logo
Transcript: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,' April 6, 2025

Transcript: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,' April 6, 2025

Wakala News06-04-2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick that aired on 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan' on April 6, 2025.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Secretary, welcome to 'Face the Nation.'
COMMERCE SECRETARY HOWARD LUTNICK: Great to be here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We see about 60% of Americans have money in the stock market, which mean that retirees could be just as concerned as hedge fund managers this morning. Did you expect this level of shock in the financial markets?
SEC. LUTNICK: Well, you've got to realize this is a national security issue. I mean, we don't make medicine in this country anymore. We don't make ships. We don't have enough steel and aluminum to fight a battle, right? All our semiconductors are made overseas. So every button we press when we try to start our car or even use our microwave, these are all semiconductors. They're all made elsewhere. We've got to start to protect ourselves, and we've got to stop having all the countries of the world ripping us off. We have a $1.2 trillion trade deficit, and the rest of the world has a surplus with us. They're earning our money. They're taking our money, and Donald Trump has seen this, and he's going to stop it. So it is going to be a big change. Of course, it's going to be a big change, but the rest of the world has been ripping us off for all these many years. Donald Trump has seen it. He's spoken about it–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –I understand that and–
SEC. LUTNICK: –and he's just not going to take it anymore. And that's his model.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And that was abundantly clear during the presidential campaign, how much the president truly believes in tariffs and putting them at the center of his economic policy, but you saw absolute panic in the global markets. Did you expect that or were you surprised?
SEC. LUTNICK: No, I think the point is, you need to reset the power of the United States of America and reset it against all our allies and our enemies alike. The- the idea that all the countries of the world can run trade surpluses with America and buy our things with us– remember, $1.2 trillion. in 1980 we were a net investor- meaning we owned more of the rest of the world than they owned of us–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah, it's a different world now, it's a different market.
SEC. LUTNICK: And now- and now they own 18- they own $18 trillion of us, net. So that means the rest of the- every year when we run a $1.2 trillion deficit, the rest of the world buys $1.2 trillion of America, and it goes up and up and up. And eventually we're not going to own America, and we are going to be owned by the rest of the world.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Are you talking about–
SEC. LUTNICK: Imagine if we had a war and we can't build a ship, we can't fly a plane. We can't build our own planes–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay–
SEC. LUTNICK: –we don't have our own semiconductors. This is what the President is here to fix for America. It's- he- in his hands, and he wants to fix America. This is his chance–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Understood. So–
SEC. LUTNICK: –to fix America, and we need him to fix it for our children and our grandchildren.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, but for- for businesses to do what you're doing, because what I hear you laying out there is a plan to re-industrialize the United States and to bring companies back to America. For a CEO to choose to invest–
SEC. LUTNICK: Well said. Well said.
MARGARET BRENNAN: –but for a CEO to make those decisions- you know this- they need certainty. They need to know if it costs them more to stay overseas, or if it costs them more to move here. So can you give them clarity, so that they don't just cut jobs because they're dealing with the cost of these tariff- tariffs. Can you tell them how long they're staying in place?
SEC. LUTNICK: Absolutely. The United States of America is going to protect the people who invest in America. Trillions and trillions of dollars- you heard the President speak about it- are coming to invest in America. This is the economy of the world. We are the consumer of the world, and companies need to build it here, and we will protect them for building it here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, so–
SEC. LUTNICK: We will help the American workers, yes. American workers are more expensive, but they're better.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I got it–
SEC. LUTNICK: We're going to protect all the factories that come to America, and that's what's coming here. So, the President is on it–
(CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, is the 10% tariff permanent?
SEC. LUTNICK: He's going to protect them- well, remember, this is a national security issue–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –I got it. Is the 10% tariff permanent?
SEC. LUTNICK: –and he needs to address our budget deficit- that- the, you know, the laws of America are the laws of America, he would like it to be that we need to protect the companies that invest here, and we are going to protect the companies that invest here. That is the policy of the United States of America. That's why trillions of dollars are coming here. The rip off of the- of the United States of America is over. All these companies are going to come and invest here. That's what they're doing. That's why they've committed trillions of dollars. They know this is the economy–
MARGARET BRENNAN: – Okay, Mr. Secretary, though–
SEC. LUTNICK: –this is the place to go.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Secretary, the campaign's over. You won. So I'm asking what the plan is. So the treasury secretary said on another network, 'we're going to hold the course.' 'It's not the kind of thing you can negotiate away in days or weeks.' That makes it sound like the tariffs are staying in place at least for days or weeks. Is that correct? Or is the President considering postponing implementation to negotiate?
SEC. LUTNICK: There is no postponing. They are definitely going to stay in place for days and weeks. That is sort of obvious. The president needs to reset global trade. Everybody has a trade surplus and we have a trade deficit. We are paying away our future and our lives. Come- the countries of the world are ripping us off, and it's got to end. The President has made it crystal, crystal clear. This is the policy we're going to protect. The factories that come build in America, we're going to protect them. They're going to be successful. That's why they're going to build in America, the greatest economy in the earth. All of these companies are going to come and build here.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So when three of the President's other economic advisers, who are on other networks today, say that 50 different countries have been calling the White House to try to talk about the tariffs, what does that mean? Because that makes it sound like there is a negotiation, which is different from saying the tariffs are permanent.
SEC. LUTNICK: Well, what it shows is that all these countries know that they've been ripping us off, and the day has come for that to end. Now the problem is, it's not just tariffs- like, I'll give you an example, like Vietnam said they'd like to be zero-zero. Remember, Vietnam sends us $120 billion worth of goods every year–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes, cheap manufacturing
SEC. LUTNICK: And we send them about $12 billion- wait, we send them $12 billion. So it's not the tariffs. It has nothing to do with tariffs. If they went to zero-zero, they would go to 200 billion with us. We need to stop the rip off, and zero-zero is- is the way–
MARGARET BRENNAN: –I know but we don't have zero-zero, sir.
SEC. LUTNICK: –to make it more of a rip off. We need–
MARGARET BRENNAN: We don't have zero-zero actually, because when we saw the president stand in the Rose Garden holding up that chart that you helped make, that- that wasn't actually tariffs. That was actually confusing to investors, because it was some kind of other formula, and the countries themselves seemed kind of random. Like, why are the Heard and McDonald Islands, which don't export to the United States and are quite literally inhabited by penguins, why do they face a 10% tariff? Did you use AI to generate this?
SEC. LUTNICK: No. No, the idea- look, the idea is that there are no countries left off.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Why are they on the list?
SEC. LUTNICK: Because the idea- what happens is, if you leave anything off the list, the countries that try to basically arbitrage America go through those countries to us. Any country- like we had tariffs, the President put tariffs on China, right, in 2018, and then what China started doing is they started going through other countries to America. They just built through other countries, through America. And so, the President knows that, he's tired of it, and he's going to fix that. So basically he said, look, I can't let any part of the world be a place where China or other countries can ship through them–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Through the Heard Islands.
SEC. LUTNICK: –so the end of those loopholes- these ridiculous loopholes. And now what he's trying to say is, I'm going to fix the trade deficit of the United States of America. It's a national security issue. We need to make medicine. We need to make semiconductors. We need to make ships. We need to have steel and aluminum. Come on, we need the greatness of America to actually be built in America. And he's tired of getting ripped off by the rest of the world.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, but just to be clear, April 9, the so-called retaliatory tariffs- the reciprocal tariffs, I should say. Are those coming or are they open to negotiation?
SEC. LUTNICK: The tariffs are coming. He announced it, and he wasn't kidding. The tariffs are coming. Of course they are.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay. Is the administration considering any kind of offset, any kind of subsidy? You mentioned the first administration, there was some bailout to farmers to help them deal with the pain from Chinese retaliation. Are you looking at that now?
SEC. LUTNICK: I'm- not that I've- I have not participated in any meetings with respect to that. The country is focused on- you realize, trillions of dollars of factories are going to be built in America. That's huge GDP. The factories being built in America are huge GDP–
(BEGIN CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: That takes years–
SEC. LUTNICK: And that is going to matter to us.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And you said that robots are going to fill those jobs. So those aren't union worker jobs.
SEC. LUTNICK: No, it's really automated jobs. It's automated factories- automated factories. But the key is, who's going to build the factories? Who's going to operate the factories? Who's going to make them work? Great American workers. You know, we are going to replace–
MARGARET BRENNAN: You said robots on other networks. You said that to FOX.
SEC. LUTNICK: –the armies of millions of people- well, remember, the army of millions and millions of human beings screwing in little- little screws to make iPhones, that kind of thing is going to come to America. It's going to be automated and great Americans- the tradecraft of America, is going to fix them, is going to work on them. They're going to be mechanics. There's going to be HVAC specialists. There's going to be electricians, the tradecraft of America. Our high school educated Americans- the core to our workforce, is going to have the greatest resurgence of jobs in the history of America to work on these high-tech factories, which are all coming to America. That's what's going to build our next generation of America.
(END CROSSTALK)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Are you concerned, in the time it will take for a company to move to America, that it will benefit China in the- in the immediate term, that other markets will look to other suppliers instead of dealing with the United States?
SEC. LUTNICK: That is ridiculous. The problem is, everyone in the world sells to us. Our economy is the consumer of the world. We are the only one with a trade deficit. The rest of the world has a trade surplus. Why does Europe have a trade surplus? Is there something about Europe that's special? Seriously, are they a different world than we are? Why are they selling 200 billion a year–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Oh, Mr. Secretary.
SEC. LUTNICK: –more to us. It's because it's not fair. The rules are made not fair, and President Trump is going to fix them, and he's doing it for America, and he's doing it for your children and mine and our grandchildren. This is the moment that the United States of America takes hold of itself, and Donald Trump's been talking about this his whole life. This is Donald Trump's agenda, and we're all here to help him execute it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Laura Loomer's hunt for disloyalty in Trump's government — and where she's looking next
Inside Laura Loomer's hunt for disloyalty in Trump's government — and where she's looking next

Egypt Independent

time6 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

Inside Laura Loomer's hunt for disloyalty in Trump's government — and where she's looking next

Laura Loomer, the controversial far-right activist with a direct line to President Donald Trump, has taken credit for a slew of recent high-profile administration firings. But she sounds more exasperated than triumphant. In an interview with CNN last week, the Trump confidante touted her role in ousting the country's chief vaccine regulator, a senior national security lawyer and a decorated cybersecurity expert tapped for a post at West Point. It was a remarkable display of influence for someone with no formal government experience and whose online antics once resulted in a ban by social media companies. She said it's not nearly enough — and she's grown frustrated with White House officials ignoring her offers to help vet candidates. 'If I have to do it on the outside because of internal resistance, then so be it,' Loomer said in a phone call. Armed with more than 1.7 million followers on X and Trump's cell phone number, Loomer has taken on the self-appointed role of 'loyalty enforcer,' scrutinizing the backgrounds of various administration officials for any inkling they once harbored doubts about the president. She then amplifies her findings online, keeping up the drumbeat until White House officials — many of whom see her overtures as doing more harm than good — can no longer ignore it. 'She's a loose cannon,' said one Trump adviser who shares that view and was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'But she has a following. It is what it is.' Inside the administration, recent episodes have only reinforced the growing perception that Loomer, despite aides' best efforts to limit her access within the White House, is nevertheless finding increasing success in influencing its decision-making from the outside. Her influence underscores the persistent personnel challenges, internal conflicts and frequent dismissals that have come to define the Trump administration since he first stepped foot in the White House. Trump, who values loyalty above all else, publicly praised Loomer's efforts on Sunday, describing her as a 'patriot.' Loomer sees disloyal operatives scattered throughout the administration, Cabinet officials misleading the MAGA faithful and a president who has yet to deliver on promises of retribution from his campaign. 'I'm not blaming Trump, but people will probably start to blame Trump if he doesn't use these opportunities to fire some Cabinet members,' she said. In a statement to CNN, White House spokesman Kush Desai did not engage on Loomer specifically, but asserted Trump 'has assembled the best and brightest talent to put Americans and America First.' 'It is not only appropriate, but critical for the Administration to recruit the most qualified and experienced staffers who are totally aligned with President Trump's agenda to Make America Great Again,' Desai said. Next targets Attorney General Pam Bondi may sit at the top of her blacklist — Loomer has publicly called for her firing several times — but she's not alone. Loomer also has doubts about Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, blaming her for Trump's softer tone of late toward undocumented farm workers. And Loomer has turned her sizable megaphone against people now working at the Department of Health and Human Services under Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a former Democrat whose alliance with Trump remains a source of her skepticism. Neither Bondi, Rollins nor Kennedy appear in immediate danger of becoming Loomer's next victims; Trump has expressed support for all three. Loomer said they have not reached out to her about her concerns, despite her ongoing efforts to dig up dirt on their hires. But one embattled Cabinet head has: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Loomer said she recently spoke with Hegseth, whom she's known for a decade, about her work finding disloyal employees within the Pentagon. Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed the two spoke, telling CNN in a statement that Hegseth 'appreciates Laura Loomer's outside advocacy.' US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth waits for the arrival of Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar during an Honor Cordon at the Pentagon on July 1, in Arlington, Virginia.'Personnel is policy, and Laura has taken that motto to heart,' Parnell said, adding: 'Qualified individuals who love our country and support the Administration's priorities will continue to be integral to our efforts.' Loomer has presented three more targets to her audience: Miami Republican Rep. Carlos Gimenez, whom she sparred with online, US Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, due to his sprawling overseas businesses; and Trump's nominee to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, David LaCerte, over his legal work for big banks. The anatomy of getting 'Loomered' The recent ouster of a top public health official served as a window into how she pushes to oust Trump administration officials — what has become known in Washington as getting 'Loomered.' On July 20, Loomer began a relentless campaign against Vinay Prasad, the head of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the US Food and Drug Administration, over his handling of key drug approvals and a series of years-old tweets expressing support for Democratic politicians and policies, claiming it was proof he was a 'leftist saboteur.' Within hours of posting her research online, Loomer sent it to the White House, she told CNN. A week later, Loomer unearthed audio of Prasad from a 2021 podcast where he joked he had stabbed a voodoo doll of Trump, along with other disparaging remarks about the president. Loomer said she sent the clip to Sergio Gor, the director of White House personnel. Prasad has not disputed the authenticity of the audio. Loomer's posts ricocheted quickly among Trump allies and heightened scrutiny of Prasad inside the administration. On day 10 of her crusade, the White House decided it'd had enough. Loomer is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on June 5. Greg Kahn/The New York Times/Redux White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told FDA Commissioner Marty Makary on Tuesday that he needed to let go of Prasad, his chief science officer and close confidant, putting an abrupt end to his tenure after less than three months, two people familiar with the matter said. Wiles and other top aides had determined that the Loomer-led campaign risked mushrooming into yet another distraction for the White House, those two people said. The sense was they needed to contain it before Trump faced the press after returning from a trip to Scotland. 'They knew that [Trump] was going to have to deal with this,' said one of the people familiar with the matter. 'So they made the decision to take him out.' The departure came over the objections of Makary and Kennedy, who had vehemently defended Prasad — a controversial figure in health circles handpicked for his willingness to overhaul the nation's vaccine protocols — to White House officials, lawmakers and other Trump allies in recent days, the two people familiar and a third person briefed on the matter said. The decision so significantly dismayed Kennedy and Makary that, even after Prasad's departure, they discussed enlisting Medicare and Medicaid chief Mehmet Oz — a longtime friend of Trump — to corner the president at a Wednesday health event and press him to reverse course, one of the people familiar with the matter said. But that plan was rendered moot once Prasad's ouster went public the night before. 'I understand the paranoia and the desire to root out bad people even if it involves taking out some good people,' one of the people familiar with the matter said. 'But it's just true: Laura Loomer fired the head drug regulator for the United States.' HHS spokesman Rich Danker said in a statement to CNN that 'the FDA informed the White House on Tuesday that Dr. Prasad had stepped down.' He did not respond to several questions seeking to verify the above details. Prasad could not be reached for comment. Other supporters of Prasad used their own online platforms to accuse Loomer of working in concert with the pharmaceutical industry and others who objected to FDA decisions he'd overseen on rare drugs. Loomer denied to CNN that she was working with Prasad's other detractors. She said her concerns about Prasad grew out of the FDA's decision earlier this year to approve a new Covid-19 vaccine manufactured by Novavax. (It later emerged that Prasad had objected to the FDA's decision and had overridden the agency's experts to recommend against the broad use of two other Covid-19 vaccines.) 'I don't trust anybody' Loomer's inflammatory rhetoric toward Muslims and promotion of conspiracy theories have made her a controversial figure in Trump's orbit for years, and his advisers have long attempted to minimize her interactions with the president. She has said aides repeatedly step in to block her when Trump has attempted to hire her over the years. A self-described investigative journalist, Loomer has also pushed for a White House press credential, to no avail. In this September 2024 photo, Laura Loomer arrives at Philadelphia International Airport on The Trump Organization's Boeing who runs a small team of researchers, argued she would be more effective if the White House let her oversee hiring from the inside. She said that lately she's become inundated with tips, including from within the administration, about certain staffers. She said she vets them all. 'Aren't they supposed to know these people are a problem before Susie has to waste her time dealing with this lack of vetting?' Loomer said. Prasad is just the latest of a growing collection of government officials to get 'Loomered.' In the administration's first six months, Loomer has claimed credit for helping spur the removal of several staffers at the White House and elsewhere in government, including a string of firings at the National Security Agency and on the National Security Council in early April that followed a phone call and an Oval Office meeting with Trump. Amid the fallout, national security adviser Michael Waltz, a regular target of Loomer's attacks, was pushed out of that position as well. Just days before Prasad's ouster, the NSA removed another top official, general counsel April Falcon Doss, after Loomer amplified a report criticizing Doss for previously working for the Senate Intelligence Committee's Democratic staff. On Wednesday, she celebrated after Trump's Army secretary ordered the US Military Academy at West Point to rescind its appointment of Biden-era cyber defense official Jen Easterly as a distinguished chair. Loomer had recently taken aim at Easterly on X, singling her out in a post that alleged without evidence that 'there are some serious moles' at the Department of Defense. Very few have demonstrated such unflinching loyalty to Trump as Loomer. With thousands of jobs to fill across Trump's administration, she concedes that some appointees will inevitably have what she considers checkered records, including past criticism of the president. Some of the most prominent figures in Trump's administration — Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, for example — were once harsh Trump detractors. She said the concerns she is raising about certain hires go beyond ideological disagreements. Rubio and Vance, she noted, have publicly made amends and earned back favor with Trump and his supporters. Still, that doesn't mean they're immune from future scrutiny. 'I don't trust anybody. I'm not friends with anybody,' Loomer said. 'That's why I have four dogs.'

The Trump administration takes a very Orwellian turn
The Trump administration takes a very Orwellian turn

Egypt Independent

timea day ago

  • Egypt Independent

The Trump administration takes a very Orwellian turn

Back in March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeted at the Smithsonian Institution that began as follows: 'Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth.' Despite the high-minded rhetoric, many worried the order was instead a thinly veiled effort to rewrite history more to Trump's liking. The order, for example, cited a desire to remove 'improper ideology' – an ominous phrase, if there ever was one – from properties like the Smithsonian. Those concerns were certainly bolstered this week. We learned that some historical information that recently vanished from the Smithsonian just so happens to have been objective history that Trump really dislikes: a reference to his two impeachments. The Smithsonian said that a board containing the information was removed from the National Museum of American History last month after a review of the museum's 'legacy content.' The board had been placed in front of an existing impeachment exhibit in September 2021. Just to drive this home: The exhibit itself is about 'Limits of Presidential Power.' And suddenly examples of the biggest efforts by Congress to limit Trump's were gone. The Impeachment exhibit in the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section within 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition inside the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History, after the museum removed explicit reference to President Donald Trump. Annabelle Gordon/Reuters It wasn't immediately clear that the board was removed pursuant to Trump's executive order. The Washington Post, which broke the news, reported that a source said the content review came after pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director. In other words, we don't know all the details of precisely how this went down – including whether the removal was specifically requested, or whether museum officials decided it might be a good way to placate Trump amid pressure. The Smithsonian said in a statement Saturday that it was 'not asked by any administration' or government official to remove content and that an updated version of the exhibit will ultimately mention all impeachment efforts, including Trump's. But it's all pretty Orwellian. And it's not the only example. Trump has always been rather blatant about his efforts to rewrite history with self-serving falsehoods and rather shameless in applying pressure on the people who would serve as impartial referees of the current narrative. But this week has taken things to another level. On Friday, Trump fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This came just hours after that agency delivered Trump some very bad news: the worst non-Covid three-month jobs numbers since 2010. Some Trump allies have attempted to put a good face on this, arguing that Dr. Erika McEntarfer's removal was warranted because large revisions in the job numbers betrayed shoddy work. But as he did with the firing of then-FBI Director James B. Comey eight years ago, Trump quickly undermined all that. He told Newsmax that 'we fired her because we didn't believe the numbers today.' To the extent Trump did lay out an actual evidence-based case for firing McEntarfer, that evidence was conspiratorial and wrong, as CNN's Daniel Dale documented Friday. And even some Republican senators acknowledged this might be precisely as draconian and self-serving as it looked. Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, for one, called it 'kind of impetuous' to fire the BLS head before finding out whether the new numbers were actually wrong. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the president had hoped for,' said Lummis, who is not often a Trump critic. Recruiters and job seekers speak during a job fair hosted by the Cook County government to support federal workers in Chicago, Illinois, on Thursday, June 26, 2025. Jamie Kelter Davis/Bloomberg/Getty Images Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina added that if Trump 'just did it because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up.' Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska both worried that Trump's move would make it so people can't trust the data the administration is putting out. And that's the real problem here. It's not so much that Trump appears to be firing someone as retaliation; it's the message it sends to everyone else in a similar position. The message is that you might want that data and those conclusions to be to Trump's liking, or else. It's a recipe for getting plenty of unreliable data and conclusions. And even to the extent that information is solid, it will seed suspicions about the books having been cooked – both among regular Americans and, crucially, among those making key decisions that impact the economy. What happens if the next jobs report is great? Will the markets believe it? We've certainly seen plenty of rather blunt Trump efforts to control such narratives and rewrite history before. A sampling: All of it reinforces the idea that Trump is trying to consolidate power by pursuing rather heavy-handed and blatant tactics. But if there's a week that really drove home how blunt these efforts can be, it might be this one.

Trump Threatens UK Drugmakers With 60-Day Deadline to Cut US Prices, 'We'll Use Every Tool We Have'
Trump Threatens UK Drugmakers With 60-Day Deadline to Cut US Prices, 'We'll Use Every Tool We Have'

See - Sada Elbalad

time2 days ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Trump Threatens UK Drugmakers With 60-Day Deadline to Cut US Prices, 'We'll Use Every Tool We Have'

Taarek Refaat President Donald Trump has issued a stark ultimatum to British pharmaceutical giants, warning they have 60 days to slash the prices of their medicines in the U.S. market or face aggressive action from his administration. 'We will use every tool in our arsenal,' Trump vowed on Saturday, targeting 17 drug companies in an escalating campaign to force them to match the reduced prices they offer in developing nations for the U.S. healthcare system. The move comes as the administration rolls out a wave of new tariffs on dozens of countries, including punitive duties on neighboring Canada, intensifying an already heated global trade climate. British drugmakers AstraZeneca and GSK saw their shares tumble amid investor fears over White House pressure, as Trump seeks to deliver on his pledge to bring down prescription costs for Americans. Analysts warn the policy could have ripple effects across the UK's National Health Service (NHS), which benefits from strong bargaining power with suppliers due to its massive purchasing scale, an advantage that could erode if companies are forced to harmonize prices globally. Trump is pushing for drugmakers to apply a 'most-favored nation' pricing model to Medicaid, the program serving low-income Americans, effectively demanding that the U.S. pay no more than the lowest price offered internationally. 'Cooperation toward global price parity in medicines would be the most effective path for companies, governments, and American patients alike,' Trump said in a statement. But his letter to pharmaceutical executives carried a blunt warning, 'If you refuse, we will use every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from unfair and excessive pricing practices. Americans need lower drug prices today, not tomorrow.' The president's remarks rattled markets, wiping an estimated £16 billion off the European pharmaceutical sector's market value amid concerns that lower U.S. prices could be offset by higher costs elsewhere in the world. Skeptics question whether Trump has the legal authority to impose direct drug price cuts, noting a similar effort during his first term was struck down in court. Back then, Trump accused current pricing models of 'subsidizing socialism abroad' by selling identical medicines, made in the same factories, at cheaper rates overseas, fueling inflated prices at home. Saturday's warning coincided with Trump signing an executive order imposing new tariffs on 68 countries plus the European Union. Canada was hit particularly hard, with duties raised from 25% to 35%, over what the White House called Ottawa's 'failure to cooperate' in halting the flow of illicit drugs, especially fentanyl, into the U.S. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney defended his country's efforts, citing 'historic investments in border security to apprehend drug traffickers and end migrant smuggling.' Switzerland, stunned by tariffs of 39%, far higher than anticipated, said it would continue negotiations with Washington to defuse the trade escalation. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store