The women of Epping don't need Tommy Robinson's help
Even Robinson doesn't seem able to make his mind up about what to do. On Sunday, he tweeted: 'Hear you loud and clear, I'm coming to Epping next Sunday ladies and bringing thousands more with me'. By lunchtime on Monday, Robinson appeared to have had second thoughts, posting a video in which he appeared to backtrack. The far-right activist said that, despite people asking him to go to Epping, he thinks it 'may not benefit the cause'. He went on to describe the Epping protests – which erupted after the arrest and charge of an asylum seeker last week on suspicion of alleged sexual assaults in the town – as involving 'local families, local women, local mothers, local children'. He noted that his presence might give the authorities an 'excuse' to 'label it a different way'. Robinson might be desperate for attention, but he isn't stupid.
Many locals in Epping would certainly prefer Robinson stays away. Monday night's peaceful protest began with the striking sight of a line of women holding hands and chanting 'protect our kids'. They waved hand-made signs with slogans such as 'Make England safe again', 'I'm not far right – I'm worried about my kids' and 'deport foreign criminals'.
Orla Minihane is one local mum who is worried. A Reform council candidate, she found herself giving an impromptu speech on Thursday, as violent clashes were beginning between locals, counterprotestors from Stand up to Racism, and police. Speaking through a megaphone, Orla described the crowd as 'good, local, taxpaying people', who 'don't want trouble, don't want fights', but who oppose the presence of hundreds of strange, threatening men in their community.
When I spoke with Orla she made it clear to me that the community's concerns are not about race: 'I wouldn't care if they were from Iceland, blonde, blue-eyed and Christian. At the end of the day, they're strange men who nobody has checked'.
She described increasing fears in the Epping area over the past year, as women have reported being followed home and blatant shoplifting has soared. There have been reports of men approaching young girls outside schools. Yet the authorities seem reluctant to provide specific details about the men involved, adding to the suspicion and distrust felt by the local community.
For many locals, the arrest and charge of an asylum seeker this month was the final straw.
Reform leader Nigel Farage has said that most of the protestors in Epping are 'genuinely concerned families', before warning that politicians shouldn't 'underestimate the simmering anger and disgust…that we are letting in every week hundreds of undocumented young males from cultures where women and girls are not even treated as second class citizens'. Farage went on to say 'I don't think anybody in London even understands how close we are to civil disobedience on a vast scale in this country'.
Perhaps Tommy Robinson won't turn up in Epping. Or perhaps his love of the limelight will draw him there. If he does attend next Sunday though, it would likely mean significantly more violence. Stand Up To Racism have already announced a 'No to fascist Tommy Robinson' protest to begin in Epping next Sunday afternoon. If they, and Robinson's followers, attend in large numbers, large-scale disorder may be inevitable. This would be in no one's interests, and would harm the local campaign, likely allow the government to paint all opposition to migrant hotels as 'far right' and do nothing to make the women and girls of Epping safe. Let's hope Robinson stays away, and the peaceful, local voices are heard.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Survivor of clergy sex abuse in Peru visits pope's hometown to call for more reforms
A Peruvian survivor of clergy sex abuse brought her public campaign for reforms to the American hometown of Pope Leo XIV on Thursday, saying he failed in investigating her case when he was a bishop in her home country and needs to step up now as leader of the world's Catholics. 'I've been quiet since the pope has been elected,' Ana María Quispe Díaz said in Spanish at a news conference in downtown Chicago. 'But I'm not planning to be quiet forever.' She appeared with members of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. The advocacy group sent a letter to the pope on Thursday renewing demands for more accountability on clergy sex abuse complaints and released documents related to Díaz's case. The Associated Press doesn't name people who say they were sexually assaulted unless they consent to being identified or decide to tell their stories publicly, as Díaz has. She began speaking out on social media in 2023, and has faced threats and harassment in Peru because of it, SNAP officials said. Ahead of Leo's May election, SNAP filed a formal complaint against then-Cardinal Robert Prevost with the Vatican secretary of state, alleging he abused ecclesiastical power in his handling of two cases. Díaz said she is a victim in one of those cases which overlapped with Prevost's tenure as bishop of Chiclayo, Peru. According to the complaint filed in March by SNAP, Prevost's diocese didn't fully investigate in April 2022 when three women accused priests Eleuterio Vásquez Gonzáles and Ricardo Yesquén of sexually abusing them as minors. Díaz said Thursday that she had spoken briefly with Prevost on the phone in 2020, telling him how she was abused by Vásquez Gonzáles, but wasn't given assurances that much could be done. All three women spoke with Prevost in person in 2022 about both priests, according to Díaz. 'How much more damage can he do now that he is the pope?" she asked, speaking through a translator. Following a protocol set by Pope Francis But Prevost did everything he was supposed to do, according to the Chiclayo diocese and Vatican, including restricting the priest's ministry, sending a preliminary investigation to the Vatican's sex crimes office, offering the victims psychological help and suggesting they go to authorities, who archived the case because it happened too long ago. Pope Francis had a mixed record on responding to the clergy sexual abuse crisis, bungling a major case in Chile in 2018 before reversing course, ordering an investigation and apologizing to the victims. Ultimately, it became a turning point for how he directed the church to handle cases of priests sexually abusing children for the rest of his papacy. In these cases, the Vatican investigation found Prevost acted correctly in imposing preliminary restrictions on Vásquez Gonzáles while Peruvian authorities conducted their own civil investigation. The Vatican office archived the case for lack of evidence, then reopened it in 2023 after it gained traction in the media. Victims' groups are demanding an accounting from Leo. Meanwhile, his supporters say the Chiclayo case is being exploited by his opponents to undermine him after he made enemies by helping shut down Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, a scandal-plagued lay Catholic community in Peru. No one has accused Leo of abuse himself, nor of knowingly keeping confirmed abusers in public ministry, which has been the biggest issue affecting the Catholic Church recently. SNAP wants this accused priest removed ASAP SNAP has asked for accused priests to be removed, which Díaz has sought as well. The organization provided copies of letters sent in July between Peruvian church officials and Díaz. In them, Peruvian church officials say Vásquez Gonzáles requested earlier this year 'to be dispensed from the obligations arising from his ordination as a priest and to leave the clerical state.' The process would take at least six months to complete, according to the letters. Díaz said that's too long. Fidel Purisaca, director of communications for the Diocese of Chiclayo, neither confirmed nor denied Vásquez Gonzáles' request. 'That is a confidential matter between the priest, the bishop, and the Vatican Dicastery,' he told The Associated Press in a WhatsApp message. The diocese said Yesquén was too sick to continue his ministry, and neither priest has commented publicly on the accusations. While in Chicago, Díaz did interviews with Spanish language media and for podcasts. She also appeared at SNAP's annual conference in Pennsylvania last week. Now 29 and a mother of two young children, Díaz said she still isn't always ready to talk about it. But she said something changed when her daughter turned 1. 'Everything came back to me about the abuse,' she said, wiping tears at times. 'I couldn't leave her alone. Since then it's been a real fight for me to be able to leave them alone.' ___ Associated Press writer Nicole Winfield in Rome and Franklin Briceño in Lima, Peru, contributed to this report.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
What is ‘an authentically conservative position'?
Kemi Badenoch has written to Conservative MPs urging them to 'take an authentically conservative position'. Which is what precisely? Answering the question demands some political context. The Tory governments of the last 15 years had some medium-size successes: Universal Credit, English schools reform, pensions simplification. But the failures were bigger: economic stagnation and uncontrolled immigration – exacerbated by the biggest conflict between two European countries since the Second World War, and the most fatal pandemic since the First. There is a justified sense that the Conservatives, who have exhausted five leaders in under ten years, lost their political compass in government – hence the rise of Reform. Badenoch is scrabbling to recover ground she is losing. What does it look like? National conservatives, libertarians, Thatcher nostalgics, authoritarians, One Nationers, populists – all claim to represent real conservatism. There are no tablets of stone, with a definition carved into them, to give an incontestable verdict. But over time, conservatism has tended to stress three indispensables. First, it's anti-utopian. It says that history shows attempts to build heaven on earth, based on race or class supremacy – Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia – end instead in hell: in holocausts, the slaughter of innocents, Holodomor and injustices worse than they replace. Second, it's local – or, rather, national. A French conservative is likely to be republican, interventionist and have a high view of the state's role. A British one will be monarchist, tend to prefer markets to planning and be increasingly suspicious of two-tier state power. The two may well find each other strangers. That said, there is rough agreement internationally on two fundamentals: social order and economic freedom, and that the two are self-reinforcing. Third – and most controversially, given our times – conservatism in Britain is bound up with institutions: monarchy, Parliament, rule of law, limited government, a free media. If they go wrong, revolutionaries try to smash them. Conservatives work instead to reform them, because institutions are a kind of collective, embodied memory. And without memory, you can't learn. Indeed, you have no identity. So far, so obvious. But how does that world-view translate into policy? I wrestled with the question in a recent essay for Policy Exchange – the Future of the Right – and found quickly that the old conservative classics are the best: boosting enterprise, particularly small business. Controlling immigration. Helping families, which the state treats as a cash cow. Boosting our defence and security in a dangerous world. Getting value for money from our public services. (Plainly, the NHS can't carry on as it is.) This is all very well. But – in a country with an ageing population, low growth, broken border control, balkanised cities and civil discontent – it sounds, and perhaps is, abstracted. Many conservatives are giving up on not just the Conservatives but politics. To opt for Reform is, above all, a cry of protest – and rage. If the question 50 years ago, when Margaret Thatcher led the Opposition, was what – what should conservatives do in government? – the question now is how: how can a government of the Right, however constituted, fulfil a conservative, democratic mandate amidst a broken, social democratic state? How would a Prime Minister Badenoch – or Nigel Farage, for that matter – respond to activist judges, bust procurement, politicised civil servants, mass strikes, Islamist demands for blasphemy laws, out-of-date agreements like the Refugee Convention, lawfare? Some conservatives have given up altogether, retreating to Substack and declaring the Blob unbeatable. It isn't. The body responsible for righting these wrongs is Parliament. Under the terms of our constitution, it makes the law, and all must ultimately bend to its will – judges, securocrats and mandarins alike – because it represents the people. But Parliament in general, and the Commons in particular, is in a very bad way. The latter has three main functions. To debate, consider legislation and provide ministers. It does none of them well. Debate is curtailed. Legislation is poorly drafted and scrutinised. Ministers are all too often not up to the job. Why? The shorthand answer is that the political parties are, increasingly, selecting parliamentary candidates for other purposes. The voter-driven fashion is to select energetic campaigners who will be committed constituency champions. That's great for individual seats. But not for the country as a whole – because sparky local campaigners don't always make efficient ministers or diligent legislators. Fifty years ago, the plan called Stepping Stones helped to pave the way for the Thatcher governments' programme of trade union reform. A Badenoch or Farage administration needs a modernised equivalent – a strategy not so much for what a conservative government would deliver but how it would deliver it. The signs are that the Conservative leader understands this. Hence the leadership campaign document to which she contributed a foreword – Rise of the Bureaucratic Class. Part of the answer to speeding its fall may lie in her own hands. 'I had rather have a plain russet-coated captain that knows what he fights for, and loves what he knows, than that which you call a gentleman and is nothing else,' Oliver Cromwell once wrote. The key to finding effective MPs is less technical ability than belief. They need stars to navigate by – enterprise, a smaller state, border control, defence, and understanding the difference between Islam, a great religion, and Islamism, a politicised and extreme ideology. Badenoch, and Farage for that matter, need the equivalents of Cromwell's captains in the Commons. As the Conservatives select candidates for the next election, the means of improving Parliament lies partly in her hands.
Metro
8 hours ago
- Metro
Labour's love lost in less than a year but will electoral reform rescue it?
In MetroTalk: Readers discuss Labour leaders, the left-wing, mass migration and the wealth tax debate (Picture:) Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Is your spiritual home sturdy? Reader comments on Farage, Corbyn and Starmer Brian Dooley (MetroTalk, Wed) thinks Jeremy Corbyn's new political party should be the spiritual home of Labour supporters because Sir Keir Starmer has abandoned core Labour values. If only! Starmer ran to be Labour leader on left-of-centre policies and then understandably abandoned them to win last year's general election. Then, inexplicably, he forgot why he had won and reverted to comfort-zone, left-of-centre policies that plunged the government into a serious poll dive that shows no sign of being reversed. Immigration control, law and order, economic growth, NHS reform… policies very popular with the electorate have all collapsed in less than a year. Instead, out-of-touch, left-of-centre backbenchers bully the prime minister to maintain a bloated welfare state that is a magnet for migrants. No wonder Nigel Farage is so popular. Brian, the present Labour Party is indeed your spiritual home… until it is swept away in a few years' time – something that has happened in practically every country in Europe. Chris Shepherd, London Left-wing and centre-left vote to be split four ways? This reader says Corbyn would have less momentum if Labour offered concession to the left-wing(Picture:) I couldn't agree more with James Freeman (MetroTalk, Tue) that if Labour were to offer any sort of concession to the left wing of the party then Corbyn's party wouldn't have as much momentum. To reduce the threat posed by Reform UK, we also need proportional representation (PR). Under first past the post (FPTP), there is a danger the left-wing and centre-left vote will be split between Labour, the Lib Dems, the Greens and Corbyn's party, while the right-wing vote is largely united behind Reform UK. Reform could win an overall majority with just 30 per cent of the popular vote under FPTP – but this could not happen under PR. Alan Yearsley, Sheffield Anti-immigrant, anti-immigration or pro-borders? Reader debates Some politicians and pro-immigration activists call their opponents 'anti-immigrant' protesters. Got a question about UK politics? Send in yours and Metro's Senior Politics Reporter Craig Munro will answer it in an upcoming edition of our weekly politics newsletter. Email alrightgov@ or submit your question here. Maybe the protesters are not so much opposing immigrants – maybe they are opposing the government policies that have encouraged mass immigration? So, why not call them anti-immigration protesters? Or again, perhaps it would be more accurate to call them pro-borders protesters? Some of the pro-immigration activists carry banners calling for 'No borders, no nations'. Will Podmore, London 'Trying to nail down jelly', reader talks wealth tax This reader says wealth tax would be 'impossible to administer' (Picture:) Rob Slater (MetroTalk, Tue) asks why chancellor Rachel Reeves has ruled out introducing a wealth tax. The answer is simple – it's impossible to administer, as other countries have found. How do you put a value on works of art, fine wines, vintage cars, property or companies owned by individuals, to give just a few examples? What's to stop people who live here moving their assets to another country? How many civil servants would you need to assess values – if indeed you could? How many court cases would be brought by those who feel their assets have been overvalued? It's like trying to nail down jelly. The big mistake this government made was in promising not to increase those taxes that make up two-thirds of the total tax income – income tax, national insurance and VAT. If we don't want to pay more tax then we have to expect cuts to public services. It's as simple as that. John Daniels, Redhill Reader says Reform can't solve emigration when the party includes many ex-Tories responsible for mass migration? In her analysis of the causes of mass immigration, Helen (MetroTalk, Tue) ignores the fact large numbers of migrants don't come from countries with war or disaster but the EU and India etc. She glossed over the fact many who do come from problem countries go through safe countries to get here. Helen ignored the impact on the country of over-population (in the 1970s people were urged to stop having children as the then much smaller population was considered unsustainable). She also ignored the fact not only are we becoming 'an island of strangers' – in the words of Starmer, albeit words he now regrets – but of enemies as per the under-reported conflict between Muslims and Hindus. Helen is right about the terrible conditions driving some to emigrate but as to Reform claiming to being the solution, the party contains many ex-Tories responsible for much of the mass migration. Reform is in favour of increasing the wealth disparity between rich and poor, probably increasing the drive for immigration. Mark, via email At what age can you be rugby tackled to the floor for breaking the law? This reader saysthat if they're allowed to vote, they're old enough to face consequences for stealing(Picture: Getty Images) The other night I watched two teenagers walk out of my local superstore with a rucksack full of shopping they had not paid for. The security guard tried to stop them but they just casually walked past him. He told me they did it all the time because they know he can't touch them. If the government considers them old enough to vote then surely they are of the age where they can be rugby-tackled to the floor for breaking the law. Gareth, London Reader suggests substance testing for those on benefits with mental health issues Why doesn't the Department for Work and Pensions introduce drug and alcohol testing for those who receive benefits and claim to have mental health issues? Very often I see people on the street smoking marijuana or with a can of beer. It's easy to see what kind of state they are in and it's very dangerous. These individuals should be receiving medical care and food, travel and rent vouchers, not money or benefits. If they refuse, they should be disqualified and prosecuted. Val, Broxbourne Arrow MORE: KöD's signature three-course menu for only £39.50: 10 unmissable Time Out deals Arrow MORE: I'll sleep soundly through the next heatwave thanks to this game-changing item from Oodie Arrow MORE: Former UFC fighter Conor McGregor loses appeal for civil rape case
