announcement of the Trump–Putin meeting has eased geopolitical concerns over the Ukraine war. Expectations of a pause in US rate cuts next year, a stabilising dollar index, and slower central bank buying all point to potential weakness in gold prices ahead,' he said. According to Kedia, gold is already in a technically overbought zone. 'Gold prices have been facing resistance at the $3,500 level. On MCX, gold prices could correct to ₹ 96,500 – ₹ 97,600 in the short term, with support at ₹ 97,600 and resistance at ₹ 1,03,500,' he added. Trivedi also warned that record-high prices could dampen short-term physical demand in jewelry and retail segments. 'Current levels present an opportunity to partially book profits. MCX gold price for October futures could drop to ₹ 96,000 – ₹ 92,000 per 10 grams over the next two to three months, while resistance is seen at ₹ 1,06,000,' he said. With geopolitical risk premiums easing and key bullish drivers losing momentum, analysts suggest that investors consider partial profit booking in gold at current elevated levels, while keeping a close watch on global developments and technical indicators. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Why 'Make in India' still depends so much on 'Made in China'
Every time India feels the heat from outside, whether it's Donald Trump's tariffs, a tense standoff at the border with China, or a festive-season push to shop locally, the 'Make in India' slogan roars back into headlines like a rallying like our economic version of calling the team into a huddle before the next big play. But more than a decade after its grand launch, a question still lingers: is this game plan really scoring for India, or just helping 'Made in China' slip in through the side door?advertisementWhen Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the 'Make in India' programme in 2014, it was meant to transform India into a global manufacturing hub, create millions of jobs, and reduce dependence on imports, especially from China. The target was to raise manufacturing's share in GDP from around 15% to 25% by 2025. More than a decade later, a report from Hinrich Foundation suggests the reality is far more India has made progress in assembling products such as smartphones, solar modules, and certain defence equipment, it remains heavily reliant on Chinese components, raw materials, and technology. The dependence has shifted from finished goods to upstream goods, keeping China firmly embedded in India's supply TRADE DEFICIT WITH CHINAGovernment trade data highlights the scale of the challenge. In the 2024/25 fiscal year, India's trade deficit with China hit a record $99.2 billion, up sharply from $85.08 billion in 2023/24, $83.2 billion in 2022/23, and $73.31 billion in 2021/ from China surged 25% year-on-year in March 2025 alone, reaching $9.7 billion for the month. Electronics, electric batteries, and solar cells drove much of this increase. Over the full year, imports from China climbed to $113.5 exports to China have gone the other way. In March 2025, they fell 14.5% year-on-year to $1.5 billion. Over the 12-month period, exports totalled just $14.3 result: China ended the fiscal year as India's second-largest trading partner after the US, with two-way trade worth $127.7 billion, but heavily skewed in Beijing's TARGETS VS REALITYThe Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, launched in 2020 with Rs 1.9 trillion in incentives for 14 sectors, was designed to build domestic manufacturing have been gains in electronics exports, semiconductor projects, and solar module production. Tariffs plus domestic incentives have reduced the share of Chinese solar imports from over 90% to 56% for cells and 66% for manufacturing's share of GDP is now below 14%, lower than when 'Make in India' began. Many sectors, including speciality steel, textiles, auto parts, and batteries, have fallen short of targets. India still imports over 70% of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) used in its generic drug industry from China, despite targeted PLI of India's headline 'success stories' remain dependent on Chinese inputs. About 70% of components for drones are sourced from China as per the report. In smartphones, 99% of devices sold in India are assembled locally, but local value addition is low, 6–8% for iPhones and 25–30% for some Samsung manufacturing advantage lies in its complete industrial ecosystem. Over decades, it has built tightly linked supply chains between factories, research institutions, and skilled by contrast, has developed strong capabilities in software and services but not in large-scale manufacturing, forcing companies to import expertise and components from Chinese SECURITY, AND ECONOMICS COLLIDINGBorder tensions in 2017 and 2020 led to bans on Chinese apps, tighter investment rules, and limits on visas for Chinese nationals. While these measures were aimed at national security, they also made it harder for Indian manufacturers to secure critical components and partnerships, slowing localisation these frictions, bilateral trade has continued to grow, with imports from China increasingly dominated by upstream goods such as display modules, printed circuit boards, and battery 2025, the government appears to be softening its stance. Indian manufacturers including Dixon Technologies, Zetwerk, and Micromax are exploring joint ventures with Chinese companies for parts and sub-assemblies. Dixon has already partnered with China's HKC to make semiconductor display modules in senior officials, including the Chief Economic Advisor, have argued that deeper integration with Chinese supply chains could help build India's manufacturing strength. Others, like Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, remain opposed, warning that such dependency could undermine strategic R&D AND SKILLS GAPThe Hinrich Foundation report points to chronic underinvestment in research and development. Large Indian conglomerates spend far less on R&D than global peers, leading to fewer patents and slower technology adoption. In critical areas like EV batteries, semiconductors, and robotics, India is far behind China, which holds key patents and dominates global supply startups have also been criticised for focusing on consumer-facing apps instead of advanced technologies. Startup founders say complex regulations, slow approvals, and inconsistent policy support often push them to relocate report warns that India risks becoming 'multi-dependent' on China for upstream goods, on the US for advanced technology, and on Russia for energy and defence supplies. While increased Chinese investment could create jobs and boost manufacturing capacity, it must be carefully managed to avoid deepening strategic vulnerabilities.(Disclaimer: The views, opinions, recommendations, and suggestions expressed by experts/brokerages in this article are their own and do not reflect the views of the India Today Group. It is advisable to consult a qualified broker or financial advisor before making any actual investment or trading choices.)- EndsTune InMust Watch
