
Trans doctor in nurse row lamented lack of guidelines on changing rooms
Dr Beth Upton said NHS Fife potentially missed an opportunity to intervene before the incident involving the doctor and the nurse Sandie Peggie in a female changing room at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023.
Peggie has taken the health board and Upton to an employment tribunal claiming she faced discrimination and harassment as a result of being forced to share female changing rooms with the doctor, who is biologically male but identifies as female.
Peggie confronted Upton in the women's changing rooms at the hospital's A&E department, telling Upton she believed the doctor had no right to be there.
Upton lodged a formal complaint with the board, claiming to have been subjected to a transphobic 'hate incident', which led to Peggie being suspended for several months. Peggie is now suing the health board and Dr Upton for alleged sexual harassment, belief discrimination, and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.
A previously unpublished document among hundreds included in an evidence bundle for the tribunal reveals Upton raised the absence of a clear transgender policy at the internal Fife Health and Social Care Partnership disciplinary hearing into Peggie's conduct.
• Janice Turner: Class snobbery is at heart of NHS gender war
The HR representative Melanie Jorgensen asked Upton at the conduct hearing in June if there had been a missed opportunity for intervention by NHS Fife before the changing-room incident.
The notes of the meeting state Upton said this was 'difficult to answer' and adds the doctor 'feels potentially there was a missed opportunity'.
Upton told the hearing it was 'clear the organisation do not have a policy'.
The notes continue: 'Beth Upton advised that she understands the legal side of things, but also feels a lot of this would have been easier if there had been a policy document that would have confirmed what to do in this situation.'
Upton's comments come after the pivotal Supreme Court judgment in April that ruled women are defined by biological sex under equalities law.
Trina Budge, director of For Women Scotland who brought the legal challenge to the Supreme Court, said: 'There absolutely should be a policy and it's unacceptable that they continue without one.
'This should have been dealt with as a priority after the Supreme Court judgment.
'The policy should have made it clear that men such as Dr Upton are not allowed in female changing rooms.
'It's just creating more disasters and more tribunals for the NHS — not just NHS Fife but throughout Scotland.'
Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns for the human-rights charity Sex Matters, which advocates for clarity about biological sex in law and life, said: 'This shows the risks of changing policy on the fly in response to one trans-identifying person's request.
• Sandie Peggie blames her upbringing for use of racial slurs
'A sign on a door saying 'Male' or 'Female' is already a statement of policy — that the space is for one sex only, in compliance with workplace regulations.
'That is what most people will understand the sign to mean. Employers are not free to choose a different meaning of 'single-sex', or a different interpretation of laws and statutory regulations. Every employer needs to follow the law as it stands.'
A spokeswoman for NHS Fife previously said: 'Throughout the course of the employment tribunal, NHS Fife has been clear that it will not comment on individuals or evidence while legal proceedings are ongoing.
'We remain respectful of the legal process and the role of the tribunal in considering all evidence presented.'
A Scottish government spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment further while judicial proceedings in an employment tribunal are ongoing.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
This new SPF from ESPA hydrates, protects and leaves skin naturally radiant with 92% of users agreeing
There's something quietly reassuring about a solid skincare routine, especially when it doesn't require a dozen complicated steps or leave you feeling slick. Still, for many of us SPF is the step that gets forgotten, skipped or reserved for holidays abroad. And who can blame us? Traditional sunscreens can feel chalky, greasy or leave behind a ghostly, stubborn white cast. The thing is: protecting your skin isn't just about beach days. With UV rays, blue light from screens and urban pollution all contributing to premature ageing, SPF really is an everyday essential – whether you're sitting on a sun-drenched patio or just replying to emails indoors. Enter ESPA's new Protect & Brighten Daily Skin Shield SPF 50 (£40, Designed to slot seamlessly into your morning routine, it promises comfortable and lightweight protection, and leaves your skin with a natural luminosity that looks fresh, not filtered. In fact, 92 per cent of users said it gave their skin a visible dewy glow. For those concerned about signs of ageing, or simply wanting to maintain a youthful-looking complexion, this may well be the SPF you've been searching for. So, what makes it stand out in a sea of sun protection? And what's behind these glow-giving claims? Let's take a look. More than sun care Unlike heavy-duty sunscreen sprays that sit on top of the skin, ESPA's Skin Shield is formulated like a luxurious moisturiser that just so happens to include SPF 50. It's powered by hydrating hyaluronic acid, antioxidant-rich beta carotene and Chinese butterfly bush extract, which help to defend against UV rays, blue light and pollution. Together, they offer more than just sun protection: they soothe, hydrate and actively help to reduce the visible signs of ageing. From fine lines to sun spots and uneven tone, the daily aggressors this product guards against are relevant year-round – not just during a heatwave. And because the texture is so lightweight and non-greasy, it layers easily over your existing moisturiser or under make-up (if you're wearing any), without pilling or feeling cakey. A 3-in-1 primer, protector and glow-booster The real beauty of ESPA's Skin Shield lies in its finish. Fast-absorbing and silky, it gives skin a subtle radiance that leaves you looking lit-from-within, naturally and without the strobe effect of a highlighter or shimmer. There's no white cast, no stickiness or even the sensation that you're wearing anything. It's the kind of multi-tasker we look to in the summer months: simplifying your morning routine but sacrificing neither sun protection nor skin smoothing. You can use it as your final skincare step, a smoothing primer or the one thing you slap on if you're running out the door. According to user trials, 96 per cent agreed their skin looked brighter after just two weeks of use and 83 per cent said fine lines and wrinkles appeared softened. For a no-makeup-makeup look, this one's doing the heavy lifting. For all skin types and every kind of day One of the biggest pain points with SPF is inclusivity, and ESPA has paid attention here. Skin Shield is wearable on all tones and textures, from dry and sensitive to oily or blemish-prone. It doesn't clog, flake or fight your base, and it's as comfortable for long hikes as it is for commuting. Add in the fact that you're getting broad-spectrum UVA/UVB coverage and oxidative stress protection in one simple step, and it starts to feel less like a luxury and more like a non-negotiable. Plus, with 20 per cent off (was £50, now £40, it's a timely excuse to elevate your skincare essentials before the seasons shift.


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Was everything brighter 40 years ago? How color perception changes as we age
Every now and then, a bit of nostalgia bait drifts across my social media feed, with people pining for the brighter colors of the past – the vivid hues of the Toys R Us logo, or a 90s McDonald's play zone. On Reddit, posters observe: 'As I get older it feels like life is losing its color,' and ask: 'Were colors brighter and more vibrant when I was younger?' Indeed, according to research from the UK's Science Museum Group, there's been a stark increase in gray everyday objects since the mid-20th century. But this dullification may go beyond the modern preponderance of ashen cars, sad beige nurseries and millennial gray apartments. Scientists believe that color perception itself can fade, altering how the world appears. Depending on how your eyes – and brain – age, the bright red balloon you remember from your seventh birthday party might not look as vivid if you came across it again at 93. Changes in color perception can occur for several reasons. One common factor is structural shifts in the eye. For instance, a cataract – a condition that clouds the eye's lens – can gradually tint vision with a yellow-brown 'brunescent' hue. In the US, about 4m cataract surgeries are performed annually. A brunescent lens 'can pull the blue and green out' of the world around us, says Dr Andrew Iwach of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. After a cataract is removed, the difference in color clarity afterward can be so striking that Iwach wears a bright blue tie to delight his recovering patients. Changes in color perception can also be caused by glaucoma or macular degeneration. Iwach recommends routine eye exams, and says if you notice this type of change, see an ophthalmologist. Research from 2024 found that up to 15% of global dementia cases could be linked to problems with color perception issues, meaning that an eye exam can be an important step in screening and mitigating the disease. Some medications can also affect color perception, says Iwach – namely Viagra (pilots are required to abstain from the drug eight hours before flying lest it affect their perception of blue hues) and some types of heart and tuberculosis medications. Yet research suggests that even in the absence of eye disease or medication use, color perception can shift over the course of our lives. Dr Janneke van Leeuwen, a social neuroscientist and honorary research fellow at University College London's Queen Square Institute of Neurology, noticed a subtle trend in behavioral studies from the last three decades: older adults consistently rated colors duller than younger participants did. Van Leeuwen set out to investigate: do we truly see the world differently as we age? And if so, is it the eyes or the brain driving that change? Her 2023 study involved 17 young adults and 20 older adults in 'an eye tracking experiment' featuring 26 colors, which varied in lightness (how light or dark a color appears) and saturation (how pure and intense a color appears). Using a camera that recorded pupil diameter 1,000 times per second, Van Leeuwen's team observed how participants' pupils reacted to each color. They found a reduction in the way older people's pupils responded to more highly saturated colors, even when correcting for the shrunken baseline pupil sizes that come with age. Thus, it seems some older adults may genuinely perceive the world as less colorful. Van Leeuwen recalls one participant saying: 'Oh, it's a shame there's not a real punchy red.' 'I was thinking: 'Well, you're looking at one!'' she says. The issue, Van Leeuwen explains, 'doesn't necessarily originate in the eyes, but in the brain'. Pupil responses are controlled by the Edinger-Westphal nucleus, a midbrain structure that receives input from the retina and the visual cortex. This means that pupillary reactions reflect both what the eyes detect and how the brain processes that information. Sign up to Well Actually Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life after newsletter promotion The brain becomes less sensitive to how saturated and vivid colors are not because the eyes fail to register them, says Van Leeuwen, but because the visual cortex may no longer interpret them with the same intensity. 'Older adults seem to be particularly less sensitive to the intensity of colors on the magenta-green pathway,' she adds, referring to the anatomical structures in the eye that help process colors. More research is needed to understand why, but the cause probably lies in how the cones in our eyes interact with color-processing pathways in the brain. Currently, Van Leeuwen is following up her study with an investigation into how differences in saturation perception influence the way colors make younger and older adults feel. The 2023 study's findings align with a phenomenon called the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch effect: the brain's tendency to perceive highly saturated colors as brighter than less saturated ones, even if their actual lightness is the same. Believed to be an evolutionary trait for important evaluations such as the ripeness of fruit, this effect also takes place in the primary visual cortex. This 'further supports our findings that the decline in sensitivity in color saturation in healthy ageing originates in the brain, and not the eyes', says Van Leeuwen. There is no sign this loss of saturation perception follows the same process as the onset of certain types of dementia, Van Leeuwen emphasizes – many older adults experience vision declines without developing dementia, which has multiple risk factors. However, the study does provide insight into how our brains change as a result of normal, healthy ageing, which is useful context in the study of neurological disease. Is there anything you can do to stop age-related declines in saturation perception? Researchers don't currently believe that lifestyle habits can meaningfully influence this process. But there's some evidence that the brain can be 'trained' to see the world differently. Anya Hurlbert, a color and vision scientist at Newcastle University, points to a 2020 study involving EnChroma glasses, which feature a saturation-boosting tint to help reduce the effects of some types of color blindness. Participants with red-green color perception deficiencies who wore the glasses reported seeing increased color saturation even after removing them. Alternatively, simply surrounding oneself with more intense colors could help. As Van Leeuwen notes, 'Older adults tend to evaluate more saturated colors more positively than younger adults … which seems to suggest they might need the extra stimulation.' Just another reason to see the new Wes Anderson movie.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Council fined after ‘preventable' death of care home dementia patient
A council has been fined following the 'preventable' death of a dementia patient who went missing from a care home during the night. Allan MacLeod, 69, disappeared from his bedroom at St Brendan's Care Home in Castlebay on the Isle of Barra in the early hours of March 9 last year without staff realising. He was found near the home about four hours after going missing, with facial injuries consistent with falling, and died a short time later in hospital. Western Isles Council was fined £80,000 at Lochmaddy Sheriff Court on Wednesday August 6 after it admitted breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) said. Mr MacLeod had been a resident at the home – one of five operated by the council throughout the Western Isles – for about six months at the time of his death. An HSE investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) determined that he had made several previous attempts to leave the home. It found that any measures that staff had taken to mitigate this, by fitting an electronic tag to his clothing that indicated his whereabouts, had been defeated by Mr MacLeod removing it. HSE said that on March 8, having been settled in bed at about 9pm, hourly checks were carried out to ensure he was alright however, at 2am on March 9, staff found that he was not in his bed. Investigations found that he had left the home via the only door that did not have an alarm which was located 10 metres from his bedroom. Following a search involving the coastguard, RNLI and firefighters, he was found near the home on the patio of a residential property. HSE inspector Ashley Fallis said: 'This was a tragic and preventable death. The council should have made sure the home had stronger measures in place with Mr MacLeod's risks already known and assessed. 'Although changes have since been made, they came too late to prevent his death.' HSE said that after Mr MacLeod's death, the home introduced a regime of half hourly checks on residents. Arrangements had already been made to install keypad entry systems on all doors, but this work had not been completed before he died. A spokesperson for Western Isles Council (Comhairle nan Eilean Siar) said: 'Comhairle nan Eilean Siar once again extends its sincere condolences to the family and friends of the late Mr Allan F MacLeod for the circumstances surrounding his tragic passing on 9 March 2024. 'Yesterday at Lochmaddy Sheriff Court, the comhairle accepted that health and safety shortcomings contributed to the tragic incident and pled guilty to the charges brought by the procurator fiscal. 'The comhairle hopes that the conclusion of this case will offer the family some closure. 'The door security system in use at St Brendan's Care Home was a key factor in this case. 'A new door security system had been procured but at the time of the incident the works to install it had not been completed. 'Comhairle nan Eilean Siar is committed to the delivery of high standards of care to all residents in our residential homes. In this instance these standards were not fully met. 'The comhairle has implemented health and safety improvements and will continue to work with the Care Inspectorate to ensure that our residential homes operate to the highest possible standards.'