SA ‘must take lead against terrorism'
Highlighted English word 'terrorism' and its definition at the dictionary. Picture: iStock
Hosting a conference on terrorism has afforded South Africa a chance to clear its image.
This is the view of criminologists and experts who commended SA for being the first African country to host the International Forum of Terrorism Risk Insurance Pools conference in Cape Town recently.
The event was staged by state-owned South African Special Risks Insurance Association and attended by leaders from sovereign-backed terrorism reinsurance pools, senior policymakers, global reinsurers and risk management experts.
Clearing SA's name against terrorism allegations
Criminologists said the conference afforded the country a chance to clear its name on allegations of terrorism that some of its citizens were accused of.
Witness Maluleke, head of the department of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Limpopo, said: 'Our security systems should be strictly safeguarded against potential terrorist threats and this platform will allow South African representatives to learn more about best proactive and reactive strategies of responding to future events.'
ALSO READ: Iran haunts MTN and SA
Willem Els, an expert from the Institute for Security Studies, said it was good that South Africa was allowed to take a lead role by hosting the event.
The country currently has two terrorism cases in court and the country is greylisted because 'we were not living up to our mandate in terms of countering terror funding as well as money laundering', he said.
'We are part of a global system. So, South Africa, as the leader in Africa, has to take the lead in this as well,' said Els.
SA has to take the lead in this
It was essential to host such a conference as the country had recently experienced a situation in which the US Treasury sanctioning various people due to terror funding allegations, he said.
'It is high time South Africa gets its house in order when it comes to countering terrorism because we are not isolated.'
ALSO READ: Isis allegedly behind beheadings, destruction of luxury SA-owned hunting camp in Mozambique
Speaking at the same event, former international relations and cooperation minister and current chair of the Nelson Mandela Foundation Naledi Pandor called for a global collaboration to address political instability.
There were growing risks associated with political instability and said there was a need for the leaders to work together to mitigate the challenges, she said.
Growing risks associated with political instability
'Leaders must take responsibility for fostering a more stable global environment. The world's political landscape has shifted in alarming ways, with growing instability and uncertainty now taking centre stage.'
Pandor said the private sector must collaborate with governments and multilateral institutions to mitigate the growing risks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
28 minutes ago
- IOL News
GIWUSA slams National Dialogue as elite 'talk shop'
GIWUSA criticises National Dialogue as an ineffective 'talk shop' amid Marikana Massacre anniversary Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media The General Industries Workers Union of South Africa (GIWUSA) has dismissed the National Dialogue convened at Unisa on August 15 -16 as an illegitimate 'talk shop' that cannot resolve the country's more profound crisis. The union's statement comes in the wake of a gathering that drew a range of participants, from self-styled civic leaders to a chorus of critics and government officials. Mametlwe Sebei, President of General Industries Workers Union of SA said the National Dialogue cannot resolve the crisis of capitalism. He argued that the platform was 'masquerading as the assembly of the representatives of all sectors of South African Society' but in practice excluded core voices and was 'widely boycotted by all main opposition parties, in and out of the GNU, many trade unions, community civics, and youth movements.' He cast the event as 'an empty spectacle' designed to create the illusion of engagement while preserving the political elite's power over the process and the very system of monopoly capitalism that has brought our people to ruin. The union tied its critique to both historical grievance and contemporary policy, insisting that the country's problems are structural, not a matter of insufficient dialogue. 'The political contradictions and polarisation tearing South Africa apart are not the result of a lack of dialogue but are rooted in the objective class divisions of our society,' said Sebei. 'It contends that capitalism, defined here as private ownership of the economy and land concentrated in a wealthy minority, puts profit before people, pitting 'the interests of the wealthy elite' against 'the working class, who fight for survival, decent wages, and a dignified life.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ GIWUSA linked the country's most wrenching crises to four decades of neoliberal policy. 'Since the crisis of capitalism began in the 1970s, the ruling class has responded with privatisation, austerity, and attacks on workers-all to maintain their wealth while the majority suffer,' read the statement, laying responsibility at the feet of policy choices shaped by capital interests. The articulation of grievances is anchored in stark episodes that, according to GIWUSA, reveal the systemic nature of the problem. Sebei referenced Marikana incident where 34 mineworkers were gunned down by police, as a 'massacre' born from a choice of 'profits over workers' lives and extended that frame to issues like education funding and service delivery, noting protests such as #FeesMustFall and #OutsourcingMustFall as clashes arising from neoliberal policy rather than miscommunication. 'Today, even traditional support systems of the working-class communities and families are tearing apart because capitalism substitutes human relations with callous cash relations,' Sebei asserted that widening inequality is not a policy slip but a structural feature of the system. 'Reject dialogue that concedes to the existing order and pursue organised, collective action that can challenge capital and, eventually, alter the country's political economy.' The union contended that 'the working class needs struggle, not talk shops,' and insisted that lasting change will come through mass mobilisation, strikes, and direct action-combined with a political program aimed at 'the nationalisation of key industries under democratic worker control' and, ultimately, 'a socialist orientation' as the only durable antidote to exploitation and inequality.
The Citizen
28 minutes ago
- The Citizen
If I were Ramaphosa, I would dismiss ‘spineless' Motshekga
The RISE Mzansi leader says the SANDF chief had no business commenting on diplomatic issues and should be fired. RISE Mzansi leader Songezo Zibi says President Cyril Ramaphosa should dismiss both South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief Rudzani Maphwanya and Defence Minister Angie Motshekga from their positions. The party held a media briefing on Monday, where they touched on several matters, including the government of national unity (GNU), the National Dialogue, and Maphwanya's recent conduct. Last week, the army chief sparked a diplomatic stir after claiming South Africa and Iran had 'common goals.' 'This trip is not only a military one, but has a political message and was carried out at the best possible time to express our heartfelt feelings to the peace-loving nation of Iran,' Maphwanya was quoted as saying by Iranian state media. Government's response to Maphwanya The defence ministry later released a statement saying Maphwanya's comments were not official. 'The Ministry of Defence and Military Veterans wishes to clarify that matters of South Africa's foreign policy and international relations are the sole prerogative of the president and the department of International Relations and Cooperation,' the ministry said. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa unaware of 'ill-advised' Iran trip by SANDF chief – Magwenya Dirco also distanced itself from Maphwanya's comments. 'Any statements made by an individual, or a department other than those responsible for foreign policy, should not be misinterpreted as the official position of the South African government,' said Dirco spokesperson Crispin Phiri. Last week, Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya confirmed that President Cyril Ramaphosa had not been informed of or approved Maphwanya's visit to Iran. He, however, highlighted that the authorisation came from Motshekga, which falls under her ministerial responsibility. Motshekga reportedly told the Sunday Times that no disciplinary action would be taken against Maphwanya. Motshekga defended the SANDF chief, insisting that his visit to Iran was appropriate. 'It's a coincidence that it [the trip] coincides with the tensions between Iran and the US and that we are negotiating on tariffs. 'This invitation is from last year. I sanctioned it last year. The event was postponed, and they then communicated back to say let's continue,' she told the publication. 'They must be fired' Zibi said on Monday that Motshekga and Maphwanya should be shown the door; the army chief for 'being out of line' and Motshekga for her response. 'The general was out of line. If my name were Cyril Ramaphosa, I would tell him he's retiring on 31 December and someone is taking over on 1 January, and name that person,' said Zibi. ALSO READ: Ministries distance themselves from SANDF chief's comments in Iran 'Generals or army officials are not supposed to make political statements at all. What the general said in Iran can be said by Angie Motshekga, not him. 'That Motshekga is spineless and does not want to deal with the issue does not mean she is correct. She herself is wrong, and if I were the president, I would also dismiss her as defence minister due to unsuitability and having zero strategic awareness, like the general, who has zero strategic awareness and diplomatic maturity, who thinks he is a politician when he is not.' Zibi said Maphwanya's comments undermined the work being done by the South African government to save jobs through trade negotiations. 'The US and Iran are enemies, the general goes there and runs his mouth because he has no strategic awareness, undermining the work that Tau and Lamola are doing. That's ill-discipline; he must be fired.' READ NEXT: Ramaphosa not likely to act as Motshekga defends SANDF chief's Iran trip – report
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SAHRC to address racism complaint against Minister Gayton McKenzie over resurfaced tweets
Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie is under fire over his past tweets in which he had apparently used the k-word. Image: GCIS The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is expected to meet today to consider a racism complaint against Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie over resurfaced tweets dating back more than a decade where he had apparently used the derogatory k-word. The SAHRC complaint, filed by ActionSA, stems from McKenzie's social media posts, some as old as 2011 containing the k-word to refer to black people. 'We must fight to protect the dignity of every South African and ensure that all, especially those serving as Cabinet Ministers, uphold the very essence of our constitutional dispensation, for which many sacrificed their lives,' said ActionSA MP, Alan Beesley. If necessary, the party said it would also escalate the matter to the Equality Court. The African Transformation Movement (ATM) also filed a complaint with the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests saying that the language was divisive and 'undermines national cohesion'. The complaint letter added that an 'unrepentant Minister cannot credibly lead a department tasked with building cultural bridges and fostering unity.' ATM leader Vuya Zungula accused McKenzie of 'hypocrisy' for defending the coloured community in relation to the remarks made about coloured people on the Open Chats podcast. Zungula said the podcasters were not elected officials. 'They do not carry the constitutional and ethical obligations that a Minister must uphold at all times. The very language he has used in the past mirrors and arguably exceeds the harm of the podcasters' remarks,' he said. The EFF called for McKenzie's removal from office and a public apology to all Black South Africans. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading In a statement the party said the comments made by McKenzie were not minor lapses or slips of the tongue. 'They are deliberate, repeated, and deeply harmful expressions of anti-Black prejudice. They mirror the historical language of white supremacists and apartheid apologists, and they reopen the wounds of generations who have been dehumanised in their own land. 'It is important to note that these remarks were made years after his release from prison, demonstrating that he is not 'rehabilitated' as he claims. 'His words prove that his outlook remains rooted in division, hate, and disdain for the very people he now claims to serve. As the EFF we have consistently called attention to the risks of employing former gang members and criminals into positions of power, and we are unfortunately consistently vindicated every time McKenzie opens his mouth. 'Leaving him in office sends the message that the government condones such racism, provided it comes from a politically connected individual.' The SAHRC said they would be meeting on the issue today and would issue a response in due course. McKenzie has denied the allegations, insisting he does not have 'a racist bone in his body' and claiming the backlash is politically motivated, following his public defense of the coloured community. The controversy comes shortly after he instructed his party's legal team to take action against the Open Chats podcast in light of demeaning remarks they made about coloured people.
