
China's Xi in Kazakhstan to cement Central Asia ties
The summit in the Kazakh capital brings together Xi -- who arrived in Astana on Monday -- and the leaders of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan.
Under Russia's orbit until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the five countries of Central Asia have courted interest from major powers including China and the United States since becoming independent.
The region is rich in natural resources and strategically located at the crossroads of Europe and Asia.
While Central Asian leaders continue to view Russia as a strategic partner, ties with Moscow have loosened since the war in Ukraine.
The five nations are taking advantage of the growing interest in their region and coordinating their foreign policies.
They regularly hold summits with China and Russia to present the region as a unified bloc and attract investment.
The "5+1" format high-level talks have also been organised with the European Union, the United States, Turkey and other Western countries.
"The countries of the region are balancing between different centres of power, wanting to protect themselves from excessive dependence on one partner," Kyrgyz political scientist Nargiza Muratalieva told AFP.
Biggest trade partner
Russia says China's growing influence in the region does not pose a threat.
"There is no reason for such fears. China is our privileged strategic partner, and the countries of Central Asia, naturally, are our natural historical partners," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Monday.
But China has now established itself as Central Asia's leading trading partner. Trade volume with the region was estimated at $95 billion in 2024, according to Chinese customs.
That figure is far ahead of the European Union (around $64 billion according to the EU Council in 2023) and Russia, with $44 billion.
Central Asia is also an important target for China in its Belt and Road initiative -- which uses huge infrastructure investments as a political and diplomatic lever.
Xi's visit to Kazakhstan will "(open) up more room for the joint construction of the Belt and Road", Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said on Monday.
Construction of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan-China railway and the China-Tajikistan highway, which runs through the Pamir Mountains to Afghanistan, are among the planned investments.
New border crossings and "dry ports" have already been built to process trade, such as Khorgos in Kazakhstan, one of the largest logistics hubs in the world.
"Neither Russia nor Western institutions are capable of allocating financial resources for infrastructure so quickly and on such a large scale, sometimes bypassing transparent procedures," said Muratalieva.
Developing transport corridors in Central Asia allows China to reduce delivery times by sending goods to Europe via the Caspian Sea, bypassing Russia.
Chinese companies are also increasingly present in Central Asia's energy sector, seeking contracts for gas in Turkmenistan, uranium in Kazakhstan and rare earths in Tajikistan, among others.
Kazakhstan said last week that Russia would lead the construction of its first nuclear power plant but that it wanted China to build the second.
"Central Asia is rich in natural resources such as oil, gas, uranium, gold and other minerals that the rapidly developing Chinese economy needs," Muratalieva said.
"Ensuring uninterrupted supplies of these resources, bypassing unstable sea routes, is an important goal of Beijing," the analyst added.
Human rights
China also positions itself as a supporter of the predominantly authoritarian Central Asian leaderships.
At the last Central Asia-China summit, Xi called for "resisting external interference" that might provoke "colour revolutions" that could overthrow the current leaders in the region.
"Central Asia directly borders Xinjiang... Beijing sees the stability of the Central Asian states as a guarantee of the security of its western borders," Muratalieva added.
Beijing is accused of having detained more than a million Uyghurs and other Muslims as part of a campaign which the UN has said could constitute "crimes against humanity".
Central Asia remains sparsely populated and has just 80 million inhabitants despite being as geographically large as the European Union.
This is far less than the 1.4 billion Chinese population, now exempt from visa requirements in some countries of the region.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
US and UK sign a trade deal, but steel imports are still in question
US president Donald Trump and British prime minister Keir Starmer said Monday that they had signed a trade deal that will slash tariffs on UK auto and aerospace industry imports — but they are still discussing how to handle steel production. "We just signed it, and it's done," Trump said, as the pair spoke to reporters at the Group of Seven summit (G7) in the Canadian Rockies, with the US president brandishing the pages of what he said was a long-awaited agreement. The rollout was anything but smooth, however, as Trump dropped the papers and said at first that his administration had reached an agreement with the European Union when he meant the United Kingdom. The president said that the pact is "a fair deal for both" and would "produce a lot of jobs, a lot of income." British prime minister, Keir Starmer, said it meant "a very good day for both our countries, a real sign of strength." Reaching this agreement is a significant step as Trump has threatened much of the world with steep import tariffs that have unsettled markets and raised the possibility of a global trade war. He has since backed off on many of his proposed levies but also continued to suggest that administration officials were furiously negotiating new trade pacts with dozens of countries — even if few have yet to materialise. Trump said, "the UK is very well protected" from tariffs. "You know why? Because I like them." The signing of the deal at the G7 followed Trump and Starmer's announcement in May that they'd reached a framework for a trade pact that would slash US import taxes on British cars, steel and aluminium in return for greater access to the British market for US products, including beef and ethanol. But Monday's agreement fully covers only British cars and aerospace materials, with more work to come on steel. The British government said the new agreement removes US tariffs on UK aerospace products, exempting Britain from a 10% levy the Trump White House has sought to impose on all other countries — a boost to British firms, including engine-maker Rolls-Royce. It also sets the tax on British autos at 10% from the end of the month, down from the current 27.5%, up to a quota of 100,000 vehicles a year. UK Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal protects "jobs and livelihoods in some of our most vital sectors." Mike Hawes, chief executive of Britain's Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said it was "great news for the UK automotive industry." There was no final agreement to cut the tax on British steel to zero as originally anticipated — seen as vital to preserving the UK's beleaguered steel industry. Britain's steel output has fallen 80% since the late 1960s due to high costs and the rapid growth of cheaper Chinese production. After the two leaders spoke, the White House released a statement seeking to clarify matters, saying that with respect to steel and aluminium, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will "determine a quota of products that can enter the United States without being subject" to previous tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The British government said Monday that the plan was still for "0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed." Trump's executive order authorising the deal contained several references to the security of supply chains, reflecting the US administration's concerns about China. It said the UK "committed to working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium products intended for export to the United States." There was also no final deal on pharmaceuticals, where "work will continue," the UK said. The deal signed Monday also confirms that American farmers can export 13,000 metric tons (29 million pounds) of beef to the UK each year, and vice versa — though a British ban on hormone-treated beef remains in place. Volvo Cars will develop different technologies for products offered to Chinese and Western customers as trade becomes more fragmented, said CEO Håkan Samuelsson on Monday. 'It's our target now to have two versions of software and silicon components, the computer in the car,' he told Euronews at the EVS38 symposium in Gothenburg, Sweden. 'We need to have a Western version and a Chinese version. That's something we just need to live with and adapt to.' Volvo Cars has been headquartered in Gothenburg since its creation in 1927, although the firm has been majority owned by China's Geely Holding Group since 2010. If efforts weren't made to tailor products to different markets, the firm's Chinese R&D could complicate exports to the US, especially as Washington seeks to distance itself from Chinese tech. In January, the Biden administration finalised a rule banning smart cars from China and Russia over concerns linked to potential US data leaks. Some feared that these cars could also be used by foreign states to interfere with the US electric grid or other critical infrastructure. 'We don't see any risk … that we will be using Chinese technology in the US. That will not happen,' said Samuelsson. In this year's first quarter earnings report, Volvo Cars reported a drop in profits, which it partly blamed on the 'current turbulence in the broader world economy'. New US tariffs of 25% on foreign cars and car parts are notably causing a headache for the firm, dampening consumer appetite as well as raising import costs. In the report, Volvo Cars announced an action plan to improve profitability, 'focusing on the US and China markets, as priorities'. Samuelsson told Euronews on Monday that he wanted to change the firm's approach to the Chinese market, tailoring it to local demands. 'We need to listen more to the local people in the region and adapt to local habits and tastes — and perhaps also have some special cars for the Chinese market,' he said. Samuelsson pointed to the new XC70, an extended-range plug-in hybrid recently launched in China, aimed at pulling market share away from competitors like BYD. Volvo Cars' retail sales decreased by 12% year-on-year in China in the first quarter, with electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids accounting for 10% of this total. In the US, Volvo Cars' sales jumped by 8% — potentially linked to tariff frontloading — with electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids making up 28% of that total. Although the firm has signalled a desire to focus more on US and Chinese customers, Volvo Cars still relies heavily on the European market. The region represented nearly half of its total sales for 2024, as well as the same proportion of sales in Q1 2025. When it comes to manufacturing these vehicles, some are made on Belgian and Swedish sites, while others are made in China and shipped to Europe. This means that — on certain vehicles — Volvo is exposed to EU duties, introduced last year in response to alleged unfair subsidies from Beijing. 'Tariffs are not going to help the European industry to be more competitive long-term,' said Samuelsson. 'We should have an attitude of free trade and free competition…but realistically that will not happen. I think we're going into a more regional world.' A recent action plan published by the European Commission suggested that Chinese carmakers operating in the EU may be obliged to enter joint ventures with European companies or license parts of their technology. Asked how Volvo Cars would be affected given its ties with Geely, Samuelsson suggested the firm would be untouched, underlining that a significant amount of development is still happening in Europe. 'I don't see any problems with the Chinese technology in our cars in this respect…the software products in the car are to a large extent adapted and developed by Volvo,' he said.


AFP
an hour ago
- AFP
Inaccurate claims about Philippine juvenile justice law surface online
"Go Kiko! Thanks to RA 9344, all 18 years old and below are protected against criminal liabilities only discernment (sic), they can kill, use drugs and they won't be held accountable by the LAW," reads a Facebook post published May 22, 2025. "You could be stabbed by a child in Tondo or Mandaluyong, and they can't be jailed. THANK YOU, Senator KIKO! Because of you, all minors are protected from prosecution." The post refers to Senator Francis Pangilinan and the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 (RA 9344), which he authored (archived link). It also references the 2021 murder of the Maguad siblings in Cotabato, where 18-year-old Gwynn and 16-year-old Louis were stabbed to death by their 17-year-old adopted sister (archived link). The suspect initially posed as a survivor before later admitting she committed the crime with a friend, also a minor. The post appears to suggest the suspects were not fully held accountable due to their age, framing the law as overly lenient toward youth offenders. "The suspects should be imprisoned for life. The justice system in the Philippines really is something," reads the caption. Image Screenshot of false post taken June 7, 2025 After his failed 2022 vice presidential bid, Pangilinan made a political comeback as an independent senatorial candidate in the May 12 midterm elections, which saw disappointing results for President Ferdinand Marcos's party (archived link). If Vice President Sara impeachment trial extends into the next Congress, Pangilinan will join in the case against his former opponent and Marcos's former ally turned political rival, who could be permanently barred from public office if convicted. The claim spread widely across social media, triggering reactions from users who believed the law grants blanket immunity to juvenile offenders. "I will never vote for him," one user said. Another commented: "Hopefully this law gets repealed. Because of this law minors can easily commit crimes." But legal experts told AFP the claims misrepresent the scope of the . 'Not automatically exempt' The Juvenile Justice and Welfare System, established under a 2006 law sponsored by Pangilinan and amended in 2013, outlines specific provisions for holding minors accountable depending on their age and whether they acted with (archived link). "The law clearly establishes that minors are not automatically exempt from criminal liability," , told AFP on May 30 (archived link). Citing section 3, Villarin explained that children 15 and below are exempt from criminal liability under all circumstances but remain civilly liable and subject to intervention programs depending on the offence. Meanwhile, "children above 15 but below 18 may be held criminally liable if they are proven to have acted with discernment, especially when the crime is punishable by more than 12 years of imprisonment, or if diversion is not appropriate or unsuccessful," she said. , also told AFP on June 5 that the post "misrepresents both the intent and actual provisions of the law" (archived link). He said the law had improved the juvenile justice system by creating ways to handle repeat and serious offences, including placing children who commit heinous crimes in intensive rehabilitation, while ensuring accountability matches their age and capacity for reform. "It's important to note that this was never about excusing wrongdoing -- it's about making sure children are held accountable in a way that reflects their age, capacity and potential for reform," he said, noting that before the law was passed, children as young as nine were jailed as adults, exposing them to abuse, criminal influence and trauma. Abitria said the Maguad siblings' case is a "powerful and painful example that accountability is very much possible" under the law. "Two minors were found to have acted with discernment -- that is, the court was convinced they understood the nature and consequences of their actions. As a result, they were tried, found guilty and sentenced to 30 years of imprisonment," he said. Philippine news outlet reported in May 2022 that the court denied parole for both minors and that they were placed in the custody of the social welfare and development agency upon conviction (archived link). The law mandates that children be placed in youth care facilities offering intensive intervention programs for serious or repeat offenders before being transferred to an adult correctional facility after turning . AFP has debunked more misinformation on the Philippine midterm elections here.


AFP
2 hours ago
- AFP
Clip from Florida misrepresented as 'woman caught in Los Angeles protests'
"The situation in America is bad right now. This video is from Los Angeles, America," reads part of a Hindi-language Facebook post published on June 10, 2025. "A mother with young children in her car was stuck -- and she was screaming, pleading to be released..." the caption continues. The woman can be heard screaming, "there's a baby in the car!" as the surrounding crowd howls. Image Screenshot of the false post, taken on June 12, 2025 Protests in Los Angeles broke out on June 6 following dozens of arrests of what authorities said were illegal migrants and gang members. Demonstrators took over streets in downtown LA, torching cars and looting stores, while law enforcement responded with tear gas and rubber bullets (archived link). US President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard and active-duty Marines into the city in response to the unrest, drawing criticism from state leaders (archived link). The clip also spread on Facebook, X and Instagram with the false claim. But a reverse image search using keyframes found a clip showing a similar scene was posted on Instagram on December 10, 2024 (archived link). Its caption contains hashtags that indicate it shows a street takeover -- impromptu events where drivers take turns doing doughnuts in intersections (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared video (L) and the Instagram clip Further searches reveal the Orange County Sheriff's Office in Florida published a video showing the same scene on its Facebook page on December 13, 2024 (archived link). The post appealed for information on a group of drivers who shut down a highway intersection to do doughnuts in their cars. "The situation escalated as participants harassed innocent drivers, blocked them from passing, and in some cases, climbed on and damaged vehicles," it goes on to say. Media outlets, including The Mirror US and Fox News, also used the clip in their reports about the incident (archived here and here). In another post on X, the Orange County Sheriff's Office said that the incident occurred at an intersection in South John Young Parkway and Central Florida Parkway (archived link). Google Street View imagery of the intersection shows that the false video was filmed in the area (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared video (L) and Google Street View imagery of the area with similarity highlighted by AFP Read more of AFP's reporting on misinformation related to the LA protests here.