Apple gets green light for parking extension as 1,300 new employees on Cork campus
Cork City Council has given the green light to Apple to build 285 extra car parking spaces at its European HQ in Hollyhill to help facilitate an additional 1,300 new employees on its campus in 2025.
The Council has attached 22 conditions to the planning permission to Apple Operations International Ltd (AOIL) for the additional car-park spaces — in one car-park with 159 spaces and the other with 126 spaces — on land banks it owns to the north of David McCarthy Rd on the northside of the city.
The permission follows consultants for AOIL, DBFL Consulting Engineers telling the council that the number of employees is expected to reach 5,350 across the entire Apple Campus at Hollyhill by mid-2025.
DBFL state that there is a longer-term projection 'of 6,000 employees by 2030 subject to market conditions'.
The grant of permission for the 285 car-spaces is in addition to the 2,572 parking spaces either on-site or under construction at the Hollyhill Campus.
In a planning report lodged with the application, consultants HW Planning stated that the proposal is appropriate to facilitate the continued success of Apple operations in Cork and to meet their growing needs "in the absence of frequent public transport provision'.
They state that the additional car spaces are required despite the initiatives being implemented on campus to promote sustainable travel options and are required to ensure the continued success of this strategic employment hub.
Outlining the background to the application in a Parking Justification Report, DBFL states that 'the additional spaces are requested to provide short-medium term resilience and mitigate anticipated delays to the planned public transport and road network improvements ahead of the opening of the Hollyhill 5 building in mid-2025'.
The report states that "in the longer term, there may be scope to repurpose these spaces to higher-value uses that support the expansion of the Apple campus – once the planned key upgrades to Cork's transport network are delivered'.
Outlining the need for the additional car spaces, the report cites delays in various public transport initiatives.
The report states that initially the Cork Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy (CMATS) 2040 envisaged the construction of the Cork Northern Distributor Multi Modal Road by 2027 which would provide orbital active travel and public transport connectivity to the campus.
The report states: 'However, the likelihood is that the delays to the roll-out of the Cork Northern Distrubutor Road in particular, will necessitate short-medium term requirement of the proposed car-parking."
On planned BusConnects, the report states that while the original BusConnects timeline envisaged roll-out of infrastructure and services beginning in 2024, roll-out is now scheduled to commence in 2025/2026.
The report states: 'The delays in the rollout of BusConnects has resulted in additional Apple shuttle services being required to address ongoing issues in journey time reliability."
The report further stated that CMATS also proposes six park-and-ride facilities, including at Dunkettle and Blarney/Stoneview, connected by high-quality public transport services to key destinations. However, 'to date, none of these park-and-ride proposals have been delivered despite the establishment of a dedicated park-and-ride office in the National Transport Authority".
The report states that in line with Apple's wider commitments to climate action and sustainability objectives, it would seek to reduce the number of employees commuting to the Hollyhill Campus by car in the long-term, by reducing the number of spaces per employee over time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Apple's fall from top of tree reflects cooling growth outlook
This year hasn't been kind to Apple . Shares are down nearly 20 per cent, making it the worst performer among the magnificent seven. Long the world's most valuable firm, Apple now ranks third, well behind Microsoft and Nvidia. The numbers explain why. Nvidia's revenue has more than quadrupled in three years. Microsoft's is up over a third. Apple's, by contrast, has barely budged. That might be excusable if Apple were brimming with promise, but its pipeline looks thin. The Vision Pro flopped. A long-awaited artificial intelligence -powered Siri is still missing. Apple Intelligence hasn't driven iPhone upgrades. Former Apple design guru Jony Ive is developing a screenless AI device with OpenAI , a potential iPhone rival. Meanwhile, judges are rebuking Apple in court. Lawmakers are circling its App Store. Regulators from Brussels to Beijing are prying into the company, and US president Donald Trump is making life awkward for CEO Tim Cook , threatening 25 per cent tariffs unless Apple shifts iPhone production to the United States. READ MORE Apple's forward price-earnings (p/e) ratio has fallen to 28. Still, it remains above its three-, five- and 10-year averages – not stretched, but hardly cheap. That suggests 2025's downturn is no panic, but more an overdue recognition of cooling fundamentals. Value investors won't be diving in just yet. Notably, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which sharply cut its Apple stake in 2024, has not shown any appetite to rebuild its position in recent months. (Disclosure: I own shares in Berkshire.) Investors aren't fleeing, but the spell has broken. Once the market's metronome, Apple now feels a beat behind.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Adrian Weckler: Honest debate about drones must go a lot further than whinging about noise
Ireland is unusually out in front, in European terms, in the drone delivery space. This is solely because of Bobby Healy's drone delivery firm, Manna, which has just signed its third major fast-food giant deal, this time with Deliveroo. Last week, Healy said he expects to see up to 10,000 daily drone delivery flights by the end of the year across 10 different locations in Ireland, including Blanchardstown, but maybe also Cork, Tallaght and Glasnevin. Regulators, generally, seem content. Businesses do too. But will there be pushback on the issue of irritation, particularly when it comes to noise? A scathing feature article in the Irish Times last week quoted a number of residents and councillors in the Blanchardstown area who said they took issue with the drones, mostly because of their noise. These complaints were dismissed as 'hysterical' by Manna, who said that the company has received just 77 complaints from over 170,000 delivery flights. So just how noisy are delivery drones? In my experience, they're clearly audible, though far less noisy than almost any delivery motorbike. Seated indoors with windows closed, you'd only hear one when it's delivering something close to your house at its lowest hover point. With windows open, it's more like hearing a buzzy bluebottle. Manna put forward a study it said was conducted by Trinity College Dublin (though commissioned by Manna) which measured the company's self-built drones at two key points of its flight: when passing over a home at 65 metres' height and when at its lowest point (14 metres in height) when delivering the package. Over the home, the TCD measurement report said the drone had the same audible reach as 'a normal conversation [within] one metre', and that it was 'audible but brief [lasting]10 seconds'. When flying at its lowest, at the point of package delivery, the drone sounded like a 'washing machine' or 'distant vacuum cleaner'. This, the TCD study said, was 'the loudest part of the mission'. It's not hard to see how this would divide opinion. Anyone who doesn't like the idea of delivery drones in the first place will say that the additional noise is unacceptable. Those in favour of the development will say it's a pretty modest hum. If Healy's projections come to pass, and we start seeing thousands, rather than hundreds, of drone delivery flights per day, this debate is likely to escalate. If it does, my hope is that it broadens sufficiently to encapsulate the core issue: acceptable noise limits in residential settings. There is a real, fully-defensible interest we all have in 21st century cities, towns and villages enjoying peaceful, non-piercing, non-disruptive levels of noise around our homes. It's a civilisation issue; we simply don't need to accept screaming machines the way we used to. Even apartments beside motorways, which are already discounted compared to those 100 metres farther away, now feel a right to thicker windows and quieter vehicle engines. I have always wondered, for example, why we put up with the existence of shrill mopeds and loud motorbikes. I know it's because they were a cost-efficient answer at the time. But these days? It's harder to justify, especially around residential areas. Everyone accepts some noise – even jolting, intrusive noise – if it serves a purpose we believe serves our neighbourhood. No-one says an ambulance's siren should be quieter. No-one seriously objects to agricultural machinery operating at the edge of town homes. And there's generally no by-law against petrol lawnmowers, as cacophonous as they are. We even still accept noisier diesel cars, even though we now know that their initial justification – that they were better for the environment than petrol engines – was false. So where do drones fit into this discussion? Is whatever noise they produce justifiable, relative to what they do for society? This is where views start to differ wildly. Listen to any call-in radio debate or online discussion on the issue and it soon becomes clear that many complaining of their noise simply don't like the idea of delivery drones at all, independent of whether they can be heard. The main objections, it seems, are a combination of utility, safety and privacy. 'Do we really need coffee delivered by a drone?' is the most common retort I hear or see. 'Medicine, maybe, but doughnuts? What sort of a society have we become?' This argument seems a little weak. It's a preachy tone laced with undertones of snobbery – what kind of slobs are you that you'd do this? And so on. This complaint also completely ignores the much worse noise from delivery motorbikes – shouldn't there be a ban on such vehicles, if noise really is the priority? Safety also crops up as a potential worry to drone delivery. What if they crash? A much more worthy objection, in my view, would be legitimate concerns over privacy and surveillance. Last week, this column revealed that a loophole in European law may allow gardaí to use face-tracking AI in real time, contrary to the EU AI Act (which applies to almost every other country) and contrary to what the Government currently says its intentions are. It may not be so hard to believe that a shift in attitudes could see delivery drones double as policing or security devices. After all, aren't Ring doorbells now effectively used as an extension of local policing? Safety also crops up as a potential worry to drone delivery. What if they crash? With thousands of flights, wouldn't the chance of that go up? The noise debate seems to be the one that looks set to occupy most heat in any pushback against drone deliveries. But if it's an honest debate, it should surely be wider than just for flying coffee couriers.
Irish Independent
6 hours ago
- Irish Independent
US judge dismisses Ireland-based multinational's GDPR fears in ruling on handover of Irish-based staff files
American power giant Eaton had asked court to reconsider order to surrender performance data to US taxman, citing data privacy fears Today at 21:30 A Dublin-headquartered multinational has been told to ignore GDPR rules in a long-running US legal case over access to Irish employee related data. The American judge argued any resulting fine from the Irish Data Protection Commissioners here would likely only be 'marginal', a view that is likely to be highly controversial with European regulators and privacy campaigners.
