Five key findings from the NT coroner's inquest into Kumanjayi Walker's death in police custody
WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this article contains the name and image of an Indigenous person who has died, used with the permission of their family.
This story contains racist and offensive language and images, as well as references to sexual assault.
The coroner made findings about Kumanjayi Walker's upbringing in remote central Australia, plagued by poverty and health issues, as well as his struggle to cope at school, because of his disabilities.
Mr Walker was deaf in one ear and was likely born with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD).
"From the age of 13 to 18, Kumanjayi spent a considerable period of time in juvenile detention or under some restraint, such as bail or subject to a court order," Judge Armitage said.
The coroner also explored Zachary Rolfe's background; his previous career in the military and prior uses of force.
Through examination of his text messages, she found the use of racial slurs was "normalised" between officers.
"The purpose of receiving this evidence was to investigate whether Mr Rolfe held racist views, what the consequence of those views might have been for his conduct on 9 November 2019, why he might have held those views and how they might be prevented in the future," she wrote.
Here are five of the key findings in the report.
Ultimately, Judge Armitage found Kumanjayi Walker's death was "avoidable" and the failed arrest of the 19-year-old was "a case of officer induced jeopardy".
"[It's] an expression that describes situations where officers needlessly put themselves in danger," Judge Armitage wrote.
The coroner found Mr Rolfe, "a very junior officer" did not prioritise safety in the arrest of a "vulnerable teenager", such as Mr Walker, and made a series of "flawed decisions that significantly increased the risk of a fatal interaction with a member of the public".
Local Yuendumu Sergeant, Julie Frost, had devised a so-called "5am arrest plan", to effect a safe arrest of Mr Walker in the early hours of November 10, in the presence of a local officer who knew him.
Mr Walker was wanted for allegedly breaching a court order, and days before his death, threatening two other police officers with an axe.
But the coroner found Mr Rolfe "jettisoned" the 5am arrest plan — which Judge Armitage also found "was not without its weaknesses" — and substituted a "vastly inferior approach" which ended in Mr Walker's death.
Judge Armitage found that she could not definitively rule that Zachary Rolfe's racist attitudes contributed to Kumanjayi Walker's death, however she also said it could not be ruled out.
"That I cannot exclude that possibility is a tragedy for Kumanjayi's family and community who will always believe that racism played an integral part in Kumanjayi's death," Judge Armitage said.
Judge Armitage said that Mr Rolfe's text messages provided evidence of his "derisive attitude to female colleagues and some superiors".
She also noted that the messages revealed his "attraction to high adrenaline policing; and his contempt for 'bush cops' or remote policing; all of which had the potential to increase the likelihood of a fatal encounter with Kumanjayi".
The coroner found his "unsavoury views" were consciously or unconsciously embedded in the decisions he made on the night Mr Walker was shot in Yuendumu.
The inquest reviewed a string of previously unseen body-worn camera videos of arrests made by Mr Rolfe prior to Kumanjayi Walker's death.
Some of them had been ruled inadmissible in the jury trial which acquitted the former officer of murder, manslaughter and engaging in a violent act causing death.
The coroner found, based on that evidence, there were at least five occasions that Mr Rolfe used "unnecessary force" and that he had a "tendency to rush into situations to 'get his man', without regard for his and others' safety, and in disregard of his training".
"There were instances where Mr Rolfe used force without proper regard for the risk of injury to persons, all of whom were Aboriginal boys or men, and significant injuries were caused to suspects because of his use of force.
"When this evidence is considered together with the contempt Mr Rolfe showed for the hands-off approach of Officers Hand and Smith on 6 November 2019 [when Mr Walker threatened them with an axe], it points to Mr Rolfe prioritising a show of force over potential peaceful resolutions," the coroner found.
The coroner noted "disturbing evidence" that Mr Rolfe had, on several occasions, recorded and shared videos of his uses of force during arrests.
"It is clear that a significant motivation for doing so was because he was proud of, was boasting about, and wished to be celebrated for, his physical feats of tactical skill or ability," the coroner wrote.
Coroner Elisabeth Armitage said the evidence she gathered over almost three years showed that Zachary Rolfe was not a "bad apple", but instead "the beneficiary of an organisation with hallmarks of institutional racism".
"To be clear, many of the police officers who gave evidence to the Inquest, impressed me as curious and culturally sensitive officers who had dedicated their working lives to serving the largely Aboriginal communities they were tasked to police," the coroner found.
However, after a series of "grotesque" racist mock awards were revealed at the inquest — handed out at Christmas parties by the force's most elite tactical unit — the coroner found racism was widespread.
"That no police member who knew of these awards reported them, is, in my view, clear evidence of entrenched, systemic and structural racism within the NT Police," she wrote.
Just hours before Kumanjayi Walker was shot, Yuendumu's local nurses had evacuated the community, fearing for their safety after a string of break-ins at their living quarters.
The coroner said she was not critical of their decision to leave, but made recommendations that NT Health improve its withdrawal processes, to make it clearer to community when staff intended to leave.
With no nurses in the community, Kumanjayi Walker was taken to the police station after the shooting — where he died on the floor of a police cell after receiving first aid from the officers.
"After Kumanjayi was shot, the fact that there was no operational local Health Clinic to treat him, exacerbated the trauma," the coroner wrote.
"Despite the suspicion of some members of the community, there was no collusion or pre-planning between NT Health and NT Police concerning the withdrawal of clinic staff from Yuendumu.
"To the contrary, there was a lack of communication between Health and Police and little awareness about what the other was doing in response to the apparently targeted break-ins."
The coroner found by the time Kumanjayi Walker passed away on November 9 2019, the medical retrieval flight had not yet left Alice Springs.
"In those circumstances, even if the clinic had remained open, there was no possibility of his survival."
The inquest's findings and formal recommendations are available in full here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Jaye Lee Walton denied bail after being charged with manslaughter of seventh-month-old baby
A father charged over the alleged domestic violence-related death of his seven-month-old son has been remanded in custody. It is alleged 42-year-old Jaye Lee Walton committed the manslaughter of his infant son, Reef Hunter Walton, while they were staying at a campsite at Chatsworth, on the Sunshine Coast, on Saturday morning. Mr Walton appeared via video link in the Ipswich Magistrates Court on Thursday morning. The court heard that a witness had told Mr Walton's partner, Amy Stevenson, that they "saw him throw him in" to a pond at the campsite, north of Gympie. Ms Stevenson also told police a woman at the campsite had approached her and said "the guys are saying they saw him throw him into the water", the court heard. Prosecutor Senior Sergeant Michael Read said police were yet to identify the people who made those claims and were actively searching for more witnesses. The court heard Ms Stevenson found Mr Walton lying asleep near the pond and saw the seven-month-old floating face down about ten metres out in the water. Mr Walton had taken the child to the toilet block half an hour earlier, the court heard. Ms Stevenson jumped into the pond and began performing CPR on her son while paramedics were called. The court heard, Ms Stevenson told police Mr Walton then woke up and was "smiling" and "oblivious" before allegedly fleeing on foot, only returning due to the actions of bystanders. The court was told Mr Walton didn't answer questions from police and consented to a breath test but then failed to take the test. The court also heard that Mr Walton was an alcoholic and had consumed "about four litres" of cask wine on the night before the incident. Ms Stevenson told police Mr Walton had slept in the car with their son, who was teething, so she could get a better night's sleep as she was to be the driver the next day, the prosecutor said. In her statement Ms Stevenson described Mr Walton as a "loving father" who was the child's primary carer. Due to the serious nature of the charges, Mr Walton was required to show cause in order to receive bail, and argue why detention was not justified. Mr Walton's lawyer, Mark Butler, argued the case was one of criminal negligence, but Magistrate Robert Walker said there was a "clear suggestion" more serious charges would follow. In rejecting the bail application, Magistrate Walker said Mr Walton's multiple alcohol-related traffic charges showed he was a danger to the public. Magistrate Walker said Mr Walton was also a danger to himself, and he was remanded in custody. The matter is expected to be heard in the Gympie Magistrates Court on August 4.

ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Meta falsely accuses Instagram user of breaking child exploitation rules
An Australian beautician says she is frustrated and disheartened after Meta suspended her business and personal accounts, falsely accusing her of posting child exploitation material. The morning of the ban, Madison Archer posted a video capturing her life as a mother and businesswoman, including a brief shot of her holding her daughter. She said she never posted anything untoward on her account and did not know what exactly triggered the suspension. But shortly after the June 14 post, Ms Archer received an email that her business's Instagram account had been suspended. Her case reflects a growing number of people in Australia and around the world complaining of harsh enforcement of account-banning and a lack of thorough review when mistakes are made. The email Ms Archer received from Meta said she had not followed community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity. "When I saw the email I initially thought it was a scam, so I didn't open it," Ms Archer told the ABC. "But when I logged into the Instagram app, a pop-up came up saying action was needed and I was like, 'What the hell?' "I felt sick because I'm so conscious of protecting my daughter as it is that I would never do anything they were accusing me of." In an effort to reinstate her account, she immediately appealed against the decision, believing the social media platform would see it was an error. An email from Meta said it would take 24–48 hours to provide a response. But within 15 minutes, an email said the appeal was unsuccessful and that the account would be permanently disabled on Instagram, leaving Ms Archer to suspect the process was entirely handled by AI. "If a human actually did the review they would see that I'm not sexually exploiting children or haven't even looked at any of that stuff on my platform," she said. Because all of Ms Archer's Meta platforms are linked, all her pages were suspended, including her personal Instagram and Facebook accounts. An option to escalate her appeal was never given, and her access to the accounts was only restored after the ABC contacted Meta for comment. When the accounts were disabled after the appeal, Ms Archer reached out to every Meta staff member whose contact details she could find in order to dispute the decision. She said the process was "incredibly difficult". "I had to create a new Facebook page and pay for Meta verification to even get in contact with a real person. "When I did manage to talk to someone, I was always met with the same answer: that it's a separate team and that I need to wait for the system to cool down and then hopefully I'll be given another chance to re-appeal." This advice seemed to contradict the initial information provided to Ms Archer when her first appeal failed — that further escalation would not be possible. At one point, she was even temporarily banned from contacting the support team because it said she had reached her "limit". "It's so disheartening that you put your trust in a platform that is designed to connect you with others, you follow the rules, and then your account can just be taken away with no proper support," she said. In a bid to rebuild nine years' worth of work building up a customer and subscriber base, Ms Archer created a new Instagram account, but was only able to attract about 2,000 of her followers — 9,000 shy of the previous number. "A lot of people that come across my profile were inclined to book [my business] from the portfolio of work they saw on my account. "They were also able to see the large following I had which backed my reputation. The ABC raised Ms Archer's case with Meta on July 15. Within hours, her account was reinstated. In an email sent to Ms Archer, seen by the ABC, the tech giant said: "We're sorry that we've got this wrong and that you weren't able to use Instagram for a while. Sometimes, we need to take action to help keep our community safe." Before her account was restored, Ms Archer also went through the process of paying a third party. She lost $1,500 to a scammer, who was referred to her by someone in the industry who is reputable and was successful in recovering their accounts. When asked by ABC News, Meta declined to comment on Ms Archer's case. "We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we've made a mistake," a Meta spokesperson said. Ms Archer's social media account is not the only one to have been falsely accused of breaching community standards. Other Australians contacted the ABC about the issue, including Katie, who said her personal Facebook account was suspended for "misrepresenting your identity". Katie said she had always used her own name, profile picture, email and phone number on the account she created in 2007. "I have 18 years of contacts on Facebook, which includes people from different cities and countries I've lived in, as well as deceased families and relatives," she said. "I use Marketplace to buy, sell and swap household items and children's clothing for my young family." In a similar case to Ms Archer, Katie said the Meta support team was "incredibly unhelpful". "Sometimes I can't access any support, and then when I do, the tickets are closed without a resolution," she said. "My account is still under review and it's been two and a half weeks with no updates." More than 30,000 people have signed a petition accusing Meta's moderation system of wrongly banning accounts and giving people no functional way to appeal. Thousands of people are also in Reddit forums dedicated to the subject. Many users have also posted on social media platforms such as X about being banned. Meta has previously acknowledged a "technical problem" with Facebook groups, but has denied its platforms are more widely affected. It is understood Meta has not seen evidence of a significant increase in incorrect enforcement of its rules. A Meta spokesperson did not answer ABC questions about why it wrongly accused Ms Archer of violating its policies. But according to an X post from Korean National Assembly member Minhee Choi, Meta has acknowledged the possibility of wrongful suspensions of accounts in her country: "Meta is currently conducting a global crackdown on activities related to child and youth pornography on social media platforms, including Instagram. During this process, they have acknowledged that some user accounts are being excessively blocked and are being restored sequentially, while they are working to identify specific issues," she said. University of Melbourne deputy head of school of computing and information systems Shaanan Cohney said large companies such as Meta had been using AI to identify accounts in breach of their guidelines for many years. "But what does change from time to time, though, is the specific AI techniques that they use," Dr Cohney said. "What these large platforms are doing behind the scenes is they're collecting a whole bunch of things called signals that might be an indicator that something is wrong or dangerous about an account. "Even if your account is innocent, but for some reason has a lot of these signals associated with it, it might be automatically picked up by one of these algorithms." Exactly what goes into the latest version of these algorithms, how they change and when they change are not known to the public. Dr Cohney said information like this was a "trade secret". "You could say that the public should have a right to know what's in these algorithms because it can impact people pretty deeply because of the way in which these platforms are integrated into our lives," he said. "But there is a legitimate counter to that. "The effectiveness of these technologies to identify harmful behaviour is partially predicated on the ability of these companies to keep the methods secret so people can't devise tricky ways to get around them." When it comes to appealing against a breach, Dr Cohney said major social media players had fairly opaque procedures for users which generally involved some sort of semi-automated process. "It would be a very, very large undertaking to require a large company like this to provide everyone with a human appeal," he said. Meta told the ABC it used a combination of people and technology to find and remove accounts that broke its rules. Ms Archer is relieved to be posting content on her original business account again. But the feeling of uncertainty that this could happen again remains. "The fear of losing it again still sits heavy," she said. "It's hard to fully relax when you've already seen how quickly it can be taken without warning. "I'm following the rules, as I have always done, and will be keeping my backup account I created just in case."

ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Police investigate fatal house fire at Carisbrook in central Victoria
A 77-year-old man has died in a house fire at Carisbrook, north of Ballarat. Police are investigating the fire, which broke out in a rear room of the Church Street house about 1am. Firefighters from Carisbrook and nearby Maryborough found the man deceased when they searched the home. Arson squad detectives and forensic chemists are on site today to determine the cause of the fire. Detective Sergeant Steve Atkinson said the man was well-known in the town. "It's a local Carisbrook identity that has been located here today — unfortunately, he was well-known in the community," he said. "We're not looking at any suspicious circumstances but the cause of the fire is yet to be determined," Detective Sergeant Atkinson said. The man's son was visibly distressed when he arrived at the house this morning. Anyone who witnessed the fire or has security camera footage or any information is urged to contact Crime Stoppers.