UK sanctions directors of oil trading group over Russian ties
LONDON : Britain announced today a package of sanctions aimed at Russia, including placing asset freezes on several directors of oil trading company Coral Energy Group, which is now known as 2Rivers Group.
The wider package of sanctions targeted around 100 oil tankers from Russia's so-called shadow fleet and was announced as leaders from northern Europe's Joint Expeditionary Force security alliance meet in Norway.
The government notice announcing the sanctions listed Ahmed Kerimov, Tahir Garayev, Anar Madatli, Talat Safarov and Etibar Eyyub and said they had 'been involved in obtaining a benefit from or supporting the government of Russia' by working as directors of Coral Energy Group.
Coral Energy rebranded as 2Rivers Group after a management buyout in 2024 by Safarov, Kerimov and Madatli.
Coral Energy was founded by Garayev in 2010 and had offices in Dubai and Singapore.
Britain said Coral Energy had been 'carrying on business in a sector of strategic significance to the government of Russia, namely the Russian energy sector'.
Britain sanctioned 2Rivers in December 2024. The group said at the time it was deeply disappointed by that decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Make or break in Alaska: Why the Trump-Putin summit could redefine the rules of peace — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 13 — On August 15, US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. The announcement alone has injected new urgency — and uncertainty — into a conflict that has not only ravaged Ukraine but also strained the very principles of the international order. What makes this meeting 'make or break' is not just the prospect of peace but the terms under which it might be achieved. According to credible reports, Russia's conditions would 'lock in' its occupation of territories seized since the February 2022 invasion. The Kremlin's proposal reportedly demands Ukraine's withdrawal from areas in Luhansk and Donetsk that Kyiv still controls. In other words, Russia is seeking a settlement that formalises its control over large swathes of the Donbas in exchange for a cessation of hostilities. For Ukraine, this is a diplomatic nightmare. Not only would it mean ceding sovereign territory, but it would also set a precedent for rewarding military aggression. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made it clear that no Ukrainian leader can legally or morally sign away territory. He has warned that surrendering these areas would hand Moscow a ready-made springboard for future offensives, rather than guaranteeing lasting peace. What is particularly alarming is Ukraine's exclusion from the Alaska meeting. This is no trivial oversight. It signals the possibility of deals being cut over Ukraine's fate without Ukrainian participation — violating the basic principle of 'no peace about Ukraine without Ukraine.' If this summit produces an agreement in which Kyiv is not a party, the legitimacy of the outcome will be fatally compromised. The risks extend far beyond Ukraine. The international system, particularly since the end of the Second World War, has been anchored in the principle that borders cannot be altered by force. This norm is not merely an idealistic slogan; it has been a practical bulwark against the chaos of unrestrained territorial conquest. Should the Alaska summit produce an agreement that legitimises Russia's occupation, it will send a dangerous message to other revisionist powers: force works, and obdurate patience pays. Exactly the values that go against the principle of non-aggression espoused by Asean. Putin's strategy is transparent. By continuing to consolidate his territorial gains while dangling the prospect of peace, he maximises Russia's leverage. The Kremlin's other reported demands — such as a pledge to halt Nato's eastward expansion — are designed to lock Ukraine into a security grey zone, too weak to defend itself and too isolated to deter future aggression. For Trump, the optics of brokering peace with Putin could be politically advantageous. He has hinted at 'land swaps' that, in his words, could benefit both sides. Yet, history warns us that peace purchased at the expense of sovereignty rarely holds. The Munich Agreement of 1938 is the most infamous example of a settlement that emboldened, rather than restrained, an aggressor. Then, as now, the desire to halt war in the short term risked planting the seeds for greater conflict later. The Alaska summit could also have far-reaching implications for Europe's security architecture. Nato, already tested by the war in Ukraine, will have to contend with the prospect of a member state — the United States — participating in an agreement that might weaken the alliance's deterrence posture. Russian traditional nesting dolls, known as Matryoshkas, with images of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump are placed on a shelf during a demonstration at a gift shop in central Moscow, Russia August 12, 2025. — Reuters pic For any genuine peace framework to emerge from Alaska, several non-negotiable elements must be present. First, Ukraine must be at the table. Peace cannot be imposed on a sovereign state by external powers, however influential. Second, any deal must come with robust, enforceable security guarantees, ideally backed by a coalition of states, to prevent a repeat of Russia's February 2022 invasion. Third, humanitarian issues — such as the return of abducted Ukrainian children — must be prioritised and resolved immediately. Fourth, an international monitoring mechanism must be established to oversee the implementation of any ceasefire and ensure compliance by both sides. Without these elements, any agreement will be little more than a temporary truce dressed up as a settlement. The stakes are not just territorial; they are about whether the post-Cold War security order can survive intact. Since 1945, the prohibition on territorial conquest has been one of the few near-universal norms in international relations. Breaking it in Ukraine will not just embolden Russia — it will encourage similar tactics in other regions where borders are contested, from the East to the South China Sea to the Caucasus. At the same time, dismissing the summit outright would be a mistake. The alternative — continued bloodshed, displacement, and economic destruction — remains intolerable. The Alaska summit is a rare opportunity. Used wisely, it could open a path to genuine reconciliation. Mishandled, it could mark the moment the rules-based order began to unravel in earnest, with which East Asia cannot but feel the future impacts too, including Asean. The world will be watching, not just for the handshake but for what it truly represents: peace at the expense of principle — or peace forged through principle. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
US human rights report softens criticism of Trump allies like Israel, El Salvador
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration has scaled back a key U.S. government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries that have been strong partners of the Republican president, such as El Salvador and Israel, which rights groups say have extensive records of abuses. Instead, the U.S. State Department in its widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report sounded an alarm about the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, countries Washington has clashed with over a host of issues. Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appeared to have been largely omitted. Washington referred to Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the 'Russia-Ukraine war.' The report's section on Israel was much shorter than last year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza. Some 61,000 people have died, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, as a result of Israel's military operations in response to an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023. The report was delayed for months as Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with 'America First' values, according to government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The report introduced new categories such as 'Life' and 'Liberty,' and 'Security of the Person.' 'There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses,' the 2024 report said about El Salvador, in sharp contrast with the 2023 report that talked about 'significant human rights issues' and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions. Washington's bilateral ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Trump took office, as the administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele, whose country is receiving $6 million from the U.S. to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison. Critics said the report was politically driven. 'The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts,' said Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of nongovernmental organization A New Policy. 'The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system.' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and that it was no longer an expansive list of 'politically biased demands and assertions.' Bruce declined to respond to specific questions about countries and did not say why a list of rights abuses in El Salvador was removed. DIFFERING ASSESSMENTS The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional U.S. promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticized countries selectively, consistent with its broader policy towards a particular country. One example is Europe, where Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in Romania, Germany, and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration. For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated Human Rights Report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy. This year's report was prepared following a major revamp of the department, which included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which takes the lead in writing the report. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in April wrote an opinion piece that said the bureau had become a platform for 'left-wing activists,' saying the Trump administration would reorient the bureau to focus on 'Western values.' In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes. This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former President Jair Bolsonaro, among others. Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump has referred to the case as a 'witch hunt' and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods. In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened. It stated that 'South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country.' In last year's report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa. Trump, earlier this year, issued an executive order that called for the U.S. to resettle Afrikaners, describing them as victims of 'violence against racially disfavored landowners,' allegations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government. - Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US indices power to fresh records after benign inflation data
Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished at fresh records. (Wikimedia Commons pic) NEW YORK : Global stocks mostly rose on Tuesday, with Wall Street indices ending at fresh records as US inflation data showed a still-subdued impact from US President Donald Trump's tariffs. That, combined with Trump extending by 90 days a trade truce with China, cheered investors. New York jumped after the US consumer price index (CPI) reading for July showed annualized inflation at 2.7%, unchanged from a month earlier. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished at fresh records. European markets were likewise boosted by the US inflation numbers, with all but Frankfurt rising. While the headline CPI figure was lower than expected, underlying price increases indicated that Trump's tariffs were nevertheless starting to ripple through the US economy. Core inflation, which strips out volatile costs such as food and energy, accelerated in July to the fastest pace in six months. 'Inflation from tariffs is beginning to feed into the core figure but not yet at the stage that is a major concern for markets,' said Lindsay James, investment strategist at Quilter, a wealth management firm. The dollar slipped against major currencies. Investors calculated that the CPI data was not enough to sway the US Federal Reserve away from an expected interest rate cut next month. The US central bank, which has an inflation target of two percent, also has to weigh other recent data, including signs in the labor market of slower economic growth. Trump has relentlessly pressured Jerome Powell to ease monetary policy, reiterating his call for the Fed chairman to cut rates immediately in a sneering post on his Truth Social platform. Trump said he may allow 'a major lawsuit' against Powell for his oversight of renovations of Federal Reserve buildings. Katy Stoves, investment manager at Mattioli Woods, warned however: 'This gentle cooling of the economy will certainly not justify a cut of interest rates to one percent as president Donald Trump is calling for.' Oil prices were lower, after Opec's latest growth projections maintained estimates for 2025. The oil cartel raised its demand forecast for 2026, signalling it expected stronger global activity next year. Trump's announcement on Monday that he would put off reimposing sky-high levies on China to November, to give more time for talks, buoyed market sentiment. Stock markets in Asia rose on the news, with Tokyo hitting a record. Investors are also awaiting a summit between Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Friday, with the US president playing down the possibility of a breakthrough in ending the war in Ukraine. In corporate news, China's real estate giant Evergrande Group said on Tuesday it will delist from Hong Kong Stock Exchange in the wake of its 2021 default. The company is emblematic of a years-long crisis in China's property market. Intel rose 5.5% after CEO Lip-Bu Tan met with Trump, who praised the executive after previously calling for him to step down.
