
What is a wealth tax – and would it work in the UK?
Many now predict the chancellor will have little choice but to tweak taxes to find more funds for the Treasury following dramatic changes to government policy over cutting welfare spending and stripping back the winter fuel payment.
At the same time, calls are also growing to axe the two-child benefit cap – a Tory-era policy which experts say keeps 400,000 children in poverty and runs contrary to Labour 's missions.
These policy decisions, paired with a difficult economic backdrop, will require funds from somewhere. The chancellor has so far stuck to Labour's manifesto commitment not to raise taxes for working people, meaning tweaks to national insurance, income tax, and VAT are off the table.
This means more creative tweaks may be under consideration for her next autumn budget, building on changes already made to levies like inheritance tax and employers' national insurance.
One option an increasing number of campaigners are pointing to is a ' wealth tax', an economic policy adopted by very few countries which focuses on the ultra-rich. Here's everything you need to know about the idea and what the experts say about it:
What is a wealth tax?
A wealth tax is a direct levy on an individual's total net assets – things like property, investments, cash, and other possessions. Unlike most regular taxes, the idea is to target accumulated wealth, rather than only income earned that year.
Alongside being a new way to raise revenue for the exchequer, the policy is also designed to redistribute wealth to reduce economic inequality.
The UK already has some taxes that focus on assets, such as inheritance tax, capital gains tax, and council tax. Tweaking any of these may also be on the table for the chancellor later this year.
Capital gains tax is most similar to a wealth tax in that it sees a levy charged on the sale of an asset. However, most models of a wealth tax would see an annual charge based on the value of assets held, even if they are not sold.
The idea of a wealth tax has proven divisive among economic experts, with debates ongoing around its fairness, revenue-raising potential, and economic impact.
Could a wealth tax work in the UK?
Campaigners say a wealth tax could generate significant sums for the Treasury, whilst only affecting a small number of individuals who are less likely to feel the sting of higher receipts.
Tax Justice UK is calling for a two per cent levy on individuals who own assets worth more than £10 million. They say this would affect 0.04 per cent of the population, while raising £24 billion a year.
The calls come at a time when the wealth of the ultra-rich in the UK has increased massively in recent decades, while living standards have dropped for those on low- to middle-incomes.
The Sunday Times rich list recorded 171 UK billionaires in 2023 – up from 15 in 1990. At the same time, there are now record numbers of children living in poverty in the UK, and in precarious living conditions like temporary accommodation.
A wealth tax should be seriously considered by the chancellor, said author and host of the Macrodose podcast, James Meadway: 'It starts to chip away at the idea that we're just going to allow wealth to pile up in a very few hands forevermore.'
Responding to criticism that a wealth tax would threaten investment in the UK, the economist said: 'Investment has fallen off a cliff between Brexit and the financial crisis. Sixty per cent of wealth in Britain is inherited. It's not something that's been built up by somebody going off and setting up a new business.
'If these people were any good, our economy would be better. It isn't better, so they're not that good, so it doesn't matter that much.'
He added: 'It's not going to solve every single economic problem, but 24 billion is not a number to be sniffed at if you're the government right now looking at how you're going to continue to fund the NHS, how you're going to pay for not imposing massive benefit cuts, how you're going to get rid of the two child benefit cap.
'There's a whole stack of things that we could do with that money that isn't being done at the minute because it's just sitting in the hands of very, very wealthy people.'
What are the issues with a wealth tax?
One of the most difficult factors in calculating the benefits of any wealth tax is predicting what the behavioural response will be. While a wealth tax would raise fairly large sums in any scenario, this uncertainty means it is hard to model.
A common concern put forward is the risk of 'capital flight,' where wealthy individuals – who tend to be more globally mobile – simply leave the UK, or at least move some of their assets.
Wealth can also be held in a diverse range of assets, anything from cars to art, meaning it may be hard for tax authorities to know exactly how to enforce the levy.
Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said it is highly uncertain how much could be raised by implementing a wealth tax. While it is difficult to estimate exactly how many wealthy individuals would leave the UK should the measure come into force, the tax expert points out that just ten leaving could reduce the revenue by billions.
This is because 15 per cent of the projected yield would come from just ten ultra-wealthy individuals, while 80 per cent would come from less than 5,000.
Alongside the risk of capital flight, Mr Neidle argues that the economic damage of a wealth tax to the UK would be massive.
He explained: 'If you tax something, you get less of it – always. All taxes are a trade-off; you need to just be clear about what they are. With a wealth tax, you're taxing savings and investment, so you get less savings and investment.'
The tax expert points to modelling of wealth tax in the US and Germany, which found the long-term effect was a two per cent and five per cent reduction in GDP respectively. This would be damaging for the economy and hit employment hard.
'We need to respond not to what we want policies to do, but what they actually do,' Mr Neidle added. 'There are lots of ways you can reform tax and tax the wealthy fairly in a way that doesn't damage the rest of us.' These could include reforming land tax, capital gains tax, and inheritance tax.
Any of these is probably a more likely option for Labour than introducing a wealth tax. But as autumn approaches, calls for some form of more redistributive measure will likely only grow louder.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
£200 payment for state pensioners born before 1959 to be made soon
The one-off payment is worth at least £200 and is being paid out to pensioners as part of the Winter Fuel Payment scheme. This cash boost will automatically land in bank accounts later this year Around nine million pensioners are set to receive a payment of at least £200 as part of the Winter Fuel Payment scheme. With the current cost of living affecting many UK households, this financial support has been designed to help older people cover the cost of heating bills during the colder months. If you were born before September 22, 1959, you could be entitled between £100 and £300 to help you pay your heating bills for this winter. This payment is also known as 'Winter Fuel Payment', which is a one-off payment. This cash boost will automatically land in bank accounts later this year, with no need for individuals to claim it. Those eligible will receive the money between the months of November and December, ahead of the winter season and Christmas time. Thanks to changes in eligibility rules, millions more pensioners will benefit from this support this year. This means that many who missed out on the winter allowance in 2024 can anticipate this bonus in the coming year. Labour initially stripped millions of pensioners of this benefit before being compelled to reverse their decision. Now, approximately 75% of seniors, those earning less than £35,000, will retain this cash boost. Those under 80 will receive £200, while those over 80 will be granted £300, reports Birmingham Live. Winter Fuel Payments typically hit bank accounts in November, ensuring everyone has the funds in time for Christmas. Initially, all pensioners will receive the cash. As per the latest reports, around 11.6 million people received a Winter Fuel Payment in 2023-2024, an increase of 214,000 from the previous year, and numbers grow every year. However, it's important to note that HMRC will reclaim it from those whose incomes exceed the threshold of £35,000. Earlier this year, the Government backtracked on its unpopular decision to alter the winter fuel scheme. This follows the government's announcement to cut the Winter Fuel Payment in July 2024, removing the eligibility to millions of pensioners. However, after significant backlash, Prime Minister Keir Starmer committed in May 2025 to easing the cuts, expanding the eligibility to receive the one-off payment. By doing so, millions of pensioners will be able to receive the extra funds to help cover energy costs and household bills during the upcoming season. This is especially important to those with fixed incomes, offering relief and stability in the current cost-of-living situations.


Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: US-EU deal boosts markets and the dollar
LONDON, July 28 (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today By Mike Dolan, opens new tab, Editor-At-Large, Finance and Markets European stocks and Wall Street futures climbed again after the weekend deal between the United States and European Union averted a trade war between two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. The euphoria also lifted the dollar across the board. The U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with the EU on Sunday, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate. The agreement mirrored key parts of the accord the U.S. reached with Japan last week, but, like that deal, this one leaves many open questions, including regarding tariffs on spirits and wine. * Euro zone stocks (.STOXXE), opens new tab jumped almost 1% to within a whisker of the record high set earlier this month, with S&P 500 futures up modestly ahead of the bell. The dollar's .DXY rise was less intuitive, but analysts said reduced trade tensions may allow markets to now refocus on yield differentials. * U.S. trade deals with the EU, Japan and UK are seen as a significant win for Washington, as they secure higher tariffs on imports into the U.S. without retaliation and include commitments for additional investment to boot. Not all in Europe were happy with the tariff hike. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou called it a "sombre day" for Europe, which he said had resigned itself to submission. U.S. and Chinese trade negotiators now resume talks in Stockholm, but the August 1 deadline on U.S. tariffs has been defused considerably as a major market issue. * Traders on Monday will also be keeping tabs on an OPEC+ ministerial meeting, but no change is expected in the production stance. It's also a heavy day of Treasury debt sales, with $139 billion of two- and five-year notes under the hammer. Treasury yields were softer going into the sales. * The week ahead is jam packed with events: policy meetings at the Fed, Bank of Japan and Bank of Canada; updates on the U.S. labor market, GDP and inflation; four megacap earnings reports and a quarterly refunding announcement. Today's column examines why the Fed may struggle to come up with justification for a rate hike in September. Today's Market Minute * The U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union on Sunday, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate - and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. * Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. * The Bank of England is expected to soon slow the pace at which it shrinks its 558 billion-pound ($754 billion) holdings of government bonds, and economists hope next week will shed some light on its longer-term goals for the stockpile. * New European Union sanctions targeting Russia's oil industry will reshuffle global diesel flows for the second time since 2022, adding pressure to an already red-hot market, writes ROI energy columnist Ron Bousso. * ROI columnist Clyde Russell claims the framework agreement reached between the U.S. and China has strong echoes of Donald Trump's failed trade deal with China from his first term as U.S. president. Chart of the day The U.S.-EU trade deal sees 15% levies on European exports to the United States. While the tariff applies to most goods, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, there are exceptions. The U.S. will keep in place a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, for example, and there's no guarantee pharma will face higher tariffs in future either. What's more, discussions are still continuing regarding any tariff exemptions for EU wines and spirits, European Commission officials said, referring to the highly contentious area. Today's events to watch * Dallas Federal Reserve July manufacturing survey (10:30 AM EDT) * U.S. corporate earnings: Universal Health, Nucor, Principal Financial, Cincinnati Financial, Veralto, Cadence, Brown & Brown, Waste Management, Welltower, Hartford Insurance, Revvity * U.S. and Chinese trade negotiators resume talks in Stockholm * President Donald Trump meets UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland * OPEC+ Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee meeting * U.S. Treasury sells $69 billion of 2-year notes, $70 billion of 5-year notes Want to receive the Morning Bid in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for the newsletter here. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, opens new tab, and you can follow us on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.


Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's farm tax architect calls for fresh capital gains raid
The adviser behind Labour's inheritance tax raid on farmers has called on Rachel Reeves to raise capital gains tax to plug gaps in public finances. Arun Advani, of the left-leaning Centre for the Analysis of Taxation think tank, said that the Government should 'start by fixing capital gains tax' if it wanted to 'tax wealth better'. It comes as business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, ruled out Labour MPs' 'daft' demands for a 'magic wealth tax', urging backbenchers to 'be serious'. The Chancellor has already raised the rate of capital gains tax to 24pc for higher rate taxpayers, and 18pc for basic rate taxpayers. But Mr Advani, an economics professor at the University of Warwick, told the Mail on Sunday that Labour could double its tax take if it brought capital gains tax in line with income tax. He said: 'The current way capital gains tax is used encourages tax avoidance. If the Government were looking at taxing wealth better, it would be much better to start by fixing capital gains tax.' Labour ministers have previously admitted that Mr Advani's research formed the basis of the inheritance tax raid on farms. The economics professor, who also sits on the advisory board for the Office for Budget Responsibility, wrote a report in 2023 calling for agricultural property relief and other 'loopholes' to be scrapped. A year later, in her maiden Budget, Ms Reeves announced that inherited farms worth more than £1m would be taxed at a rate of 20pc after having been shielded from the levies for decades. A 20pc rate will also be charged on inherited business assets over £1m when someone dies. Mr Advani has since urged Labour to go further and halve agricultural property relief to £500,000. Shadow business secretary, Andrew Griffith, told the Mail that capital gains tax was 'a wealth tax by another name', and that the tax further punished people 'on the higher inflation Labour is causing'. It comes as official figures show a sharp drop in capital gains tax receipts following successive cuts to allowances, suggesting they have backfired. Data published by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) on Friday showed the Government's capital gains tax take fell by 18pc to £12bn in the 2023-24 financial year, as the Conservatives halved the annual tax-free allowance to £6,000. HMRC suggested receipts in 2024-25 would drop a further 10pc to £13.1bn as a result of the allowance being cut again – to £3,000. Sarah Coles, of wealth manager Hargreaves Lansdown, said there was 'a decent chance that an awful lot of investors were just sitting on gains'. She added: 'It's a classic example of tweaking a tax in order to raise money – and then ending up with less in the long term.' Critics argue that increasing capital gains tax would undermine the Chancellor's drive for economic growth by discouraging investment. Jason Hollands, of wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said: 'If taxes on gains are seen to be too punitive, people will conclude the rewards aren't worth the risk, which would undermine the economy.' However, the OBR predicts capital gains tax receipts to almost double over the next five years to £25.5bn by 2029-30. Laith Khalaf, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said: 'Receipts largely reflect selling activity in the previous tax year, and plenty of people took fright ahead of last October's Budget and decided to sell up, in case of a capital gains tax raid. 'As things turned out, the Chancellor's changes to capital gains tax for individuals were relatively modest, but those who disposed of assets at a substantial profit ahead of the Budget will still be on the hook for capital gains tax, especially now the annual amount of gains you can make before paying the tax has been cut to just £3,000.' The Treasury was approached for comment.