logo
China being provocative, ignoring olive branches, top Taiwan policymaker says

China being provocative, ignoring olive branches, top Taiwan policymaker says

Straits Times28-05-2025

FILE PHOTO: Aircraft carriers and airplane are seen in front of Chinese and Taiwanese flags in this illustration, August 6, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
TAIPEI - China is being provocative with an "extreme pressure" campaign against Taiwan and is intentionally ignoring the island's olive branches and goodwill, its top China policy maker told Reuters, as Beijing ratchets up its tactics against Taipei.
China, which views Taiwan as its own territory despite the rejection of that position by the democratic and separately governed island, has stepped up military and political pressure on it, calling President Lai Ching-te a dangerous "separatist".
Since Lai took office in May last year, China has held at least three rounds of major war games around Taiwan, while also threatening the death penalty for "diehard" supporters of its independence, and setting up hotlines to report such activity.
Mainland Affairs Council minister Chiu Chui-cheng said Beijing should own up to its responsibility for stoking tension by exerting "extreme pressure" which includes almost daily military incursions near Taiwan and public influence campaigns.
"It's true that we don't see any sincerity from mainland China," Chiu said this week, speaking in his office in central Taipei.
He repeated the government's offer for talks with China based on equality and respect, but without Beijing's political preconditions.
"We have made a lot of effort and offered many olive branches," Chiu added.
"We are a democratic country and it is impossible for us to accept your political premise of eliminating the Republic of China, belittling Taiwan or treating Taiwan as part of the People's Republic of China."
The defeated Republic of China government fled to Taiwan in 1949 after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong's communists, and that remains the island's formal name. No peace treaty has ever been signed, and neither government recognises the other.
Asked on Wednesday about Taiwan saying it was showing goodwill towards China, a spokesperson for China's Taiwan Affairs Office said it was an "objective fact" the island was part of China.
"Scheming for Taiwan's independence and secession means there is no way to talk about cross-Strait dialogue and consultations," spokesperson Chen Binhua told reporters in Beijing.
"It will only undermine peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait."
CHINA A "HOSTILE FORCE"
In March, Lai called China a "foreign hostile force", saying it had deepened its influence campaigns and infiltration tactics against the island, while pledging measures to tackle Beijing's efforts to "absorb" Taiwan.
An angry China responded with a new round of war games.
"We were just explaining the facts to everyone," Chiu said of Lai's description of China. "The serious threat level to Taiwan from mainland China, the Beijing authorities, can be described as extreme pressure pressing ever closer."
Chiu said China's hotlines to report supposed separatist activity, which Beijing says generated 6,000 reports, had only served to sow fear amongst Taiwan's sizeable business community in China, spurring some to leave.
He compared such "indiscriminate reporting" to actions during the Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976 in China, referring to the decade of chaos and violence unleashed after Mao declared class war, turning neighbours and families against each other.
"I myself have heard many of our Taiwanese business people say, 'We have been in mainland China for 30 to 40 years, and we are willing to stay here even if the economy is bad, but living in an environment where we are on edge and worried about being reported day and night, that's why I decided to leave.'" REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Myanmar and Laos have been caught up in Trump's sweeping travel bans
Why Myanmar and Laos have been caught up in Trump's sweeping travel bans

Straits Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Why Myanmar and Laos have been caught up in Trump's sweeping travel bans

US President Donald Trump issued a proclamation on June 4 banning citizens from 12 countries from entering the US. PHOTO: REUTERS – The inclusion of Myanmar and Laos on a list of countries deemed by the Trump administration to pose terrorist and national security threats to the United States prompted immediate double takes from analysts in the Asean region. US President Donald Trump issued a proclamation on June 4 banning citizens from 12 countries, mostly in the Middle East and Africa, from entering the US, reinstating and expanding on one of the most controversial measures from his first term in office. Partial restrictions apply to seven additional countries. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Nato's dilemma: How Zelensky can attend summit without provoking Trump
Nato's dilemma: How Zelensky can attend summit without provoking Trump

Straits Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Nato's dilemma: How Zelensky can attend summit without provoking Trump

US and Ukrainian officials did not reply to questions about the nature of any invitation to Ukraine.. PHOTO: REUTERS BRUSSELS - Officials organising a Nato summit in The Hague in June are expected to keep it short, restrict discussion of Ukraine, and choreograph meetings so that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky can somehow be in town without provoking US President Donald Trump. Though the Ukrainian president is widely expected to attend the summit in some form, Nato has yet to confirm whether he is actually invited. Diplomats say he may attend a pre-summit dinner but be kept away from the main summit meeting. Whether the brief summit statement will even identify Russia as a threat or express support for Ukraine is still up in the air. The careful steps are all being taken to avoid angering Washington, much less provoking any repeat of February's White House blow-up between Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky that almost torpedoed the international coalition supporting Kyiv. Nato's European members, who see Russia as an existential threat and Nato as the principal means of countering it, want to signal their continued strong support for Ukraine. But they are also desperate to avoid upsetting a volatile Mr Trump, who stunned them at a summit seven years ago by threatening to quit the alliance altogether. If Mr Zelensky does not attend in some form, it would be 'at least a PR disaster', acknowledged a senior Nato diplomat. Since Russia's invasion three years ago, Mr Zelensky has regularly attended Nato summits as the guest of honour, where alliance members pledged billions in weapons and condemned Russia for an illegal war of conquest. Leaders repeatedly promised that Ukraine would one day join Nato. But since Washington's shift under Mr Trump towards partly accepting Russia's justifications for the war and disparaging Mr Zelensky, the 32-member alliance no longer speaks with a single voice about Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II. Mr Trump has taken Ukraine's Nato membership off the table, unilaterally granting Moscow one of its main demands. After dressing down Mr Zelensky in the Oval Office in February, Mr Trump cut vital US military and intelligence support for Ukraine for days. Since then, the two men publicly mended fences in a meeting in St Peter's Basilica for the funeral of Pope Francis. But mostly they have spoken remotely, with Mr Zelensky twice phoning the White House on speakerphone while surrounded by four friendly Europeans – Britain's Keir Starmer, France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz and Poland's Donald Tusk. Spending boost Mr Trump is expected to come away from The Hague with a big diplomatic victory as Nato members heed his longstanding complaints that they do not spend enough on defence and agree a much higher target. They are expected to boost their goal for traditional military spending to 3.5 per cent of economic output from 2 per cent. A further pledge to spend 1.5 per cent on related expenses such as infrastructure and cyber defence would raise the total to 5 per cent demanded by Mr Trump. But the summit itself and its accompanying written statement are expected to be unusually short, minimising the chances of flare-ups or disagreements. A pledge to develop recommendations for a new Russia strategy has been kicked into the long grass. Meanwhile, Mr Zelensky may have to be content with an invitation to a pre-summit dinner, hosted by Dutch King Willem-Alexander, diplomats say. Unlike at Nato's previous two annual summits, the leaders do not plan to hold a formal meeting of the Nato-Ukraine Council (NUC), the official venue for talks between the alliance and Kyiv. The senior Nato diplomat said a working dinner with either foreign ministers or defence ministers could instead serve as an NUC. 'Properly represented' On June 4, Nato boss Mark Rutte said he had invited Ukraine to the summit, but sidestepped a question on whether the invitation included Mr Zelensky himself. After meeting Mr Rutte on June 2, Mr Zelensky said on X that it was 'important that Ukraine is properly represented' at the summit. 'That would send the right signal to Russia,' he said. US and Ukrainian officials did not reply to questions about the nature of any invitation to Ukraine. Some European countries are still willing to say in public that they hope to see Mr Zelensky invited as the head of the Ukrainian delegation. Estonian Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said he would like to see a 'delegation led by President Zelensky'. Asked about an invitation for Mr Zelensky, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said 'I, for my part, strongly welcome the invitation' without giving further details. But diplomats have tried to play down the importance of the formal status of Mr Zelensky's role: 'Many allies want to have Zelensky at the summit, but there is flexibility on the precise format that would allow his presence,' said a second senior Nato diplomat. A senior European diplomat said: 'We should not get stuck on 'NUC or no NUC'. If he comes to the leaders' dinner, that would be the minimum.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

$6k fine for man who falsely claimed Josephine Teo made offensive remarks against Malays
$6k fine for man who falsely claimed Josephine Teo made offensive remarks against Malays

Straits Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

$6k fine for man who falsely claimed Josephine Teo made offensive remarks against Malays

Manmeet Singh Bahadar Singh pleaded guilty to knowingly committing an act that promoted disharmony between different racial groups. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG $6k fine for man who falsely claimed Josephine Teo made offensive remarks against Malays SINGAPORE – A blogger was fined $6,000 after he posted a TikTok video falsely claiming that Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo had made offensive remarks against Malays. Manmeet Singh Bahadar Singh, 57, pleaded guilty on June 6 to knowingly committing an act that promoted disharmony between different racial groups. Singh uploaded a video on TikTok on Aug 12, 2024, after receiving a link to a WordPress blog post via WhatsApp from an unknown person. The blog post claimed that Mrs Teo made an offensive remark against Malays when asked about racial progress during an interview with the Chinese media about Singapore's development since 1965. Singh felt offended and posted a TikTok video bearing the words 'Minister Josephine Teo blurted 'Malays are i*****' in a Chinese interview', without verifying the authenticity of the claims. He repeated the blog post's allegations in his video and told his viewers to 'go look it up'. Singh added: 'I have been voicing out for, you know, against racial discrimination in Singapore. And look what happened now? My prediction's right!' At the end of the video, he also uttered the phrase 'bring them down'. His TikTok account had over 9,000 followers when he uploaded the video, which was online long enough for Mrs Teo's colleagues and a reporter to ask the minister about it. About four hours after the video was uploaded, Mrs Teo informed her press secretary, who downloaded a copy of the video and made a police report. Suspecting that his claims were false, Singh removed the TikTok video later that day. He subsequently posted another video apologising to Mrs Teo, admitting that his claims were false. Mrs Teo took to various social media platforms to clarify that the allegations were false. Singh was arrested on Feb 4 and released on bail the next day. For promoting racial disharmony, an offender can be jailed for up to three years, fined, or both. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store