logo
Texas issues arrest warrants for Democrats who fled state to avoid districts vote

Texas issues arrest warrants for Democrats who fled state to avoid districts vote

Telegraph6 days ago
Texas has issued arrest warrants for the Democrats who fled the state in order to block Donald Trump's effort to implement new congressional districts favouring the Republican Party.
More than 50 Democratic lawmakers boarded chartered planes on Sunday as they sought to deny the Texas House of Representatives the quorum required to vote on the redrawn congressional map, which could create an additional five Republican seats.
On Monday, the Texas House voted 85-6 to track down and arrest those lawmakers not present in the chamber, after which House Speaker Dustin Burrows signed civil warrants for each of the legislators, empowering state troopers to bring them to the state Capitol.
The warrants apply only within state lines, making them largely symbolic. However, they mark the latest escalation in a stand-off between Democrats and Republicans in the battle over redistricting that is likely to grow increasingly fraught in the lead up to next year's midterm elections.
Earlier on Monday, Kathy Hochul, the New York governor, said the US president and his 'coconspirator', Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, had left the party no choice but to 'fight fire with fire'.
Pulling the trigger on the plans, Ms Hochul said: 'This is a war. We are at war. And that's why the gloves are off and I say, bring it on.'
Some of the 57 Democrats missing from the state legislature on Monday fled to New York, where they met with Ms Hochul, while others travelled to Illinois, where they are being supported by JB Pritzker.
Speaking at a press conference in Albany on Monday, Ms Hochul said: 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice: we must do the same.
'There's a phrase, you have to fight fire with fire, that is a true statement of how we're feeling right now.
'And I've said, another overused but applicable phrase, all's fair in love and war. That's why I'm exploring with our leaders every option to redraw our state congressional line as soon as possible.'
She added: 'We're already working on a legislative process, reviewing our legal strategies and will do everything in our power to stop this brazen assault.'
The Democrats, whom Ms Hochul described as 'brave patriots', face a $500 (£377) fine for every day they break a quorum, and under new state laws they are not allowed to use party funding to pay. Members began fundraising to cover costs ahead of the walkout.
Texas has 38 seats in the House. The Republican party occupies 25 of those seats, and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant following the death of Sylvester Turner in March.
The delegation of Texas lawmakers who travelled to New York did not disclose where they would be travelling next, but said they would not be returning to Texas.
Mr Abbott threatened to 'remove' the fleeing Democrats from membership in the Texas House and suggested those who fundraised or accepted donations to cover costs incurred by the stunt could be charged with felonies.
Several Texas Democrats and their allies, sheltering with Mr Pritzker in Chicago, told Politico they feared Mr Trump could mobilise the Illinois National Guard to return them to Texas.
Democrats running away 'like cowards'
Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General, threatened to have the fleeing lawmakers arrested.
'Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately,' Mr Paxton wrote on X.
Ms Hochul said she had hosted the Texas Democrats at the governor's residence, where she fed them and took them to visit a home that Franklin D Roosevelt once lived in 'for inspiration'.
'Donald Trump came up with this scheme, perhaps with the help of AI, I don't know', Ms Hocul said, before claiming that the Republicans had redrawn the congressional map on 'racist lines' to disenfranchise Texans.
She added: 'What Texas and Republican states are doing at the direction of Donald Trump, I say, is nothing short of a legal insurrection against our Capitol.'
Mihaela Plesa, a Texas State representative who was among those to travel to New York, told reporters: 'The playing field has changed, not just for Democrats, but all Americans, and it's time to meet them on the new field.'
Addressing the press conference on Monday, Jolanda Jones, a Texas state representative, suggested a committee in charge of redistricting had held 'sham' meetings about redrawing the map.
She said: 'My constituents demanded that I be here, so you think I'm going to listen to Donald Trump and Greg Abbott... and the attorney general who can't treat his wife right and lies on documentation? So I think he needs to worry about going to jail.'
While the Democrats spoke of the need to fight back against the Republican redistricting plan, such a move is limited by the state's constraints.
While the Texas redistricting plan could see new boundaries put in place by 2026, potential New York changes would take years.
The rules of redistricting can be vague and variable – each state has its own set of rules and procedures. Politicians are gauging what voters will tolerate when it comes to politically motivated mapmaking.
Texas and New York are not the only states seeking to redraw congressional lines.
Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, said he was 'very seriously' looking to redraw the state's map, claiming the 2020 US census was flawed.
Ms Hochul said the changes being explored for New York would involve amending the state's constitution.
Redistricting usually happens after the once-a-decade population count by the US Census Bureau or in response to a court ruling.
A plan being explored by New York democrats in anticipation of the Texas plan could see residents vote on changes to conduct mid-decade restructuring in the autumn of 2027, and they could be put in place in time for the 2028 election.
The New York bill would also only be applicable if another state engaged in mid-decade redistricting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles
Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

Trump made a much-teased announcement on Monday that he would invoke a never-before-used presidential authority to seize control of Washington, D.C.'s police department from local control to his Attorney General Pam Bondi. The president also announced he would deploy the National Guard on the streets of the nation's capital as a plan to 'rescue' the city from rampant crime, despite the fact that crime dropped in Washington by 35 percent last year after it spiked during the Covid-19 pandemic. Trump had teased a federal takeover of Washington and has decried homelessness and graffiti in the city. Republicans have encroached on Washington, D.C's home rule for decades. The fact it is a majority Black city with a Black political establishment has also made it easy to attack the same way Trump has attacked Baltimore and other cities run by Black mayors. Of course, this is not the first time that Trump has taken control of a major American city. Earlier this year, after protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles without the consent of the governor of California or the city's mayor. Trump may be hoping his actions will boost his approval ratings, which have been sagging in recent months. But a simple look at the numbers shows that it might backfire precipitously. First, let's get to the kernel of truth in Trump's idea. Voters in Democratic cities did vote against their leaders partially because of crime. New York City elected Eric Adams, a former police officer, as mayor in 2021. Voters in San Francisco kicked out mayor London Breed and voters in Los Angeles and Alameda beat back progressive prosecutors for lax policies toward crime. While almost no Democratic presidential candidate has supported defunding the police it became a tagline for Republicans use to hit at Democrats. That being said, it's fairly clear that Trump's approval ratings took a hit after he dispatched troops and the National Guard to Los Angeles. When Trump first came into office this year, and even after he began his tariff regime, Americans continued to support him on immigration. In February, according to an Economist/YouGov poll, he only cracked 50 percent approval on immigration. That number began to dip in April, after Trump sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the immigrant based in Maryland, to El Salvador. In April, Trump's approval number on immigration went to 45 percent. But by May, the same poll showed his approval on immigration started to rebound to 48 percent. That would go 'poof' in June once Trump began to send troops to Los Angeles. By the middle of June, a plurality of Americans thought that his response to the anti-ICE protests was too aggressive and 52 percent disapproved of his policies on immigration. By the end of June, 50 percent of Americans opposed Trump's policies on immigration. and his number has stubbornly stayed there. Not only that, as The Independent reported last month, polling from CBS News and CNN bore that out as well. The CNN poll also found that 59 percent of Americans opposed the deployment of National Guard troops without the consent of the governor and 55 percent of respondents said it was justified. While much of the attention when it comes to Trump's approval tends to focus on Jeffrey Epstein, it's clear that his approval began to collapse long before that scandal, when he began to deploy troops into the second-largest city in the United States. Trump may be trying to bait protesters by having troops roving throughout Washington in hopes that it will create the type of unrest that happened in 2020 and in Los Angeles. But the numbers show he might come to regret that. Voters may not like disorder and crime but they dislike overzealous responses from the government even more.

AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years
AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years

AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising the price of its signature "Big Cans" for the first time in nearly 30 years. The potential price increase is a direct result of Donald Trump 's 50 percent tariff on aluminum imports. Co-founder Don Vultaggio expressed strong reluctance to abandon the $0.99 price point, which has been maintained since 1997, emphasizing customer loyalty. The company imports 20 percent of its aluminum from Canada, and the tariffs are expected to drive up costs for both imported and domestic materials. Industry groups and political figures have criticized the tariffs, warning of their detrimental impact on American manufacturers and consumers.

Texas businessmen indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's Pemex
Texas businessmen indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's Pemex

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Texas businessmen indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's Pemex

MEXICO CITY, Aug 11 (Reuters) - Two Texas businessmen were indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's state energy company Pemex with $150,000 and luxury items to secure contracts, the U.S. Justice Department announced on Monday. Between 2019 and 2021, Ramon Rovirosa and Mario Avila, both Mexican citizens and U.S. lawful permanent residents, conspired to pay bribes to officials at Pemex and its exploration and production arm, known as PEP, according to an indictment unsealed in the Southern District of Texas. Rovirosa is also alleged to have ties to Mexican cartel members, the Department of Justice said in a statement. Rovirosa, 46, was arraigned while Avila, 61, remains at large. Reuters was unable to immediately contact the lawyers for Rovirosa and Avila. Pemex did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Together with co-conspirators, Rovirosa and Avila allegedly paid bribes in the form of cash and luxury goods, including from Louis Vuitton and Hublot, to at least three Pemex and PEP officials. In exchange, those Pemex officials are accused of helping companies associated with Rovirosa obtain contracts worth at least $2.5 million, the statement said. Mexico and its ailing state company Pemex have for decades been awash with corruption, with several former senior officials facing charges, including former Chief Executive Officer Emilio Lozoya. Lozoya, in turn, has accused ex-presidents Felipe Calderon and Carlos Salinas of corruption, along with former President Enrique Pena Nieto, his ex-finance minister, Luis Videgaray, and more than a dozen others. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who was Mexican president during the time covered in the indictment, had vowed to root out the corruption that had plagued the country and its most important company for decades. Even so, Mexico's corruption ranking, opens new tab slipped. Rovirosa and Avila are each charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and three substantive violations of it. The act makes it illegal for citizens, U.S. companies, or foreign persons and businesses in the United States to pay foreign officials to win business.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store