I agree with RFK Jr.'s food dye ban. Indiana should lead it.
But, about a week later, RFK Jr. formally announced a proposal to phase out eight artificial food dyes in the U.S. It is the kind of common sense move our leaders on both sides should be making.
Artificial dyes like Red 40 and Yellow 5 are linked to serious issues. Research published in 2021 found that artificial food dyes increase hyperactivity in 10% to 20% of children with ADHD. They can also trigger allergic reactions and behavioral problems in sensitive kids.
Opinion: Make Indiana Healthy Again is about cost-cutting, not wellness
These dyes are purely cosmetic, making snacks more colorful but offering zero nutritional value. Europe banned or labeled many of these dyes years ago. Yet, in the U.S., they are still found in everything from cereal to school lunches.
U.S. companies already make dye-free products for international markets but do not offer them here. This double standard puts corporate convenience over American children's health. Some critics argue that reformulation raises costs, but natural ingredients add less than 2% to production expenses, and targeted subsidies, as seen in the EU, can help ease consumer prices.
Holding food companies accountable is good governance. No parent should need a chemistry degree to read food labels or worry that candy will lead to classroom meltdowns.
Indiana has a major stake in this. Our childhood obesity rate reached 17.8% in 2023, which is among the highest in the nation, with processed food as a key contributor. ADHD diagnoses are climbing, too, now affecting 12% of Hoosier children. In many rural and lower income communities, families turn to low-cost processed foods because healthier choices are simply out of reach.
Opinion: My son has autism. He deserves better than RFK Jr.'s ignorance. | Opinion
But there is also opportunity. Indiana's $16 billion agriculture industry could grow by an estimated $500 million annually by supplying clean, additive-free foods. Our farmers are ready to meet the moment. With the right support, we can align economic growth with better health and do it in a way that reflects Indiana's conservative values: protecting kids, empowering parents and ensuring transparency.
RFK Jr.'s plan is a strong start. Indiana can lead by taking these steps:
Subsidize organic produce: Allocate $2 million annually to help farmers grow organic fruits and vegetables, prioritizing SNAP accessible stores.
Ban harmful additives: Prohibit the eight targeted dyes within 24 months.
Require clear labeling: Mandate bold warnings on dyed foods.
Fund mobile markets: Launch mobile markets in food desert counties, such as Jay and Perry, with a strict implementation timeline.
Offer tax breaks: Provide 5% tax credits to companies that reformulate products without dyes.
Support local farmers: Grant $1 million annually to small farms transitioning to clean food production.
Boost nutrition education: Integrate healthy eating into Indiana school curricula.
Indiana was the first state to seek to restrict soda and candy purchases under SNAP. Now, let's be the first to implement a comprehensive, forward-looking plan to eliminate artificial dyes.
Phasing out artificial dyes may be the lowest hanging fruit in American health policy, and it offers a rare opportunity for real bipartisanship on an issue that affects everyone.
Dr. Raja Ramaswamy is an Indianapolis-based physician and the author of "You Are the New Prescription."
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Food dyes are cosmetic and harmful. RFK Jr. is right. | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
22 minutes ago
- UPI
Appeals court OKs termination of TPS for Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua
An appeals court on Wednesday as permitted the Trump administration to continue with its plans to terminate deportation protections for tens of thousands from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua. File Photo by Sarah Silbiger/UPI | License Photo Aug. 21 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court is permitting the Trump administration to continue with its termination of deportation protections for tens of thousands of people in the United States from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua amid litigation. The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit approved the Trump administration's request for a stay pending appeal on Wednesday as it challenges a lower court's ruling that initially postponed the federal government's termination of Temporary Protected Status for those from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua until at least Nov. 18, when the next hearing is scheduled to test the merits of the case. The decision was unanimous. No reason was given. "This devastating and unexplained decision threatens families who have lived here for decades, raised U.S. citizen children, built businesses and become an integral part of our communities," National TPS Alliance, which brought the case against the Trump administration, said in a statement following the ruling. "But let it be clear: We are families, workers, neighbors. And despite this setback, TPS holders and allies will CONTINUE to fight for justice, permanent protections and the right to stay in the only home many of us have ever known." The ruling is a victory for President Donald Trump and his administration amid their crackdown on immigration as the American leader seeks to conduct mass deportations of non-citizens. "This is yet another huge legal victory for the Trump administration, the rule of law, safety of the American public," Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement. "TPS was never meant to be a de facto asylum system, yet that is how previous administrations have used it for decades," she said, adding, "This unanimous decision will help restore integrity to our immigration system to keep our homeland and its people safe." Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, was established by Congress in 1990 to shield migrants in the United States from being deported to their home countries experiencing crises such as war, conflict or famine, where they would be put into harm's way. Honduras and Nicaragua were both granted TPS designation in January 1999, following the devastation caused by Hurricane Mitch a year earlier, with Nepal receiving the designation in 2015, due to a destructive earthquake that hit the country that April. Some 60,000 people from the three countries are currently protected from deportation to their native nations because of TPS, many of whom have been in the United States for decades. Trump is attempting to dismantle TPS as part of his immigration crackdown. He announced it was ending deportation protections for those from Nepal in early June, doing the same for Honduras and Nicaragua in July. The designations were to be terminated Aug. 5 for Nepal and Sept. 8 for Honduras and Nicaragua. The Trump administration has argued that TPS was never meant to be a long-term solution and that the conditions in those countries have changed. On July 7, the National TPS Alliance sued the federal government, arguing the terminations were unconstitutional as the Trump administration failed to follow the necessary review process, while its reason for ending TPS was racially motivated. In late July, District Judge Trina Thompson issued a strongly worded decision postponing the termination of TPS for Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua until mid-November, stating: "The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty and the American Dream. That is all plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names and purify their blood." Following the ruling on Wednesday, Sandhya Lama, a TPS holder from Nepal, said she was "heartbroken" by the decision. "I've lived in the U.S. for years, and my kids are U.S. citizens and have never been to Nepal. This ruling leaves us and thousands of other TPS families in fear and uncertainty," she said in a statement. "We are families, workers and neighbors who have built our lives here. Despite this setback, we will continue to fight for justice." The Trump administration is also seeking to terminate TPS protections for Afghanistan, Haiti and Venezuela, moves that are also being challenged in court.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FACT FOCUS: Trump says he has ended seven wars. The reality isn't so clear cut
President Donald Trump has projected himself as a peacemaker since returning to the White House in January, touting his efforts to end global conflicts. In meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders Monday, Trump repeated that he has been instrumental in stopping multiple wars but didn't specify which. 'I've done six wars, I've ended six wars, Trump said in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy. He later added: 'If you look at the six deals I settled this year, they were all at war. I didn't do any ceasefires.' He raised that figure Tuesday, telling 'Fox & Friends" that 'we ended seven wars.' But although Trump helped mediate relations among many of these nations, experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. Here's a closer look at the conflicts. Israel and Iran Trump is credited with ending the 12-day war. Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear program and military leadership in June, saying it wanted to stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon — which Tehran has denied it was trying to do. Trump negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran just after directing American warplanes to strike Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. He publicly harangued both countries into maintaining the ceasefire. Evelyn Farkas, executive director of Arizona State University's McCain Institute, said Trump should get credit for ending the war. 'There's always a chance it could flare up again if Iran restarts its nuclear weapons program, but nonetheless, they were engaged in a hot war with one another,' she said. 'And it didn't have any real end in sight before President Trump got involved and gave them an ultimatum.' Lawrence Haas, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council who is an expert on Israel-Iran tensions, agreed the U.S. was instrumental in securing the ceasefire. But he characterized it as a 'temporary respite' from the ongoing 'day-to-day cold war' between the two foes that often involves flare-ups. Egypt and Ethiopia This could be described as tensions at best, and peace efforts — which don't directly involve the U.S. — have stalled. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile River has caused friction between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan since the power-generating project was announced more than a decade ago. In July, Ethiopia declared the project complete, with an inauguration set for September. Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam. Although the vast majority of the water that flows down the Nile originates in Ethiopia, Egyptian agriculture relies on the river almost entirely. Sudan, meanwhile, fears flooding and wants to protect its own power-generating dams. During his first term, Trump tried to broker a deal between Ethiopia and Egypt but couldn't get them to agree. He suspended aid to Ethiopia over the dispute. In July, he posted on Truth Social that he helped the 'fight over the massive dam (and) there is peace at least for now.' However, the disagreement persists, and negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have stalled. 'It would be a gross overstatement to say that these countries are at war,' said Haas. 'I mean, they're just not.' India and Pakistan The April killing of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir pushed India and Pakistan closer to war than they had been in years, but a ceasefire was reached. Trump has claimed that the U.S. brokered the ceasefire, which he said came about in part because he offered trade concessions. Pakistan thanked Trump, recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. But India has denied Trump's claims, saying there was no conversation between the U.S. and India on trade in regards to the ceasefire. Although India has downplayed the Trump administration's role in the ceasefire, Haas and Farkas believe the U.S. deserves some credit for helping stop the fighting. 'I think that President Trump played a constructive role from all accounts, but it may not have been decisive. And again, I'm not sure whether you would define that as a full-blown war," Farkas said. Serbia and Kosovo The White House lists the conflict between these countries as one Trump resolved, but there has been no threat of a war between the two neighbors during Trump's second term, nor any significant contribution from Trump this year to improve their relations. Kosovo is a former Serbian province that declared independence in 2008. Tensions have persisted ever since, but never to the point of war, mostly because NATO-led peacekeepers have been deployed in Kosovo, which has been recognized by more than 100 countries. During his first term, Trump negotiated a wide-ranging deal between Serbia and Kosovo, but much of what was agreed on was never carried out. Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo Trump has played a key role in peace efforts between the African neighbors, but he's hardly alone and the conflict is far from over. Eastern Congo, rich in minerals, has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is the M23 rebel group backed by neighboring Rwanda, which claims it is protecting its territorial interests and that some of those who participated in the 1994 Rwandan genocide fled to Congo and are working with the Congolese army. The Trump administration's efforts paid off in June, when the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House. The M23, however, wasn't directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and said it couldn't abide by the terms of an agreement that didn't involve it. The final step to peace was meant to be a separate Qatar-facilitated deal between Congo and M23 that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. But with the fighting still raging, Monday's deadline for the Qatar-led deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms. Armenia and Azerbaijan Trump this month hosted the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, where they signed a deal aimed at ending a decades-long conflict between the two nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called the signed document a 'significant milestone,' and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev hailed Trump for performing 'a miracle.' The two countries signed agreements intended to reopen key transportation routes and reaffirm Armenia's and Azerbaijan's commitment to signing a peace treaty. The treaty's text was initialed by the countries' foreign ministers at that meeting, which indicates preliminary approval. But the two countries have yet to sign and ratify the deal. Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in a bitter conflict over territory since the early 1990s, when ethnic Armenian forces took control of the Karabakh province, known internationally as Nagorno-Karabakh, and nearby territories. In 2020, Azerbaijan's military recaptured broad swaths of territory. Russia brokered a truce and deployed about 2,000 peacekeepers to the region. In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched a lightning blitz to retake remaining portions. The two countries have worked toward normalizing ties and signing a peace treaty ever since. Cambodia and Thailand Officials from Thailand and Cambodia credit Trump with pushing the Asian neighbors to agree to a ceasefire in this summer's brief border conflict. Cambodia and Thailand have clashed in the past over their shared border. The latest fighting began in July after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thai politics. Both countries agreed in late July to an unconditional ceasefire during a meeting in Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim pressed for the pact, but there was little headway until Trump intervened. Trump said on social media that he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that the U.S. would not move forward with trade agreements if the hostilities continued. Both countries faced economic difficulties and neither had reached tariff deals with the U.S., though most of their Southeast Asian neighbors had. According to Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and University of Michigan doctoral candidate, 'President Trump's decision to condition a successful conclusion to these talks on a ceasefire likely played a significant role in ensuring that both sides came to the negotiating table when they did.' ___ Associated Press reporters Jon Gambrell, Grant Peck, Dasha Litvinova, Fay Abuelgasim, Rajesh Roy, and Dusan Stojanovic contributed. ___ Find AP Fact Checks here: Solve the daily Crossword
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Eric Adams adviser suspended from campaign after being accused of giving local reporter cash
A longtime ally, adviser and fundraiser for New York Mayor Eric Adams was suspended from his reelection effort after being accused of attempting to hand a local journalist a cash-stuffed potato chip bag. Winnie Greco was outed by a local newspaper, 'The City,' for attempting to give cash surreptitiously tucked inside of a Herr's Sour Cream & Onion ripple potato chip bag to one of its City Hall reporters after a campaign event Wednesday afternoon in Harlem. According to the news outlet, the reporter, Katie Honan, initially refused the potato chips, which she believed to be a genuine snack offer, but Greco insisted. Upon discovering the wad of cash, which reportedly included at least one $100 bill and several $20 bills, she immediately contacted the Adams' confidante to return the unwanted gift. 'I can't take this, when can I give it back to you," Honan texted Greco, to no response, according to The City. Greco later called the money offer "a mistake" and apologized profusely when confronted by the local paper about why she attempted to give a reporter who covers Adams' administration a cash gift following an event meant to support his reelection. Greco, who is Chinese, said the act was "a culture thing," a position her attorney supported in a statement to The City. 'I can see how this looks strange,' Greco's attorney, Steven Brill, told The City. 'But I assure you that Winnie's intent was purely innocent. In the Chinese culture, money is often given to others in a gesture of friendship and gratitude. Winnie is apologetic and embarrassed by any negative impression or confusion this may have caused.' Todd Shapiro, a spokesperson for Adam's mayoral campaign saidthat "Grecco [sic] holds no position in this campaign and has been suspended from all VOLUNTEER campaign-related activities." 'We are shocked by these reports," Shapiro said, adding, "Mayor Adams had no prior knowledge of this matter." Greco has been a close ally of Adams for more than a decade, serving as a conduit between the mayor and the city's Asian-American communities, a top fundraiser for his campaigns, and landing a role in his administration as director of Asian Affairs. She resigned from that role last year, months after the FBI raided two of her properties as part of an investigation into a straw donations scheme in Adams' 2021 campaign. The probe into the straw donations was one of several legal scandals surrounding the mayor, who was charged by federal prosecutors last year for abusing his position "as this City's highest elected official, and before that as Brooklyn Borough President, to take bribes and solicit illegal campaign contributions." The Trump Justice Department later dismissed those charges. Shapiro said Adams "has always demanded the highest ethical and legal standards." Richard Kim, the editor in chief of The City, called Greco's cash gift "deeply disturbing." 'The fact that one of mayor Adams' closest, longtime advisors would attempt to ingratiate herself to any reporter, much less Katie Honan, with a cash gift is deeply disturbing and speaks to a rampant and blatant disregard for the role of a free and fair press," Kim said. "The choice of sour cream and onion chips is also questionable.'
