What position does Elon Musk hold in the federal government? Is his position legal?
AI-assisted summary
Elon Musk holds the position of head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a newly formed entity aimed at reducing federal spending.
Musk's role is designated as a "special government employee," permitting temporary federal employment with or without compensation.
Memphis' most prominent business owner recently gained a position in the White House, but what exactly is his position?
With Elon Musk's new department comes a number of questions about his position, the program itself and whether Musk is allowed to work in federal government at all. Recently, Musk was made a "special government employee." This position, while not new, is not used often by presidents.
Along with Musk's position, his team has been making a stir from the federal programs they have already investigated.
Here's what to know about Musk's new position.
What position does Elon Musk hold in government?
Musk leads the Department of Government Efficiency whose goal is to find and remove excess or wasteful spending in federal programs. He promised his program would cut trillions from the federal budget.
Musk was made a "special government employee" which allows him to work for the federal government for a limit period of time with or without pay.
According to the United States Department of the Interior, a special government employee is "an officer or employee in the Executive Branch of the Federal Government who is appointed to perform important, but limited, services to the Government, with or without compensation, for a period not to exceed 130 days during any period of 365 consecutive days."
While Musk is the head of the department, his team consists of several engineers, aged 19 to 25, with little-to-no government experience, Wired reported.
One member resigned from his DOGE position once he was linked to a social media account which shared racist content, Fortune reported.
What has DOGE done so far?
Recently, Musk's department went after the United States Agency for International Development.
Musk's team is currently working at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services this week examining payment and contracting systems of the federal health agency.
Additionally, a top official for the United States Department of Education confirmed the team working for DOGE has been reviewing the agency's operations.
When did Elon Musk become a citizen?
Musk was born in Pretoria, South Africa, in 1971. He was born to a South African father and Canadian mother, through whom he has Canadian citizenship.
He came to the United States when he was in college and has mostly remained here since. A 2023 biography noted that Musk gained his United States citizenship in 2002 after living here for years.
Can Elon Musk run for president?
According to the Constitution, a person must be at least 35 years old, a natural born citizen and have been a resident in the United States for 14 years in order to run for president.
As Musk is not a natural born citizen, it should mean he cannot run for president. Senator John McCain was approved, with scrutiny, to run for president despite being born on U.S. territory in Panama and being granted citizenship when he was 11 months old. McCain, however, was allowed to run on the basis of both his parents were natural born U.S. citizens.
Can Elon Musk work for the government?
To work for the federal government, it is generally required that you must be a United States citizen or natural, although there are exceptions says the United States Office of Personnel Management.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk called Trump Monday night before expressing regret for harshest criticism of the president
Elon Musk called President Donald Trump Monday night, two sources told CNN, before saying early Wednesday that he regrets some of his social media posts about the president during their very public blow-up last week. The call with the president, which lasted just moments, came after Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles spoke by phone with Musk on Friday, when which the three discussed the feud between Trump and the tech billionaire, two sources familiar with the discussion told CNN. Musk backed off from his attacks following the phone calls, deleting his most critical social media posts about the president — including the one relating to Jeffrey Epstein and another agreeing with the suggestion that Trump should be impeached. On Wednesday, Musk went even further, writing on X that he some of the posts 'went too far.' 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' he wrote on X. The New York Times first reported the Monday phone call and The Wall Street Journal first reported the Friday call. CNN has reached out to a spokesperson for Musk. Republican lawmakers and high-profile Trump allies have spent the last week quietly reaching out to Musk, urging him to not only reconcile with the president, but also support his domestic policy bill. During Musk's time as Trump's 'first buddy,' many of the president's closest advisers formed their own relationships with the tech billionaire, which they leaned on after the messy public break-up between the two men to try and bring Musk back around. Through text messages and phone calls with Musk, these Trump allies have sought to deescalate the feud and explain the necessity for what Trump calls his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which faces hurdles in the Senate. Sources familiar with these interactions said Musk was receptive to outreach but still pushed back on there not being enough spending cuts in the legislation. On Monday, House Speaker Mike Johnson told CNN that he was in touch with Musk and was 'trying to be a peacemaker' between him and the president. 'I think the temperature's being turned down, and I'm very hopeful that these two will reconcile,' the Louisiana Republican said. While the two billionaires are seemingly on the path to reconciliation after Musk called Trump, many close to the president would still like to see Musk come out in favor of the bill. 'He has real concerns, but we're all hoping he comes around. His words carry a lot of weight,' one of the sources said. The Friday call with Musk came after Vance had asked the president last week how he wanted him to publicly handle the feud, especially given Vance was slated to do an interview with conservative podcast host Theo Von hours later, one of the sources told CNN. Trump urged Vance to be diplomatic, the source said. The sources familiar with the discussion told CNN that by the time Wiles and Vance got on the phone with Musk, it appeared Trump and the Tesla founder had already begun to deescalate their feud. 'Musk appeared to already be backing off at that point, and the president wasn't as pissed by then as he was the day before,' one of the sources said. White House officials have since left the door open to the possibility the two men will eventually repair their relationship. While at first it appeared Musk's attacks may have been an irrevocable break in their alliance, the president has internally not been as harsh toward Musk in recent days as some had previously expected, they said. Vance had recorded the Theo Von podcast on Thursday, which was then released on Saturday. During that recording, the vice president said he thought it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump the way he had, but that he hoped Musk 'comes back into the fold.' 'I actually think that if Elon chilled out a little bit everything would be fine,' Vance said. After last week's very public blow-up between Trump and Musk, the tech billionaire began inching back toward Trump over the weekend, as unrest and protests of immigration raids began roiling Los Angeles. Musk appeared to support the Trump administration's stance on the situation in Los Angeles, adding American flags to a post from Vance about how the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence.' Musk has long supported closed borders, stopping illegal immigration, and deportations, in alignment with the administration. And Musk posted a screenshot of a Trump Truth Social post that said California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'should apologize to the people of Los Angeles.' This week, he also re-followed White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and conservative podcaster and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, proponents of the domestic policy bill whom he had unfollowed amid the fight with Trump. Kirk had been publicly calling on Musk and Trump to reconcile. 'I know both these guys … I am hopeful, optimistic and will do everything I possibly can to try and bring this back together,' Kirk told Megyn Kelly on Tuesday, adding he expected them to make up. Musk's message of regret in the early hours of Wednesday appears to have reached the president, who told The New York Post in a brief phone interview, 'I thought it was very nice that he did that.' This story and headline have been updated with additional reporting.
The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump, Musk hint at reconciliation
The Big Story President Trump said he thinks he could make amends with tech billionaire Elon Musk, while the Tesla CEO voiced regrets over his public clash with the president. © AP Photo/Evan Vucci Less than a week after the blowup between the two men that grew increasingly dramatic as Musk called for Trump's impeachment and linked him to the Jeffrey Epstein files, the president appeared open to making peace. However, he also suggested that doing so is not a priority for him. 'I guess I could, but you know, we have to straighten out the country,' the president told the New York Post's 'Pod Force One.' 'And my sole function now is getting this country back to a level higher than it's ever been. And I think we can do that. I think we're going to do it easily.' When asked if there was anything he could do to forgive Musk, the president said he has 'no hard feelings' but was surprised by his former top adviser's public criticism of the House-passed tax and spending bill. 'When he did that, I was not a happy camper,' Trump said. Musk earlier on Wednesday also voiced regret for his public feud with the president, saying that it 'went too far' on his social media platform X. The Hill's Alex Gangitano has more here. Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter, we're Miranda Nazzaro and Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future: Trump, Musk spoke ahead of 'regret' post amid reconciliation talk: Reports President Trump spoke on the phone with tech billionaire Elon Musk late Monday night, according to multiple reports, as allies of both men had urged them to reconcile their feud that exploded last week with a torrent of social media barbs. The New York Times first reported on the call. The White House did not respond to requests for comment about the conversation Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week after … 2 House panels advance crypto market structure bill A pair of House panels voted Tuesday to advance legislation laying out oversight of the crypto market. The House Financial Services Committee and House Agriculture Committee held separate markups on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, with both ultimately voting to report the bill out of committee. The scenes in the two committees, however, were vastly different. The House Agriculture Committee voted 47-6 to advance … Gabbard: AI used to decide continued JFK files' classification Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the Trump administration used artificial intelligence (AI) to help determine which documents related to the assassination of former President Kennedy should remain classified. Gabbard, speaking at an Amazon Web Services conference Tuesday, touted how the agency fed tens of thousands of pages of materials into AI systems ahead of their declassification to speed up the otherwise … The Refresh News we've flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics: Crypto Corner Stablecoin bill clears another Senate hurdle © Greg Nash Welcome to Crypto Corner, a daily feature focused on digital currency and its outlook in Washington. The Senate voted Wednesday to advance legislation setting up a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, bringing the crypto bill one step closer to a final vote in the upper chamber. Eighten Democrats voted with almost every Republican to end debate on an updated version of the GENIUS Act. The new bill text was reached as part of lengthy negotiations between Republicans and crypto-friendly Democrats last month, ahead of an earlier procedural vote on the Senate floor. The vote breakdown was largely similar to the May vote, although the bill picked up support from Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.) while Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) switched her vote to oppose the measure. Blunt Rochester had supported the bill both in the Senate Banking Committee in March and on the Senate floor last month. She voiced some hesitation Tuesday about Senate leadership's decision to forgo an open amendment process on the GENIUS Act, emphasizing she hoped to see additional changes to the bill. 'I was really clear,' she told The Hill. 'I hoped that there would be an open amendment process, and that's what I heard Leader Thune say around last month, so I will take a look at this language, and we'll make a decision from there.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) ultimately scrapped the push for so-called 'regular order,' as controversial amendments — most notably, Sen. Roger Marshall's (R-Kan.) Credit Card Competition Act — threatened to upend support for the bill. The GENIUS Act likely faces a handful more votes before it can clear the Senate and head to the House. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) told The Hill on Tuesday that she expects a final vote on the bill next week. In Other News Branch out with other reads on The Hill: Walmart expanding drone delivery service to these 5 cities BENTONVILLE, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — Walmart has confirmed that it will be expanding its drone delivery program, allowing customers in five more cities to order items from the retailer and have them flown right to their doorstep. 'Now, millions of customers in Atlanta, Charlotte, Houston, Orlando and Tampa will enjoy the convenience of receiving their orders in just minutes,' the release stated. Walmart drone delivery … What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Judges probe whether immunity decision leads to wipeout of Trump conviction An appeals court panel took up President Trump's bid to fight his hush money criminal conviction in federal court Wednesday, acknowledging the extraordinary … Read more Where the 'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests are planned Organizers with the 'No Kings' movement are planning some 1,500 demonstrations across the country to protest the upcoming military parade … Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow!
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Bloodthirsty' Kristi Noem and Stephen Miller Want More Military on Streets
Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem are two of the loudest voices in the room encouraging Donald Trump to militarize Los Angeles, a presidential aide has disclosed. Both urged the president to federalize and deploy California Army National Guard troops and send U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in response to protests against federal immigration raids, even though local officials opposed the move. 'Stephen has been clear in all the meetings: More military, faster,' a Trump adviser told Axios. Miller has called for using the military to crack down on protesters who try to block federal agents from making immigration arrests, even though federal troops are generally barred from domestic policing. He's been backed by Noem, who is 'practically bloodthirsty' in demanding tougher immigration enforcement, the adviser said. On Sunday, the homeland security secretary asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to instruct U.S. Marines to arrest rioters. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security told Axios in a statement that Noem is 'antithetical to bloodthirsty—she is trying to prevent bloodshed.' The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House and DHS for comment. Trump took the extraordinary step over the weekend of deploying 4,000 National Guard troops and hundreds of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in defiance of California Gov. Gavin Newsom's warnings that sending in federal troops would only make things worse. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom said. The governor has sued to block the deployments. After five days of protests, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass enacted a partial curfew Tuesday night for downtown L.A. The reason, she said, was to 'stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the president's chaotic escalation.' Rioters have set off fireworks at officers, lit cars on fire, and thrown pieces of concrete at police, according to the Los Angeles Police Department. Video also shows the police using tear gas, flash-bangs, and non-lethal bullets to disperse crowds downtown. City officials, however, have said that the people peacefully protesting during the day are not the same ones who are clashing with police at night. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said Sunday that Trump had called in the National Guard troops prematurely. The president has long regretted not sending in the National Guard to quell the 2020 protests that broke out in major cities nationwide after the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man. At the time, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, convinced Trump not to invoke the Insurrection Act or deploy active-duty troops against the protesters. A federal law known as the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits using federal troops for domestic policing, except when expressly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. The main exception to the rule is the Insurrection Act, a compilation of statutes that allows the U.S. president to use the military to quash an armed rebellion or other insurrection, according to Lawfare. As of Wednesday, the president hadn't invoked the Insurrection Act, which limits the federal troops' mission to protecting federal property and personnel. According to Axios, that hasn't stopped Noem and Miller from calling for the military to do more, faster.
