Medics objecting to Sandie Peggie's return warned of culpability, tribunal told
She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment and cited concerns about 'patient care'.
Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation.
The tribunal resumed in Dundee on July 16 after an initial set of hearings in February.
On Monday, service manager Charlotte Myles, who made a decision to lift the suspension on March 7, told the tribunal that two senior consultants and two senior nurses 'weren't happy' at her decision to allow Ms Peggie to return to work.
Ms Myles said that Dr Kate Searle and Dr Maggie Currer both objected to her decision, while senior nurse managers Esther Davidson and Louise Curran 'similarly expressed' objections, but were not able to give an 'accurate response' regarding alleged patient safety concerns.
She said she told Ms Peggie verbally on March 7 and in writing on March 12 that the suspension would be lifted. However, it was later reinstated due to issues with looking after the nurse's dog, and she returned to work around April 12 2024.
Ms Myles said that 'usually we don't like to suspend' and she believed there were no patient safety issues, the tribunal heard.
However she said that she 'wasn't impressed' by allegations made by senior medics and warned them to comply with correct protocols and policies.
Ms Myles said: 'When I explained to staff members they weren't particularly happy with my decision initially.'
She said she visited Dr Searle's office to co-ordinate a rota and was met with further objections, but warned the consultant she was 'culpable' if allegations were not reported correctly, the tribunal heard.
Ms Myles said: 'Kate Searle expressed unhappiness that we were taking Ms Peggie back into the workplace and made a comment saying there had been patient safety issues, there had been other behaviours towards a doctor. I asked if this had been investigated and reported appropriately, and she said no.
'I said that if these events had happened and they had not been reported, you were culpable.'
She added: 'They weren't happy but it was my sole responsibility to review the suspension. My primary concern is to make sure patients are getting seen.'
The witness said she did not know 'what the indicators were… to be suspended in the first place' and felt there 'was no risk', the tribunal heard.
Ms Myles said: 'I wasn't impressed; if someone wants to raise patient safety concern it should go through correct process and be escalated at the time the incident happened. My stance was: 'If you have not followed correct protocol and policy you are culpable'.'
She said that Ms Davidson alleged that a doctor had been subject to a racist slur by Ms Peggie, and branded allegations by Ms Curran that the nurse shared Donald Trump's views on gender 'tittle-tattle', the tribunal heard.
Ms Myles said: 'It was very similar, tittle-tattle of being a supporter of Donald Trump and sharing his views on gender. That's somebody's personal view and as long as it doesn't impact on workforce or patients or cause harm, people are entitled to have their private views.'
She said she perceived Dr Upton to be 'a female colleague', but said: 'I do believe we should make alterations to support everybody, but how we do it is completely out of my remit.'
During re-examination by Jane Russell KC, representing NHS Fife and Dr Upton, the witness was asked about the alleged comments.
Ms Myles said: 'I was told Sandie Peggie had called a member of the medical team a P**i but that was not reported formally; when I asked Esther which member of the team it was directed at, it took a while to get a response. I believe the person who was supposed to have had the comment directed at them doesn't recall the comment being directed at them.'
Judge Alexander Kemp asked if she had seen a previous risk assessment for suspending Ms Peggie, and the witness said she had not, despite asking for previous documentation prior to March 7.
The tribunal continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Trans doctor Beth Upton lamented lack of guidelines on changing rooms
The transgender doctor at the centre of a landmark tribunal over women-only spaces lamented the lack of clear guidelines about access to female changing rooms, documents have shown. Dr Beth Upton said NHS Fife potentially missed an opportunity to intervene before the incident involving the doctor and the nurse Sandie Peggie in a female changing room at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023. Peggie has taken the health board and Upton to an employment tribunal claiming she faced discrimination and harassment as a result of being forced to share female changing rooms with the doctor, who is biologically male but identifies as female. Sandie Peggie told Upton that the doctor had no right to be in the women's changing rooms at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife IAIN MASTERTON/ALAMY Peggie confronted Upton in the women's changing rooms at the hospital's A&E department, telling Upton she believed the doctor had no right to be there.
Times
a day ago
- Times
Trans doctor in nurse row lamented lack of guidelines on changing rooms
The transgender doctor at the centre of a landmark tribunal over women-only spaces lamented the lack of clear guidelines about access to female changing rooms, documents have shown. Dr Beth Upton said NHS Fife potentially missed an opportunity to intervene before the incident involving the doctor and the nurse Sandie Peggie in a female changing room at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023. Peggie has taken the health board and Upton to an employment tribunal claiming she faced discrimination and harassment as a result of being forced to share female changing rooms with the doctor, who is biologically male but identifies as female. Peggie confronted Upton in the women's changing rooms at the hospital's A&E department, telling Upton she believed the doctor had no right to be there. Upton lodged a formal complaint with the board, claiming to have been subjected to a transphobic 'hate incident', which led to Peggie being suspended for several months. Peggie is now suing the health board and Dr Upton for alleged sexual harassment, belief discrimination, and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010. A previously unpublished document among hundreds included in an evidence bundle for the tribunal reveals Upton raised the absence of a clear transgender policy at the internal Fife Health and Social Care Partnership disciplinary hearing into Peggie's conduct. • Janice Turner: Class snobbery is at heart of NHS gender war The HR representative Melanie Jorgensen asked Upton at the conduct hearing in June if there had been a missed opportunity for intervention by NHS Fife before the changing-room incident. The notes of the meeting state Upton said this was 'difficult to answer' and adds the doctor 'feels potentially there was a missed opportunity'. Upton told the hearing it was 'clear the organisation do not have a policy'. The notes continue: 'Beth Upton advised that she understands the legal side of things, but also feels a lot of this would have been easier if there had been a policy document that would have confirmed what to do in this situation.' Upton's comments come after the pivotal Supreme Court judgment in April that ruled women are defined by biological sex under equalities law. Trina Budge, director of For Women Scotland who brought the legal challenge to the Supreme Court, said: 'There absolutely should be a policy and it's unacceptable that they continue without one. 'This should have been dealt with as a priority after the Supreme Court judgment. 'The policy should have made it clear that men such as Dr Upton are not allowed in female changing rooms. 'It's just creating more disasters and more tribunals for the NHS — not just NHS Fife but throughout Scotland.' Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns for the human-rights charity Sex Matters, which advocates for clarity about biological sex in law and life, said: 'This shows the risks of changing policy on the fly in response to one trans-identifying person's request. • Sandie Peggie blames her upbringing for use of racial slurs 'A sign on a door saying 'Male' or 'Female' is already a statement of policy — that the space is for one sex only, in compliance with workplace regulations. 'That is what most people will understand the sign to mean. Employers are not free to choose a different meaning of 'single-sex', or a different interpretation of laws and statutory regulations. Every employer needs to follow the law as it stands.' A spokeswoman for NHS Fife previously said: 'Throughout the course of the employment tribunal, NHS Fife has been clear that it will not comment on individuals or evidence while legal proceedings are ongoing. 'We remain respectful of the legal process and the role of the tribunal in considering all evidence presented.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment further while judicial proceedings in an employment tribunal are ongoing.'
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26trim%3D230%2C118%2C268%2C135%26crop%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
4 days ago
- Scotsman
Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal: 'Mass discrimination' legal action warning if nurse wins case over Beth Upton
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It has been one of the most contentious and high-profile employment tribunals in modern British legal history and its outcome could wield significant influence at a time when policies and guidance around gender are in a state of flux. All eyes are on the Dundee employment tribunal that has heard every blow and counter in the case brought by Sandie Peggie against NHS Fife. In legal proceedings that have made headlines around the UK, the nurse is pursuing a claim for sexual harassment, belief discrimination and victimisation against both the health board and Dr Beth Upton, a trans woman colleague at Kirkcaldy's Victoria Hospital with whom she clashed over a women's changing room. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With the final evidence sessions concluding last week, the legal teams of those involved have until August 25 to provide any supplementary statements effectively summarising their case. The tribunal will then briefly reconvene at the start of September for two days for oral submissions alongside any legal questions. Supporters of nurse Sandie Peggie protest outside the employment tribunal hearings in Dundee. Picture: Lisa Ferguson | Lisa Ferguson Only then will the panel, helmed by employment judge Sandy Kemp, be in a position to issue a written ruling. But while many tribunal judgements are given relatively quickly after the final submissions have been made, the intricacies of this particular case mean it could be weeks, if not months, before a legally binding decision is announced. One source indicated 'the end of 2025' as a 'likely timeframe', given the panel has to consider not just the evidence from more than 15 witnesses, but thousands of pages of documentation. When the moment eventually arrives, the implications could well be far reaching. Around the UK there are a number of ongoing employment tribunals and other legal cases which span the kind of gender-critical and trans issues that have been discussed at length throughout the Peggie tribunal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And according to gender-critical campaign and advocacy groups involved in various legal activities, there is likely to be similar employment tribunal cases in Scotland - and potentially, even a large, class-action style legal action. 'There are more employment tribunals' Susan Smith, co-founder of For Women Scotland, the gender critical group that successfully fought the Scottish Government all the way to the Supreme Court over sex-based protections, said there were other women planning legal action around such issues. She indicated there may also be cases similar to the judicial review brought to the Court of Session in April by parents in the Scottish Borders, which ultimately led to a judge ordering that Scottish state schools must provide single sex toilets for pupils. Ms Smith said: 'I know there are more employment tribunals. It's always hard to say how many, because people are at different stages of the process, but I understand there are a couple of court dates that have been set. Susan Smith, left, celebrated with colleagues and supporters of For Women Scotland after the Supreme Court ruling that the word 'woman' in the 2010 Equality Act refers to a biological woman. Picture: Lucy North/PA | PA 'There is also consideration underway about whether judicial reviews will be brought against anyone at any point for not adhering to the law. It can be a difficult process, but ultimately, we're not going anywhere. And if things aren't being done, we're keeping an eye on what we need to think about doing.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Maya Forstater, chief executive of the Sex Matters group, stressed the law on single sex spaces was 'already clear' in the wake of April's landmark Supreme Court ruling. The court decision set out the terms 'woman' and 'sex' refer only to a biological woman and biological sex in the Equality Act. But should the Dundee tribunal find in Ms Peggie's favour, Ms Forstater said it would 'help bring home to foot-dragging employers all over the country that complying is not optional'. 'Any employer that continues to flout health and safety regulations concerning toilets, changing rooms and washing facilities is putting itself at risk not only of a high-profile legal case involving a single brave claimant like Sandie, but a mass discrimination and harassment case taken jointly by large numbers of female employees,' she said. Appeal could lead to legal precedent being set As is to be expected, the extent of the repercussions of the Peggie case depends on the ruling the Dundee tribunal issues, which could be fully or partly in favour of one side or the other, and the similarity of circumstances in future cases. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Either way, the outcome will be consequential, not least because there is little in the way of existing case law around the question of workplace changing rooms. And although judgements in Scottish tribunals are not binding in England, Wales or Northern Ireland due to the separate legal jurisdictions, they can be used as persuasive arguments by the parties involved. One legal source familiar with the Peggie case said in the event the judgement goes to appeal - a process that could end up in the Supreme Court - the outcome could set a legal precedent similar to that seen in the case of Ms Forstater's High Court appeal win against an employment tribunal in 2021, which found her gender-critical beliefs fell under the Equality Act. Above all, the source said, the Peggie case would be a 'cautionary example' to public bodies 'not to play fast and loose with the law and its interpretations'. Nurse Sandie Peggie, centre, alongside Maya Forstater, left, and employment lawyer, Margaret Gribbon, outside the Scottish Parliament after a meeting with MSPs in June. Picture: PA | PA Such developments could prove important in a case such as that brought to a Newcastle tribunal by a group of nurses, who are challenging the decision by the NHS foundation trust in County Durham and Darlington to allow one of their trans colleagues to use female changing rooms. The group has filed claims at an employment tribunal on the grounds of sexual harassment, discrimination, victimisation and breaches of the right to a private life, under article eight of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case is not scheduled to be heard until October. But it has been reported the Royal College of Nursing has urged the trust to comply with statutory provisions laid down in the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, which require all changing rooms to be male or female-only except when they are 'single lockable rooms'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Smith said if Ms Peggie wins her case, it will become all the more important for health boards, and Scottish ministers, to ensure they are complying with existing legislation. 'The immediate implications for the NHS in Scotland will be to ensure that they have lawful policies,' she said. 'It might focus minds at health boards that they are going to have to take some responsibility for sorting things out. They can't leave these kinds of policies to graduates with no background in law or human resources, and they're going to have to review all their policies for staff and patients. 'They are responsible whether they like it or not' 'Ever since the Supreme Court ruling, we have been pushing the government on policies which we don't regard as lawful, especially around schools and prisons. Their argument a lot of the time is that these organisations, like the NHS, are arms-length and that it's not up to the government to provide guidance, even though they've done just that in the past. They are responsible whether they like it or not.' Ms Smith added: 'A lot of organisations are putting off any changes because of the false narrative that's been created, which says the ruling is not law until the statutory guidance is approved by Parliament. But that's utter rubbish - the law is what the Supreme Court says it is. Unfortunately, a lot of people choose not to believe that.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sandie Peggie | Lisa Ferguson Ms Smith also suggested the intense scrutiny of NHS Fife's processes and practices may prevent other public bodies from contesting similar cases raised at employment tribunals in the future, describing it as a 'real embarrassment' for the health board. 'Even if they were to win at this stage, which I don't think is likely, I am sure it would go to appeal, and ultimately, they would lose,' she said. They have spent a vast amount of taxpayers' money on this, and it's been humiliating to hear some of the evidence, and the gossiping and bitchiness in the workplace. 'I think there'll be more cases and I think there will be more settlements. Wiser lawyers will be telling their clients that it is better for them to swallow whatever disadvantage comes from settling, because they're not going to win in the long term.' Political pressure and cost concerns The Peggie judgement will also have repercussions for NHS Fife. Already, senior figures in Scotland and elsewhere have reflected at length on the case, with many calling for changes even before a judgement is issued. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As part of cross-party condemnation of the health board, Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay is among those who have said senior managers should step down over its handling of the case, while SNP MSP Michelle Thomson has called on the members of NHS Fife's board to consider their positions. Elsewhere, Scottish Labour's Carol Mochan has said Holyrood's health committee should investigate the way in which the health board has handled the case. NHS Fife has come under extensive criticism. Picture: Fife Free Press | Fife Free Press That criticism is likely to continue, especially as the costs of defending the tribunal case mount up. NHS Fife has confirmed that as of the end of June, it had spent more than £258,000 on legal costs relating to the tribunal - a sum that includes counsel fees and services provided by NHS Scotland. But given the hearings that have taken place since then, one source suggested the total bill could reach in the region of £500,000 to £700,000 if not more. That sum would exclude any remedy made in Ms Peggie's favour should the health board lose its case. 'The costs of defending such a case, and eventually paying compensation, is likely to be enormous,' Ms Forstater said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
