The man with the plan to end Europe's Russian gas addiction
Good morning. News to start: Brussels plans to make it easier for UK professionals to work in the EU, a key British post-Brexit request, in a proposal seen by the Financial Times.
Today, our energy correspondent profiles Dan Jørgensen, the Danish commissioner whose plan to end EU imports of Russian energy will be released this afternoon. And parliament's top border control lawmaker tells Laura what's still hindering the EU's new border system.
Join Chris Giles and Monetary Policy Radar colleagues tomorrow for a Q&A on how central banks should navigate the new world order . Phasing out
Dan Jørgensen, the EU's energy commissioner, admits that working out how the EU will wean itself off Russian fossil fuels 'is by far the most important and difficult thing I've been involved with'.
Its success or failure will probably define his tenure, writes Alice Hancock .
Context: The European Commission will today present a plan setting out how the bloc will rid itself of its remaining imports of Russian fossil fuels by 2027. The document marks the beginning of the end of the EU's dependence on Russian energy, which previously accounted for two-fifths of the bloc's gas imports and around a third of its oil.
It's proven a tricky political balancing act for Jørgensen, who has had to account for the varying interests of different member states, but also US preferences, as American gas is expected to help replace the Russian fuel. Read More Binance Founder Changpeng Zhao Agrees to Step Down, Plead Guilty
Jørgensen is not new to tough negotiations. He has repeatedly led discussions on contentious climate issues decided at the UN COP climate conference. As Denmark's climate and energy minister, he was among those sat around the EU negotiating table during the 2022 gas price crisis.
But this plan, he told the FT, goes beyond even those 'days and nights . . . making emergency plans for what to do if [Vladimir] Putin closed off the gas'.
'We moved from being afraid that [Putin] would stop the gas to working on stopping it ourselves. And to some extent, you can say that we've been extremely successful,' Jørgensen said. 'I don't honestly think there . . . are many parts of the world where countries would be able to fundamentally shift from one supplier as much as we have [and] as fast as we have.'
'It's the first time that the EU takes a step that is this significant towards another country,' he added.
Despite countries hassling Jørgensen to present the plan from 'day one on this job', it was nonetheless delayed from its original March publication date owing to the complexity of the options the commission is presenting.
Jørgensen said it was 'a very complicated matter' but that Brussels had found 'new solutions that will make it possible for us to finally say that this will now happen'.
Many EU officials now see turning off Russian gas — and turning up US LNG imports — as a win-win situation that could also avoid a trade war with Washington.
Jørgensen said he had spoken to his US counterparts to let them know the plan was coming but, because of the market implications, specific details of the plan have been 'kept very tight'. Chart du jour: Frenemy
China is on a charm offensive with Europe and other global powers, to push back against US influence and shore up its export markets. Phasing in
Germany, France and the Netherlands must remove the last hurdles for the EU's new electronic border to come into force this autumn, the lawmaker leading European parliament negotiations on the issue tells Laura Dubois .
Context: The so-called Entry/Exit System has been bogged down for eight years amid technical delays and security concerns. The system will record personal details of all foreign travellers entering or exiting the bloc.
'The only thing that is standing in the way of getting ahead with this legislation is the readiness of France, Germany and the Netherlands,' Assita Kanko of the hard-right European Conservatives and Reformists told the FT.
The three countries had raised concerns about the central system, prompting the European Commission to propose a phased rollout to ensure a smooth transition.
Kanko said that 'any risk of a total failure of the system has been removed'.
Both the council of EU member states and the European parliament have approved the gradual phase-in, meaning that negotiations between parliamentarians and the council can now start. Kanko said that a first round of talks had been scheduled for Friday.
If the institutions agree — and all countries declare they are ready — the system can be phased in from late October or early November over six months, Kanko said.
A spokesperson for Germany's interior ministry said it 'will adopt the declaration of operational readiness within the required timeframe to avoid further delays'.
The responsible Dutch and French ministries did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but officials have signalled they would stick to the planned timetable. What to watch today
Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Council president António Costa address the European parliament in Strasbourg.
Friedrich Merz to be elected German chancellor Now read these
Free Lunch — Your guide to the global economic policy debate. Sign up here
The State of Britain — Peter Foster's guide to the UK's economy, trade and investment in a changing world. Sign up here
Are you enjoying Europe Express? Sign up here to have it delivered straight to your inbox every workday at 7am CET and on Saturdays at noon CET. Do tell us what you think, we love to hear from you: europe.express@ft.com . Keep up with the latest European stories @FT Europe
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
FAA planning more helicopter route changes after fatal collision
By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Federal Aviation Administration said on Friday it is planning additional helicopter route changes near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport after the January 29 mid-air collision of an American Airlines regional jet and an Army helicopter that killed 67 people. FAA official Nick Fuller said at a National Transportation Safety Board investigative hearing that an agency work group is planning changes on a key helicopter route near Reagan after imposing permanent restrictions on non-essential helicopter operations in March and further restricting where they could operate in June. NTSB officials at the hearing expressed concerns about a "disconnect" between front-line air traffic controllers and agency leaders and raised other questions about FAA actions before the fatal collision, including why earlier reports of close call incidents did not prompt safety improvements. Board members have also raised concerns about the failure of the FAA to turn over documents in a timely fashion during the investigation of the January collision. The NTSB received details on staffing levels at the time of the January 29 crash "after considerable confusion and a series of corrections and updates from the FAA," a board report said. The hearing has run more than 30 hours over three days and raised a series of troubling questions, including about the failure of the primary controller on duty to issue an alert to the American regional jet and the actions of an assistant controller who was supposed to assist the primary controller. "That did not occur and we're trying to understand why. And no one has been able to tell us what the individual was doing during that time," NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said. Homendy said earlier this week the FAA had ignored warnings about serious safety issues. "Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you," Homendy said. "You transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem ... Fix it. Do better." FAA officials at the hearing vowed to work more collaboratively and address concerns. Senator Tim Kaine on Friday also cited concerns raised by an FAA manager about the volume of flights at the airport before the collision and the decision by Congress last year to add five additional daily flights to Reagan. "Congress must act to reduce dangerous congestion by removing flights into and out of (Reagan National)," Kaine said.
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Bid to relocate US Space Shuttle Discovery faces museum pushback
Tucked inside President Donald Trump's flagship tax and spending bill last month was a little-noticed provision to relocate the iconic Space Shuttle Discovery from a museum outside Washington to Houston. The plan now faces legal uncertainty, with the Smithsonian Institution arguing Congress had no authority to give away what it considers private property -- even before accounting for the steep logistical and financial challenges. "The Smithsonian Institution owns the Discovery and holds it in trust for the American public," the museum network, which receives substantial federal funding yet remains an independent entity, said in a statement to AFP on Friday. "In 2012, NASA transferred 'all rights, title, interest and ownership' of the shuttle to the Smithsonian," the statement continued, calling Discovery one of the museum's "centerpieces" that welcomes millions of visitors a year. The push to move Discovery from the Air and Space Museum's site in northern Virginia began in April, when Texas Senator John Cornyn, a Republican who faces a tough primary challenge next year by state attorney general Ken Paxton, introduced the "Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act," naming Discovery. The legislation stalled until it was folded into the mammoth "Big Beautiful Bill," signed into law on July 4. Its passage allocated $85 million for the move, though the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has projected a far higher cost of $325 million, adding that the NASA administrator's power over non-NASA entities is "unclear." To comply with Senate rules, the bill's language was modified such that Discovery is no longer named directly. Instead, the bill refers to a "space vehicle," though there is little doubt as to the target. NASA's administrator -- currently Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, serving in an acting capacity -- was given 30 days to identify which spacecraft is to be relocated, a deadline coming up on Sunday. - End of an era - NASA's Space Shuttle program ended in 2011, after a 30-year run that carried America's post-Apollo space ambitions. The four surviving orbiters -- Atlantis, Endeavour, prototype Enterprise, and Discovery -- were awarded to Florida, California, New York, and Virginia through a ranked selection process. Discovery, the most flown, was chosen as a vehicle-of-record in a near-complete state, intended for study by future generations. "There was not a lot of support within Houston to want a shuttle," space historian Robert Pearlman told AFP, adding that a proposal to house it at Space Center Houston was relatively weak. But after the announcement, Texas -- home to the Johnson Space Center, which oversees NASA's human spaceflight -- felt snubbed, and allegations of political interference by then-president Barack Obama swirled. A NASA inspector general probe found no evidence of foul play. - Enormous challenges - Relocating Discovery now would pose major technical hurdles. NASA had modified two Boeing 747s to ferry retired shuttles -- one is now a museum piece, and the other is out of service. That leaves land and water transport. "The nearest water entrance to the Potomac River is about 30 miles away," Pearlman said -- but it may be too shallow for the orbiter and required barge, requiring a 100-mile journey instead. A water transport would require a massive enclosed barge, he added. The US government owns only one such vessel, controlled by the military. Loaning it to a civilian agency would require another act of Congress, and the alternative would involve building one from scratch. Dennis Jenkins, a former shuttle engineer who oversaw the delivery of retired orbiters to their new homes, told the Collect Space outlet he could see costs reach a billion dollars. Nicholas O'Donnell, an attorney at Sullivan & Worcester with expertise in art and museum law, told AFP that assuming Smithsonian has valid paperwork, "I don't think Secretary Duffy or anyone in the federal government has any more authority to order the move of Discovery than you or I do." The government could invoke eminent domain -- seizing private property for public use -- but it would have to pay fair market value or try to sue. The Smithsonian is unlikely to want a court battle, and while it's legally independent, its financial reliance on federal funds leaves it politically vulnerable, said O'Donnell. ia/jgc
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump defends firing labor statistics chief, confirms movement of two nuclear subs
President Trump defended firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, claiming job numbers were 'phony' before the election and later revised. He also confirmed moving U.S. nuclear submarines closer to Russia after threats from a former Russian president, saying the move was necessary to protect Americans. Solve the daily Crossword
