logo
Diners rush in after horror head-on crash on busy King Street in Sydney's Newtown

Diners rush in after horror head-on crash on busy King Street in Sydney's Newtown

News.com.au18 hours ago

A family of five is lucky to have escaped with their lives after a horror head-on collision on a busy inner Sydney street.
CCTV footage captured the moment a black SUV sped down the wrong side of King Street in Newtown at around 7pm on Sunday night.
Driving straight at oncoming traffic, it clipped the side of a sedan before hurtling head-on into a four-wheel drive carrying a family of five, including a 9 and 12-year-old.
Diners at the restaurants lining the street came out to help the injured, with one person rushing to pull out the 28-year-old man who had been driving the out of control car.
Witnesses described the crash as sounding like gunshots or a bomb.
'People, kids inside the restaurant all got scared, they thought it was a bomb,' one local restaurant owner told 9News.
A total of five cars were damaged in the incident, and seven people were taken to hospital. Amazingly, there were no fatalities.
The driver was among those taken to hospital, where he underwent mandatory testing.
He has since been charged with driving under the influence and had his licence suspended.
He is due to face court in August.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad lectures be removed from social media
Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad lectures be removed from social media

ABC News

time27 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad lectures be removed from social media

A series of lectures delivered by an Islamic preacher at a Sydney prayer centre must be removed from social media under orders from a Federal Court judge who found they contained "fundamentally racist and antisemitic" material. Wissam Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, gave the speeches at Bankstown's Al Madina Dawah Centre in November 2023. In the Federal Court, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) alleged he contravened the Racial Discrimination Act, including by portraying Jewish people as "wicked", "scheming", "vile", "mischievous" and "descendants of apes and pigs". Mr Haddad's lawyers argued the speeches were derived in substance from religious texts including the Koran, were delivered only to a Muslim audience in private and did not refer to Australian Jewish people. Justice Angus Stewart today found the speeches contravened the Racial Discrimination Act and rejected Mr Haddad's defences.

Popular sunscreen brands Banana Boat, Hawaiian Tropic targeted by consumer watchdog over greenwashing claims
Popular sunscreen brands Banana Boat, Hawaiian Tropic targeted by consumer watchdog over greenwashing claims

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Popular sunscreen brands Banana Boat, Hawaiian Tropic targeted by consumer watchdog over greenwashing claims

Popular sunscreen brands allegedly took advantage of and deprived consumers of the chance to make informed decisions, with Australia's consumer watchdog launching court action over greenwashing claims. The parent companies of popular sunscreen brands Hawaiian Tropic and Banana Boat have been targeted by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) for allegedly making false or misleading claims that more than 90 sunscreen products were 'reef friendly'. The watchdog submitted that Edgewell Personal Care Australia breached consumer law by making the claims on websites, in social media, catalogues and other publications and including a 'reef friendly' logo. The claims were allegedly based on guidance, advice and direction from the US-based parent company Edgewell Personal Care Company (PCC). Edgewell bolstered its 'reef friendly' assertions by claiming the sunscreens didn't contain the chemicals oxybenzone or octinoxate – banned in some jurisdictions, including Hawaii – that could cause damage to reefs. However, the ACCC argued the products included other ingredients that could harm, or risked causing harm, to reefs, including to coral and marine life. These included octocrylene, homosalate, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane. Further, the ACCC claimed Edgewell PCC and/or Edgewell Australia knew of studies, reports and literature that indicated some of the ingredients could affect reefs or that there was a risk of harm, but the companies didn't commission any testing to determine the impact. ACCC deputy chair Catriona Lowe said the alleged conduct constituted greenwashing, which deprived consumers of the chance to make informed decisions. 'We allege that Edgewell engaged in greenwashing by making claims about the environmental benefits of Hawaiian Tropic and Banana Boat sunscreens that it had no reasonable or scientific basis to make,' Ms Lowe said. 'Many consumers consider environmental factors when purchasing products. By engaging in this alleged greenwashing, we say Edgewell deprived consumers of the ability to make an informed decision and may have prevented them from purchasing a different brand of sunscreen that did not contain chemicals which risked causing harm to reefs.' Ms Lowe said businesses needed to be able to substantiate claims of environmental credentials, including by reliable scientific reports or reputable third-party certification. The 'reef friendly' branding was removed from Edgewell's US sunscreen products in about 2000; however, the watchdog alleged the claim continued to be made in Australia until about the end of 2024. Federal Court action was launched against the companies on June 30, with the ACCC arguing Edgewell didn't have any reasonable basis to make the 'reef friendly' claims and that there wasn't any appropriate scientific evidence or testing at the time the representations were made. The 'reef friendly' claim was made on the Hawaiian Tropic product packaging, the Hawaiian Tropic and Banana Boat websites, social media and advertisements in third-party publications, the statement of claim alleged. The conduct 'took advantage of consumers' concerns' about environmental impact and deprived them of the chance to make informed purchasing decisions, lawyers on behalf of the ACCC claimed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store