Apple's fall from top of tree reflects cooling growth outlook
This year hasn't been kind to
Apple
. Shares are down nearly 20 per cent, making it the worst performer among the magnificent seven. Long the world's most valuable firm, Apple now ranks third, well behind Microsoft and Nvidia.
The numbers explain why. Nvidia's revenue has more than quadrupled in three years. Microsoft's is up over a third. Apple's, by contrast, has barely budged.
That might be excusable if Apple were brimming with promise, but its pipeline looks thin. The Vision Pro flopped. A long-awaited
artificial intelligence
-powered Siri is still missing. Apple Intelligence hasn't driven iPhone upgrades. Former Apple design guru Jony Ive is developing a screenless AI device with
OpenAI
, a potential iPhone rival.
Meanwhile, judges are rebuking Apple in court. Lawmakers are circling its App Store. Regulators from Brussels to Beijing are prying into the company, and US president
Donald Trump
is making life awkward for CEO
Tim Cook
, threatening 25 per cent
tariffs
unless Apple shifts iPhone production to the United States.
READ MORE
Apple's forward price-earnings (p/e) ratio has fallen to 28. Still, it remains above its three-, five- and 10-year averages – not stretched, but hardly cheap.
That suggests 2025's downturn is no panic, but more an overdue recognition of cooling fundamentals. Value investors won't be diving in just yet.
Notably, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which sharply cut its Apple stake in 2024, has not shown any appetite to rebuild its position in recent months. (Disclosure: I own shares in Berkshire.)
Investors aren't fleeing, but the spell has broken. Once the market's metronome, Apple now feels a beat behind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kingspan embraces Donald Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Donald Trump 's One Big Beautiful Act isn't so beautiful to everyone. Just ask Elon Musk . The US president's signature piece of legislation promises to cut taxes (again), create new tax exemptions, and muster up billions of dollars for deportation efforts. But it will also reduce social spending and balloon the federal deficit, a sore point for many fiscally conservative Republicans . But as the pros and cons are debated amid the very public falling out of Trump and Musk , Irish insulation provider Kingspan , at least, has given it a tacit thumbs up . This week, it said it would increase its US investment by $250 million, bringing its overall commitment to the Stateside roofing business to a whopping $1 billion. READ MORE 'The One Big Beautiful Act, when enacted, should make the returns even more compelling,' it said in a statement. Kingspan's enthusiasm for the bill is perhaps understandable given the size of its ambitions. The largest 'roofing mega-site' in the US 'will be unrivalled', it says. The question is how other businesses may weigh up similar investment strategies in the context of Trump's legislative wishlist. US debt markets, meanwhile, were rocked by the tax bill last month given its threat to sharply increase the country's deficit. The non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates it will lead to an increase in the US national debt of more than $3.3 trillion (€2.9 trillion) over the next decade, increasing federal government debt held by the public to a record 125 per cent of GDP. [ Musk and Trump's big, beautiful breakup Opens in new window ] The legislation is at the centre of a fierce battle among Republicans and must still pass the US Senate where changes could be made. And so ultimately, for now at least, few will care what companies think. Especially when all eyes are fixed on Musk and his increasingly acerbic dismissal. 'A disgusting abomination,' said the world's richest man of the tax agenda, in comments directed at the world's most powerful man. With such protagonists, Kingspan's views mean little.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Apple's fall from top of tree reflects cooling growth outlook
This year hasn't been kind to Apple . Shares are down nearly 20 per cent, making it the worst performer among the magnificent seven. Long the world's most valuable firm, Apple now ranks third, well behind Microsoft and Nvidia. The numbers explain why. Nvidia's revenue has more than quadrupled in three years. Microsoft's is up over a third. Apple's, by contrast, has barely budged. That might be excusable if Apple were brimming with promise, but its pipeline looks thin. The Vision Pro flopped. A long-awaited artificial intelligence -powered Siri is still missing. Apple Intelligence hasn't driven iPhone upgrades. Former Apple design guru Jony Ive is developing a screenless AI device with OpenAI , a potential iPhone rival. Meanwhile, judges are rebuking Apple in court. Lawmakers are circling its App Store. Regulators from Brussels to Beijing are prying into the company, and US president Donald Trump is making life awkward for CEO Tim Cook , threatening 25 per cent tariffs unless Apple shifts iPhone production to the United States. READ MORE Apple's forward price-earnings (p/e) ratio has fallen to 28. Still, it remains above its three-, five- and 10-year averages – not stretched, but hardly cheap. That suggests 2025's downturn is no panic, but more an overdue recognition of cooling fundamentals. Value investors won't be diving in just yet. Notably, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which sharply cut its Apple stake in 2024, has not shown any appetite to rebuild its position in recent months. (Disclosure: I own shares in Berkshire.) Investors aren't fleeing, but the spell has broken. Once the market's metronome, Apple now feels a beat behind.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
How Oklahoma City turned its fortunes around with an infamous robbery
In 1993 the number of hotels in Oklahoma City had been reduced to one. It was a low ebb for a city that had, in its oil-gushing heyday, boasted architectural wonders such as the Biltmore and the Criterion, demolished along with many other gems during the 1970s grand plan to reimagine the historic downtown. The past was razed. The renowned modernist architect IM Pei was brought in to deliver a 21st-century city. The vision was extravagant. But the city money ran dry with the next oil slump, and most of what was planned was never built. By 1991, the city had become a finalist of an intense competition to win a $1 billion United Airlines maintenance plant, which would create 7,500 jobs and offer a welcome stable well of employment as opposed to the volatile, flash-flood riches of the oil industry. A successful bid would be a lifeline in a city that, according to the 1990 US census, had some 11,000 abandoned houses and a 14 per cent poverty rate. Ultimately, Oklahoma lost out to Indianapolis. The bittersweet feedback from United was, then mayor Ron Norick reported, that Oklahoma's proposal was 'by far the best prepared, well organised, the most courteous, the most responsive. But we didn't win the big enchilada.' READ MORE The main reason was that United didn't feel it could reasonably ask its people to live and work in somewhere as bereft of variety as OKC. Stung, Norick decided he would travel to Indianapolis to see for himself what it had that his beloved city did not. Everything, it turned out. 'So he got on a plane and flew to Indianapolis. There, he found a vibrant downtown and two major league professional sports teams,' David Holt, the current Oklahoma City mayor reported to readers of the Indianapolis Star in an opinion piece this week. 'Like OKC, Indianapolis lacked mountains or an ocean, but it had a central meeting place and reasons for people to rally there. Through its downtown and its sports teams, and all the things that come with those amenities, Indianapolis offered a quality of life appropriate to a city its size. OKC was also a pretty large city, but after being hollowed out by urban renewal, an oil bust and a banking crisis, it felt more like a place where a lot of people just happened to live. Indianapolis – previously our foil – was now our inspiration.' The reason behind the opinion piece is that the stars have aligned to thrust both Oklahoma and Indianapolis into a shared spotlight for the next fortnight. The cities' basketball teams, the Oklahoma Thunder and the Indiana Pacers, are again competing for the top prize, this time in the NBA finals. [ Thunder enlightens Oklahoma as basketball brings wind of change Opens in new window ] One of the first things Norick realised on that trip was that Oklahoma needed a sports team. It took almost two decades and a comprehensive downtown renaissance, which was interrupted and then spurred on by the federal building bombing in 1995, before they got their wish. The city custodians built a state-of-the-art sports arena but could find no willing tenant until it finally acquired, through infamous chicanery, a brand new franchise, the Thunder. But there is a uniquely American sting in the tail of Oklahoma's fairy story. Because it could not persuade a big sports team to move to its city, it went out and stole one. At least that is what any number of bereft Seattle basketball fans will tell you. In 2006, a consortium of Oklahoma business people bought shares in the Supersonics, the long-established Seattle team. When pressure to build a publicly funded upgraded arena was rejected by the Seattle city managers, the owners simply moved their club to Oklahoma, with the blessing of the NBA. The Supersonics vanished over a summer. The internet carries many grainy clips of the last Supersonics game, after 41 seasons, when the fans chanted 'Save Our Sonics' in unison through the closing minutes while the players raised their arms to encourage more decibels. But by the following September, many of the same players were wearing the uniform of the brand new Thunder. The loss of the team, the Seattle Times declared this weekend, 'leaves Seattle feeling like the victim of identity theft'. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander of the Oklahoma City Thunder drives to the basket against Tyrese Haliburton of the Indiana Pacers during Game One of the 2025 NBA Finals. Photograph: William Purnell/Getty If Oklahomans ever felt Seattle's pain, they have come to terms with it. Seattle is one of the great US city success stories, an enviable combination of tech-generated wealth and artistic creativity. They'd get over the Supersonics. Oklahoma was parched. Now the city is committed to spending $850 billion to a new publicly funded stadium. The Thunder, valued at $3.6 billion, will pitch in a mere $50 billion. But they don't want to make the same mistake as Seattle. So, for the next fortnight, the Supersonics will act as the ghost at the banquet throughout these finals. The Pacers, an august one-city team who joined the NBA in 1967 are still seeking their first championship. Their fans will feel slightly queasy about the fact that Oklahoma are standing between them and a maiden title. The Thunder are heavy favourites to win the finals. 'Thirty-four years after our United Airlines loss to Indianapolis, Oklahoma City is now in the NBA Finals, an achievement that feels like the capstone of an amazing American success story. It has been a journey inspired by you,' Holt writes in his salute to Indianapolis. 'Should another chapter be written in the weeks ahead, I regret to tell you that you'll have no one but yourselves to blame.'
