
US economy shrugs off trade war and soldiers on
President Trump is still issuing tariff threats, consumer spending is weakening, and the Mideast is in turmoil. So why did the S&P 500 hit a record high Friday?
Investors may not think the economy is taking off, but they are probably relieved that the worst-case scenarios feared in recent months haven't come to pass. Trump's tariffs, deportations, and cuts to the federal bureaucracy have bent the economy but haven't broken it.
The S&P 500 plummeted 19% from its previous high in February to its 2025 low on April 8. Behind the drop: fears that Trump's threatened tariffs of as high as 145% on China and 50% on other major trading partners would send inflation and interest rates up, sap business and consumer confidence, and spark a recession.
Instead, Trump has significantly dialed back the tariffs from what he first proposed. Although tariffs did come into effect starting in February on China, Canada and Mexico, as well as on autos, steel and aluminum, the effect on inflation to date has been milder than feared. Oil prices leapt when Israel attacked Iran and the U.S. joined in, but have since fallen back.
Even after President Trump's rollbacks, the average tariff in the U.S. is 18.8%, the highest since the 1930s.
Economists at JPMorgan Chase put the probability of recession starting in the next four quarters at about one-third, down from 60% in early April.
In recent months, business confidence fell amid tariff threats. Yet that sentiment never fully translated into behavior: businesses kept investing in equipment, factories and technology. They kept adding jobs, albeit at a slower pace than last year.
'The macro economy is doing decently," said Jason Furman, a Harvard economics professor who was an adviser to President Barack Obama. Especially when it comes to tariffs, the market is now more confident 'that Trump will back off if necessary," he added. 'In April I think the fear was he would just plow ahead no matter what. Now there is a sense that there are realities he won't try to blow past."
Consumer confidence has also recovered a bit. The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index rose 16% in June from May, though it remains 18% lower than in December.
Wall Street analysts expect earnings at retailers and other S&P 500 consumer discretionary companies to fall in the second quarter from a year earlier.
Earlier this year, 'consumers were really on a downward trend, they really were worried that the high levels of tariffs threatened and policy volatility could lead to very dire consequences," said Joanne Hsu, director of consumer surveys for the University of Michigan. Now, 'consumers don't think we're out of the woods, but they're less worried about the worst-case scenario.'
Still, while consumer spending never collapsed, new data shows that it has weakened significantly. The labor market also appears to be softening. Annualized growth in gross domestic product is likely to average 0.8% over the first two quarters of 2025, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence, down sharply from 2.5% in 2024.
The stock market isn't the economy, but it does capture in real time how investors feel about growth, profits, interest rates, and risk. While companies were cautious about the outlook a few months ago, their recent profit guidance has tended to be better than analysts expected, according to FactSet.
The policy landscape has also become less unpredictable, easing investors' fears. Republicans' massive tax and spending bill remains up in the air, but that sort of risk is more familiar than the tariffs and steep cuts to the federal bureaucracy by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency that regularly emanated from the White House in previous months.
'If you look at the beginning of the year, the main action economically was tariffs and DOGE, and both of those were very dramatic, very fast and of debated lawfulness," Furman said. 'Now the main thing going on is this fiscal bill, which I think is problematic. But it's sort of normal…things have moved more into the legislative arena, which is weirdly more predictable."
In a recently released report, the White House Council of Economic Advisers predicted the Senate draft of Trump's 'one big beautiful bill" will significantly boost investment, wages and employment in the next four years relative to a scenario in which the 2017 tax cuts expire this year, as scheduled.
This past week, Fed chairman Jerome Powell acknowledged there has been little evidence of tariffs pushing up inflation broadly thus far, and some Fed officials have said a rate cut should be on the table as soon as next month. That has caused some bond yields to drop, which is also good for the stock market.
Still, tariffs' full effect could still lie ahead. A 90-day pause on Trump's steepest tariffs is to end July 9. Officials have said that deadline could slip as the U.S. and some partners close in on deals. But Friday, Trump said he had broken off talks with Canada and would issue new tariffs soon, and the administration is also carrying out probes that could yield new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.
Trump's tariff threats spurred car sales earlier this year.
Even after Trump's rollbacks, the average tariff in the U.S. is 18.8%, the highest since the 1930s, versus 2.4% in 2024, according to Preston Caldwell, chief U.S. economist at Morningstar. He thinks that will push inflation based on the index of personal-consumption expenditures to 3.2% in early 2026, versus 2.3% now.
The biggest risk to the outlook appears to be the consumer. This past week, the Commerce Department sharply revised down consumption growth. That softness has persisted in the second quarter, with inflation-adjusted consumption slipping 0.3% in May from April, leaving the level of spending below December's. Particularly notable was softness in discretionary categories including air travel and hotels, which are especially sensitive to moods about the economy.
Wall Street analysts now expect earnings at S&P 500 consumer discretionary companies, which includes retailers, restaurant chains and carmakers, to slip by 5.1% in the second quarter from a year earlier, according to FactSet, down from a 2.2% gain at the end of March.
Write to Jeanne Whalen at Jeanne.Whalen@wsj.com, Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com and Te-Ping Chen at Te-ping.Chen@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
ATTENTION green card holders! Trump govt issues fresh warning to immigrants, says your green card, visas will be revoked if...
ATTENTION green card holders! Trump govt issues fresh warning to immigrants, says your green card, visas will be revoked if... The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has given a clear warning to immigrants: anyone who breaks serious laws can lose their visa or green card. In a recent message shared on X (earlier known as Twitter), USCIS posted an image saying, 'Green cards and visas will be revoked if an alien breaks the law.' The agency explained that people found guilty of serious crimes, like supporting or encouraging terrorism, can have their legal stay in the U.S. taken away. For those who may not know, a Green Card, officially called a Permanent Resident Card, allows a person to live and work in the U.S. permanently. However, the process to get one depends on the person's situation. The USCIS also wrote: 'Coming to the United States and getting a visa or green card is a privilege. You must follow our laws and respect our values. If you support violence, terrorism, or encourage others to do the same, you will lose the right to stay in the country.' US focusing on stricter immigration rules This warning comes at a time when the U.S. is putting more focus on national security and stricter immigration rules. USCIS didn't refer to any specific case, but made it clear that breaking the law can lead to deportation. This also follows the government's newly announced 'catch and revoke' policy, where violators will be caught and have their legal documents cancelled. What is the 'catch and revoke' policy? The 'catch and revoke' policy is a new immigration rule introduced earlier this year by the Trump administration. Under this rule, any non-U.S. citizen who is caught breaking U.S. laws could immediately lose their visa or green card. Announcing the policy, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X (formerly Twitter): 'There is now a one-strike policy: Catch-And-Revoke. Whenever the government catches non-U.S. citizens breaking our laws, we will take action to revoke their status.' This means that if an immigrant is found guilty of crimes, especially serious ones like domestic violence, assault, or other violent acts, the U.S. government will cancel their legal status and may deport them. The policy was first revealed in Rubio's April 30 newsletter and is part of a broader effort to tighten immigration rules and increase national security. In simple terms, if you're not a U.S. citizen and you commit a crime, you may only get one chance after that, your legal stay in the U.S. can be taken away.

Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Donald Trump's head-spinning foreign policy
WASHINGTON—President Trump hasn't sounded much like Donald Trump in recent days. He said the U.S. needed to attack Iran over a growing nuclear threat, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization wasn't ripping off America and that Russian President Vladimir Putin was an impediment to ending the war in Ukraine. It was a remarkable shift for a president who said he would extract the U.S. from foreign entanglements, once called NATO obsolete and often has avoided criticizing Moscow. But Trump's supporters and critics alike said they didn't expect the new version of Trump to last for long. By Friday afternoon, Trump said he wouldn't lift sanctions on Iran after suggesting earlier in the week that he would do so. Minutes later, he said he was canceling trade talks with Canada. Since his first days in office, Trump has pinballed from dove to hawk, at some points promoting a more inward-looking America and at others defending risky armed responses. Trump has kept world leaders off balance since his second inauguration in January, threatening tariffs against dozens of countries, hinting at military incursions against Greenland and Panama and ambushing fellow national leaders in the Oval Office. The president's supporters said he would do whatever it takes to secure U.S. interests—and that keeping foreign leaders on their toes is a feature not a bug. This past week has underscored the complexities of defining a cohesive 'Trump Doctrine." He has promised to keep the U.S. out of conflicts in the Middle East, but has nonetheless engaged in them. He has said he would do whatever possible to end the war in Ukraine, but has at times been hesitant to put political and economic pressure on Russia to do so. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said Trump practices 'purposeful strategic ambiguity" in foreign policy to give himself leverage in negotiations. 'World leaders fear him, respect him, and hang on every word he says," she said. Trump is in full command, Leavitt said, asserting that he is shaping—not reacting to—complex global events. 'The world has changed because of Donald Trump," she said, 'Donald Trump has not changed because of the world." But some analysts said Trump doesn't appear to have a clear foreign-policy worldview. 'It is hard to discern a coherent, strategically consistent thread through what Donald Trump does," said Christopher Preble, director of the Reimagining U.S. Grand Strategy program at the Stimson Center think tank. Trump initially resisted involving the U.S. in Israel's military campaign against Iran, but later authorized U.S. strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites. The mission was designed to inflict maximum damage on the facilities, knowing Iran was weakened and would struggle to retaliate, before turning back to his preferred diplomacy-focused approach. After helping to broker a cease-fire in the Israel-Iran war, Trump gave conflicting public statements about whether the U.S. would try to reach a deal with Iran to dismantle its nuclear program. 'We may sign an agreement," he said Wednesday at a NATO summit press conference, but added, 'I don't think it's that necessary." Two days later, Trump said the U.S. would pursue a nuclear pact that could include inspectors in Iran and the end of the nation's domestic uranium enrichment—but his advisers said he remained open to striking Iran again if necessary. Trump's comments this week triggered confusion among foreign-policy analysts and government officials over whether the U.S. would wind down sanctions on Tehran. Trump wrote on social media earlier this week that China could purchase oil from Iran, a move that would weaken the president's maximum-pressure campaign aimed at starving Iran of money to fund its nuclear ambitions and regional proxies. The White House later said there had been no change in U.S. sanctions policy. Then on Friday, Trump said he had been working to remove U.S. sanctions on Iran after all. But he said he changed his mind because he was angry at Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei for saying his country had won the war. Trump is hardly the only president who adjusted his foreign policy views in response to events. George W. Bush campaigned against nation-building, but after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and Iraq before attempting to establish democratic beachheads in both countries. Barack Obama promised a more peaceful foreign policy, but he expanded the use of drone strikes and ordered more troops into Afghanistan and Iraq without fully resolving either conflict. Presidents who follow carefully-planned strategies aren't guaranteed success. The Biden administration spent months trying to avert a Russian invasion of Ukraine, but it didn't stop Putin from launching the largest European land war since World War II. Trump has long touted his personal approach to decision-making. 'I like following my instincts," Trump said when announcing his decision to send 3,000 troops to Afghanistan in August 2017 after campaigning on ending the war. 'But all my life I've heard that decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk in the Oval Office." After vowing to reduce military involvement in the Middle East, Trump also authorized a large campaign to defeat ISIS, attacked chemical-weapons sites in Syria and ordered the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, then the leader of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Trump promised a different approach in his second term: The U.S. would finally steer clear of the Middle East's internal affairs. 'In the end, the so-called nation-builders wrecked far more nations than they built—and the interventionists were intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand themselves," he said during a May visit to Saudi Arabia. The following month, Trump authorized 125 U.S. aircraft, including seven B-2 stealth bombers, to drop more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs and a barrage of cruise missiles at Iranian nuclear sites. Trump quickly brokered a cease-fire between Iran and Israel, ending the 12-day war. The Iran strikes prove a Trump doctrine is coming into view, administration officials said. Vice President JD Vance, in a social-media post this week, said Trump's approach to foreign policy centers on three points: '1) Clearly define an American interest; 2) negotiate aggressively to achieve that interest; 3) use overwhelming force if necessary." Arriving at the framework took years, according to his supporters. 'I don't see this as a different Trump; I see it as a more experienced president," said Victoria Coates, vice president of the Heritage Foundation's national security and foreign policy team. Administration officials said the president's approach has led to successes. Iran's nuclear program was set back significantly by the attack Trump authorized. The U.S. brokered a peace deal between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. Trump also has said he persuaded India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed enemies, in May to quit fighting after a four-day skirmish that could have spiraled out of control. Pakistan nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts, while India disputes the U.S. played a significant role. But such accomplishments don't stem from a core foreign-policy vision, said John Bolton, one of Trump's national security advisers in the first term, and whom Trump dismissed. The only consistency with Trump, he argued, is that he is inconsistent. 'There's an old saying about Washington weather that applies to Trump: 'If you don't like the weather, wait a minute and it will change,'" Bolton said. 'That is the only certainty in Trumpworld." Write to Alexander Ward at

Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Jasprit Bumrah Breathes Fire in the Nets
Trump's Triumph: US Senate Votes Down Resolution To Curb Iran War Powers | 'If We Send Troops…' The Republican-led U.S. Senate rejected a Democratic-led bid to block President Donald Trump from using further military force against Iran. This came hours after Trump said he would consider more bombing. The Senate vote was 53 to 47 against a war powers resolution that would have required congressional approval for more hostilities against Iran. The vote was along party lines, except Pennsylvania Democrat John Fetterman voted no, with Republicans, and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul voted yes, with Democrats. 1.4K views | 7 hours ago