
How to foster innovation at work
Gupta and his team invested significantly in technology, restructured to improve collaboration, and, most critically, drove a series of cultural interventions to encourage innovation friendly behaviors. Over the next 15 years DBS Bank transformed from an under performer in its local market to the best performing bank in the world. How did Gupta and other leaders who look to foster innovation do it?
As a researcher, advisor, (DBS was a consulting client of mine from 2017 to 2019), executive, and now teacher, I have spent 25 years practicing and studying disruptive change. Here are some essential takeaways for nurturing disruptive teams.
Recognize the importance of teamwork
Innovation stories typically celebrate charismatic leaders like Steve Jobs or Jeff Bezos. That sometimes leaves leaders thinking they have to carry the reins of disruption, or need to find a lone genius to drive disruption.
Innovation isn't the job of the few. It's highly dependent on teamwork. For example, in the 1960s, Procter & Gamble launched Pampers disposable diapers, which went on to become the first brand in P&G's storied history to cross $10 billion in revenue. Vic Mills (a decorated scientist) chartered a team led by Bob Duncan (whose grandfather played a key part in the development of Tide laundry detergent) that included researchers like Harry Tecklenburg, who went on to have a 30-year career at P&G and wrote a wonderful retrospective about the launch of Pampers in 1990.
The job of the leader isn't to be charismatic and do the work alone, it is to create conditions that enable teams to do disruptive work.
Embrace uncertainty
One key to success is to recognize that disruption is predictably unpredictable. Julia Child's 1961 book Mastering the Art of French Cooking enabled a broader population to enjoy French dishes. Her pioneering cooking shows on television further brought cooking to the masses. Her story echoes every disruptive journey I have studied. Most notably, success required overcoming false starts, fumbles, and failures. She started working on Mastering the Art (with coauthors Simone Beck and Louisette Bertholle) in 1951. The goal was to publish the book in 1953. It took an extra eight years, two publisher switches, and one stinging rejection in 1959 that almost killed the project.
While you can't predict the specific path a disruptive innovation will follow, you can predict there will be twists and turns along the way. That means that leaders need to make sure that their environments accept and encourage the kind of intelligent failure that accompanies disruptive success.
Celebrate failure
Disruption's predictable unpredictability also means leaders need to make sure that their environments accept and encourage the kind of intelligent failure that accompanies disruptive success. One technique that can help is to have a formal ceremony to celebrate failure. That's what Finnish gaming company Supercell does. Every time a team successfully launches a new game, everyone gets together, and cracks open a beer. Every time a team admits defeat and decides to shut down a project, everyone gets together and pops a bottle of champagne. The 'reward' for the failure is greater than the reward for success.
Saying cheers to failure has two clear benefits. First, it shows that a good, not bad, thing has happened, encouraging other teams to continue to push frontiers. Second, it shows that the effort is finished.
Many organizations suffer from what I call 'zombie projects.' The walking undead. Projects that everyone knows will not move the needle but they shuffle and linger on, sucking all of the life out of the organization. Zombies exist because failure carries such a stigma that organizations avoid killing projects. Saying cheers to failure stops zombies from ever spawning and allows teams to move onto the next project—which might actually be the disruptive innovation for which your company has been searching.
Accept risk
Pursuing disruption is risky. The first reference to gunpowder appears in the book The Kinship of the Three in 142 CE. Its development over the centuries involved alchemists, blacksmiths, peasants, gunners, philosophers, and scientists. There were farmers and fighters experimenting with different uses. There were leaders allocating time and money and directing work. As one historian noted, success required the work of 'daredevils, visionaries, madmen,' many of whom found 'not fortune but disfiguring burns and death.'
The burns are more metaphorical today—doubts from colleagues, the pain of a hypothesis proved wrong, the discomfort that always accompanies doing something new—but they still sting. Doing new things is hard. Having things not work out as expected is painful. Disruptive innovators question the status quo. Some people inside organizations love it, some are indifferent to it, some actively seek to subvert or sabotage it. Disruption casts a shadow.
When you see someone in your organization who is pushing disruption, encourage them. Celebrate their courage, and tell them how much you appreciate their work. It's a small thing, but big things come from a collection of small things.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he'd do it again
Eric Vaughan, CEO of enterprise-software powerhouse IgniteTech, is unwavering as he reflects on the most radical decision of his decades-long career. In early 2023, convinced that generative AI was an 'existential' transformation, Vaughan looked at his team and saw a workforce not fully on board. His ultimate response: He ripped the company down to the studs, replacing nearly 80% of staff within a year, according to headcount figures reviewed by Fortune. Over the course of 2023 and into the first quarter of 2024, Vaughan said IgniteTech replaced hundreds of employees, declining to disclose a specific number. 'That was not our goal,' he told Fortune. 'It was extremely difficult … But changing minds was harder than adding skills.' It was, by any measure, a brutal reckoning—but Vaughan insists it was necessary, and says he'd do it again. For Vaughan, the writing on the wall was clear and dramatic. 'In early 2023, we saw the light,' he told Fortune in an interview, adding that he believed every tech company was facing a crucial inflection point around adoption of artificial intelligence. 'Now I've certainly morphed to believe that this is every company, and I mean that literally every company, is facing an existential threat by this transformation.' Where others saw promise, Vaughan saw urgency—believing that failing to get ahead on AI could doom even the most robust business. He called an all-hands meeting with his global, remote team. Gone were the comfortable routines and quarterly goals. Instead, his message was direct: Everything would now revolve around AI. 'We're going to give a gift to each of you. And that gift is tremendous investment of time, tools, education, projects … to give you a new skill,' he explained. The company began reimbursing for AI tools and prompt engineering classes, and even brought in outside experts to evangelize. 'Every single Monday was called 'AI Monday,'' Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could only work on AI. 'You couldn't have customer calls, you couldn't work on budgets, you had to only work on AI projects.' He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody at IgniteTech. 'That culture needed to be built. That was… that was the key.' This was a major investment, he added: 20% of payroll was dedicated to a mass-learning initiative, and it failed because of mass resistance, even sabotage. Belief, Vaughan discovered, is a hard thing to manufacture. 'In those early days, we did get resistance, we got flat-out, 'Yeah, I'm not going to do this' resistance. And so we said goodbye to those people.' The pushback: Why didn't they get on board? Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the 'most resistant,' he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn't do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added. This friction is borne out by broader research. According to the 2025 enterprise AI adoption report by WRITER, an AI platform that specifically helps enterprise clients with AI integration, one in three workers say they've 'actively sabotaged' their company's AI rollout—a number that jumps to 41% of millennial and Gen Z employees. This can take the form of refusing to use AI tools, intentionally generating low-quality outputs, or avoiding training altogether. Many act out due to fears that AI will replace their jobs, while others are frustrated by lackluster AI tools or unclear strategy from leadership. WRITER's Chief Strategy Officer Kevin Chung told Fortune the 'big eye-opening thing' from this survey was the human element of AI resistance. 'This sabotage isn't because they're afraid of the technology … It's more like there's so much pressure to get it right, and then when you're handed something that doesn't work, you get frustrated.' He added that WRITER's research shows that workers often don't trust where their organizations are headed. 'When you're handed something that isn't quite what you want, it's very frustrating, so the sabotage kicks in, because then people are like, 'Okay, I'm going to run my own thing. I'm going to go figure it out myself.'' You definitely don't want this kind of 'shadow IT' in an organization, he added. Vaughan says he didn't want to force anyone. 'You can't compel people to change, especially if they don't believe.' He added that belief was really the thing he needed to recruit for. Company leadership ultimately realized they'd have to launch a massive recruiting effort for what became known as 'AI Innovation Specialists.' This applied across the board, to sales, finance. marketing, everywhere. Vaughan said this time was 'really difficult' as things inside the company were 'upside down … We didn't really quite know where we were or who we were yet.' A couple key hires helped, starting with the person who became IgniteTech's chief AI officer, Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu. That led to a full reorganization of the company that Vaughan called 'somewhat unusual.' Essentially, every division now reports into the AI organization, regardless of domain. This centralization, Vaughan says, prevented duplication of efforts and maximized knowledge sharing—a common struggle in AI adoption, where WRITER's survey shows 71% of the C-suite at other companies say AI applications are being created in silos and nearly half report their employees left to 'figure generative AI out on their own.' No pain, no gain? In exchange for this difficult transformation, IgniteTech reaped extraordinary results. By the end of 2024, the company had launched two patent-pending AI solutions, including a platform for AI-based email automation (Eloquens AI), with a radically rebuilt team. Financially, IgniteTech remained strong. Vaughan disclosed that the company, which he said is in the nine-figure revenue range, finished 2024 at 'near 75% EBITDA'—all while completing a major acquisition, Khoros. 'You multiply people … give people the ability to multiply themselves and do things at a pace,' he said, touting the company's ability to build new customer-ready products in as little as four days—an unthinkable timeline in the old regime. What does Vaughan's story say for others? On one level, it's a case study in the pain and payoff of radical change management. But his ruthless approach arguably addresses many challenges identified in the WRITER survey: lack of strategy and investment, misalignment between IT and business, and the failure to engage champions who can unlock AI's benefits. The 'boy who cried wolf' problem To be sure, IgniteTech is far from alone in wrestling with these challenges. Joshua Wöhle is the CEO of Mindstone, a firm similar to WRITER that provides AI upskilling services to workforces, training hundreds of employees monthly at companies including Lufthansa, Hyatt, and NBA teams. He recently discussed the two approaches described by Vaughan—upskilling and mass replacement—in an appearance on BBC Business Today. Wöhle contrasted the recent examples of Ikea and Klarna, arguing the former's example shows why it's better to 'reskill' existing employees. Klarna, a Swedish buy-now pay-later firm, drew considerable publicity for a decision to reduce members of its customer support staff in a pivot to AI, only to rehire for the same roles. 'We're near the point where [AI is] more intelligent than most people doing knowledge work. But that's precisely why augmentation beats automation,' Wöhle wrote on LinkedIn. A representative for Klarna told Fortune the company did not lay off employees, but has instead adopted several approaches to its customer service, which is managed by outsourced customer-service providers who are paid according to the volume of work required. The launch of an AI customer-service assistant reduced the workload by the equivalent of 700 full-time agents—from roughly 3,000 to 2,300—and the third-party providers redeployed those 700 workers to other clients, according to Klarna. Now that the AI customer service agent is 'handling more complex queries than when we launched,' Klarna says, that number has fallen to 2,200. Klarna says its contractor has rehired just two people in a pilot program designed to combine highly trained human support staff with AI to deliver outstanding customer service. In an interview with Fortune, Wöhle said one client of his has been very blunt with his workers, ordering them to dedicate all Fridays to AI retraining, and if they didn't report back on any of their work, they were invited to leave the company. He said it can be 'kinder' to dismiss workers who are resistant to AI: 'The pace of change is so fast that it's the kinder thing to force people through it.' He added that he used to think that if he got all workers to really love learning, then that could help Mindstone make a real difference, but he discovered after training literally thousands of people that 'most people hate learning. They'd avoid it if they can.' Wöhle attributed much of the AI resistance in the workforce to a 'boy who cried wolf' problem from the tech sector, citing NFTs and blockchain as technologies that were billed as revolutionary but 'didn't have the real effect' that tech leaders promised. 'You can't really blame them' for resisting, he said. Most people 'get stuck because they think from their work flow first,' he added, and they conclude AI is overhyped because they want AI to fit into their old way of working. 'It takes a lot more thinking and a lot more kind of prodding for you to change the way that you work,' but once you do, you see dramatic increases. A human can't possibly keep five call transcripts in their head while you're trying to write a proposal to a client, he offers, but AI can. Ikea echoed Wöhle when reached for comment, saying that its 'people-first AI approach focuses on augmentation, not automation.' A spokesperson said Ikea is using AI to automate tasks, not jobs, freeing up time for value-added, human-centric work. The WRITER report notes that companies with formal AI strategies are far more likely to succeed, and those who heavily invest in AI outperform their peers by a large margin. But, as Vaughan's experience shows, investment without belief and buy-in can be wasted energy. 'The culture needed to be built. Ultimately, we ended up having to go out and recruit and hire people that were already of the same mind. Changing minds was harder than adding skills.' For Vaughan, there's no ambiguity. Would he do it again? He doesn't hesitate: He'd rather endure months of pain and build a new, AI-driven foundation from scratch than let an organization drift into irrelevance. 'This is not a tech change. It is a cultural change, and it is a business change.' He said he doesn't recommend that others follow his lead and swap out 80% of their staff. 'I do not recommend that at all. That was not our goal. It was extremely difficult.' But at the end of the day, he added, everybody's got to be in the same boat, rowing in the same direction. Otherwise, 'we don't get where we're going.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chinese port achieves first-of-its-kind transfer that could revolutionize maritime trade: 'Significantly cheaper than land transport'
Chinese port achieves first-of-its-kind transfer that could revolutionize maritime trade: 'Significantly cheaper than land transport' A cargo transfer milestone has been reached at a Chinese port. But the haul wasn't typical products, but rather, air pollution. It's a fascinating achievement that could provide shipping with another revenue stream, astoundingly from ship exhaust, according to the Maritime Executive. Evergreen's 152,300-deadweight-ton Ever Top was retrofitted last year with tech to capture carbon dioxide from exhaust, lassoing nearly 80% of emissions with a nearly 100% purity. The stored fumes can then be sold at a profit for other uses, per ME and Interesting Engineering. The transfer happened on June 19 at the Port of Shanghai thanks to special onboard equipment, including absorption and regeneration modules, compression refrigeration, and storage. Past efforts that used trucks and tanks to offload the CO2 were more complicated. In Shanghai, a barge vessel called De Jin parked alongside Ever Top to complete the move, heralded by Chinese officials as a novel effort, ME reported. "For scaled operations, ship-to-ship transfer offers clear advantages. It is significantly cheaper than land transport and much more efficient," project manager Du Mingsai said in IE's story. The retrofit cost about $10 million. But reports indicated the expense can be more than recouped within two years by selling the stored carbon. ME said that experts estimated ships could make an amazing $8 million a year from selling tailpipe gases. Drax Group, a United Kingdom renewable energy company not involved with the project, listed numerous product uses for captured carbon. Sneakers, furniture, cleaner concrete, and even alternative metal were some of the ones noted. The push to capture carbon comes from efforts within the sector to reduce heat-trapping air pollution that is warming the atmosphere and oceans. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that around 91% of the excess heat produced on Earth is absorbed by the oceans. Coral bleaching, sea level rise, and other problems are linked to the warming waters, per the agency. The European Federation for Transport and Environment reported that the sector produces about 3% of global CO2 fumes, which is expected to grow by half by 2050 if "stringent measures are not taken." New-age sails, kites, and hydrogen fuel are some other options being harnessed to cut the use of dirty energy in maritime travel. But ME reported that the Ever Top retrofit costs less than a new vessel or an alternative fuel conversion. "From onboard storage to mobile transfer and reuse, the milestone gives Shanghai a full-chain ecosystem for maritime carbon capture. It also positions the city as a global model for cutting shipping emissions and sets a new benchmark for the industry's green transition," IE's Neetika Walter wrote. Do you worry about air pollution in your town? All the time Often Only sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. But not all of the headlines coming from the Far East seas are squeaky clean. CBS News reported that China is using so-called "dark" vessels to transfer dirty oil between ships as the country continues to buy the fossil fuel from heavily sanctioned Iran. The ships have disabled their transponders, making them tough to ID. China buys 90% of Iran's oil and calls the transactions legitimate, all according to CBS. Staying informed about key environmental issues can help you judge if efforts happening at home and around the world are legitimately meeting sustainability goals. Sometimes companies and countries tout big projects with little actual progress. Choosing cleaner travel options can also make a difference. Public transportation is a way to curb pollution. Every mile traveled via public means instead of driving cuts about a pound of heat-trapping fumes. The move can also save you serious cash in your transportation budget. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword


Geek Wire
an hour ago
- Geek Wire
Week in Review: Most popular stories on GeekWire for the week of Aug. 10, 2025
Get caught up on the latest technology and startup news from the past week. Here are the most popular stories on GeekWire for the week of Aug. 10, 2025. Sign up to receive these updates every Sunday in your inbox by subscribing to our GeekWire Weekly email newsletter. Most popular stories on GeekWire Reports of stricter Microsoft return-to-office policy add to post-layoff uncertainty Is Microsoft about to shake up its workforce again? A new report this week by The Verge is adding to the speculation that the company is preparing to tighten its return-to-office policy, potentially requiring most employees at its Redmond headquarters to be on-site at least three days a week starting in January. In response to an inquiry from GeekWire, a Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that the company is reviewing its flexible work guidelines, as it has in the past, but said no final decisions have been made. … Read More Photos: Inside the Allen Institute for AI's new HQ in Seattle's first mass-timber office building It was a big news week for Seattle's Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (Ai2), including the announcement of a new AI robotics initiative and a landmark grant from Nvidia and the National Science Foundation to lead the creation of the future AI backbone for U.S. … Read More