Joe Biden went a decade without prostate cancer screening, his office confirms
Former US President Joe Biden had not received a test for prostate cancer, known as a PSA, for more than a decade before he was diagnosed with an advanced form of the disease last week, a spokesperson said on Tuesday.The latest comments from the former Democratic president's camp come amid questions from Republicans and some health professionals about why his cancer was not caught before reaching an advanced stage.advertisementBiden, 82, has also faced broader questions about whether he and his allies withheld critical information from the American public about his ability to serve in the White House. A new book, "Original Sin," details widespread concerns about Biden's mental acuity amongst aides as he pursued reelection last year.
"President Biden's last known PSA was in 2014," the Biden spokesperson said on Tuesday. "Prior to Friday, President Biden had never been diagnosed with prostate cancer."A PSA test, or prostate-specific antigen test, is a blood test that is used to screen for prostate cancer.Some health professionals consulted by Reuters expressed surprise at the diagnosis given that most prostate cancers are detected at an earlier stage and that presidents undergo thorough health monitoring.Still, others said it is not unusual to discontinue testing for prostate cancer in older patients because the test is less reliable in that age group. Prostate cancer has a much higher survival rate than most other cancers.advertisementIn 2012, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in men of all ages. The task force reversed the recommendation in 2017, advising against screening for men older than 70.Biden, who ultimately abandoned his reelection bid and left office in January, was in his early 70s at the time of his 2014 screening."It is very reasonable to discontinue PSA screening at age 72, regardless of health status, or significantly decrease the frequency of screening," said Dr. Scott Eggener, a urologic cancer specialist and professor of surgery at the University of Chicago.Biden's office said he had been diagnosed on Friday with "aggressive" prostate cancer that had spread to his bones. Cancers that have spread, or metastasised, are considered stage 4, the most advanced.US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance are amongst the Republicans who have offered well-wishes to Biden while also raising questions about the timing and nature of his cancer diagnosis.Trump received a PSA test as part of his latest annual physical exam, according to results released in April.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Indian-American lawyer running for the US House of Representatives in California
Indian-American civil rights attorney Anuj Dixit is running for the US House of Representatives in California's 41st congressional district, aiming to contest Republican incumbent Ken Calvert. Dixit accused Congressman Calvert of not working for the middle-class and said he is contesting "to give them a voice".Dixit, who was born to immigrant parents from India, said he is running for Congress to shake up a system that's been rigged for decades by insiders like Congressman Ken Calvert by bringing fresh energy and bold ideas to make Washington work for the middle-class, such as making it easier to start a business, find a good-paying job, and help more Americans progress in said he would lead the charge in going after big businesses that "buy elections and dodge taxes". He also said he would fight to cut middle-class taxes and make California more affordable, as per his website. "In the 30 years since Ken Calvert went to Congress, Washington stopped working for the middle-class," Dixit announced his campaign, emphasising promoting economic grew up on March Air Force Base in Riverside County. His father is a six-year veteran of the US Air DIXIT LOST GRANDPARENTS IN LOCKERBIE BOMBINGAccording to his website, he lost his grandparents, aunt, and cousins in the Pan Am 103 (Lockerbie) bombing in 1988 and came of age in the shadow of 9/ Indian American Impact Fund (IAIF), which supports Indian-American and South Asian political candidates, has announced its endorsement of thrilled to endorse Anuj Dixit, a fierce advocate for democracy and opportunity. Anuj understands the challenges faced by working and middle-class families because he's lived them — and he's spent his career fighting for the rights and dignity of others," said Chintan Patel, executive director of the the campaign trail, Dixit helps run his family's health clinic, which provides essential care to patients in the community. He is a graduate of UCLA and Columbia Law School, The American Bazar, a Maryland-based news portal, election is scheduled for November 3, 2026.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ro Khanna says he's certain Elon Musk would also criticize Trump for 'banning' foreign students
Ro Khanna said he always praised Elon Musk's innovations and he's certain that Elon Musk is against Donald Trump's crackdown on foreign students. Indian-origin Democratic Rep Ro Khanna of California spoke against the Donald Trump administration's ban on international students and said international students contribute $44 billion to the American economy, making this one of the best exports for those who care about lowering the trade deficit. Khanna said Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick always speaks about lowering the trade deficit and this is the sector that can actually help. "The reality is that you have people like Elon Musk who were foreign students, I mean, they have been embedded in Silicon Valley and the companies that have been created," Ro Khanna said on CNBC. "Now you like Elon Musk?" the host on the panel asked Ro Khann to which the Democrat said he always praised Elon Musk and his contribution, and the two know each other for a long time. "I have known Elon Musk for 15 years. I have always praised Tesla, SpaceX, his innovations. And you see him now expressing certain concerns. I guarantee he would criticize banning foreign students," Khanna said. The comments of the Democratic leader came as Elon Musk is ow on a warpath against President Donald Trump though he has not named the president but criticized the Congressmen who voted for the Big, Beautiful Bill which he said would increase the debt ceiling by five trillion dollars. 'You go talk to Stanford, you talk to other state colleges, many of them rely on international students to be able to have the employment they do. Foreign students who pay full freight also help defray the cost so American students don't have to pay as much," Ro Khanna said. The State Department has paused all student visa interviews to come to a decision on social media vetting. The president Wednesdat signed a proclamation restricting foreign student visas at Harvard University amid the administration's ongoing tussle with the university. Trump barred harvard to enroll international students as it did not provide the administration with details of foreign students that it sought -- but the order was stayed by a court.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Will Trump get to pick US Supreme Court justices in his second term?
Legal experts suggest that Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint additional Supreme Court justices during a potential second term, potentially reshaping the court's direction for decades. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Roberts may face pressure to retire, allowing Trump to install younger, like-minded individuals. Experts have said Trump might appoint loyalist justice. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can Trump overhaul judiciary? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can Trump pick judges? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump may seek loyalty over ideology During his first term in office, President Donald Trump appointed 226 federal court judges, including three US Supreme Court justices. Trump successfully installed judges who promoted his political agenda, including overturning the landmark ruling from 1973 that declared the Constitution guaranteed the right to abortion, Roe v. something unusual appears to be unfolding in his second term. Rather than reinforcing Trump-era policies, federal judges — even those appointed by Trump himself — are now halting key parts of the president's second-term initiatives. So, a question that keeps popping up on everyone's mind is that- Will Donald Trump appoint Supreme Court judges in the US?Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. During his first term in office, Trump appointed three justices to the US Supreme Court, thus significantly influencing the judiciary system. Trump may have another chance to nominate a justice in the coming years- —an appointment that could shape the Court's direction for decades. Such a move would likely have profound effects on public policy, particularly in areas like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, and executive Justices Clarence Thomas (76), Samuel Alito (75), and Chief Justice John Roberts (70) are already facing calls from some on the right to consider retirement in the coming years. With Republicans currently holding control of the presidency and a 53-seat majority in the Senate, they are in a strong position to confirm new Supreme Court justices without Democratic argue that Republicans should take a lesson from Democrats, who have previously faced setbacks when their justices chose not to retire during favorable political Urman, a law professor at Northeastern University, told Newsweek that while it's impossible to predict exactly when a justice might step down, Justices Alito and Thomas are the most likely candidates for retirement—primarily to allow a like-minded successor to be appointed. However, he noted that this isn't a certainty, as both justices are now part of the majority after spending years as dissenting voices on the Court, a position they deeply from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said."Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices."None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections."However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court."Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s.""Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders."Stephen Wermiel, a constitutional law professor at American University, told Newsweek, "It's uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy. But there's a good chance conservatives will begin urging Roberts, Thomas, and Alito to retire after this term so Trump could install younger, like-minded justices.'Legal analysts believe Trump may prioritize personal loyalty over ideological alignment when choosing future Supreme Court McQuade, a former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek that frustration with decisions made by Justices Barrett and Roberts may drive Trump to look for candidates who are not only conservative but personally loyal to him."Trump could seek justices who won't break from him on major rulings," McQuade said. "That could have a major impact on upcoming cases dealing with birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and the limits of executive power."Justice Amy Coney Barrett has occasionally sided against Trump's positions, including a ruling against deporting alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Her independent stance has drawn criticism from Trump-aligned analyst Urman agreed that loyalty may guide Trump's future selections, noting that he 'appears to value loyalty above all else in his nominees.' Any new appointments, Urman added, would likely align more closely with the judicial philosophies of Justices Thomas or Alito than Barrett.
