logo
Commentary: Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' is canceled, but he won't go quietly into that goodnight

Commentary: Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' is canceled, but he won't go quietly into that goodnight

Yahoo19-07-2025
We seem to be in an era of endings. The end of ethical norms, of the rule of law, of science, of democracy, of Marc Maron's "WTF" podcast, possibly the world and the just-announced end of "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert," when the host's contract runs out in 10 months — which may presage the end of late-night television, at least on CBS, which says it has no plans to replace him or keep the show.
"This is all just going away," Colbert said in a statement taped Thursday.
Coincidentally, or not, Paramount Global, which owns CBS, is seeking regulatory approval from the Trump administration to sell itself to the Hollywood studio Skydance Media. (I'd never heard of it either.) An official statement, claiming that the "Late Show" cancellation represents "a purely financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night … not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount" (italics mine) is — however true it might be — just the sort of thing to make one say, "Pull the other one."
"Other matters" would seem to refer to the merger and to Paramount's recent payment of $16 million to settle a frivolous Trump lawsuit over the perfectly routine editing of a "60 Minutes" Kamala Harris interview that was somehow supposed to give Harris an unfair advantage in the 2024 election and to have caused her opponent "mental anguish" — a payment Colbert characterized in a monologue just a few days ago as a "big fat bribe": "As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended. And I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company. But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help."
Read more: CBS to end 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' next year
Though he responded to his studio audience's supportive boos saying, "Yeah, I share your feelings," he was only kind to the network: 'I do want to say that the folks at CBS have been great partners,' Colbert said. 'I'm so grateful to the Tiffany network for giving me this chair and this beautiful theater to call home."
But there have been plenty of surrogates to draw connections, provide context and bite harder, especially in light of the departure of "60 Minutes" executive producer Bill Owens and CBS News President Wendy McMahon. 'Love you Stephen," ABC host Jimmy Kimmel, posted on Instagram, "adding "F— you CBS and all your Sheldons.' (In January, ABC also settled a Trump suit for $16 million, over George Stephanopoulos erroneously saying that Trump had been found civilly liable of "rape.")
Of the remaining late-night hosts, we may say that each is special in their own way. Colbert, 61, who has been at "The Late Show" for 10 years, is the most mature, professorial and philosophical — gentle, a gentleman, and at times a mock-gentleman, addressing his audience as "My fellow Americans," or echoing Walter Winchell, "Mr. and Mrs. America and All the Ships at Sea," or as "Ladies and Gentlemen." He slaps himself in the face twice before every show to "be in the moment … [to] only do this for the next hour." Though he may still kick up his heels during a monologue, as an interviewer he is composed and thoughtful and curious — and funny, to be sure — to the degree each conversation demands. A committed (liberal) Catholic, he co-narrated the English-language audiobook of Pope Francis' "Life: My Story Through History," with Franciscan Father John Quigley, at the same time, he's a first-generation Dungeons & Dragons devotee, a lifelong reader of science fiction and a man of whom director Peter Jackson said, "I have never met a bigger Tolkien geek in my life." (Jackson cast him as "Laketown spy" in "The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.") He's a person who will quote Gandalf in a conversation on grief and loss with Anderson Cooper, or, on "The Friendship Onion" podcast with Dominic Monaghan and Billy Boyd, a.k.a. Merry and Pippin, declare that after reading "The Lord of the Rings" after college, "I realized that Aragorn is the Apollonian model of manhood … The Hobbits are us. And we should love life as much as they do."
And he knows a thing or two about Ronnie James Dio. And grew up on Mad magazine, where young minds were taught to recognize the deceptions and hypocrisies of politics, business and media.
Read more: 'Jimmy Kimmel is next': Trump gloats after cancellation of Colbert's 'Late Show'
Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report," which he hosted from 2005 through 2014, had a huge cultural effect beyond the reach of any late-night host now, Colbert included. Because it ran on basic cable and not network television, and because Colbert hid within the character of a pompous conservative pundit, the show could take wild swings; to the extent it looked respectable, it was only a matter of irony. Colbert and Jon Stewart, on whose "The Daily Show," where Colbert had earlier worked, staged a "Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear" on the National Mall in Washington, which drew a crowd of more than 200,000; he ran for president twice and created a PAC, Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow, "100 percent legal and at least 10 percent ethical."
During its run, he (or his writers) gave the world "truthiness," named 2006's Word of the Year by Merriam-Webster, which defined it as "a truthful or seemingly truthful quality that is claimed for something not because of supporting facts or evidence but because of a feeling that it is true or a desire for it to be true." Colbert was twice named one of Time's 100 Most Influential People. Ben & Jerry's created an ice cream flavor, Stephen Colbert's AmeriCone Dream, in his honor, and NASA dubbed a piece of exercise equipment for use on the International Space Station the "Combined Operational Load-Bearing External Resistance Treadmill," or COLBERT.
Testifying in character in 2010, before a House Judiciary subcommittee on legal status for immigrant farmworkers, he said, as if looking into 2025, "This is America," he said, "I don't want my tomato picked by a Mexican. I want it picked by an American, then sliced by a Guatemalan and served by a Venezuelan in a spa where a Chilean gives me a Brazilian … My great grandfather did not travel over 4,000 miles of the Atlantic Ocean to see the country overrun by immigrants. He did it because he killed a man back in Ireland. That's the rumor, I don't know if that's true. I'd like to have that stricken from the record."
The signature segment of "The Late Show" is the "Colbert Questionert" in which the host poses 15 questions "ergonomically designed to penetrate straight to the soul of one of my guests and reveal their true being to the world." (It's "a scientifically verified survey; I've asked several scientists and they assured me — yeah, it's a survey.") Designed to create comic and/or sincere responses, they range from "What's the best sandwich?" (Will Ferrell: "Salami and grapefruit on rye, with a light sheen of mayonnaise.") to "Apples or oranges?" (Colbert considers apples the correct answer, because you can put peanut butter on them.) to "The rest of your life in five words." (Tom Hanks: "A magnificent cavalcade of color.") Cate Blanchett took it lying on Colbert's desk, as if in therapy. "What do you think happens when we die?" he asked. "You turn into a soup," she replied. "A human soup."
But it's Colbert's extended interviews and discussions, from "The Late Show" and elsewhere, posted online, that dig the deepest and reveal the most about him in the bargain: a much circulated conversation with Nick Cave from last year; a long talk with Anderson Cooper, after the death of his mother, both about grief and gratitude; an episode of "The Spiritual Life With Fr. James Martin, S.J.," from a couple of weeks ago. (Colbert describes himself as "publicly Catholic," not "a public Catholic.") Such discussions perhaps point the way to a post-"Late Show" practice for Colbert, much as it became one for David Letterman, who passed the seat on to him. (He's only the second host since the show's premiere in 1993.)
As to the field he'll be leaving next May, who can say? Taylor Tomlinson's "After Midnight" game show, which followed "The Late Show," expired this week. Kimmel and Seth Meyers, who go as hard against Trump as does Colbert, and the milder Jimmy Fallon, seem for the moment safely fixed at their desks. Though new platforms and viewing habits have changed the way, and how much, it's consumed, late-night television by its temporal nature remains a special province, out at the edge of things, where edgy things may be said and tried. (Don't expect Colbert to go quietly into that goodnight.) Yet even as the No. 1 show in late night, "The Late Show" reportedly loses money. There's something to that "financial decision," I'm sure; it's the "purely" that smells. We'll see.
"I absolutely love that Colbert got fired," Trump posted on his vanity social media site, going on to say that he "hears" that "Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert." Trump and Colbert could not be farther apart as humans. The president sells fear; he uses it as a club. But the TV host is sanguine.
"You can't laugh and be afraid at the same time," Colbert is fond of saying, sometimes adding, "and the Devil cannot stand mockery."
Sign up for Screen Gab, a free newsletter about the TV and movies everyone's talking about from the L.A. Times.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My girlfriend loves me more than I love her. Should I settle at 27, or move on?
My girlfriend loves me more than I love her. Should I settle at 27, or move on?

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

My girlfriend loves me more than I love her. Should I settle at 27, or move on?

Welcome back to 'Ask Amy & T.J.' In this week's column, Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes learn what a Zoomer is — and share some lessons learned in their 20s. We want to hear your questions about being newly single. When is it OK to bring a date around friends who knew your ex? Or post about your new partner on social media? If you have a question for Amy and T.J. about dipping your toes back into the dating pool, email it to askamyandtj@ If you want to hear more from our advice columnists, check out their podcast. Amy and T.J., I realize I might sound like a jerk, but here's my question: Should I be with someone who's really into me if I don't want them as much back? Or should I wait to find someone I'd really like to be with, but will have to work to win over? I'm a 27-year-old Zoomer deciding whether to settle for my current partner or start over and keep looking. What should I do?Gut reaction T.J. Holmes: What's that sound like? Amy Robach: It sounds like he's just not that into his partner! On further thought … AR: By the time I was 27, I'd been married for four years. TJH: Me too. We both got married at 23. AR: And we shouldn't have! TJH: And we shouldn't have! It's not that you can't have your ish together at age 27. But for many people at that age, you haven't necessarily figured out who you want to be yet. So how are you going to be ready to know what you want in a partner long-term? It isn't always a matter of age, though; it's a matter of where you are now and whether you can grow from there. Because by the time you're 34, you might not be the same person you are now. Your partner may not be either — by then they may not like you! AR: I also think that 27 is too young to settle. I know when you're 27, you feel like you've lived so much life — I did when I was 27; I thought I had figured most of it out. But you haven't. And you can't have. So if you aren't already in a relationship where you are so excited about taking the next step with that person, you should wait until you find that person. You've got plenty of time at 27. On the other hand, I do think that your generation — I didn't know you were called Zoomers — is far more picky, and that's not a bad thing. But there is no such thing as a perfect mate. You're never going to find the perfect person. What you want is to find the person who you love and respect enough that you will want to grow with them and be willing to change and evolve with them. You want to find the right person to be on that journey with you, but it's not going to be the perfect person. TJH: It's all about realistic vs. idealistic. A lot of people have this idea — we see it in Love Island USA — this fantasy of someone who makes their heart flutter, who's going to be their Prince or Princess Charming. It's OK to have standards, but if you get too attached to this idealistic expectation, now, any time you date someone, if they're not perfect, you think, 'I shouldn't settle for less.' Settling for less is not the same as being realistic about what you really want in a relationship. Don't let perfect get in the way of good. And sometimes what you have is perfectly good. So, before you make a decision, maybe ask yourself whether you want to throw away the relationship you have to try to get the perfect one. Maybe you can grow to be head over heels? If this woman cares about you that much, maybe eventually you'll realize that you have something special? AR: I think that might be possible. And it's why you need to be honest with your partner. Explain that you're not where they are emotionally yet, but you're not ready to end things. Ask for patience, but make it clear that you can't promise a ring at the end of this. And honestly, your partner might say 'bye' when you come clean. But I think anyone you're dating should get that opportunity to know where your head is and make a decision for themselves. It's not just you making this decision; your partner is in this relationship too. The final word TJH: The key word, though, is settle. Any time you insert that into a sentence regarding the person you're with, I think that's a wrap. That's done, it's over. You can think about being realistic vs. idealistic. But the word 'settle' is a big problem. AR: You should never settle. You can talk to your partner honestly about seeing if your feelings might grow. But don't settle. Because it might just feel like 'settling' right now, early on in the relationship. But if you stay together and you really feel like you're settling, it will turn into resentment and full-blown anger and depression. It can lead to a lot of really negative things. If your relationship is starting at settling, it's not going to end well. Solve the daily Crossword

Jason Momoa Wants You To Know His Son Got Cast In Dune Totally 'On His Own'
Jason Momoa Wants You To Know His Son Got Cast In Dune Totally 'On His Own'

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jason Momoa Wants You To Know His Son Got Cast In Dune Totally 'On His Own'

As the debate around the preferential treatment shown to so-called 'nepo babies' in Hollywood rages on, Jason Momoa is adamant that he's not part of the problem. The former Aquaman star played Duncan Idaho in Denis Villeneuve's Oscar-winning adaptation of Dune, and is set to reprise the role in the upcoming third instalment in the sci-fi series. For this next offering, though, he'll be joined on screen by a familiar face, with his 16-year-old son Nakoa-Wolf reported to have landed the role of Timothée Chalamet and Zendaya's on-screen son, Leto II. 'He's in for a rude awakening is what he's in for,' Jason told Extra of his son's big-screen debut. He's into the workforce for the first time. It's going to be good.' Seemingly shrugging off any nepotism suggestions, the actor then insisted: 'He did it on his own. I don't want to help him, and he's done it all on his own, and good for him.' Heaping praise on the teen, Jason added: 'You want your children to be better than you, and I really, actually believe he is. I couldn't do what he's doing at his age. There's no way I could sit in a room with Denis Villeneuve and hold my own.' 'I was on Baywatch at 19. He's 16 and holding shit down with Denis Villeneuve,' he remarked. Jason has two children with his ex-wife Lisa Bonet. They welcomed their first child, Lola Iolani, in July 2007, followed by Nakoa-Wolf Manakauapo in December 2008. The two were together for almost 20 years before announcing their split in 2022, four years after tying the knot. Since then, Jason has entered a new relationship with fellow actor Adria Arjona, who joined him and the rest of his family at the premiere of his new drama Chief Of War earlier this month. READ MORE: Jason Momoa Confirms New Relationship Following Split From Lisa Bonet Jason Momoa's Cheeky Approach To Flogging His Line Of Merch Gets A Big Reaction From Fans Jason Momoa Shows Off Dramatic New Look After Shaving His Iconic Locks For A Good Reason

Europe reacts with mix of relief and concern to US trade deal
Europe reacts with mix of relief and concern to US trade deal

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Europe reacts with mix of relief and concern to US trade deal

By Philip Blenkinsop and Sudip Kar-Gupta BRUSSELS (Reuters) -European governments and companies reacted with both relief and concern on Monday to the framework trade deal struck with U.S. President Donald Trump, acknowledging what was seen as an unbalanced deal but one that avoided a deeper trade war. The agreement, announced on Sunday between two economies that account for almost a third of global trade, will see the U.S. impose a 15% import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate but much more than what Europeans hoped for. Many of the specifics of the deal were not immediately known, however. "As we await full details of the new EU–U.S. trade agreement, one thing is clear: this is a moment of relief but not of celebration," Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever wrote on X. "Tariffs will increase in several areas and some key questions remain unresolved." Trump said the deal, including an investment pledge topping the $550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of U.S. exporters. It will bring clarity for European makers of cars, planes and chemicals. But the EU had initially hoped for a zero-for-zero tariff deal. And the 15% baseline tariff, while an improvement on the threatened rate of 30%, compares to an average U.S. import tariff rate of around 2.5% last year before Trump's return to the White House. European Commission chief Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, told reporters on Sunday that it was "the best we could get". European stocks opened up on Monday, with the STOXX 600 at a four-month high and all other major bourses also in the green. Tech and healthcare stocks led the way. "The 15% rate is better than the market was fearing," said Jefferies economist Mohit Kumar. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. MORE CLARITY, BUT 'NOT THE END OF THE STORY' French government ministers said on Monday that the deal had some merits - such as exemptions they hoped to see for some key French business sectors such as spirits - but was nevertheless not balanced. Industry minister Marc Ferracci stressed more talks - potentially lasting weeks or months - would be needed before the deal could be formally concluded. "This is not the end of the story," he told RTL radio. European companies, meanwhile, were left wondering whether to cheer or lament the accord. "Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm," said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association VCI. "Further escalation has been avoided. Nevertheless, the price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. U.S. customers are paying the tariffs," he said. Stellantis shares were up 3.5% and car parts maker Valeo jumped 4.7% while German pharma group Merck KGaA rose 2.9%, in a sign of relief for those sectors. Among the many questions that remain to be answered, however, is how the EU's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. and steeply increase energy purchases can be turned into reality. It was not immediately clear if specific pledges of increased investments were made or whether the details still must be hammered out. And while the EU pledged to make $750 billion in strategic purchases over the next three years, including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel, the U.S. will struggle to produce enough to meet that demand. While U.S. LNG production capacity is due to almost double over the next four years it will still not be enough to ramp up supplies to Europe, and oil production is expected to be lower than previously forecast this year. Despite the lingering unknowns, analysts stressed the deal still helped decrease uncertainty. Oil prices rose on Monday, as did the euro. "Now that there is more clarity, you would think that not only in the United States, but around the globe, there will be a little bit more willingness to look at investment, to look at expansions, and to look at where the opportunities are," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store