In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain
I have seen an economy that has the ingredients for success – a skilled and committed workforce, world-class universities, innovative businesses. You don't hear Reform or the Conservatives talk of this success. They want you to believe the economy is broken. That our best days are behind us and that the path of decline is inevitable. I fundamentally reject that. It is not the country I see around us, and it is not the future I believe in. Britain's economy is not broken, but I know that in recent years it has got stuck.
Austerity, a chaotic Brexit and Liz Truss's disastrous mini-budget led to more than a decade of stagnation. Our economy became trapped in a cycle of low growth, repressed investment and stagnant income that weakened our competitiveness on the global stage.
The months and weeks before any budget are filled with people speculating about – or claiming to know – what tax and spend decisions I will take or what the Office for Budget Responsibility will conclude. This budget is no different – I get that. I will set out the decisions I take in a responsible manner.
But just as my focus over the past 12 months has been about kickstarting economic growth for the benefits of working people, so will my next. Because Britain's productivity problem is not an abstract, technocratic one – it directly affects every working family in Britain who feel they are squeezing every penny to make ends meet. When businesses can't grow, wages stagnate and there is less money in the pockets of working people. When infrastructure is inadequate, costs rise, and opportunities are lost.
When skills do not match economic needs, potential goes unfulfilled. With lower productivity, tax revenues go down and our public services face cuts. And with the world changing, Britain has been left too exposed to global shocks.
Working people across Britain are striving and grafting, but they haven't had the tools they need for the job. They have not seen their incomes rise as a reward for their hard work. There is that sinking feeling that families and businesses across the country feel at the end of every month that they are working hard, but getting nowhere. There is nothing progressive – nothing Labour – about an economy that is not productive and does not reward those who contribute. Since I became shadow chancellor and then chancellor, I have known that breaking this cycle will require our sustained effort across many fronts.
Because if renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools. It's investment into our infrastructure, from the train lines and roads that connect businesses and communities to each other to the building of new houses that working people need to fulfil the dream of owning a home. It's investing in British workers and raising skills in this country, so we end business reliance on cheap migrant workers.
We are providing that investment and unblocking the barriers to it too. Breaking down the planning system to get Britain building, cutting the unnecessary red tape that has stifled innovation rather than enabled it, and filling the skills gaps that are leaving businesses unable to expand and working people unable to progress.
We are making progress: wages grew faster in our first 10 months in power than the first 10 years of Conservatives, 384,000 more jobs have been created, trade deals now struck with the United States, India and the European Union, the cost of a representative new variable rate mortgage lower than when we were elected, and millions of working people getting a pay rise from a boost to the national minimum wage.
But I know there is more to do – and that is what this autumn will be about. Because I do not accept decline as inevitable. If Labour's first year in power was about fixing the foundations, then the second year is about building a stronger economy for a renewed Britain. A renewed economy that works for working people – and rewards working people. That is my priority. That is my mission. That is what I am determined to deliver.
Rachel Reeves is chancellor of the exchequer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
2 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Green leadership hopefuls set out fight for frustrated Labour supporters' votes
The London City Hall member said: 'In the same way that Reform have really made the Tories collapse, I think there's a huge space for the Green left in this country to galvanise and to take votes away, and to say that we don't have to take second-best and actually you can have a party that's unapologetic about its values – that will stand up for migration, that will stand up for the poorest communities, and will take the fight to wealth and power.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Inflation or jobs: Federal Reserve officials are divided over competing concerns
One major question will be front and center for Federal Reserve policymakers as they prepare for an annual conference in Jackson, Wyoming next week and a crucial policy meeting in September: Which is a bigger problem for the economy right now, stubborn inflation or slower hiring? Weak job gains since April have pushed some officials toward supporting a cut in the Fed's key rate as soon as next month, but speeches and comments by other Fed policymakers show that inflation is still a concern. That could make the Fed's ultimate move at its September 16-17 meeting a close call. There will be another jobs report and another inflation report before then, and both will likely heavily influence the decision of whether to cut or not. The uncertainty also means that Fed Chair Jerome Powell 's speech next Friday in Jackson will be closely watched for any clues about next steps. If Fed officials worry more that unemployment will start to rise and the economy falter, they are more likely to reduce their rate in order lower borrowing costs and spur borrowing and spending. Yet if their concerns grow that inflation will stay high or worsen as tariffs ripple across global supply chains, they will lean more towards keeping borrowing costs high to cool the economy and lower prices. The rate currently stands at 4.3%. Wall Street investors are pretty certain — for now — that the central bank will reduce rates in September, with futures prices putting the odds of a cut at 93%, according to CME Fedwatch. Those odds jumped after the monthly jobs report Aug. 1 showed that hiring was sluggish in July and was much lower than previously estimated in May and June. Average job gains over those three months fell to just 35,000, down from 123,000 a year ago. And Tuesday's inflation report, which showed only a mild pickup in inflation at the consumer level and limited signs that tariffs were pushing goods prices higher, underscored the view of some officials that they could put inflation concerns aside and focus on shoring up the job market instead. 'With underlying inflation on a sustained trajectory toward 2%, softness in aggregate demand, and signs of fragility in the labor market, I think that we should focus on risks to our employment mandate,' Michelle Bowman, a member of the Fed's governing board, said last week. Yet Austan Goolsbee, president of the Federal Reserve's Chicago branch, downplayed the weakness in hiring in remarks to reporters Wednesday. The slowdown in job gains could partly reflect the drop in immigration stemming from President Donald Trump 's border crackdown, Goolsbee said, rather than a weaker economy. He also pointed to the still-low unemployment rate of 4.2% as evidence that the job market is solid. This week's inflation report included some warning signs, Goolsbee added: Prices of many services that aren't affected by tariffs, such as dental care and air fares, jumped, a sign that inflation may not be in check. 'That was the most concerning thing in the inflation report, and if that persisted, we would have a hard time getting back to 2%,' Goolsbee said, referring to the central bank's inflation goal. "I am still hopeful that will not be a lasting problem.' Fed officials also disagree on how tariffs will affect inflation going forward. Many increasingly believe the duties will result in simply a one-time boost to prices that will quickly fade and not lead to ongoing inflation. 'Tariffs will boost inflation in the near term, but likely not in a persistent way' that would require the Fed to keep rates elevated, Mary Daly, president of the Fed's San Francisco branch, said in a recent speech. Daly also said the labor market has 'softened" and suggested the Fed 'will likely need to adjust policy in the coming months.' However, Raphael Bostic, president of the Fed's Atlanta branch, said Wednesday that the tariffs could lead to longer-term inflation if they cause more manufacturers to shift output from lower-cost locations overseas back to the United States, or to other countries with higher wages. Such a change would be more than just a one-time shift. 'You're going to see fundamental structural changes if this is successful," Bostic said in remarks in Red Bay, Alabama. 'It is actually a different economy.' In that scenario, Bostic said, he would prefer to wait 'until we have a little more clarity." And he added that with unemployment low, 'we have the luxury to do that.' Thursday's July wholesale price report, which showed a sharp jump in goods and services prices before they reach the consumer, did make one move less likely: A half-point cut in September, as suggested by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Alberto Musalem, president of the Fed's St. Louis branch, who votes on Fed policy this year, said that a reduction of that size is 'unsupported by the current state of the economy, and the outlook for the economy," in an interview on CNBC. Tim Duy, an economist at SGH Macro, said Thursday that the Fed may have to raise its inflation forecast at its September meeting when it provides its latest set of quarterly economic projections. The central bank's policymakers currently expect inflation, excluding volatile food and energy, to reach 3.1% by the end of this year, yet inflation is already near that level. Cutting rates at the September meeting would be hard for the Fed if it is also forecasting higher inflation, Duy said. 'There are things that could happen that would push the Fed off the path" toward a rate cut, he said. 'We're not paying adequate attention to those risks.'
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Green leadership hopefuls set out fight for frustrated Labour supporters' votes
The party's incumbent co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who is running jointly with North Herefordshire MP Ellie Chowns, called for a 'bold and practical' strategy which puts the Greens' 'wilderness years' behind them. Challenging them, Mr Ramsay's current deputy Zack Polanski claimed 'bold messaging at the national level' had been 'missing' from his party's high offices. Green Party members began voting on August 1 and are halfway through the process, with polls closing on August 30. Ellie Chowns and Adrian Ramsay are running on a joint ticket to lead the Green Party (Ellie & Adrian 2025/PA) 'One of our top priorities, absolutely, is winning over support from people who are utterly disillusioned with Labour,' Mr Ramsay told the PA news agency. 'But there will also be people from other parts of the political spectrum who are also feeling politically homeless, deeply care about the environment, want to see our services restored. 'And in the era of politics that we're now in, there are so many people who don't think about politics in old left-right terms, and we need to be the ones that are showing what Greens stand for – for social justice and for a liveable future for people and planet.' Mr Ramsay, the Waveney Valley MP, said the Greens under his leadership would move to tackle 'inequality and poverty, the decline of our public services, the degradation of our natural environment and the threat of climate breakdown'. Mr Polanski said his party was 'here ultimately to replace the Labour Government'. The London City Hall member said: 'In the same way that Reform have really made the Tories collapse, I think there's a huge space for the Green left in this country to galvanise and to take votes away, and to say that we don't have to take second-best and actually you can have a party that's unapologetic about its values – that will stand up for migration, that will stand up for the poorest communities, and will take the fight to wealth and power.' He added: 'Alongside the Labour Government, of course, Reform are a huge issue for the entire country. 'But I think the problem is a Labour Party pretending to be that antidote to Reform whereas they're just mimicking them. 'And if people want Reform-lite policies, then they'll just vote Reform.' Zack Polanski says the party needs bold messaging (Lucy North/PA) Under Mr Ramsay's co-leadership with Carla Denyer, with Mr Polanski as their deputy, the party gained 241 council seats in 2023, and picked up a further 74 last year. The Green Party also secured four seats at the general election. Mr Polanski pledged to 'continue' with existing efforts but added: 'What has been missing, though, is the bold messaging at the national level, and we need to make sure that before we've even knocked on a door or someone's picked up a leaflet, they already know that the Green Party stand for so much more than the environment. 'Now, the environment is really important to us, it will remain really important to us, but this is about lowering bills, rent controls, making sure that we're funding our public services and taxing the super-wealthy, all measures that are increasingly popular.' Mr Ramsay warned that Mr Polanski's language was aimed at 'the 'progressive activist' section of the public', who were already convinced by the party's messaging. He added: 'Having that credibility alongside the distinctive Green policies that we're putting forward is so crucial and it's what's taken us out of the wilderness years that the Green Party was in in my early time in the party. 'I've been in the party 27 years. People used to say, 'Well, I like what you stand for but can you really win? Can you really take on these positions and make a real impact? 'We've demonstrated that now and we've got to continue that route of continuing to build our impact and continuing to build on a record-breaking success and a record-breaking strategy.' Carla Denyer is not seeking re-election to her co-leader post (Lucy North/PA) Mr Ramsay said he was 'concerned about the Green Party going down a populist route, given that populism relies on polarising and divisiveness'. Mr Polanski said: 'The idea that eco-populism is divisive is a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is I'm talking about, which is the 99% versus the 1%. 'Now that 1% are corporations who are destroying our environment, destroying our democracy and destroying our communities, so if it's divisive, it's where the division already is, which is between the super-rich and then everyone else who is working hard with their hands and their brain.' Ms Denyer, the Bristol Central MP, is not standing for a leadership role.
