Turkey thwarted another attack with pagers in Lebanon last year, officials say
Daily Sabah reported that 1,300 pagers and 710 chargers rigged with explosives were confiscated inside a cargo shipment at Istanbul Airport that was on its way to Beirut from Hong Kong.
A Turkish security official, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with regulations, confirmed the report but would not provide further details.
In Beirut, Hezbollah's chief spokesman Youssef el-Zein told The Associated Press Tuesday that days after the Sept. 17 pagers attack in Lebanon and Syria, Hezbollah informed Turkish intelligence that a shipment of pagers was in Turkey and about to be sent to Lebanon.
El-Zein said Turkish authorities confiscated the pagers and most likely destroyed them. He had no further details.
The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the report.
Israel triggered the Sept. 17 attack when pagers all over Lebanon started beeping. The devices exploded even if a person carrying one failed to push buttons to read an incoming encrypted message.
The next day, Israel activated walkie-talkies, some of which exploded at funerals for some of the people who were killed in the pager attacks.
The attacks marked a major escalation in the Israel-Hezbollah war that started after Hamas launched its attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, triggering the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip. Although the Lebanon attack struck many Hezbollah members, civilians were also killed or wounded. At least 37 people were killed, including two children, and some 3,000 were wounded in the two-day explosions.
Daily Sabah said that acting on a tip that a shipment of pager devices would be in Istanbul to be delivered to Lebanon two days after the attacks, Turkish intelligence agents launched an operation.
The newspaper said that authorities discovered a shipment that arrived in Istanbul from Hong Kong one day before the Lebanon explosions. The cargo had 61 boxes and was scheduled to depart from Istanbul to Beirut on Sept. 27 through Istanbul Airport. The cargo was described as a shipment of food choppers, Daily Sabah said. Inside, authorities found 1,300 Gold Apollo brand pagers and 710 desktop chargers.
After the pagers attack, Israel expanded the war against Hezbollah with strikes that killed nearly 500 people on Sept. 23, forcing hundreds of thousands to flee their homes. On Sept. 27, Israeli airstrikes on a southern suburb of Beirut killed Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's leader and one of its founding members, in the biggest blow for the Iran-backed group.
The war ended on Nov. 27, when a U.S.-brokered ceasefire went into effect.
____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Shut it down and start again': staff disquiet as Alan Turing Institute faces identity crisis
When the UK government announced the creation of the Alan Turing Institute in 2014 it promised a 'fitting memorial' to the renowned computer scientist and artificial intelligence pioneer. More than a decade on, Britain's leading AI institute is in turmoil as staff warn it may be in danger of collapse and ministers demand a shift in focus to defence and security work. 'The ATI brand is well recognised internationally,' says Dame Wendy Hall, a professor of computer science at the University of Southampton and the co-chair of a 2017 government AI review. 'If it ceases to be the national institute for AI and data science then we are at risk of weakening our international leadership in AI.' Turing's legacy, as the mathematical genius who helped crack the Enigma code, outlined key concepts of AI and invented the eponymous test to discern whether a computer can show human intelligence, has been rebuilt and burnished in recent years. In 2013 he received a posthumous royal pardon 59 years after his death, having been convicted of gross indecency in 1952 after admitting a sexual relationship with a man. A year later he was immortalised in the Oscar-winning film The Imitation Game and in 2021 he became the face of the £50 note. A cornerstone of that legacy is in trouble, however. This month a group of staff filed a whistleblower complaint with the Charity Commission, which has a regulatory role over ATI because the nominally independent organisation is a registered charity – albeit largely funded by the UK government. The complaint raised eight points of concern including the possibility that £100m of government funding might be withdrawn, which 'could lead to the Institute's collapse'. 'These concerns are so significant that many staff now believe the institute's charitable status and public credibility are at risk,' said the complaint, which also raised concerns about internal governance and culture as well as oversight of spending. It is the latest in a series of staff broadsides at management. In March last year more than 180 staff wrote a letter to leadership expressing 'serious concerns' about the organisation's approach to diversity after it appointed four men to senior roles. In December more than 90 staff warned in another letter that ATI's credibility was in 'serious jeopardy' amid a restructuring that was threatening jobs – and research projects. ATI has recently notified about 50 staff – or approximately 10% of its workforce – that they are at risk of redundancy and is shutting down projects related to online safety, tackling the housing crisis and reducing health inequality. This is part of an overhaul dubbed Turing 2.0 under which the institute will focus on three key areas: health, the environment, and defence and security. A recent letter from the UK technology secretary, Peter Kyle, has made clear the overhaul does not go far enough. Writing to ATI's chair last month, Kyle demanded the institute switch its main focus to defence and security, adding that ATI's 'longer-term funding arrangement' could be reviewed next year. 'Moving forward, defence and national security projects should form a core of ATI's activities, and relationships with the UK's security, defence, and intelligence communities should be strengthened accordingly,' Kyle wrote. He also indicated that leadership changes might be needed. 'To realise this vision, it is imperative that the ATI's leadership reflects the institute's reformed focus,' he wrote. 'Careful consideration should be given to the importance of an executive team who possesses a relevant background and sector knowledge to lead this transition.' It is against this backdrop – long-running staff dissatisfaction with leadership, a strategic and financial overhaul, and then a bombshell from the government – that the whistleblower complaint was filed. ATI is led by chief executive Jean Innes, who has had senior roles in the civil service and tech sector, and is chaired by Doug Gurr, the former head of Amazon's UK operations and interim chair of the UK's competition watchdog. Gurr responded to Kyle last month with a letter pledging to 'step up' on defence and national security as well as boosting the UK's self-sufficiency in AI – or 'sovereign capabilities'. 'We will step up at a time of national need,' Gurr wrote. However, Gurr added that ATI will 'continue to drive forward high-impact work in environment and healthcare' where it fits with the 'government's missions and the interests of our philanthropic and private funders'. At a recent meeting between staff and ATI leadership, held remotely, Gurr faced pointed questions about the new direction raised by Kyle and the institute's restructuring. One attender said the atmosphere was difficult, describing the mood among the more than 100 employees during the meeting as 'contemptuous throughout'. In an internal note to staff this week, Innes and Gurr confirmed a new working group of government officials and ATI staff had met to discuss the new direction. It also confirmed people would be leaving through redundancies and non-renewal of contracts. ATI's goals include to 'advance world-class research and apply it to national and global challenges', as well as driving an 'informed public conversation' on AI. Its five founding UK universities were Cambridge, Oxford, Edinburgh, UCL and Warwick, with its research work including teaming up with the Met Office to improve weather forecasting, creating cardiac 'digital twins' to study heart disease and improving air traffic control. A source who worked in the previous Conservative government said Labour's concerns about the institute are 'far from new' and there had been disquiet in political circles about the institute's performance for some time, with multiple university stakeholders blurring its focus. In that context, the source said, it makes sense to double down on what the institute does well – defence and security – or 'just shut it down and start again'. Prof Jon Crowcroft, the Marconi professor of communication systems at the University of Cambridge's Computer Lab, and an adviser to Innes, says the institute's staff have become unsettled. 'I think the crisis in terms of people is real. A lot of people are still there because they believe it's a good, open institution doing valuable public work. But they're also wondering where their job is going to be,' he says. He adds: 'I have not seen a plan A for keeping all the staff happy, which would mean keeping some non-defence and security projects. The reason why staff have issued these letters is because they have not seen that.' Referring to ATI's base at the British Library in London, he says: 'Nor have I seen a plan B for what happens if too many people leave, because so many projects have gone, which means the core funding is not viable and they cannot justify the size of the building they are in.' There are 'mixed views' on the looming shift to defence and security, according to a current staff member who says they have listened to a 'diverse' array of concerns among colleagues. 'We understand the national importance issue. Very few of us are saying that work shouldn't happen. But we think a singular focus would be too narrow. Turing's strength comes from applying AI to a wide range of societal challenges, from health to the environment, with responsible innovation at the heart.' The staff member adds: 'Those areas are still important, and with the right leadership we could fulfil the vision and purpose that brought us here in the first place.' The staff member adds that Gurr's letter pledging to double down on defence and security, while still working on health and environment, leaves ATI in a 'precarious standoff' with government. 'The leadership is hoping the government's attention, or its personnel, shifts,' they said. Hall says the institute has no choice but to change. 'Clearly there is not much money around and the institute needs to do what the government asks. If it doesn't, then presumably the government will close it down.' She adds: 'The institute has ceased to be what it was initially set up to be, which was a national institute for data science and AI. The government has asked it to focus on defence and security. Whether the UK needs such an institute is for the government to decide. Personally I would like to see the justification.' Crowcroft, who defends the quality of the institute's work, says the UK has always been strong in AI and is 'probably now stronger still', pointing to multiple generations of AI expertise produced by universities such as Cambridge, Oxford, Imperial College and Edinburgh as well as the success of London-based Google DeepMind and the establishment of UK-based AI units by leading US tech firms such as Microsoft and OpenAI. A spokesperson for ATI said the institute was going through 'substantial' change to continue to deliver in its unique role as the UK's national institute for data science and AI. 'As we move forward, we're focused on delivering real-world impact across society's biggest challenges, including responding to the national need to double down on our work in defence, national security and sovereign capabilities.' A government spokesperson said the technology secretary wants ATI to show value for money for taxpayer, which can be achieved by 'giving the institute a key role in safeguarding our national security and positioning it where the British public expects it to be'. Turing's legacy will live on. But in terms of the institute that bears his name, its longevity is in doubt.
Sky News
11 hours ago
- Sky News
'Not in our name': Israelis protest against Gaza war - but Netanyahu seems unmoved
The coordinates came through last minute. The instruction was to get there fast. People organising demonstrations, blocking motorways and major intersections, did not want police getting wind of their plans. The one we found ourselves at, near the town of Lod, halfway between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, felt a bit like a flash-mob protest, done and dusted in less than half an hour. The protestors had set fire to tyres, which blazed across the motorway, filling the sky with thick black smoke. They waved the Israeli flag and other yellow flags to show solidarity with the remaining hostages still in Gaza, whose photos they carried - their faces and names seared on the collective consciousness now - a collective trauma. "We want the war to end, we want our hostages back, we want our soldiers back safe home, and we want the humanitarian disaster in Gaza to end", one of the protestors told me. "We do not want to have these crimes made in our name." And then she was gone, off to the next location as the group vanished in a matter of minutes, leaving police to put out the fire. This was a day of stoppage, a nationwide strike - a change of tactics by the hostage families to up the ante with the government in their calls to stop the war, make a deal and bring the hostages home. Benjamin Netanyahu was unmoved. "Those who are calling for an end to the war today without defeating Hamas are not only hardening Hamas's stance and delaying the release of our hostages, they are also ensuring that the horrors of October 7 will recur again and again", he said at the start of the weekly cabinet meeting. Netanyahu 'broke contract' with us Ahead of the day of strike action, we spoke to a former Air Force reservist who quit in April in protest over Netanyahu's decision to break the ceasefire. "I felt he hadn't broken the contract with Hamas, he'd broken the contract with us - with the people, releasing the hostages, stopping the war. That was my breaking point." He wanted to be anonymous, identifying himself by the call sign 'F'. He had done three tours since the war began, mostly spent with eyes on Gaza - coordinating air strikes to support ground operations and ensuring the Air Force gets the target right. 2:55 'This is eternal war' "It's very complicated, very demanding and very hectic. The main problem is to see that you follow the rules and there are lots of rules - safety rules, international law rules, military doctrine rules. "And to see that there are no mistakes because you can check all the rules, you can make everything perfect, if there's a mistake, it bypasses everything you did and the bomb would fall on someone you didn't want it to fall on." I ask him how he feels about the huge death toll in Gaza. "Look, the uninvolved death toll is tough. It's tough personally, it's tough emotionally, it's tough professionally. It shouldn't happen. "When you conduct a war at this scale, it will happen. It will happen because of mistakes, because of the chaos of war." 1:05 He is softly spoken, considered and thoughtful, but says he's prepared to take part in the more radical protest actions, such as blocking motorways and starting fires, to try and get the message through. "Hamas is probably the weakest enemy we have had since 1948," he says. "In '48, in the liberation of Israel, we fought seven armies, much better equipped, better ordered than us, and the war took less time. "We stopped the war with Iran after 12 days. They are much more dangerous than Hamas. We stopped a war with Hezbollah in a couple of months, and they are still a much bigger threat than Hamas.
The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ex-Israeli intelligence chief said 50 Palestinians must die for every 7 October victim
The Israeli general who headed military intelligence on 7 October 2023 has said 50 Palestinians must die for every person killed that day and 'it does not matter now if they are children', in recordings broadcast by Israel's Channel 12 TV station. Aharon Haliva said the toll in Gaza, which he put at more than 50,000 dead, was 'necessary' as a 'message to future generations' of Palestinians. 'They need a Nakba every now and then to feel the price,' he added, referring to the mass expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians from their homes and lands after the creation of Israel in 1948. Nakba means catastrophe in Arabic. Much of Israel's leadership and media has used genocidal rhetoric about Palestinians since Hamas's 7 October attacks, including describing them as 'human animals', saying there are 'no innocents' in Gaza and calling for Gaza's total destruction and its ethnic cleansing. However, Haliva's description of a campaign of mass killing including children was an unusually direct description of collective punishment of civilians, which is illegal under international law. Haliva, who stepped down from his position in April 2024, also appeared to endorse the casualty figures compiled by health authorities in Gaza, which Israeli officials regularly attack as propaganda. They have proved reliable in past conflicts. Channel 12 said the undated conversations were recorded 'in recent months'. The Gaza health ministry's toll for those killed by Israeli attacks passed 50,000 in March and has recently climbed above 60,000. Israel's most recent published data on the war put the number of militants killed at about 20,000, so Haliva would have been aware that even by his country's own count most of the Palestinians killed were civilians. 'The fact that there are already 50,000 dead in Gaza is necessary and required for future generations,' he said in the broadcast comments. 'For everything that happened on October 7th, for every person on October 7, 50 Palestinians must die. It doesn't matter now if they are children.' About 1,200 people were killed in the Hamas-led cross-border attacks, the majority of them civilians, and 250 were taken hostage to Gaza. Channel 12 did not clarify how it had obtained the recordings or who Haliva was speaking with. Israel's Haaretz newspaper described the recordings as a format that allowed the retired officer to 'give an interview … without actually being interviewed'. Haliva's comments about mass killings of Palestinian civilians did not make headlines in other mainstream Israeli outlets. They focused instead on his criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu and warnings of systemic failures in security and intelligence. That coverage highlighted the vast gulf between how the war is perceived and discussed inside Israel's borders and beyond them. Among Israelis, Haliva is widely seen as a centrist critic of the current government and its far-right ministers such as Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, as the general himself noted in the broadcast comments. He quoted an internal critic at the intelligence directorate telling him it was 'lucky' that many of those killed and kidnapped on 7 October 2023 were leftwing Israelis linked to peace movements. 'He told me: 'If this had happened to us, the right, you wouldn't have gone to war like this,'' Haliva said. 'That's what people believe here.' Quique Kierszenbaum contributed to this report
